Masked phonological priming effects in English - Center for Reading ...

Table 2Studies of English phonological priming, using the backward-masked perceptual identification paradigmStudyTargetduration (ms)PrimelexicalityPrimeduration (ms)% Correct:phonological% Correct:graphemic% Correct:unrelatedPhonologicalgraphemicPerfetti et al. (1988), Exp. 1a 30 Nonword 25 55 49 32 6 23Perfetti et al. (1988), Exp. 1b 33 Nonword 16 64 61 53 3 11Perfetti et al. (1988), Exp. 2 45 Nonword 30 54 45 32 9 22Berent and Perfetti (1995), Exp. 1a 15 Nonword 30 32 17 2 15 30Berent and Perfetti (1995), Exp. 1b 30 Nonword 30 68 69 48 1 20Berent and Perfetti (1995), Exp. 1c 45 Nonword 60 82 74 57 8 25Xu and Perfetti (1999), Exp. 1 30 Nonword 58 50 43 24 7 26Xu and Perfetti (1999), Exp. 2 30 Nonword 62 81 78 60 3 21Perfetti and Bell (1991), Exp. 1a 35 Nonword 30 27 21 7 6 20Perfetti and Bell (1991), Exp. 1b 45 Nonword 30 48 43 20 5 28Perfetti and Bell (1991), Exp. 1c 55 Nonword 30 59 55 37 4 22Verstaen et al. (1995), Exp. 1 42 Nonword 28 69 65 53 4 16Verstaen et al. (1995), Exp. 2 42 Nonword 28 55 56 43 1 12Verstaen et al. (1995), Exp. 3 56 Nonword 28 78 81 70 3 8Verstaen et al. (1995), Exp. 4a 42 Nonword 28 65 59 51 6 14Verstaen et al. (1995), Exp. 4b 42 Nonword 28 60 60 51 0 9Tan and Perfetti (1999), Exp. 1 28 Word 28 56 66 32 10 24Tan and Perfetti (1999), Exp. 2 42 Word 28 88 79 70 9 18Note: Exp., Experiment.PhonologicalunrelatedK. Rastle, M. Brysbaert / Cognitive Psychology 53 (2006) 97–145 105