Masked phonological priming effects in English - Center for Reading ...

Table 1Studies of English phonological priming, using the forward-masked perceptual identification paradigmStudyTargetduration(ms)PrimelexicalityPrimeduration(ms)% Correct:phonological% Correct:graphemic% Correct:unrelatedPhonologicalgraphemicHumphreys et al. (1982), Exp. 1 35 Word 35 56 47 43 9 13Humphreys et al. (1982), Exp. 2 40 Word 40 58 47 45 11 13Humphreys et al. (1982), Exp. 3 35 Nonword 35 50 48 42 2 8Humphreys et al. (1982), Exp. 4a 40 Word 40 64 53 50 11 14Humphreys et al. (1982), Exp. 4b 40 Word 40 57 47 50 10 7Perfetti and Bell (1991), Exp. 2a 30 Nonword 25 34 34 30 0 4Perfetti and Bell (1991), Exp. 2b 30 Nonword 35 54 51 33 3 21Perfetti and Bell (1991), Exp. 2c 30 Nonword 45 52 44 20 8 32Perfetti and Bell (1991), Exp. 2d 30 Nonword 55 54 44 18 10 36Perfetti and Bell (1991), Exp. 2e 30 Nonword 65 46 37 18 9 28Booth et al. (1999), Exp. 1a 30 Nonword 30 76 70 33 6 43Booth et al. (1999), Exp. 1b 30 Nonword 30 65 48 28 17 37Booth et al. (1999), Exp. 1c 30 Nonword 30 65 53 30 12 35Booth et al. (1999), Exp. 1d 30 Nonword 30 54 39 26 15 28Booth et al. (1999), Exp. 2a 60 Nonword 60 71 69 18 2 53Booth et al. (1999), Exp. 2b 60 Nonword 60 56 42 22 14 34Booth et al. (1999), Exp. 2c 60 Nonword 60 62 52 20 10 42Booth et al. (1999), Exp. 2d 60 Nonword 60 52 37 17 15 35Note: Exp., Experiment.PhonologicalunrelatedK. Rastle, M. Brysbaert / Cognitive Psychology 53 (2006) 97–145 103