Masked phonological priming effects in English - Center for Reading ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

144 K. Rastle, M. Brysbaert / Cognitive Psychology 53 (2006) 97–145Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (1994b). Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 2. Evidence fromphonological priming by homophones and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,123, 331–353.Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (2000). An evaluation of the two-cycles model of phonological assembly. Journalof Memory and Language, 42, 183–207.Paap, K. R., & Noel, R. W. (1991). Dual-route models of print to sound—Still a good horse race. PsychologicalResearch, 53, 13–24.Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003). Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter confusability effects in maskedassociative priming. Memory & Cognition, 31, 829–841.Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2004). Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects withnonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 231–246.Perfetti, C. A., Bell, L. C., & Delaney, S. M. (1988). Automatic (prelexical) phonetic activation in silent wordreading: Evidence from backward masking. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 59–70.Perfetti, C. A., & Bell, L. C. (1991). Phonemic activation during the first 40 ms of word identification: Evidencefrom backward masking and priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 473–485.Perry, C., & Ziegler, J. C. (2002). On the nature of phonological assembly: Evidence from backward masking.Language and Cognitive Processes, 17, 31–59.Pexman, P. M., Lupker, S. J., & Jared, D. (2001). Homophone effects in lexical decision. Journal of ExperimentalPsychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 139–156.Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal andimpaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103,56–115.Pollatsek, A., Lesch, M., Morris, R. K., & Rayner, K. (1992). Phonological codes are used in integratinginformation across saccades in word identification and reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: HumanPerception and Performance, 18, 148–162.Pugh, K. R., Rexer, K., & Katz, L. (1994). Evidence of flexible coding in visual word recognition. Journal ofExperimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 807–825.Rastle, K., & Coltheart, M. (1998). Whammies and double whammies: The effect of length on nonword reading.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 277–282.Rastle, K., & Coltheart, M. (1999). Serial and strategic effects in reading aloud. Journal of ExperimentalPsychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 482–503.Rastle, K. & Coltheart, M. (in press). Is there serial processing in the reading system; and are there localrepresentations? In S. Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing. Hove:Psychology Press.Rastle, K., Harrington, J., & Coltheart, M. (2002). 358,534 nonwords: The ARC nonword database. QuarterlyJournal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 1339–1362.Rastle, K., Harrington, J., Coltheart, M., & Palethorpe, S. (2000). Reading aloud begins when the computation ofphonology is complete. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26,1178–1191.Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1988). A retrieval theory of priming. Psychological Review, 95, 385–408.Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1987). Eye-movements in reading—A tutorial review. In M. Coltheart (Ed.),Attention and performance XII. Hove, Sussex: Erlbaum.Rayner, K., Sereno, S. C., Lesch, M. F., & Pollatsek, A. (1995). Phonological codes are automatically activatedduring reading: Evidence from an eye movement priming paradigm. Psychological Science, 6, 26–32.Reynvoet, B., Caessens, B., & Brysbaert, M. (2002). Automatic stimulus-response associations may besemantically mediated. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 107–112.Roberts, M. A., Rastle, K., Coltheart, M., & Besner, D. (2003). When parallel processing in visual wordrecognition is not enough: new evidence from naming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 405–414.Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (1996). Computing contrasts, effect sizes, and counternulls on other people’spublished data: General procedures for research consumers. Psychological Methods, 1, 331–340.Rosnow, R. L., Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (2000). Contrasts and correlations in effect-size estimation.Psychological Science, 11, 446–453.Schoonbaert, S., & Grainger, J. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated andtransposed letters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 333–367.Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition andnaming. Psychological Review, 96, 523–568.
K. Rastle, M. Brysbaert / Cognitive Psychology 53 (2006) 97–145 145Tan, L. H., & Perfetti, C. A. (1999). Phonological and associative inhibition in the early stages of English wordidentification: Evidence from backward masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception andPerformance, 25, 59–69.Van Orden, G. C. (1987). A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading. Memory & Cognition, 15, 181–198.Van Orden, G. C., Johnston, J. C., & Hale, B. L. (1988). Word identification in reading proceeds from spelling tosound to meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 371–386.Van Orden, G. C., Stone, G. O., Garlington, K. L., Markson, L. R., Pinnt, G. S., Simonfy, C. M., et al. (1992).‘‘Assembled’’ phonology and reading: A case study in how theoretical perspective shapes empiricalinvestigation. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 249–292).Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.Verstaen, A., Humphreys, G. W., Olson, A., & d’Ydewalle, G. (1995). Are phonemic effects in backward maskingevidence for automatic prelexical phonemic activation in visual word recognition? Journal of Memory andLanguage, 34, 335–356.Xu, B., & Perfetti, C. A. (1999). Nonstrategic subjective threshold effects in phonemic masking. Memory &Cognition, 27, 26–36.Weekes, B. S. (1997). Differential effects of number of letters on word and nonword naming latency. QuarterlyJournal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 439–456.Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading acrosslanguages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 3–29.Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., & Coltheart, M. (2003). Speed of lexical and nonlexical processing in French: The case ofthe regularity effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 947–953.Zorzi, M., Houghton, G., & Butterworth, B. (1998). Two routes or one in reading aloud? A connectionist dualprocessmodel. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1131–1161.
Page 5 and 6: K. Rastle, M. Brysbaert / Cognitive
Page 7 and 8: Table 1Studies of English phonologi
Page 21 and 22: Phonological priming effects on RTs
Page 23 and 24: As in Experiment 1, we assessed pho
Page 25 and 26: simulation of masked priming. It is
Page 27 and 28: items yielded this pattern; and at
Page 31 and 32: Despite improvement in the analysis
Page 41 and 42: flu phlue slaur DSD 727 669 0.15 0.
Page 43 and 44: nerve nurve narve SDS 563 547 0.10
Page 47: K. Rastle, M. Brysbaert / Cognitive

Masked phonological priming effects in English - Center for Reading ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?