Masked phonological priming effects in English - Center for Reading ...

142 K. Rastle, M. Brysbaert / Cognitive Psychology 53 (2006) 97–145Appendix B (continued)Relationship Condition E1: target E1: prime E2: target E2: primeGraphemic SDS kive korve tole tuilGraphemic SDS zorgue zaigue nise naisGraphemic SSD dobe dode yel yedGraphemic SSD coob coom dait daichGraphemic SSD vig vib rhed rhellGraphemic SSD paim paith boath boamGraphemic SSD vove vope froe frieGraphemic SSD nuck nutch harve hargeGraphemic SSD shace shafe bumb buthGraphemic SSD thutch thunn sead seaphReferencesAndrews, S. (1996). Lexical retrieval and selection processes: Effects of transposed-letter confusability. Journal ofMemory and Language, 35, 775–800.Baddeley, A. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Berent, I. (1997). Phonological priming in the lexical decision task: Regularity effects are not necessarily evidencefor assembly. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1727–1742.Berent, I., & Perfetti, C. A. (1995). A rose is a REEZ: The two-cycles model of phonological assembly in readingEnglish. Psychological Review, 102, 146–184.Bibi, U., Tzelgov, J., & Henik, A. (2000). Stroop effect in words that differ from color words in one letter only.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 678–683.Booth, J. R., Perfetti, C. A., & MacWhinney, B. (1999). Quick, automatic, and general activation of orthographicand phonological representations in young readers. Developmental Psychology, 35, 3–19.Borowsky, R. & Besner, D. (in press). Parallel distributed processing and lexical-semantic effects in visual wordrecognition: Are a few stages necessary? To appear in Psychological Review.Bowers, J. S. (2002). Challenging the widespread assumption that connectionism and distributed representationsgo hand-in-hand. Cognitive Psychology, 45, 413–445.Bowers, J. S., Vigliocco, G., & Haan, R. (1998). Orthographic, phonological and articulatory contributions tomasked letter and word priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24,1705–1719.Brysbaert, M. (2001). Prelexical phonological coding of visual words in Dutch: Automatic after all. Memory &Cognition, 29, 765–773.Brysbaert, M., Grondelaers, S., & Ratinckx, E. (2000). Sentence reading: Do we make use of orthographic cueson homophones? Acta Psychologica, 105, 31–56.Brysbaert, M., & Praet, C. (1992). Reading isolated words: No evidence for automatic incorporation of thephonetic code. Psychological Research, 54, 91–102.Coltheart, M. (2004). Are there lexicons? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 1153–1171.Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic(Ed.), Attention and performance VI. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Coltheart, M., & Rastle, K. (1994). Serial processing in reading aloud: Evidence for dual-route models of reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1197–1211.Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). The DRC model: A model of visual wordrecognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204–256.Coltheart, M., Woollams, A., Kinoshita, S., & Perry, C. (1999). A position-sensitive Stroop effect: Furtherevidence for a left-to-right component in print-to-speech conversion. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6,456–463.Davis, C., Castles, A., & Iakovidis, E. (1998). Masked homophone and pseudohomophone priming in adults andchildren. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, 625–651.Davis, C. J. (1999). The Self-Organising Lexical Acquisition and Recognition (SOLAR) model of visual wordrecognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.