11.07.2015 Views

Der Fuehrer - Hitler's Rise to Power (1944) - Heiden

Der Fuehrer - Hitler's Rise to Power (1944) - Heiden

Der Fuehrer - Hitler's Rise to Power (1944) - Heiden

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

64 DER FUEHRERhoped <strong>to</strong> breathe new strength in<strong>to</strong> the sickened empire. He was notinterested in nationalities; he was no Pan-German; he wanted neither <strong>to</strong>go away from Rome nor home <strong>to</strong> the Reich. And yet one could learnfrom him. How well this unknown, nameless man had fought his way <strong>to</strong>power, almost <strong>to</strong> omnipotence! With his 'rare knowledge of men' he<strong>to</strong>ok — as Hitler describes him — good care 'not <strong>to</strong> see people as betterthan they are' — the young student of life from the lodging-house couldagree with a burning heart. And Lueger had put his profound knowledgeof human affairs in<strong>to</strong> a form 'corresponding <strong>to</strong> the receptivity of thebroad masses which is very small'; yes, Lueger knew the great brainlessworking beast. There were in particular two secrets of success whichHitler thought he had learned from him: Lueger put the chief emphasis'on the winning of classes whose existence is threatened,' because onlysuch classes carry on the political struggle with passion; secondly, he<strong>to</strong>ok pains in 'inclining powerful existing institutions <strong>to</strong> his use.' InLueger's case, this was the all-powerful Catholic Church; in anothercase, it might have been the German Army or the Bank of England; andno one will ever have any success in politics who overlooks this obviousfact.But whatever Hitler learned or thought he had learned from hismodel, Lueger, he learned far more from his opponent. And thisopponent, whom he combated from the profound hatred of his soul, isand remains plain ordinary work. Organized, it calls itself labormovement, trade union, Socialist Party. And, or so it seems <strong>to</strong> him, Jewsare always the leaders.The relatively high percentage of Jews in the leadership of theSocialist parties on the European continent cannot be denied. Theintellectual of the bourgeois era had not yet discovered the workers, andif the workers wanted <strong>to</strong> have leaders with university education, oftenonly the Jewish intellectual remained — the type which might haveliked <strong>to</strong> become a judge or government official, but in Germany,Austria, or Russia simply could not. Yet, though many Socialist leadersare Jews, only few Jews are Socialist leaders. To call the mass ofmodern Jewry Socialist, let alone revolutionary, is a bad propagandajoke. The imaginary Jew portrayed in The Pro<strong>to</strong>cols of the Wise Menof Zion ostensibly wants <strong>to</strong> bend the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!