reliability assessment of offshore jacket structures in niger delta
reliability assessment of offshore jacket structures in niger delta reliability assessment of offshore jacket structures in niger delta
accomplishment is important for the straightforward assessment of existing offshoreplatforms particularly, when the structure life extension is anticipated.ReferencesM.A. Salau, D.E. Esezobor, M. F. Omotoso/Petroleum & Coal 53 (4) 291-301, 2011 298[1] Sharp J.V.,: (1992),” Ageing offshore structures: a review of recent UK research”,Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, OMAE 1992, V. III-B, MaterialEngineering, p.p. 391-398 C.[2] Guedes Soares and Garbatov: (1998), “Reliability Assessment of Maintained ShipHulls with Correlated Corroded Elements, Unit for Marine Technology andEngineering, Instituto Superior Tecnico, Universidade Tecnica de Lisboa Paris1096, Portugal, Marine Structures p.p.629-653.[3] Moan, T.: (2005). Reliability-based Management of Inspection Maintenance andRepair of Offshore Structures, Journal of Structures and InfrastructureEngineering, Vol. 1, No 1, pp 33 – 62, Taylor & Francis Publication.[4] Gerhard Ersdal: (2005). Assessment of Existing Offshore Structures for LifeExtension, PhD Thesis University of Stavanger Norway 16 p.[5] API RP-2A WSD (2000). Recommended Practice for Planning, design andconstructing fixed offshore platforms – Working Stress Design, API Recommendedpractice 2A-WSD Twenty-first edition.[6] BOMEL :(2003), ageing structures and life extension – Review of UK work invarious industries, HSE Proposal number: P241. Restricted Commercial ReportIssued by Bomel Consortium Ledger House, Maidenhead, Berkshire, SL6 2NR, UK.[7] Nicholas Summerville: (2004) Basic Reliability – An introduction to ReliabilityEngineering (ISBN 1-4184-2418-8) 108 p.[8] Buche.r C.G. and Bourgund. U.: (1990), “A Fast and Efficient Response SurfaceApproach for Structural Reliability Problems”, Structural Safety, Vol. 7, p.p. 5.[9] Au S.K. and Beck J.L: (1999), “A new adaptive importance sampling scheme forreliability calculation”, Structural Safety, Vol. 21, p.p. 135-158.
M.A. Salau, D.E. Esezobor, M. F. Omotoso/Petroleum & Coal 53 (4) 291-301, 2011 29912BAAB+ 4.00MWLOMAMWL+ 4.00OMB1DB+ 4.00MWLOM11D19.4+ 4.00MWLOM29.61D1EL (-) 7.002MAEL (-) 7.002MB9.6EL (-) 7.002M13D19.6EL (-) 7.002M2L04L03L013DBL02L019.1L04L013D2L03EL (-)18.3018.254MA9.458.1018.11EL (-) 18.3012.74MB52B3MB51B11.618.5EL (-) 18.3018.64M118.2EL (-)18.3018.115BA3MB4M2Tabl5D418.5218.611.953B5CA12.5EL (-) 32.006M1EL (-)32.006MAEL (-) 32.006MBEL (-)32.006M2B12M1Row- A2MB2MD2MH2MG2MF 2ME22M2BRow- B14ME4M14MF4MG4MB4MC4MD24M2Row-1B11B9.44M16M112.04ME9.04MF6ME4MGRow-2226MB4MB9.14MD6MC4M26M24MC6MDRow-Row-A2MAAAPlan at Level (–) 7.00Plan at Level (–) 18.30APlan at 6MA Level (–) 18.3011Figure 7 Jacket Platform Elevations and SectionsPlan at Level (– ) 32.00
- Page 1 and 2: Petroleum & CoalISSN 1337-7027Avail
- Page 3 and 4: Where R(t) and P f (t) represent me
- Page 5 and 6: M.A. Salau, D.E. Esezobor, M. F. Om
- Page 7: eliability of the group bracings wa
- Page 11: M.A. Salau, D.E. Esezobor, M. F. Om
M.A. Salau, D.E. Esezobor, M. F. Omotoso/Petroleum & Coal 53 (4) 291-301, 2011 29912BAAB+ 4.00MWLOMAMWL+ 4.00OMB1DB+ 4.00MWLOM11D19.4+ 4.00MWLOM29.61D1EL (-) 7.002MAEL (-) 7.002MB9.6EL (-) 7.002M13D19.6EL (-) 7.002M2L04L03L013DBL02L019.1L04L013D2L03EL (-)18.3018.254MA9.458.1018.11EL (-) 18.3012.74MB52B3MB51B11.618.5EL (-) 18.3018.64M118.2EL (-)18.3018.115BA3MB4M2Tabl5D418.5218.611.953B5CA12.5EL (-) 32.006M1EL (-)32.006MAEL (-) 32.006MBEL (-)32.006M2B12M1Row- A2MB2MD2MH2MG2MF 2ME22M2BRow- B14ME4M14MF4MG4MB4MC4MD24M2Row-1B11B9.44M16M112.04ME9.04MF6ME4MGRow-2226MB4MB9.14MD6MC4M26M24MC6MDRow-Row-A2MAAAPlan at Level (–) 7.00Plan at Level (–) 18.30APlan at 6MA Level (–) 18.3011Figure 7 Jacket Platform Elevations and SectionsPlan at Level (– ) 32.00
Change language