Traffic Management for the Available Bit Rate (ABR) Service in ...
Traffic Management for the Available Bit Rate (ABR) Service in ... Traffic Management for the Available Bit Rate (ABR) Service in ...
ENDIF ELSE PR5 =FALSE� At BRM Receive event: IF (NI = 0 AND ACR ok) ENDIF IF (ACR < ER) PR5 =TRUE ELSE PR5 = FALSE� ACR = Min(ACR +AIR PCR, PCR)� ACR = Min(ACR, ER)� ACR = Max(ACR, MCR)� Initialization ACR ok = True� PR5 = False� Note that the comparison (ACR SR) may always yield false due to the fact that cells may bescheduled only at certain xed slots. There is typically a minimum granularity which dictates the cell scheduler at the source. To account for this scheduler, the comparison may be replaced by (ACR SR + ). 7.1.9 Time-Based UILI Proposal The time-based UILI proposal has a ACR reduction function which depends upon the time T since the last FRM was sent. While this aspect is similar to the August 1995 UILI proposal, the other changes suggested are: 237
1. The time-based proposal also independently observes the problem with using ICR as the oor of the reduction function (as discussed in Section 7.1.8). The proposal suggests two possible oor values: a) ACRmax = Max(ICR, TOF SR) b) ACRmax = ICR + SR 2. IF ( ACR > ACRmax ) ACRnew = Max( ACR (1 ; T/Tc), ACRmax )� The recommended value for Tc is Max(ADDF FRTT, TBE/PCR), where ADDF has a default value of 2. FRTT is the Fixed Round Trip Time measured at connection setup. The ACR reduction formula decreases ACR depending upon how long the idle period is compared to the round-trip time. A performance comparison of the count- based and the time-based alternatives is presented in Section 7.1.12. 7.1.10 Joint Source-Based UILI Proposal The time-based and count-based camps agreed on a consensus, which we refer to as the \joint source-based proposal." The proposal uses the count-based reduction function and a constant value for TDF. It uses the new oor of the reduction function and the additive headroom. However, ICR is used in the UILI function instead of the proposed \headroom" parameter. The hysterisis region (region B in Figure 7.3) suggested by the count-based proposal is not used. Rule 5b remains the same as the August 1995 proposal, and PR5 is not used since TDF is set to a small value (1/16), the count-based reduction formula is used. 238
- Page 213 and 214: 6.22 Performance Evaluation of the
- Page 215 and 216: espectively. The target delay T 0 i
- Page 217 and 218: 6.22.4 Fairness Figure 6.9: Parking
- Page 219 and 220: st link, VC 15 is limited to a thro
- Page 221 and 222: From the gures, it is clear that ER
- Page 223 and 224: counts the bursty source as active
- Page 225 and 226: 6.23 Summary of the ERICA and ERICA
- Page 227 and 228: (a) Transmitted Cell Rate (c) Link
- Page 229 and 230: (a) Transmitted Cell Rate (c) Link
- Page 231 and 232: (a) Transmitted Cell Rate (c) Link
- Page 233 and 234: (a) Transmitted Cell Rate (basic ER
- Page 235 and 236: (a) Transmitted Cell Rate (basic ER
- Page 237 and 238: (a) Transmitted Cell Rate (c) Link
- Page 239 and 240: (a) Transmitted Cell Rate (c) Link
- Page 241 and 242: (a) Transmitted Cell Rate (c) Link
- Page 243 and 244: (a) Transmitted Cell Rate (c) Link
- Page 245 and 246: (a) Transmitted Cell Rate (c) Link
- Page 247 and 248: (a) Transmitted Cell Rate (c) Link
- Page 249 and 250: (a) Transmitted Cell Rate (basic ER
- Page 251 and 252: RM cells. In this chapter, we devot
- Page 253 and 254: low. This tradeo was discovered and
- Page 255 and 256: in the speci cation. b) ACR shall n
- Page 257 and 258: 7.1.6 December 1995 Proposals There
- Page 259 and 260: Figure 7.2: Multiplicative vsAdditi
- Page 261 and 262: is never triggered. However, the PR
- Page 263: simulation results of bursty source
- Page 267 and 268: The switch maintains a local alloca
- Page 269 and 270: PNI = f0, 1g : f1 ) No rule 5b, 0 )
- Page 271 and 272: after reaching the goal. The time-b
- Page 273 and 274: Figure 7.8: Closed-Loop Bursty Tra
- Page 275 and 276: The algorithm measures the load and
- Page 277 and 278: Medium Bursts Medium bursts are exp
- Page 279 and 280: count-based technique may be insu c
- Page 281 and 282: Figure 7.13: An event trace illustr
- Page 283 and 284: CHAPTER 8 SUPPORTING INTERNET APPLI
- Page 285 and 286: u ering which does not depend upon
- Page 287 and 288: 4 make it to the destination are ar
- Page 289 and 290: Figure 8.3: At the ATM layer, the T
- Page 291 and 292: issues and e ect of bursty applicat
- Page 293 and 294: from the loss and they trigger the
- Page 295 and 296: 8.8 Performance Metrics We measure
- Page 297 and 298: the performance is fair. Also, the
- Page 299 and 300: Figure 8.7(b) shows the rates (ACRs
- Page 301 and 302: Window Size in bytes vfive-tcp/opti
- Page 303 and 304: The e ect of large bu ers on CLR is
- Page 305 and 306: 8.13 Summary of TCP/IP performance
- Page 307 and 308: Feedback delay: Twice the delay fro
- Page 309 and 310: on a link, two cells are expected a
- Page 311 and 312: state only after the switch algorit
- Page 313 and 314: queue length is less susceptible to
1. The time-based proposal also <strong>in</strong>dependently observes <strong>the</strong> problem with us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
ICR as <strong>the</strong> oor of <strong>the</strong> reduction function (as discussed <strong>in</strong> Section 7.1.8). The<br />
proposal suggests two possible oor values:<br />
a) ACRmax = Max(ICR, TOF SR)<br />
b) ACRmax = ICR + SR<br />
2. IF ( ACR > ACRmax )<br />
ACRnew = Max( ACR (1 ; T/Tc), ACRmax )�<br />
The recommended value <strong>for</strong> Tc is Max(ADDF FRTT, TBE/PCR), where<br />
ADDF has a default value of 2. FRTT is <strong>the</strong> Fixed Round Trip Time measured<br />
at connection setup.<br />
The ACR reduction <strong>for</strong>mula decreases ACR depend<strong>in</strong>g upon how long <strong>the</strong> idle<br />
period is compared to <strong>the</strong> round-trip time. A per<strong>for</strong>mance comparison of <strong>the</strong> count-<br />
based and <strong>the</strong> time-based alternatives is presented <strong>in</strong> Section 7.1.12.<br />
7.1.10 Jo<strong>in</strong>t Source-Based UILI Proposal<br />
The time-based and count-based camps agreed on a consensus, which we refer to<br />
as <strong>the</strong> \jo<strong>in</strong>t source-based proposal." The proposal uses <strong>the</strong> count-based reduction<br />
function and a constant value <strong>for</strong> TDF. It uses <strong>the</strong> new oor of <strong>the</strong> reduction function<br />
and <strong>the</strong> additive headroom. However, ICR is used <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UILI function <strong>in</strong>stead of<br />
<strong>the</strong> proposed \headroom" parameter. The hysterisis region (region B <strong>in</strong> Figure 7.3)<br />
suggested by <strong>the</strong> count-based proposal is not used. Rule 5b rema<strong>in</strong>s <strong>the</strong> same as <strong>the</strong><br />
August 1995 proposal, and PR5 is not used s<strong>in</strong>ce TDF is set to a small value (1/16),<br />
<strong>the</strong> count-based reduction <strong>for</strong>mula is used.<br />
238