24.11.2012 Views

Traffic Management for the Available Bit Rate (ABR) Service in ...

Traffic Management for the Available Bit Rate (ABR) Service in ...

Traffic Management for the Available Bit Rate (ABR) Service in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Proof <strong>for</strong> Region 2<br />

Po<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> triangular region 2 satisfy <strong>the</strong> conditions: y s, x s, and x + y<br />

U(1 + )<br />

In this region, both x and y are greater than or equal to <strong>the</strong> fair share s = U=2.<br />

There<strong>for</strong>e, <strong>the</strong> new po<strong>in</strong>t is given by : (x0�y0 x(1; )<br />

)=( � z<br />

x 0 + y 0 =<br />

x(1 ; )+y(1 ; )<br />

z<br />

= (x + y)(1 ; )<br />

z<br />

= Uz(1 ; )<br />

y(1; )<br />

).Hence,<br />

z<br />

z<br />

= U(1 ; )<br />

This <strong>in</strong>dicates that <strong>the</strong> new po<strong>in</strong>t ison<strong>the</strong>lower l<strong>in</strong>e of <strong>the</strong> TUB (which is a part of<br />

<strong>the</strong> TUB) This proves claim C1 <strong>for</strong> all po<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong> region 2.<br />

The proof of claim C1 <strong>for</strong> regions 3 and 4 is similar to that of regions 1 and 2,<br />

respectively.<br />

5.8.2 Proof of Claim C2<br />

We show convergence to <strong>the</strong> fairness region (claim C2) as follows. Any po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> fairness region rema<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> fairness region. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, any po<strong>in</strong>t (x� y) <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> TUB but not <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> fairness region moves towards <strong>the</strong> fairness region at every<br />

step. Consider <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e L jo<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t (x� y) to <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong> (0� 0) as shown <strong>in</strong><br />

Figure 5.25(a). As <strong>the</strong> angle between this l<strong>in</strong>e and <strong>the</strong> fairness l<strong>in</strong>e (x = y) decreases,<br />

<strong>the</strong> operation becomes fairer. We show that <strong>in</strong> regions outside <strong>the</strong> fairness zone, <strong>the</strong><br />

angle between <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e L and <strong>the</strong> fairness l<strong>in</strong>e ei<strong>the</strong>r decreases or rema<strong>in</strong>s <strong>the</strong> same. If<br />

<strong>the</strong> angle rema<strong>in</strong>s <strong>the</strong> same, <strong>the</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t moves to a region where <strong>the</strong> angle will decrease<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> subsequent step.<br />

We <strong>in</strong>troduce four more l<strong>in</strong>es to Figure 5.25(a). These l<strong>in</strong>es correspond to y =<br />

(1 + )x� y = (1 ; )x� y =<br />

(1; )<br />

(1+ )<br />

x and y = x. This results <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> TUB<br />

(1+ ) (1; )<br />

141

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!