History of Latin American Dermatology

History of Latin American Dermatology History of Latin American Dermatology

biusante.parisdescartes.fr
from biusante.parisdescartes.fr More from this publisher
11.07.2015 Views

ELBIO FLORES-CEVALLOS, LUIS FLORES-CEVALLOS, ZUÑO BURSTEINin charge of Maxime Kuczynski, who, after founding an Anti-Leprosy Dispensary in Iquitosin 1941, reconstructed the San Pablo asylum as a farming colony, attaining remarkableadvances in the exploration of various rivers, especially the Ucayali, conductingvaluable leprological surveys. In 1944, with the creation of the National Anti-LeprosyService, a few months later the Northeast Anti-Leprosy Service was created, taking onthe supervisory roles in the region.Hugo Pesce stated that the focus of child leprosy in Loreto was one of the most severein the world. All the data collected on the clinical forms of child leprosy in that area revealeda process characterized by the absence of considerable signs of defenses on thepart of the population, which meant that it was a rather recent, severe endemic, and withdevelopmental features. Pesce noted that the first cases of leprosy among genuine junglepeople observed in South America were reported by Maxime Kuczynski (Cambo and Cocamatribes), and by himself (Piro tribe). Successive cases were object of study, in 1953,by H. Pesce and R. Montoya. All cases were extremely malignant forms, which indicatesthe extremely serious and lasting danger that all the population of the Northeast wouldbe exposed to if leprosy penetrated in the midst of jungle tribes, of which the number ofmembers has been estimated at 141,000, far from any possibility of sanitary control.History of leprosy control in PeruIn Andahuaylas, Hugo Pesce detected the first cases of Andean leprosy, and founded,in 1937, the Apurímac Anti-Leprosy Service. Moreover, on January 1, 1944, he createdthe National Anti-Leprosy Campaign, as a sanitary entity officially in charge of the fightagainst this disease at the national level. In this manner, the Peruvian school of leprologyschool was born around this master, the Northeast Anti-Leprosy Service being set upthat same year.The structural feature of the anti-leprosy campaign, which in 1954 became known asthe National Anti-Leprosy Service, was that it was a unified organization, with a head officeand various peripheral services. The head office, called the Leprosy Department, hadmanaging, normative and control functions, with specialized sections. The peripheralservices were in charge of conducting the anti-leprosy campaign in the territories undertheir jurisdiction; thus, in every leprogenic region, functional units, called Regional Anti-Leprosy Services, were built, each with its own organization.This organization, methodically planned and implemented, within a short period, permittedthe achievement of a diagnosis of Peruvian leprological realities, and the obtainmentof an effective benefit for patients and the country. Unfortunately, on January 14,1963, the Leprosy Department, previously transformed into the Leprosy Division, wasdissolved by the government of that time, disassembling the meticulously mounted structure;its various constitutive elements were transferred to other organizations, and,starting in 1965, the peripheral levels were integrated into other health services of eacharea of the country.The dismemberment and deterioration of the health actions related to Hansen’s diseaseat the different levels of responsibility, at both central technical and normative, andbasic peripheral executive levels, as well as in research, staff training and others, ledMinister and PAF Lieutenant General M. Campodónico, who was in charge of PublicHealth in 1977, to order the update of the Hansen’s Disease Control Program, consideringthat diagnosis, treatment and research in dermatoleprology was a multi-institutionalresponsibility of national importance, accepting the recommendations of the RegionalSeminary on Hanseniasis, which took place in September 1971 in the city of Pucallpa.Unfortunately, successive replacements of officials and other unpredictable factorslargely delayed the implementation of the established measures.Meanwhile, Dr. Víctor Noria, with his individual and pioneering efforts in chargeof the Leprosy Unit, a central-level technical-normative organization of the Ministry348

History of Dermatology in Peruof Health, was the only person who, with absolute responsibility, kept up a programbased on the projects, on his own ideas, and on his vast experience as clinical leprologistand epidemiologist.In 1980, Zuño Burstein published an essay on the “Breakdown of the Leprosy ControlProgram in Peru due to the Decentralization and Integration with the General HealthPrograms,” 59 providing a detailed analysis of the sanitary organization of leprosy control,and concluding that, in Peru, there was a serious breakdown of sanitary control actionscaused, to a great extent, by the inadequate, untimely and premature policy ofdecentralization and integration with general health programs, not suited to the nationalsituation. Moreover, he stressed that it was absolutely necessary to set up a well-articulatedand adequately financed Hansen’s Disease Control Program, since it was a healthproblem of significant seriousness in endemic zones, with national repercussions.In 1963, with the disappearance of the National Anti-Leprosy Service and its LeprosyDepartment, the specialized laboratory diagnoses, the preparation of lepromine, the fulfillmentof special investigations and the training of professional and technical staff became,in theory, tasks of the Leprosy and Medical Mycology Department, located in theorganizational structure of the National Institutes of Health, a decentralized dependencyof the Health Ministry. This Department was derived from the Central Leprosy Laboratory,which was part of the Leprology Section of the abolished Leprosy Department, acommand organization of the National Anti-Leprosy Service, at the level of the centralorganization of the Health Ministry. When the National Service and its Leprosy Departmentclosed down, the Laboratory was incorporated into the Public Health Institute, intheory keeping its function and structure, established since 1944. Based on this structure,the Health Ministry has, since 1975, had an agreement — repeatedly ratified —with the National Higher University of St. Mark, through its Daniel A. Carrión Institute ofTropical Medicine, in order to conduct joint research work, services to the communityand staff training, regarding hanseniasis and others ailements in the field of sanitarydermatology.In a communication published in 1972, under the title “Our Contribution to the Diagnosisof Leprosy in Peru,” 60 Burstein reported that, out of 2,366 biopsies sent, from 1944to 1971, for the diagnosis of leprosy to the Leprosy and Medical Mycology Department ofthe National Institute of Health under his management, 1,119 (47.3%) corresponded tolepromatose leprosy, 619 (26.2%) to undifferentiated leprosy, 233 (9.4%) to tuberculoidleprosy and 18 (0.8%) to dimorphic leprosy. Using the serial biopsies over time, thehystopathological changes of these patients were studied, and a correlation between theclinical diagnosis and the hystopathological verification was established. No later studiessimilar to this one have been conducted.In 1980 Dr. Samsaricq, head of the Leprosy Program of the World Health Organization(WHO), visited Peru and suggested the setting up of a permanent committee thatwould take care of the Hanseniasis Control Program, promoting, evaluating and recommendingnew actions, as well as the creation of a national scientific committee to promoteand evaluate research on the disease.Up to 1985, the Epidemiology Office, within its programmatic structure, consideredthe integrated control of tuberculosis and leprosy under the Technical Office for theCoordination of Special Programs, even though the WHO considered the control of thesediseases independently. For this reason, D.S. N° 017-87-SA was issued in 1987, approvingonly the Tuberculosis Control Program, thus disassociating it from that of Leprosy.In January 1988, the National Hanseniasis Control Program was approved as partof the special health programs, appointing Dr. Augusto Reátegui as its general director61 . Supreme Decree No. 003-88SA (January 22, 1988) established that “Peru,as a member of the World Health Organization, has adopted the commitment ofthe Fortieth World Health Meeting, of May, 15 1987, to organize active programs349

ELBIO FLORES-CEVALLOS, LUIS FLORES-CEVALLOS, ZUÑO BURSTEINin charge <strong>of</strong> Maxime Kuczynski, who, after founding an Anti-Leprosy Dispensary in Iquitosin 1941, reconstructed the San Pablo asylum as a farming colony, attaining remarkableadvances in the exploration <strong>of</strong> various rivers, especially the Ucayali, conductingvaluable leprological surveys. In 1944, with the creation <strong>of</strong> the National Anti-LeprosyService, a few months later the Northeast Anti-Leprosy Service was created, taking onthe supervisory roles in the region.Hugo Pesce stated that the focus <strong>of</strong> child leprosy in Loreto was one <strong>of</strong> the most severein the world. All the data collected on the clinical forms <strong>of</strong> child leprosy in that area revealeda process characterized by the absence <strong>of</strong> considerable signs <strong>of</strong> defenses on thepart <strong>of</strong> the population, which meant that it was a rather recent, severe endemic, and withdevelopmental features. Pesce noted that the first cases <strong>of</strong> leprosy among genuine junglepeople observed in South America were reported by Maxime Kuczynski (Cambo and Cocamatribes), and by himself (Piro tribe). Successive cases were object <strong>of</strong> study, in 1953,by H. Pesce and R. Montoya. All cases were extremely malignant forms, which indicatesthe extremely serious and lasting danger that all the population <strong>of</strong> the Northeast wouldbe exposed to if leprosy penetrated in the midst <strong>of</strong> jungle tribes, <strong>of</strong> which the number <strong>of</strong>members has been estimated at 141,000, far from any possibility <strong>of</strong> sanitary control.<strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> leprosy control in PeruIn Andahuaylas, Hugo Pesce detected the first cases <strong>of</strong> Andean leprosy, and founded,in 1937, the Apurímac Anti-Leprosy Service. Moreover, on January 1, 1944, he createdthe National Anti-Leprosy Campaign, as a sanitary entity <strong>of</strong>ficially in charge <strong>of</strong> the fightagainst this disease at the national level. In this manner, the Peruvian school <strong>of</strong> leprologyschool was born around this master, the Northeast Anti-Leprosy Service being set upthat same year.The structural feature <strong>of</strong> the anti-leprosy campaign, which in 1954 became known asthe National Anti-Leprosy Service, was that it was a unified organization, with a head <strong>of</strong>ficeand various peripheral services. The head <strong>of</strong>fice, called the Leprosy Department, hadmanaging, normative and control functions, with specialized sections. The peripheralservices were in charge <strong>of</strong> conducting the anti-leprosy campaign in the territories undertheir jurisdiction; thus, in every leprogenic region, functional units, called Regional Anti-Leprosy Services, were built, each with its own organization.This organization, methodically planned and implemented, within a short period, permittedthe achievement <strong>of</strong> a diagnosis <strong>of</strong> Peruvian leprological realities, and the obtainment<strong>of</strong> an effective benefit for patients and the country. Unfortunately, on January 14,1963, the Leprosy Department, previously transformed into the Leprosy Division, wasdissolved by the government <strong>of</strong> that time, disassembling the meticulously mounted structure;its various constitutive elements were transferred to other organizations, and,starting in 1965, the peripheral levels were integrated into other health services <strong>of</strong> eacharea <strong>of</strong> the country.The dismemberment and deterioration <strong>of</strong> the health actions related to Hansen’s diseaseat the different levels <strong>of</strong> responsibility, at both central technical and normative, andbasic peripheral executive levels, as well as in research, staff training and others, ledMinister and PAF Lieutenant General M. Campodónico, who was in charge <strong>of</strong> PublicHealth in 1977, to order the update <strong>of</strong> the Hansen’s Disease Control Program, consideringthat diagnosis, treatment and research in dermatoleprology was a multi-institutionalresponsibility <strong>of</strong> national importance, accepting the recommendations <strong>of</strong> the RegionalSeminary on Hanseniasis, which took place in September 1971 in the city <strong>of</strong> Pucallpa.Unfortunately, successive replacements <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficials and other unpredictable factorslargely delayed the implementation <strong>of</strong> the established measures.Meanwhile, Dr. Víctor Noria, with his individual and pioneering efforts in charge<strong>of</strong> the Leprosy Unit, a central-level technical-normative organization <strong>of</strong> the Ministry348

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!