Planck Pre-Launch Status Papers - APC - Université Paris Diderot ...
Planck Pre-Launch Status Papers - APC - Université Paris Diderot ... Planck Pre-Launch Status Papers - APC - Université Paris Diderot ...
M. Bersanelli et al.: Planck pre-launch status: Design and description of the Low Frequency InstrumentFig. 11. Footprint of the LFI main beams on the sky and polarisationangles as seen by an observer looking towards the satellite along its opticalaxis. The units are u − v coordinates defined as u = sin θ bf cos φ bfand v = sin θ bf sin φ bf ,whereθ bf and φ bf refer to each main beam frame(Sandri et al. 2010). The angular region covered by the plot is approximately10 ◦ × 10 ◦ .Labelsfrom18to23referto70GHzhorns,from24to 26 refer to 44 GHz horns, and 27 and 28 refer to 30 GHz horns. Thescan direction, orthogonal to the focal plane symmetry axis, is indicatedby an arrow. All the relative angles in pairs of feeds aligned along thescan direction are shifted by 45 ◦ ,withtheexceptionofRCA24.Fig. 10. Arrangement of the LFI feeds in the focal plane. Top:mechanicaldrawing of the main frame and focal plane elements. Shown are thebipods connecting the FPU to the telescope structure. Bottom: pictureof the LFI flight model focal plane.exception of one 44 GHz feed, all the E planes are oriented at±22.5 ◦ relative to the scan direction. We also align pairs of feedssuch that their projected lines of sight will follow each other inthe Planck scanning strategy.The spin axis of Planck will be shifted by 2 ′ every ∼45 min(Tauber et al. 2010a). Therefore, even for the highest LFI angularresolution, θ FWHM ≃ 13 ′ at 70 GHz, the sky is well sampled.4.1.2. LFI main frameThe LFI mainframe provides thermo-mechanical support to theLFI radiometer front-end, but it also supports the HFI and interfacesto the cold end (nominal and redundant) of the 20 Ksorption cooler. In fact, some of the key requirements on theLFI mainframe (stiffness, thermal isolation, optical alignment)are driven by the HFI rather than the LFI instrument. The mainframeis built of the aluminium alloy 6061-T6, and it is dismountablein three subunits to facilitate integration of the completeRCAs and of the HFI front-end.The interface between the FPU and the 50 K payload modulestructure must ensure thermal isolation, as well as compliancewith eigenfrequencies from launch loads. A trade-off was madeto identify the proper material properties, fibre orientations, andstrut inclinations. The chosen configuration was a set of three225-mm-long CFRP T300 bipods, inclined at 50 ◦ .TheLFI-HFIinterface is provided by a structural ring connected to the HFIby six insulating struts locked to the LFI main frame through ashaped flange. The design of the interface ring allows HFI integrationinside the LFI, as well as waveguide paths, while ensuringaccurate alignment of the 4 K reference loads with thereference horns mounted on the FEMs.4.1.3. Feed hornsThe LFI feeds must have highly symmetric beams, low levels ofside lobes (−35 dB), cross-polarisation (−30 dB), and return loss(−25 dB), as well as good control of the phase centre location(Villa et al. 2002). Dual profiled conical corrugated horns havebeen designed to meet these requirements, a solution that has theadded advantage of high compactness and design flexibility. Theprofiles have a sine squared inner section, i.e., R(z) ∝ sin 2 (z),and by an exponential outer section, R(z) ∝ exp(z).The detailed electromagnetic designs of the feeds were developedbased on the entire optical configuration of the feedtelescopesystem. The control of the edge taper only requiredminimal changes on the feed aperture and overall feed sizes,so that an iterative design process could be carried out at systemlevel.The evaluation of straylight effects in the optimisationprocess required extensive simulations (carried out withGRASP8 software) of the feed-telescope assembly for severaldifferent feed designs, edge tapers, and representative positionsin the focal plane (Sandri et al. 2010). A multi-GTD (geometricaltheory of diffraction) approach was necessary since theeffect of shields and multiple scatter needed to be included inthe simulations. In Table 4 we report the main requirements andcharacteristics of the LFI feed horns. The details of the design,Page 11 of 21
A&A 520, A4 (2010)Table 4. Specifications of the feed horns.30 GHz 44 GHz 70 GHzBand [GHz] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27–33 39.6–48.4 63–77Return loss [dB] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
- Page 29 and 30: A&A 520, A2 (2010)Table 2. Predicte
- Page 31 and 32: Table 3. Predicted in-flight main b
- Page 33 and 34: A&A 520, A2 (2010)materials. Theref
- Page 35 and 36: A&A 520, A2 (2010)Fig. 11. Comparis
- Page 37 and 38: A&A 520, A2 (2010)Table 5. Inputs u
- Page 39 and 40: A&A 520, A2 (2010)Fig. 16. Three cu
- Page 41 and 42: A&A 520, A2 (2010)Table 7. Optical
- Page 43 and 44: A&A 520, A2 (2010)Fig. A.1. Dimensi
- Page 45 and 46: A&A 520, A2 (2010)5 Università deg
- Page 47 and 48: A&A 520, A3 (2010)Horizon 2000 medi
- Page 49 and 50: A&A 520, A3 (2010)Fig. 1. CMB tempe
- Page 51 and 52: A&A 520, A3 (2010)Ω ch 2τn s0.130
- Page 53 and 54: A&A 520, A3 (2010)Fig. 6. Integral
- Page 55 and 56: A&A 520, A3 (2010)Table 2. LFI opti
- Page 57 and 58: 3.3.1. SpecificationsThe main requi
- Page 59 and 60: A&A 520, A3 (2010)Fig. 11. Schemati
- Page 61 and 62: A&A 520, A3 (2010)features of the r
- Page 63 and 64: A&A 520, A3 (2010)Fig. 13. Level 2
- Page 65 and 66: A&A 520, A3 (2010)Fig. 15. Level 3
- Page 67 and 68: A&A 520, A3 (2010)GUI = graphical u
- Page 69 and 70: A&A 520, A3 (2010)23 Centre of Math
- Page 71 and 72: A&A 520, A4 (2010)In addition, all
- Page 73 and 74: A&A 520, A4 (2010)Table 2. Sensitiv
- Page 75 and 76: A&A 520, A4 (2010)Fig. 2. Schematic
- Page 77 and 78: A&A 520, A4 (2010)Fig. 6. LFI recei
- Page 79: A&A 520, A4 (2010)Fig. 9. Schematic
- Page 83 and 84: A&A 520, A4 (2010)Fig. 15. DAE bias
- Page 85 and 86: A&A 520, A4 (2010)Fig. 19. Picture
- Page 87 and 88: A&A 520, A4 (2010)Table 10. Main ch
- Page 89 and 90: Table 13. Principal requirements an
- Page 91 and 92: A&A 520, A5 (2010)DOI: 10.1051/0004
- Page 93 and 94: A. Mennella et al.: LFI calibration
- Page 95 and 96: A. Mennella et al.: LFI calibration
- Page 97 and 98: A. Mennella et al.: LFI calibration
- Page 99 and 100: A. Mennella et al.: LFI calibration
- Page 101 and 102: A. Mennella et al.: LFI calibration
- Page 103 and 104: A. Mennella et al.: LFI calibration
- Page 105 and 106: D.1. Step 1-extrapolate uncalibrate
- Page 107 and 108: A&A 520, A6 (2010)DOI: 10.1051/0004
- Page 109 and 110: F. Villa et al.: Calibration of LFI
- Page 111 and 112: F. Villa et al.: Calibration of LFI
- Page 113 and 114: F. Villa et al.: Calibration of LFI
- Page 115 and 116: F. Villa et al.: Calibration of LFI
- Page 117 and 118: F. Villa et al.: Calibration of LFI
- Page 119 and 120: F. Villa et al.: Calibration of LFI
- Page 121 and 122: A&A 520, A7 (2010)DOI: 10.1051/0004
- Page 123 and 124: M. Sandri et al.: Planck pre-launch
- Page 126 and 127: A&A 520, A7 (2010)Fig. 8. Footprint
- Page 128 and 129: -30-40-30-6-3-20A&A 520, A7 (2010)0
A&A 520, A4 (2010)Table 4. Specifications of the feed horns.30 GHz 44 GHz 70 GHzBand [GHz] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27–33 39.6–48.4 63–77Return loss [dB] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .