A&A 520, A12 (2010)Fig. 19. Broad-band (68 frequencies) 545-2 multi-mode power beam.Bottom figure is on a different X-Y scale (both in degrees). Color scale:un-normalised gain. Contours in dB respectively to maximum.Table 9. Single-mode channels spillover calculations (in %).Fig. 20. Main beam intensity maps for the polarised detector 143-1a atthe central frequency of 143 GHz. Same caption than for Fig. 16.Pixel Measurement Ideal Worst case Medianfrequency spillover spillover spillover100-1a 100 GHz 0.36 0.42 0.39100-3a 100 GHz 0.29 0.43 0.36143-1a 143 GHz 0.32 0.45 0.38217-8a 240 GHz 0.24 0.43 0.33217-3u 240 GHz 0.24 1.08 0.66353-5a 308 GHz 0.07 0.08 0.075Notes. Only results for horn types showing some discrepancies betweenmodel and experimental power patterns are shown. The suffix “a”denotesthe beam associated with the a detector of a PSB while “u” isrelated to an unpolarised pixel.Table 10. Spillover calculations (in %) of the high frequency channelsassuming theoretical horn beam patterns.Channel Edge taper Angle Average Spilloverfrequency (deg) %545 GHz 26 0.3857 GHz 27 0.038. ConclusionsWe have described the design optimisation of the cold optics andof the focal plane unit of <strong>Planck</strong>-HFI. The measured optical performancesof the resulting instrument flight model are presented,together with beam simulations based on the perfect optical system.Fig. 21. Main beam intensity maps for the polarised detector 217-5a atthe central frequency of 217 GHz. Same caption than for Fig. 16.Page 14 of 15
B. Maffei et al.: <strong>Planck</strong> pre-launch status: HFI beam expectations from the optical optimisation of the focal planeand high frequency foreground removal, the lower measuredefficiencies (Table 5), still within the scientific requirements, areless of an issue.Some of the ground calibration data are still being analysedand the results will be combined with in-flight calibration in orderto get a more accurate knowledge of the instrument. Furtherpost-launch publications will then be available.Fig. 22. Main beam intensity maps for the polarised detector 353-3a atthe central frequency of 353 GHz. Same caption than for Fig. 16.Much original research both in terms of modelling and experimentalverification was required to develop horns that couldmatch the very demanding optical performance requirements of<strong>Planck</strong> (angular resolution, edge taper and spillover) while at thesame time minimizing the length of the long wavelength horns.This required the development of complex theoretical tools andapproaches to achieve an acceptable solution.Therelevantresultsfrom the calibration campaigns have been summarised andshow that most of the optical requirements are met.Concerning the single-mode channels, the optical efficiencyrequirement is met for all but some of the 353 GHz detectionassemblies, and analysis is still ongoing in order to get a betterunderstanding of these. Most of the lower frequency pixels exceedthe goals. It is important to note (Lamarre et al. 2010) thatthe measured NETs show that the overall sensitivities exceedthe goal in most cases. Simulations show that only the 100 GHzbeams have a slightly larger beam width than required (9.6 arcmininstead of 9.2), and that all but one detection assembly hasalargerspilloverthanrequired(1%insteadof0.5%).In this paper we also described in broad terms the developmentand performance of the unique multi-mode channelsfor HFI, specially designed to have higher throughput than theCMB channels in order to increase the sensitivity, while matchingthe desired non-diffraction limited resolution. In particularthe 857 GHz horns, although challenging to manufacture (thecorrugation period is of the order of 60 microns), were shown tohave predicted beam patterns that match the resolution and edgetaper requirements with significantly improved throughput overasingle-modedesign.Thedetailsofthedesignandpredictedperformance of these channels (at 545 GHz and 857 GHz) willbe presented in a future paper (Murphy et al. 2010). Becausethese channels are mainly dedicated to point source detectionsAcknowledgements. The authors would like to acknowledge the support fromSTFC, CNRS, CNES, NASA, Enterprise Ireland and Science FoundationIreland.The authors extend their gratitude to numerous engineers and scientists who havecontributed to the design, development, construction or evaluation of HFI.ReferencesAde, P. A. R., Pisano, G., Tucker, C., et al. 2006, Proc. SPIE, 6275Ade, P. A. R., Savini, G., Sudiwala, R., et al. 2010, A&A, 520, A11Benoit, A., Ade, P. A. R., Amblard, A., et al. 2002, Astropart. Phys., 17, 101Bersanelli, M., Mandolesi, N. Butler, R. C., et al. 2010, A&A, 520, A4Bock, J. J., Chen, D., Mauskopf, P. D., et al. 1995, Space Sci. Rev., 74, 229Brossard, J. 2001, Ph.D. ThesisBrossard, J., Yurchenko, V., Gleeson, E., et al. 2004, Proc. 5th ICSO, ESA SP-554, 333Catalano, A. 2008, Ph.D. ThesisChurch, S. E., Philhour, B. J., Lange, A. E., et al. 1996, Proc. 30th ESLABsymposium on Submillimetre and Far-Infrared Space Instrumentation, ESA-ESTEC, 77Clarricoats, P. J. B., & Olver, A. D. 1984, Corrugated horns for microwaveantennas, ed. PeregrinusColgan, R. 2001, Electromagnetic and Quasi-Optical Modelling of HornAntennas for Far-IR Space Applications, Ph.D. Thesis, NUI MaynoothD’Arcangelo, O., Garavalia, S., Simonetto, A., et al. 2005, ExperimentalAstronomy, 16, 165de Bernardis, P., Ade, P. A. R., Bock, J. J., et al. 2000, Nature, 404, 955del Rio Bocio, C., Gonzalo, R., Sorolla Ayza, M., et al. 1999, IEEE Trans.Antennas Propag., 47, 1440Dodelson, S. 2003, Modern Cosmology (Amsterdam: Academic <strong>Pre</strong>ss)Fargant, G., Dubruel, D., Cornut, M., et al. 2000, SPIE Proc., 4013, 69Gleeson, E. 2004, Single and Multi-moded Corrugated Horn Design for CosmicMicrowave Background Experiments, Ph.D. Thesis, NUI MaynoothHuffenberger, K. M., Eriksen, H. K., Hansen, F. K., et al. 2008, ApJ, 688, 1Holmes, W. A., Bock, J. J., Crill, B. P., et al. 2008, Appl. Opt., 47, 5996Jones, W. C., Bhatia, R., Bock, J. J., et al. 2003, Proc. SPIE, 4855, 227Lamarre, J. M., Puget, J. L., Bouchet, F., et al. 2003, New Astr. Rev., 47, 1017Lamarre, J. M., Puget, J. L., Ade, P. A. R., et al. 2010, A&A, 520, A9Maffei, B., Ade, P. A. R., Tucker, C. E., et al. 2000, Int. J. Infrared and Millimetrewaves, 21, 2023Maffei, B., Pisano, G., Haynes, V., et al. 2008 Proc. SPIE, 7020Murphy, J. A., Colgan, R., O’Sullivan, C., et al. 2001, Infrared Phys. Technol.,42, 515Murphy, J. A., et al. 2010, Journal of Instrumentation, submittedNoviello, F. 2008, Optical Performance of the ESA <strong>Planck</strong> Surveyor andTechniques for the Study of the Cosmic Microwave Background, Ph.D.Thesis, NUI MaynoothOlver, A. D., Clarricoats, P. J. B., Kishk, A. A., et al. 1994, Microwave Hornsand Feeds (IEEE <strong>Pre</strong>ss)The <strong>Planck</strong> community, Blue Book: <strong>Planck</strong> the Scientific Programme, www.rssd.esa.int/SA/PLANCK/docs/Bluebook-ESA-SCI(2005)1_V2.pdfPontoppidan, K. 2005, GRASP9 Technical Description, TICRA EngineeringConsultantsRosset, C. 2004, Conference: XXXIXth Rencontres de Moriond, Exploring theUniverse, La ThuileRosset, C., Yurchenko, V., Delabrouille, J., et al. 2007, A&A, 464, 405Rosset, C., Tristam, M., Ponthieu, N., et al. 2010, A&A, 520, A13Schroeder, D. J. 2000, Astronomical Optics (San Diego: Academic <strong>Pre</strong>ss)Sudiwala, R. V., Maffei, B., Griffin, M. J., et al. 2000, Nucl. Instr. Methods Phys.Res., Sect. A, 444, 408Tauber, J. A., Norgaard-Nielsen, H. U., Ade, P. A. R., et al. 2010a, A&A, 520,A2Tauber, J. A., Mandolesi, N., Puget, J.-L., et al. 2010b, A&A, 520, A1Woodcraft, A. L., Sudiwala, R. V., Griffin, M. J., et al. 2002, Int. J. Infrared andMillimeter Waves, 23, 575Yun, M., Bock, J. J., Holmes, W., et al. 2004, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 22, 220Yurchenko, V. B., Murphy, J. A., & Lamarre, J. M., et al. 2004a, Proc. SPIE,5487, 542Yurchenko, V. B., Murphy, J. A., Lamarre, J. M., et al. 2004b, Int. J. Infrared andMillimeter Waves, 25, 601Page 15 of 15
- Page 1 and 2:
A&A 520, E1 (2010)DOI: 10.1051/0004
- Page 3 and 4:
ABSTRACTThe European Space Agency
- Page 5 and 6:
A&A 520, A1 (2010)Fig. 2. An artist
- Page 7 and 8:
A&A 520, A1 (2010)Fig. 4. Planck fo
- Page 9 and 10:
A&A 520, A1 (2010)Fig. 6. The Planc
- Page 11 and 12:
A&A 520, A1 (2010)Table 4. Summary
- Page 13 and 14:
A&A 520, A1 (2010)three frequency c
- Page 15 and 16:
A&A 520, A1 (2010)Fig. 12. The left
- Page 17 and 18:
A&A 520, A1 (2010)Fig. 14. Left pan
- Page 19 and 20:
A&A 520, A1 (2010)flux limit of the
- Page 21 and 22:
A&A 520, A1 (2010)- University of C
- Page 23 and 24:
A&A 520, A1 (2010)57 Instituto de A
- Page 25 and 26:
A&A 520, A2 (2010)Fig. 1. (Left) Th
- Page 27 and 28:
A&A 520, A2 (2010)Fig. 3. (Top)Twos
- Page 29 and 30:
A&A 520, A2 (2010)Table 2. Predicte
- Page 31 and 32:
Table 3. Predicted in-flight main b
- Page 33 and 34:
A&A 520, A2 (2010)materials. Theref
- Page 35 and 36:
A&A 520, A2 (2010)Fig. 11. Comparis
- Page 37 and 38:
A&A 520, A2 (2010)Table 5. Inputs u
- Page 39 and 40:
A&A 520, A2 (2010)Fig. 16. Three cu
- Page 41 and 42:
A&A 520, A2 (2010)Table 7. Optical
- Page 43 and 44:
A&A 520, A2 (2010)Fig. A.1. Dimensi
- Page 45 and 46:
A&A 520, A2 (2010)5 Università deg
- Page 47 and 48:
A&A 520, A3 (2010)Horizon 2000 medi
- Page 49 and 50:
A&A 520, A3 (2010)Fig. 1. CMB tempe
- Page 51 and 52:
A&A 520, A3 (2010)Ω ch 2τn s0.130
- Page 53 and 54:
A&A 520, A3 (2010)Fig. 6. Integral
- Page 55 and 56:
A&A 520, A3 (2010)Table 2. LFI opti
- Page 57 and 58:
3.3.1. SpecificationsThe main requi
- Page 59 and 60:
A&A 520, A3 (2010)Fig. 11. Schemati
- Page 61 and 62:
A&A 520, A3 (2010)features of the r
- Page 63 and 64:
A&A 520, A3 (2010)Fig. 13. Level 2
- Page 65 and 66:
A&A 520, A3 (2010)Fig. 15. Level 3
- Page 67 and 68:
A&A 520, A3 (2010)GUI = graphical u
- Page 69 and 70:
A&A 520, A3 (2010)23 Centre of Math
- Page 71 and 72:
A&A 520, A4 (2010)In addition, all
- Page 73 and 74:
A&A 520, A4 (2010)Table 2. Sensitiv
- Page 75 and 76:
A&A 520, A4 (2010)Fig. 2. Schematic
- Page 77 and 78:
A&A 520, A4 (2010)Fig. 6. LFI recei
- Page 79 and 80:
A&A 520, A4 (2010)Fig. 9. Schematic
- Page 81 and 82:
A&A 520, A4 (2010)Table 4. Specific
- Page 83 and 84:
A&A 520, A4 (2010)Fig. 15. DAE bias
- Page 85 and 86:
A&A 520, A4 (2010)Fig. 19. Picture
- Page 87 and 88:
A&A 520, A4 (2010)Table 10. Main ch
- Page 89 and 90:
Table 13. Principal requirements an
- Page 91 and 92:
A&A 520, A5 (2010)DOI: 10.1051/0004
- Page 93 and 94:
A. Mennella et al.: LFI calibration
- Page 95 and 96:
A. Mennella et al.: LFI calibration
- Page 97 and 98:
A. Mennella et al.: LFI calibration
- Page 99 and 100:
A. Mennella et al.: LFI calibration
- Page 101 and 102:
A. Mennella et al.: LFI calibration
- Page 103 and 104:
A. Mennella et al.: LFI calibration
- Page 105 and 106:
D.1. Step 1-extrapolate uncalibrate
- Page 107 and 108:
A&A 520, A6 (2010)DOI: 10.1051/0004
- Page 109 and 110:
F. Villa et al.: Calibration of LFI
- Page 111 and 112:
F. Villa et al.: Calibration of LFI
- Page 113 and 114:
F. Villa et al.: Calibration of LFI
- Page 115 and 116:
F. Villa et al.: Calibration of LFI
- Page 117 and 118:
F. Villa et al.: Calibration of LFI
- Page 119 and 120:
F. Villa et al.: Calibration of LFI
- Page 121 and 122:
A&A 520, A7 (2010)DOI: 10.1051/0004
- Page 123 and 124:
M. Sandri et al.: Planck pre-launch
- Page 126 and 127:
A&A 520, A7 (2010)Fig. 8. Footprint
- Page 128 and 129:
-30-40-30-6-3-20A&A 520, A7 (2010)0
- Page 130 and 131:
A&A 520, A7 (2010)Table 4. Galactic
- Page 132 and 133:
A&A 520, A7 (2010)Fig. A.1. Polariz
- Page 134 and 135:
A&A 520, A8 (2010)inflation, giving
- Page 136 and 137:
A&A 520, A8 (2010)estimated from th
- Page 138 and 139:
A&A 520, A8 (2010)ways the most str
- Page 140 and 141:
unmodelled long-timescale thermally
- Page 142 and 143:
A&A 520, A8 (2010)Fig. 5. Polarisat
- Page 144 and 145:
A&A 520, A8 (2010)Table 3. Band-ave
- Page 146 and 147:
A&A 520, A8 (2010)where S stands fo
- Page 148 and 149:
A&A 520, A8 (2010)Fig. 11. Simulate
- Page 150 and 151:
stored in the LFI instrument model,
- Page 152 and 153:
A&A 520, A8 (2010)Table 5. Statisti
- Page 154 and 155:
A&A 520, A8 (2010)comparable in siz
- Page 156 and 157:
A&A 520, A8 (2010)Table B.1. Main b
- Page 158 and 159:
A&A 520, A8 (2010)Bond, J. R., Jaff
- Page 160 and 161:
A&A 520, A9 (2010)- (v) an optical
- Page 162 and 163:
A&A 520, A9 (2010)Fig. 2. The Russi
- Page 164 and 165: A&A 520, A9 (2010)Table 3. Estimate
- Page 166 and 167: A&A 520, A9 (2010)Fig. 7. Picture o
- Page 168 and 169: A&A 520, A9 (2010)Fig. 9. Cosmic ra
- Page 170 and 171: A&A 520, A9 (2010)Fig. 13. Principl
- Page 172 and 173: A&A 520, A9 (2010)Fig. 16. Noise sp
- Page 174 and 175: A&A 520, A9 (2010)Table 6. Basic ch
- Page 176 and 177: A&A 520, A9 (2010)with warm preampl
- Page 178 and 179: A&A 520, A9 (2010)20 Laboratoire de
- Page 180 and 181: A&A 520, A10 (2010)Table 1. HFI des
- Page 182 and 183: A&A 520, A10 (2010)based on the the
- Page 184 and 185: A&A 520, A10 (2010)Fig. 6. The Satu
- Page 186 and 187: A&A 520, A10 (2010)5. Calibration a
- Page 188 and 189: A&A 520, A10 (2010)Fig. 16. Couplin
- Page 190 and 191: A&A 520, A10 (2010)217-5a channel:
- Page 192 and 193: A&A 520, A10 (2010)10 -310 -495-The
- Page 194 and 195: A&A 520, A11 (2010)DOI: 10.1051/000
- Page 196 and 197: P. A. R. Ade et al.: Planck pre-lau
- Page 198 and 199: P. A. R. Ade et al.: Planck pre-lau
- Page 200 and 201: P. A. R. Ade et al.: Planck pre-lau
- Page 202 and 203: A&A 520, A12 (2010)Table 1. Summary
- Page 204 and 205: arrangement was also constrained by
- Page 206 and 207: A&A 520, A12 (2010)frequency cut-of
- Page 208 and 209: A&A 520, A12 (2010)Fig. 9. Gaussian
- Page 210 and 211: A&A 520, A12 (2010)the horn-to-horn
- Page 212 and 213: A&A 520, A12 (2010)Fig. 15. Composi
- Page 216 and 217: A&A 520, A13 (2010)DOI: 10.1051/000
- Page 218 and 219: C. Rosset et al.: Planck-HFI: polar
- Page 220 and 221: C. Rosset et al.: Planck-HFI: polar
- Page 222 and 223: of frequencies and shown to have po
- Page 224 and 225: C. Rosset et al.: Planck-HFI: polar
- Page 226 and 227: C. Rosset et al.: Planck-HFI: polar