Planck Pre-Launch Status Papers - APC - Université Paris Diderot ...
Planck Pre-Launch Status Papers - APC - Université Paris Diderot ... Planck Pre-Launch Status Papers - APC - Université Paris Diderot ...
A&A 520, A8 (2010)Fig. 11. Simulated pattern on the sky for the axial ratio of the (Q, U)error ellipse for worst-case geometric assumptions at 30 GHz (top) and44 GHz (middle). Note that the colour scale for 30 GHz covers only20% of the range for 44 GHz. Maps are in galactic coordinates. Theactual pattern for the WMAP 5-year V band is show at bottom, on thesame colour scale as for Planck at 44 GHz.U (±90 ◦ in the (Q, U)plane).Ingeneraltheerrorellipsewillberotated from this orientation by 2ψ.The Crab polarisation angle of ≈−88 ◦ in galactic coordinates(Page et al. 2007)translatesto−28 ◦ in ecliptic coordinates,hence −56 ◦ in (Q, U). Therefore, for horns with ψ = 22. ◦ 5, themajor axis of the error ellipse is along 135 ◦ /−45 ◦ ,withinabout10 ◦ of the Crab’s (Q, U) vector.Asaresultwegetarelativelypoor measurement of the polarisation amplitude but a good measurementof the angle. Conversely, for horns with ψ = −22. ◦ 5weget a relatively poor measurement of the angle.Each LFI horn will make an independent measurement of theCrab from the two visits in each year of observations. Optimalfitting to the calibrated and background-subtracted time-orderedFig. 12. Scanning the spin axis away from the Ecliptic allows us to obtainsignificantly misaligned scan circles even for a source like the Crabnebula that is sited on the Ecliptic. As in Fig. 1, red arrows and circlesshow the spin axis and scan circle, in this case for the two visits to theCrab in each year (the Crab is at the point just below the Ecliptic wherethe two scan circles intersect). The view is centred at ecliptic coordinates(90 ◦ , 10 ◦ ). Also shown is the 180 ◦ period cycloid path of the spinaxis (for n = 0). Top: near-optimal cycloid phase. Bottom: worst-casecycloid phase giving degenerate scans.data will be used; that is, the known Mueller-matrix beam patternsfor each detector (M QI , M QQ , M QU ), synthesised over theband using the known spectral index of the Crab, will determinethe weight of each sample of the ˜Q H signal, and the best-estimate(Q, U)willbederivedbyleastsquaresfitting.We have simulated the uncertainty in the Crab polarisationangle from this process, using the current best estimates for theLFI detector noise, and nominal background fluctuations withrms [17, 25, 25] µK at30,44,70GHz,respectively,foreachofQ and U.Thefluctuationvaluesareupperlimitstothesignal(asopposed to noise) fluctuations derived in annuli around the Crabin the WMAP 5-year maps, for the nearest frequency channels.Page 16 of 26
J. P. Leahy et al.: Planck pre-launch status: Expected LFI polarisation capabilityResults are shown in Fig. 13.Theprimaryvariableisthereferencephase of the cycloid scanning strategy, Φ 0 .Theapproximateorbit used in our simulations 9 does not affect the basicgeometry, in particular the phases at which the scan angles becomedegenerate and hence the errors diverge, at Φ 0 ≈ 65 ◦ and275 ◦ .Forn = 0(forwardprecession)themajorchangeisthatthe scan degeneracies occur at Φ 0 ≈ 115 ◦ and 265 ◦ .Avoidingthese bad phases is one of the more significant constraints on thechoice of scan strategy.The figures show that we can obtain precisions of better than0. ◦ 5degreesforabouthalfoftheRCAs,withonlythethreeawkwardly-oriented RCAs at 70 GHz being significantly worsethan 1 ◦ .WheretheuncertaintyisapproximatelyconstantwithΦ 0 ,theerrorsaredominatedbyourassumedbackgroundfluctuations;these are 1σ upper limits and may be significant overestimatesat 44 and 70 GHz, since they are derived from WMAPStokes Q and U data at Q, V, and W bands where there is nosecure detection of fluctuations in our background annuli.These measurements determine the relative orientation of thefeed horn to the Crab’s net polarisation angle Θ at the effectiveobserving frequency. This will unambiguously reveal any misalignmentsbetween feeds in each band, but to give us the desiredabsolute angle we need external measurements of Θ(ν).Theory tells us that the polarisation of a synchrotron sourcesuch as the Crab will change only very slowly with frequencyin the Faraday-thin regime. Faraday rotation in the Crab hasameanrotationmeasureRM ≈ −23 rad m −2 and an rms ofσ RM = 14 rad m −2 (Bietenholz & Kronberg 1991); this correspondsto rotations of 0. ◦ 08 at 30 GHz, which we can indeedneglect. The remaining effect is that the Crab’s net polarisationis a vector average over the rather tangled polarisation structureof the nebula; since the spectral index is not exactly the same atall positions in the nebula, the weighting in the average changesslowly with frequency. Fortunately, over the LFI band such spectralindex variations are remarkably small: Green et al. (2004)show that the spectral index between 1.5 and 350 GHz variesby ≈±0.02 over the bright part of the nebula, which dominatesthe total flux, corresponding to a change of weight of typically≈±1.7% between 30 and 70 GHz.The current best direct measurements of the Crab polarisationin the LFI frequency range are those from WMAP. Pageet al. (2007)presentedpreliminarymeasurementsbasedonsimpleaperture photometry, with typical errors of 1 ◦ –3 ◦ ,butweestimatethat with optimal fitting, the 5-year data will yield randomerrors (including background fluctuations) ranging from 0. ◦ 14 atKbandto0. ◦ 9atWband.Pageetal.estimatethattheirabsoluteorientations are known from pre-launch data to
- Page 97 and 98: A. Mennella et al.: LFI calibration
- Page 99 and 100: A. Mennella et al.: LFI calibration
- Page 101 and 102: A. Mennella et al.: LFI calibration
- Page 103 and 104: A. Mennella et al.: LFI calibration
- Page 105 and 106: D.1. Step 1-extrapolate uncalibrate
- Page 107 and 108: A&A 520, A6 (2010)DOI: 10.1051/0004
- Page 109 and 110: F. Villa et al.: Calibration of LFI
- Page 111 and 112: F. Villa et al.: Calibration of LFI
- Page 113 and 114: F. Villa et al.: Calibration of LFI
- Page 115 and 116: F. Villa et al.: Calibration of LFI
- Page 117 and 118: F. Villa et al.: Calibration of LFI
- Page 119 and 120: F. Villa et al.: Calibration of LFI
- Page 121 and 122: A&A 520, A7 (2010)DOI: 10.1051/0004
- Page 123 and 124: M. Sandri et al.: Planck pre-launch
- Page 126 and 127: A&A 520, A7 (2010)Fig. 8. Footprint
- Page 128 and 129: -30-40-30-6-3-20A&A 520, A7 (2010)0
- Page 130 and 131: A&A 520, A7 (2010)Table 4. Galactic
- Page 132 and 133: A&A 520, A7 (2010)Fig. A.1. Polariz
- Page 134 and 135: A&A 520, A8 (2010)inflation, giving
- Page 136 and 137: A&A 520, A8 (2010)estimated from th
- Page 138 and 139: A&A 520, A8 (2010)ways the most str
- Page 140 and 141: unmodelled long-timescale thermally
- Page 142 and 143: A&A 520, A8 (2010)Fig. 5. Polarisat
- Page 144 and 145: A&A 520, A8 (2010)Table 3. Band-ave
- Page 146 and 147: A&A 520, A8 (2010)where S stands fo
- Page 150 and 151: stored in the LFI instrument model,
- Page 152 and 153: A&A 520, A8 (2010)Table 5. Statisti
- Page 154 and 155: A&A 520, A8 (2010)comparable in siz
- Page 156 and 157: A&A 520, A8 (2010)Table B.1. Main b
- Page 158 and 159: A&A 520, A8 (2010)Bond, J. R., Jaff
- Page 160 and 161: A&A 520, A9 (2010)- (v) an optical
- Page 162 and 163: A&A 520, A9 (2010)Fig. 2. The Russi
- Page 164 and 165: A&A 520, A9 (2010)Table 3. Estimate
- Page 166 and 167: A&A 520, A9 (2010)Fig. 7. Picture o
- Page 168 and 169: A&A 520, A9 (2010)Fig. 9. Cosmic ra
- Page 170 and 171: A&A 520, A9 (2010)Fig. 13. Principl
- Page 172 and 173: A&A 520, A9 (2010)Fig. 16. Noise sp
- Page 174 and 175: A&A 520, A9 (2010)Table 6. Basic ch
- Page 176 and 177: A&A 520, A9 (2010)with warm preampl
- Page 178 and 179: A&A 520, A9 (2010)20 Laboratoire de
- Page 180 and 181: A&A 520, A10 (2010)Table 1. HFI des
- Page 182 and 183: A&A 520, A10 (2010)based on the the
- Page 184 and 185: A&A 520, A10 (2010)Fig. 6. The Satu
- Page 186 and 187: A&A 520, A10 (2010)5. Calibration a
- Page 188 and 189: A&A 520, A10 (2010)Fig. 16. Couplin
- Page 190 and 191: A&A 520, A10 (2010)217-5a channel:
- Page 192 and 193: A&A 520, A10 (2010)10 -310 -495-The
- Page 194 and 195: A&A 520, A11 (2010)DOI: 10.1051/000
- Page 196 and 197: P. A. R. Ade et al.: Planck pre-lau
J. P. Leahy et al.: <strong>Planck</strong> pre-launch status: Expected LFI polarisation capabilityResults are shown in Fig. 13.Theprimaryvariableisthereferencephase of the cycloid scanning strategy, Φ 0 .Theapproximateorbit used in our simulations 9 does not affect the basicgeometry, in particular the phases at which the scan angles becomedegenerate and hence the errors diverge, at Φ 0 ≈ 65 ◦ and275 ◦ .Forn = 0(forwardprecession)themajorchangeisthatthe scan degeneracies occur at Φ 0 ≈ 115 ◦ and 265 ◦ .Avoidingthese bad phases is one of the more significant constraints on thechoice of scan strategy.The figures show that we can obtain precisions of better than0. ◦ 5degreesforabouthalfoftheRCAs,withonlythethreeawkwardly-oriented RCAs at 70 GHz being significantly worsethan 1 ◦ .WheretheuncertaintyisapproximatelyconstantwithΦ 0 ,theerrorsaredominatedbyourassumedbackgroundfluctuations;these are 1σ upper limits and may be significant overestimatesat 44 and 70 GHz, since they are derived from WMAPStokes Q and U data at Q, V, and W bands where there is nosecure detection of fluctuations in our background annuli.These measurements determine the relative orientation of thefeed horn to the Crab’s net polarisation angle Θ at the effectiveobserving frequency. This will unambiguously reveal any misalignmentsbetween feeds in each band, but to give us the desiredabsolute angle we need external measurements of Θ(ν).Theory tells us that the polarisation of a synchrotron sourcesuch as the Crab will change only very slowly with frequencyin the Faraday-thin regime. Faraday rotation in the Crab hasameanrotationmeasureRM ≈ −23 rad m −2 and an rms ofσ RM = 14 rad m −2 (Bietenholz & Kronberg 1991); this correspondsto rotations of 0. ◦ 08 at 30 GHz, which we can indeedneglect. The remaining effect is that the Crab’s net polarisationis a vector average over the rather tangled polarisation structureof the nebula; since the spectral index is not exactly the same atall positions in the nebula, the weighting in the average changesslowly with frequency. Fortunately, over the LFI band such spectralindex variations are remarkably small: Green et al. (2004)show that the spectral index between 1.5 and 350 GHz variesby ≈±0.02 over the bright part of the nebula, which dominatesthe total flux, corresponding to a change of weight of typically≈±1.7% between 30 and 70 GHz.The current best direct measurements of the Crab polarisationin the LFI frequency range are those from WMAP. Pageet al. (2007)presentedpreliminarymeasurementsbasedonsimpleaperture photometry, with typical errors of 1 ◦ –3 ◦ ,butweestimatethat with optimal fitting, the 5-year data will yield randomerrors (including background fluctuations) ranging from 0. ◦ 14 atKbandto0. ◦ 9atWband.Pageetal.estimatethattheirabsoluteorientations are known from pre-launch data to