Planck Pre-Launch Status Papers - APC - Université Paris Diderot ...
Planck Pre-Launch Status Papers - APC - Université Paris Diderot ... Planck Pre-Launch Status Papers - APC - Université Paris Diderot ...
A&A 520, A6 (2010)measured by varying T ref with T sky kept fixed. The term −G 0 ·∆T sky is a correction factor for any unwanted variation of T skyoriginating chiefly from thermal non-ideality of the cryofacility.At 70 GHz the best working conditions were found by measuringthe noise temperature and the isolation as a function ofthe gate voltages V g1 and V g2 ,butwithaslightlydifferent approachmainly for schedule reasons to that of the lower frequencychains. The procedure required two different temperaturesfor the reference load (about 10 K in the low state and about20 K in the high state) and V g1 , V g2 ,andV d were varied independentlyon the half FEM. Then the procedure was repeated withboth FEM legs switched on. The noise temperature was measuredwith the Y-factor method from the signals coming fromthe two temperature states, and the isolation was calculated withEq. (16).Although the bias parameters found during the RCA tuningare the optimal ones, we found that different electrical and cryogenicconditions induce uncertainties in the bias values. This isdue to the different grounding and the impact of the thermal gradientalong the bias cables. To overcome this problem, tuningverification campaigns are planned at LFI integrated level andinflight. In both cases the RCA bias values have been assumedas reference values.Fig. 11. Physical temperature ranges for the RCA_LIS tests. Black linesrefer to the reference load temperature steps. Gray lines refer to theskyload temperature steps.4.3. Basic propertiesThe basic properties of the radiometers, namely noise temperature,isolation, gain, and linearity were obtained in a single test.The RCA_LIS test was performed varying T sky (and subsequentlyT ref )instepswhilekeepingtheT ref (and subsequentlyT sky )constant.InFig.11 we give the temperature range spannedduring the tests. Due to the different thermal behavior of eachRCA the range was not the same for all the chains. The brightnesstemperature was calculated from temperature sensors locatedin the external calibrators (both sky and reference) andthe output voltages of the four detectors were recorded. Themain uncertainty was in the determination of the actual brightnesstemperature seen by the radiometer. At 30 and 44 GHz thebrightness temperature of the skyload was derived from the thermometerlocated inside the pyramids, from where the main thermalnoise emission originated. For 70 GHz both the backplatethermometer and the absorber thermometer were used to derivethe brightness temperature. However, the backplate and the absorbertemperatures were found to introduce a significant systematicerror in the reconstructed physical temperature of theload, as explained in Sect. 3.4. Itwasdecidedtocalibratethe70 GHz RCAs using the reference load steps instead.We denote here for simplicity the value of either V skyout or Voutrefwith V out in Eqs. (5) and(8), alternatively T sky or T ref with T in ,and the corresponding ˜T skyNor ˜TNref with T sys. WithG we denotethe corresponding total gain.For a perfectly linear radiometer the output signal can bewritten asV out = G · (T in + T sys ), (17)and the gain and system temperature can be calculated by measuringthe output voltage for only two different values of theinput temperature (Y-factor method). This was indeed the casefor the 70 GHz RCAs. For the 30 and 44 GHz RCAs the determinationof the basic properties was complicated by a significantnon-linear component in the response of the 30 and 44 GHzRCAs. This was discovered during the previous qualificationcampaign and has been well characterized during these flightFig. 12. Typical temperature behavior of sky load (blue), reference load(green) and FEM body (red) during the RCA_STn test. The temperaturestability is better than 1 mK.model RCA tests. The non-linearity effects in LFI are discussedin Mennella et al. (2009) togetherwithitsimpactonthescienceperformances. For a radiometer with compression effectsthe radiometer gain, G, isafunctionoftotalinputtemperature,T = T in + T sys and is given byV out = G(T) · (T in + T sys ). (18)Particular care was required in the determination of the noisetemperature of the 30 and 44 GHz RCAs. To overcome theproblem, the application of four different types of fit were performed:1. Linear fit. This fit was always calculated as a reference, evenfor non-linear behavior of the radiometer, so thatV out = G lin · T. (19)The linear gain, G lin ,andthenoisetemperaturewerederived.The fit was applied to all available data, not only to the twotemperature steps as in the Y-factor method, to reduce theuncertainties for the linear 70 GHz RCAs and to evaluate thenon-linearity of the 30 and 44 GHz chains.2. Parabolic fit. This was applied to understand the effect ofthe non-linearity, for the evaluation of which the quadraticfit is the simplest way. The output of the fit were the threecoefficients from the equationV out = a 0 + a 1 T + a 2 T 2 . (20)Page 8 of 14
F. Villa et al.: Calibration of LFI flight model radiometersTable 4. Receiver basic properties.ISOL (dB)LINEAR MODELM-00 M-01 S-10 S-11RCA18 –13.5 –13.0 –11.1 –10.9RCA19 –15.5 –15.9 –15.3 –13.9RCA20 –15.8 –15.9 –12.7 –14.2RCA21 –13.0 –12.4 –10.1 –10.4RCA22 –12.8 –11.1 –12.4 –11.3RCA23 –12.6 –11.8 –13.3 –14.3RCA24 –11.7 –12.3 –10.4 –10.5(–13.3) (–13.6) (11.6) (–11.9)RCA25 –10.8 –10.7 –12.0 –11.5(–14.6) (–14.4) (–15.5) (–14.5)RCA26 –10.8 –11.9 –13.7 –13.7(–9.7) (–10.4) (–13.9) (–14.0)RCA27 –13.0 –12.8 –14.7 –14.6(–11.2) (–11.0) (–11.7) (–11.8)RCA28 –10.9 –10.3 –10.3 –10.5(–11.6) (–11.2) (–12.0) (–12.2)Notes. Isolation in dB. The values found during the V g2 tuning are alsoreported in brackets for comparison.In this case the noise temperature was employed as the solutionof the equation a 2 T 2 sys + a 1 T sys + a 0 = 0.3. Inverse parabolic fit. This was used because the noise temperaturewas directly derived fromT = a 0 + a 1 V out + a 2 V 2 out, (21)where T sys = a 0 .4. Gain model fit. Anewgainmodelwasdevelopedbasedon the results of Daywitt (1989), modified for the LFI (seeAppendix B). The total power output voltage was written as⎡⎤G 0V out = ⎢⎣1 + b · G 0 · (T ) ⎥⎦in + T · (T )in + T sys , (22)syswhere G 0 is the total gain in the case of a linear radiometer,b is the linear coefficient (b = 0inthelinearcase,b = ∞ forcomplete saturation, i.e. G(T) = 0).The values obtained for gain, linearity and noise temperature arereported in Table 5. TheisolationvalueswerecalculatedwithEq. (16)basedonallpossiblecombinationsoftemperaturevariationon the reference load. The results are given in Table 4,where the values obtained during the tuning of the V g2 are alsoreported for the 30 and 44 GHz RCAs. While at 30 GHz thedifferences are due mainly to the reference load thermal modelapplied in this case, for the 44 GHz RCAs the differences aredominated by the gain used to compensate for thermal couplingin Eq. (16).4.4. Noise propertiesRadiometer noise properties were derived from the RCA_STntest. This test consisted of acquiring data under stable thermalconditions for at least three hours. Then the temperature of theloads were changed to measure the noise properties at differentsky and reference target temperatures. As expected, the best 1/ fconditions were found when the difference between the sky andreference load temperatures was minimal. This occurred at thefirst and last step as seen in Fig. 12, whichrepresentsatypicalTable 5. Receiver basic properties: gain, noise temperature, andlinearity.GAIN (V/K), T n (K), AND LINM-00 M-01 S-10 S-11RCA18 G 0 0.0173 0.0195 0.0147 0.0143T n 36.0 36.1 33.9 35.1RCA19 G 0 0.0161 0.0174 0.0176 0.0196T n 33.1 31.5 32.2 33.6RCA20 G 0 0.0186 0.0164 0.0161 0.0165T n 35.2 34.2 36.9 35.0RCA21 G 0 0.0161 0.0154 0.0119 0.0114T n 27.3 28.4 34.4 36.4RCA22 G 0 0.0197 0.0174 0.0165 0.0163T n 30.9 30.3 30.3 31.8RCA23 G 0 0.0149 0.0171 0.0271 0.0185T n 35.9 34.1 33.9 31.1RCA24 G 0 0.0048 0.0044 0.0062 0.0062T n 15.5 15.3 15.8 15.8b 1.79 1.49 1.44 1.45RCA25 G 0 0.0086 0.0085 0.0079 0.0071T n 17.5 17.9 18.6 18.4b 1.22 1.17 0.80 1.01RCA26 G 0 0.0052 0.0067 0.0075 0.0082T n 18.4 17.4 16.8 16.5b 1.09 1.42 0.94 1.22RCA27 G 0 0.0723 0.0774 0.0664 0.0562T n 12.1 11.9 13.0 12.5b 0.12 0.12 0.13 0.14RCA28 G 0 0.0621 0.0839 0.0607 0.0518T n 10.6 10.3 9.9 9.8b 0.19 0.16 0.19 0.20Notes. For the 70 GHz RCAs, the gain, G 0 ,andthenoisetemperature,T n ,werederivedfromthelinearfit,andthelinearitycoefficient is notreported. For 30 and 44 GHz, G 0 , T n ,andthelinearitycoefficient, b,were derived from the gain model-fit.temperature profile of the test. The amplitude spectral densitywas calculated for each output diode. The 1/ f component (kneefrequency, f k ,andslope,α), the white noise plateau and the gainmodulation factor, r,werederived.At70GHzthe1/ f spectrumwas clearly dominated by thermal instabilities of the BEM whichwas not controlled in temperature. There the measured knee frequencyvalues were over-estimated, while at 30 and 44 GHz thecryofacility was sufficiently stable to characterize the 1/ f performancesof the radiometers. From the white noise and DC levelthe effective bandwidth was calculated asβ = K 2 ·V 2 out∆V 2 out· τ,(23)where ∆V out is the white noise level, V out is the DC level, τ theintegration time, and K = 1forasingledetectortotalpowerin the unswitched condition, K = √ 2forasingledetectortotalpower in the switched condition, K = 2forasingledetectordifferenced data, K = √ 2fordouble-diodedifferenced data.This formula does not include the non-linearity effects that arediscussed in detail by Mennella et al. (2009). The overall noiseperformances of all eleven RCAs are reported in Table 6, whileFig. 13 shows the typical amplitude spectral density of the noisefor each frequency channel.Apart from 1/ f noise and white noise, spikes were observedin all RCAs: at 70 GHz they were caused by the electrical interactionbetween the two DAE units, which were slightly unsynchronised;at 30 and 44 GHz they were due to the housekeepingPage 9 of 14
- Page 63 and 64: A&A 520, A3 (2010)Fig. 13. Level 2
- Page 65 and 66: A&A 520, A3 (2010)Fig. 15. Level 3
- Page 67 and 68: A&A 520, A3 (2010)GUI = graphical u
- Page 69 and 70: A&A 520, A3 (2010)23 Centre of Math
- Page 71 and 72: A&A 520, A4 (2010)In addition, all
- Page 73 and 74: A&A 520, A4 (2010)Table 2. Sensitiv
- Page 75 and 76: A&A 520, A4 (2010)Fig. 2. Schematic
- Page 77 and 78: A&A 520, A4 (2010)Fig. 6. LFI recei
- Page 79 and 80: A&A 520, A4 (2010)Fig. 9. Schematic
- Page 81 and 82: A&A 520, A4 (2010)Table 4. Specific
- Page 83 and 84: A&A 520, A4 (2010)Fig. 15. DAE bias
- Page 85 and 86: A&A 520, A4 (2010)Fig. 19. Picture
- Page 87 and 88: A&A 520, A4 (2010)Table 10. Main ch
- Page 89 and 90: Table 13. Principal requirements an
- Page 91 and 92: A&A 520, A5 (2010)DOI: 10.1051/0004
- Page 93 and 94: A. Mennella et al.: LFI calibration
- Page 95 and 96: A. Mennella et al.: LFI calibration
- Page 97 and 98: A. Mennella et al.: LFI calibration
- Page 99 and 100: A. Mennella et al.: LFI calibration
- Page 101 and 102: A. Mennella et al.: LFI calibration
- Page 103 and 104: A. Mennella et al.: LFI calibration
- Page 105 and 106: D.1. Step 1-extrapolate uncalibrate
- Page 107 and 108: A&A 520, A6 (2010)DOI: 10.1051/0004
- Page 109 and 110: F. Villa et al.: Calibration of LFI
- Page 111 and 112: F. Villa et al.: Calibration of LFI
- Page 113: F. Villa et al.: Calibration of LFI
- Page 117 and 118: F. Villa et al.: Calibration of LFI
- Page 119 and 120: F. Villa et al.: Calibration of LFI
- Page 121 and 122: A&A 520, A7 (2010)DOI: 10.1051/0004
- Page 123 and 124: M. Sandri et al.: Planck pre-launch
- Page 126 and 127: A&A 520, A7 (2010)Fig. 8. Footprint
- Page 128 and 129: -30-40-30-6-3-20A&A 520, A7 (2010)0
- Page 130 and 131: A&A 520, A7 (2010)Table 4. Galactic
- Page 132 and 133: A&A 520, A7 (2010)Fig. A.1. Polariz
- Page 134 and 135: A&A 520, A8 (2010)inflation, giving
- Page 136 and 137: A&A 520, A8 (2010)estimated from th
- Page 138 and 139: A&A 520, A8 (2010)ways the most str
- Page 140 and 141: unmodelled long-timescale thermally
- Page 142 and 143: A&A 520, A8 (2010)Fig. 5. Polarisat
- Page 144 and 145: A&A 520, A8 (2010)Table 3. Band-ave
- Page 146 and 147: A&A 520, A8 (2010)where S stands fo
- Page 148 and 149: A&A 520, A8 (2010)Fig. 11. Simulate
- Page 150 and 151: stored in the LFI instrument model,
- Page 152 and 153: A&A 520, A8 (2010)Table 5. Statisti
- Page 154 and 155: A&A 520, A8 (2010)comparable in siz
- Page 156 and 157: A&A 520, A8 (2010)Table B.1. Main b
- Page 158 and 159: A&A 520, A8 (2010)Bond, J. R., Jaff
- Page 160 and 161: A&A 520, A9 (2010)- (v) an optical
- Page 162 and 163: A&A 520, A9 (2010)Fig. 2. The Russi
F. Villa et al.: Calibration of LFI flight model radiometersTable 4. Receiver basic properties.ISOL (dB)LINEAR MODELM-00 M-01 S-10 S-11RCA18 –13.5 –13.0 –11.1 –10.9RCA19 –15.5 –15.9 –15.3 –13.9RCA20 –15.8 –15.9 –12.7 –14.2RCA21 –13.0 –12.4 –10.1 –10.4RCA22 –12.8 –11.1 –12.4 –11.3RCA23 –12.6 –11.8 –13.3 –14.3RCA24 –11.7 –12.3 –10.4 –10.5(–13.3) (–13.6) (11.6) (–11.9)RCA25 –10.8 –10.7 –12.0 –11.5(–14.6) (–14.4) (–15.5) (–14.5)RCA26 –10.8 –11.9 –13.7 –13.7(–9.7) (–10.4) (–13.9) (–14.0)RCA27 –13.0 –12.8 –14.7 –14.6(–11.2) (–11.0) (–11.7) (–11.8)RCA28 –10.9 –10.3 –10.3 –10.5(–11.6) (–11.2) (–12.0) (–12.2)Notes. Isolation in dB. The values found during the V g2 tuning are alsoreported in brackets for comparison.In this case the noise temperature was employed as the solutionof the equation a 2 T 2 sys + a 1 T sys + a 0 = 0.3. Inverse parabolic fit. This was used because the noise temperaturewas directly derived fromT = a 0 + a 1 V out + a 2 V 2 out, (21)where T sys = a 0 .4. Gain model fit. Anewgainmodelwasdevelopedbasedon the results of Daywitt (1989), modified for the LFI (seeAppendix B). The total power output voltage was written as⎡⎤G 0V out = ⎢⎣1 + b · G 0 · (T ) ⎥⎦in + T · (T )in + T sys , (22)syswhere G 0 is the total gain in the case of a linear radiometer,b is the linear coefficient (b = 0inthelinearcase,b = ∞ forcomplete saturation, i.e. G(T) = 0).The values obtained for gain, linearity and noise temperature arereported in Table 5. TheisolationvalueswerecalculatedwithEq. (16)basedonallpossiblecombinationsoftemperaturevariationon the reference load. The results are given in Table 4,where the values obtained during the tuning of the V g2 are alsoreported for the 30 and 44 GHz RCAs. While at 30 GHz thedifferences are due mainly to the reference load thermal modelapplied in this case, for the 44 GHz RCAs the differences aredominated by the gain used to compensate for thermal couplingin Eq. (16).4.4. Noise propertiesRadiometer noise properties were derived from the RCA_STntest. This test consisted of acquiring data under stable thermalconditions for at least three hours. Then the temperature of theloads were changed to measure the noise properties at differentsky and reference target temperatures. As expected, the best 1/ fconditions were found when the difference between the sky andreference load temperatures was minimal. This occurred at thefirst and last step as seen in Fig. 12, whichrepresentsatypicalTable 5. Receiver basic properties: gain, noise temperature, andlinearity.GAIN (V/K), T n (K), AND LINM-00 M-01 S-10 S-11RCA18 G 0 0.0173 0.0195 0.0147 0.0143T n 36.0 36.1 33.9 35.1RCA19 G 0 0.0161 0.0174 0.0176 0.0196T n 33.1 31.5 32.2 33.6RCA20 G 0 0.0186 0.0164 0.0161 0.0165T n 35.2 34.2 36.9 35.0RCA21 G 0 0.0161 0.0154 0.0119 0.0114T n 27.3 28.4 34.4 36.4RCA22 G 0 0.0197 0.0174 0.0165 0.0163T n 30.9 30.3 30.3 31.8RCA23 G 0 0.0149 0.0171 0.0271 0.0185T n 35.9 34.1 33.9 31.1RCA24 G 0 0.0048 0.0044 0.0062 0.0062T n 15.5 15.3 15.8 15.8b 1.79 1.49 1.44 1.45RCA25 G 0 0.0086 0.0085 0.0079 0.0071T n 17.5 17.9 18.6 18.4b 1.22 1.17 0.80 1.01RCA26 G 0 0.0052 0.0067 0.0075 0.0082T n 18.4 17.4 16.8 16.5b 1.09 1.42 0.94 1.22RCA27 G 0 0.0723 0.0774 0.0664 0.0562T n 12.1 11.9 13.0 12.5b 0.12 0.12 0.13 0.14RCA28 G 0 0.0621 0.0839 0.0607 0.0518T n 10.6 10.3 9.9 9.8b 0.19 0.16 0.19 0.20Notes. For the 70 GHz RCAs, the gain, G 0 ,andthenoisetemperature,T n ,werederivedfromthelinearfit,andthelinearitycoefficient is notreported. For 30 and 44 GHz, G 0 , T n ,andthelinearitycoefficient, b,were derived from the gain model-fit.temperature profile of the test. The amplitude spectral densitywas calculated for each output diode. The 1/ f component (kneefrequency, f k ,andslope,α), the white noise plateau and the gainmodulation factor, r,werederived.At70GHzthe1/ f spectrumwas clearly dominated by thermal instabilities of the BEM whichwas not controlled in temperature. There the measured knee frequencyvalues were over-estimated, while at 30 and 44 GHz thecryofacility was sufficiently stable to characterize the 1/ f performancesof the radiometers. From the white noise and DC levelthe effective bandwidth was calculated asβ = K 2 ·V 2 out∆V 2 out· τ,(23)where ∆V out is the white noise level, V out is the DC level, τ theintegration time, and K = 1forasingledetectortotalpowerin the unswitched condition, K = √ 2forasingledetectortotalpower in the switched condition, K = 2forasingledetectordifferenced data, K = √ 2fordouble-diodedifferenced data.This formula does not include the non-linearity effects that arediscussed in detail by Mennella et al. (2009). The overall noiseperformances of all eleven RCAs are reported in Table 6, whileFig. 13 shows the typical amplitude spectral density of the noisefor each frequency channel.Apart from 1/ f noise and white noise, spikes were observedin all RCAs: at 70 GHz they were caused by the electrical interactionbetween the two DAE units, which were slightly unsynchronised;at 30 and 44 GHz they were due to the housekeepingPage 9 of 14