AUTEX Research Journal, Vol. 8, No4, December 2007 © AUTEXThe above-described issues about <strong>the</strong> fast fashion <strong>supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong> for knitted garments are discussed <strong>in</strong>this article. The technological development of <strong>the</strong> <strong>production</strong> of knitted garments has made it possibleto make complete garments ready made, directly <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knitt<strong>in</strong>g mach<strong>in</strong>e, without any processes suchas cutt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> sew<strong>in</strong>g to follow. With this technique <strong>the</strong> producer can respond quickly to new orders<strong>and</strong> also produce garments of a higher quality [1].The ord<strong>in</strong>ary way to produce a coarse knitted garment is to knit rectangular panels, one for <strong>the</strong> front,one for <strong>the</strong> back <strong>and</strong> two panels for <strong>the</strong> sleeves. These panels are cut <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> right form <strong>and</strong> sewedtoge<strong>the</strong>r with pockets, trims <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r accessories <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> post-knit processes. This traditional<strong>production</strong> system, with several post-knit operations <strong>and</strong> processes necessary to obta<strong>in</strong> a complete<strong>and</strong> ready made garment, makes it difficult to match <strong>the</strong> new complete garment concept when itcomes to short lead times <strong>and</strong> quick responses to <strong>the</strong> market.This paper focuses on how this new complete garment knitt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>production</strong> technology could beadjusted <strong>and</strong> implemented <strong>in</strong> a fast fashion logistics system <strong>and</strong> how <strong>the</strong> decoupl<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t could bemoved nearer to <strong>the</strong> customer us<strong>in</strong>g this logistics system.2. MethodologyThe method used <strong>in</strong> this paper is an <strong>in</strong>ductive approach based on a literature survey, visits to fashion<strong>production</strong> companies, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation from suppliers of knitt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>production</strong> equipment. The textiletechnology <strong>and</strong> <strong>production</strong> issues are taken <strong>in</strong>to consideration <strong>and</strong> implemented <strong>in</strong> a fast fashionlogistics system. This paper takes a top-down perspective on <strong>supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong> design. Its purpose is tounderst<strong>and</strong> how <strong>the</strong> different parts of <strong>the</strong> systems affect each o<strong>the</strong>r. The system is viewed as a whole,with parts or functions that <strong>in</strong>teract with each o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> ways that make <strong>the</strong>m more than just <strong>the</strong> sum of<strong>the</strong> parts. The most important element <strong>in</strong> a system is its boundaries <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> context <strong>in</strong> which it ispresented [2].In this paper <strong>the</strong> context is <strong>the</strong> fast fashion <strong>supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong> design <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> boundaries are <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>teractionbetween <strong>the</strong> two most important constra<strong>in</strong>ts: cost <strong>and</strong> time. Figure 1 shows a model of a generalsystem <strong>the</strong>ory with feedback. This Figure shows that <strong>the</strong> difference between <strong>in</strong>put-dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong>output-dem<strong>and</strong> fulfilment is lost sales. In o<strong>the</strong>r words, if <strong>the</strong> system can fulfil all dem<strong>and</strong>s of itscustomers it works perfectly. This leads to <strong>the</strong> knowledge that <strong>the</strong> system or transformations processmust be designed to reduce <strong>the</strong> difference between dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> dem<strong>and</strong> fulfilment, with regard to itsconstra<strong>in</strong>ts.Constra<strong>in</strong>ts (Cost, time, quality,security, <strong>in</strong>formation…)Input (s)Transformation processOutput (s)Dem<strong>and</strong>Design, <strong>production</strong>, logisticsDem<strong>and</strong> fulfilmentGoal (Sales)Figure 1. General system <strong>the</strong>ory with feedback [2, 3].http://www.autexrj.org/No4-2007/0219.pdf 265
AUTEX Research Journal, Vol. 8, No4, December 2007 © AUTEX3. Def<strong>in</strong>itions3.1. Production of flat knitted garmentsThe flat knitt<strong>in</strong>g mach<strong>in</strong>e is one type of knitt<strong>in</strong>g mach<strong>in</strong>ery. It has a l<strong>in</strong>ear needle bed that makes itpossible to produce flat knitted rectangular panels for products like sweaters, cardigans, skirts,scarves <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r outer garment products. This mach<strong>in</strong>e type traditionally produces coarse structureknit panels, with a fixed edge <strong>and</strong> a welt at <strong>the</strong> bottom of <strong>the</strong> panel <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>n structures or patterns asjacquard, stripes or cables across <strong>the</strong> panel. Thus <strong>the</strong> <strong>production</strong> of a product from yarn to garmentwith flat knitt<strong>in</strong>g technology could be done <strong>in</strong> several ways, depend<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong> mach<strong>in</strong>ery available <strong>and</strong><strong>the</strong> <strong>production</strong> <strong>methods</strong> that a company has adopted.Knitt<strong>in</strong>g made F<strong>in</strong>ish<strong>in</strong>g Cutt<strong>in</strong>g Sew<strong>in</strong>g F<strong>in</strong>ish<strong>in</strong>gReadymadegarmentFigure 2. Production process of flat knitted garments.The <strong>production</strong> from yarn to ready made garment consists of several processes, as shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 2.It starts with <strong>the</strong> knitt<strong>in</strong>g process, where yarn on yarn-cones is knitted to panels <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> flat knitt<strong>in</strong>gmach<strong>in</strong>e. The panels are steamed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ish<strong>in</strong>g process after knitt<strong>in</strong>g. In <strong>the</strong> cutt<strong>in</strong>g process <strong>the</strong>panels are cut to <strong>the</strong> right shape <strong>and</strong> size accord<strong>in</strong>g to design quality requirements. The panels arejo<strong>in</strong>ed toge<strong>the</strong>r to a garment <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sew<strong>in</strong>g process. To accomplish <strong>the</strong> right quality, <strong>the</strong> garment isoften passed through a f<strong>in</strong>ish<strong>in</strong>g process such as wash<strong>in</strong>g or steam<strong>in</strong>g. The traditional <strong>production</strong> ofcoarse flat knitted garment thus consists of several-time consum<strong>in</strong>g processes after knitt<strong>in</strong>g.Knitt<strong>in</strong>g Cut & sew F<strong>in</strong>ish<strong>in</strong>gReady made garmentFigure 3. Production process of complete garment concept.The <strong>production</strong> of complete garment due to <strong>the</strong> new complete garment technology is done as shown<strong>in</strong> Figure 3. Yarn on yarn-cones is knitted to complete garments directly <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> flat knitt<strong>in</strong>g mach<strong>in</strong>e.After knitt<strong>in</strong>g, some cutt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> sew<strong>in</strong>g processes can be obta<strong>in</strong>ed, but not to <strong>the</strong> extent as <strong>in</strong> ord<strong>in</strong>aryflat knit <strong>production</strong>, shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 2, as <strong>the</strong> garment is here complete <strong>and</strong> almost ready made. Here<strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ish<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> garment is done <strong>in</strong> only one process, after knitt<strong>in</strong>g, cutt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> sew<strong>in</strong>g. The factthat <strong>the</strong> garment is knitted complete <strong>and</strong> almost ready made, directly <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knitt<strong>in</strong>g mach<strong>in</strong>e, with lessnumber of manufactur<strong>in</strong>g processes, makes it possible to reduce <strong>the</strong> start to f<strong>in</strong>ish time of <strong>production</strong>.The cha<strong>in</strong> of processes becomes shorter <strong>and</strong> especially non-value added time, such as wait<strong>in</strong>g timefor <strong>the</strong> garments between processes, is reduced.3.2. Production <strong>methods</strong> <strong>in</strong> flat knitt<strong>in</strong>g garment <strong>production</strong>The manufactur<strong>in</strong>g process of flat knitted garments can be divided <strong>in</strong> four different <strong>production</strong><strong>methods</strong>:• Cut & sew• Fully fashion• Integral knitt<strong>in</strong>g• Complete garment3.2.1 Cut & SewCut & sew is <strong>the</strong> conventional <strong>and</strong> most common method for <strong>production</strong> of flat knitted garments.Panels for front, back <strong>and</strong> sleeves are knitted <strong>in</strong> a rectangular form <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>n cut <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> right form <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>cutt<strong>in</strong>g process. After <strong>the</strong> cutt<strong>in</strong>g process, <strong>the</strong> panels are sewn toge<strong>the</strong>r with separately knittedtrimm<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>and</strong> pockets to complete <strong>the</strong> garment. Both cutt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> sew<strong>in</strong>g are post-knit processes,separated from <strong>the</strong> knitt<strong>in</strong>g mach<strong>in</strong>e. With cut & sew, up to 30% of <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al fabric may go to wasteas cut-loss. The advantage with this type of <strong>production</strong> is that it could be done on all flat knitt<strong>in</strong>gmach<strong>in</strong>es, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g old models without computer process<strong>in</strong>g systems. The disadvantages is <strong>the</strong>http://www.autexrj.org/No4-2007/0219.pdf 266
- Page 1: AUTEX Research Journal, Vol. 8, No4
- Page 5 and 6: AUTEX Research Journal, Vol. 8, No4
- Page 7 and 8: AUTEX Research Journal, Vol. 8, No4
- Page 9 and 10: AUTEX Research Journal, Vol. 8, No4
- Page 11: AUTEX Research Journal, Vol. 8, No4