11.07.2015 Views

CHRISTIAN FUCHS - ICT&S - Universität Salzburg

CHRISTIAN FUCHS - ICT&S - Universität Salzburg

CHRISTIAN FUCHS - ICT&S - Universität Salzburg

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Christian Fuchs: Social Networking Sites and the Surveillance Societybe their equipment(f) data necessary to identify the location of mobile communication equipment“ 2 .“Member States shall ensure that the categories of data specified in Article 5 areretained for periods of not less than six months and not more than two years fromthe date of the communication“ 3 .At the time of writing this report (October 2008), Austria had not implemented thedirective in its Telecommunications Act and had been admonished by the EUCommission twice for not doing so. The Directive was realized in Germany onNovember 9, 2007 by passing the Act on Readjusting TelecommunicationsSurveillance.In December 2007, the Social Democratic Party of Austria (SPÖ) and the AustrianPeoples Party (ÖVP) changed the Security Police Act (Sicherheitspolizeigesetz) so thatall information and communication providers are required to pass on personal data ofusers, if the police ask for it. No judicial order is needed. In contrast to Austria, theGerman Federal Constitutional Court decided in March 2008 that providers only in thecase of a judicial order and a severe criminal act must grant the police access tocommunication data.Austrian Security Police Act §53 (3a):“The security authorities have the right to demand from providers of publictelecommunications services and other service providers the disclosure of:1. Name, address, and identification number of a certain connection,2. Internet protocol address (IP-address) of a specific message and the time of itstransmission, as well as3. Name and address of a user, to whom a certain IP address was allocated at acertain point of time,if certain facts justify the assumption of a concrete threat and they require thisdata as an important precondition for the completion of the tasks that are assignedto them by this federal law. The identification of a connection according to point 1can also take place by reference to a call taken via this connection throughnaming as precisely as possible a period of time and the passive user number forthe completion of the general duty for first aid or the defence against dangerousattacks. The provider is required to disclose information immediately and at nocharge” 4 .2 Data Retention Directive, Article 5, http://www.ispai.ie/DR%20as%20published%20OJ%2013-04-06.pdf, accessed on October 28, 2008.3 Data Retention Directive, Article 6, http://www.ispai.ie/DR%20as%20published%20OJ%2013-04-06.pdf, accessed on October 28, 2008.4 “§ 53 Sicherheitspolizeigesetz:(3a) Die Sicherheitsbehörden sind berechtigt, von Betreibern öffentlicher Telekommunikationsdienste (§92 Abs. 3 Z 1 Telekommunikationsgesetz 2003 - TKG 2003, BGBl. I Nr. 70) und sonstigenDiensteanbietern (§ 3 Z 2 E-Commerce-Gesetz - ECG, BGBl. I Nr. 152/2001) Auskunft zu verlangen über1.Namen, Anschrift und Teilnehmernummer eines bestimmten Anschlusses,2. Internetprotokolladresse (IP-Adresse) zu einer bestimmten Nachricht und den Zeitpunkt ihrerÜbermittlung sowie3. Namen und Anschrift eines Benutzers, dem eine IP-Adresse zu einem bestimmten Zeitpunktzugewiesen war, wenn bestimmte Tatsachen die Annahme einer konkreten Gefahrensituation27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!