11.07.2015 Views

1881 Watch Tower - A2Z.org

1881 Watch Tower - A2Z.org

1881 Watch Tower - A2Z.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

We next inquire--Of what value to Jesus was this anointing?--and find answer that it was of the utmost importance: though hehad been a spiritual being yet he had given that up when he tookour nature, which is not spiritual, but human; consequently heno longer had a spiritual body, but a human or fleshly body-- infashion as a man. Understand us; we believe that there was nosham or pretention in this matter--no false pretence on the partof the Father and Jesus: We believe that Jesus actually gave upentirely and forever, his existence as a spiritual or heavenlybeing, changing or transferring it for a human or earthlyexistence. We state the matter thus plainly because so manyhave the idea that Jesus retained his spiritual being, merelycovered, or concealed under the guise or pretence (deception weshould call it) that he was a man. Such are continually in troubleand difficulty to explain away the statement that "He wastempted in all points like as we are, yet without sin," and thetemptation of the devil in the wilderness, etc.Now, if he really took a human nature and became a man, wecan understand how he that was rich (in a better state orcondition), for our sakes became poor, that we, through hispoverty, might become rich. If he merely left his riches for a fewyears to return again, and never really gave up his right or claimto them, then he did not become poor, but only appeared orpretended to do so.But we prefer to take it as it says, and believe that God is true,though it contradict a great many men's theories--He who wasrich, became poor--He who was a spiritual being, became ahuman or earthly being; not a depraved and death-condemnedhuman being. No; having done no sin, it would have been unjustin the Father to have placed him under sin's penalty--"thebondage of corruption"--death. No; though of our own nature,he was the perfection of it, and stood on precisely the sameplane that Adam occupied before sin, abundant arrangementbeing made for this in his miraculous birth.When he had reached the perfection of manhood (thirty years),knowing why he had taken that nature --that it was not becausehe wanted to be a man and live on earth, rather than be aspiritual being and live in heavenly conditions-- but that hemight carry out the Father's plans, and redeem mankind fromdeath, by giving himself a ransom for them, that, "as by mancame death, by a man also, came [the right of] resurrection ofthe dead"-- that "as by one man's disobedience many were madesinners, so by the obedience of one (man) shall many be maderighteous." Rom. 5:19.This was necessary, for according to God's own arrangement ofan eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, and a life for a life, nonebut a human being could redeem or pay the ransom forhumanity, and hence the necessity that he who was rich shouldbecome poor.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!