64 ŠOLSKO POLJE LETNIK <strong>XX</strong> ŠTEVILKA 5/6gories on which the topoi of the Topics rely (the four predicables).Most of them are ‘common’ only in the sense that they are notspecific to one single species of speech, but to all of them (Aristotlecalls those koina, »what is general, common«). Some of them offer strategicadvice, for example, to turn what has been said against oneself uponthe one who said it. For this reason, it would be completely misleading tosay that the functions of common topoi and specific topoi (i.e. idia) arecomplementary, insofar as the common topoi offer the logical form toa content that has been provided by the specific ones (idia).With Romans topoi became loci (which is a great »improvement« forthe speakers of Romance languages …), and Cicero literally defines them asplaces, as »the home of all proofs« (De or. 2.166.2), »pigeonholes in which argumentsare stored« (Part. Or. 5.7-10) or simply »storehouses of arguments«(Part. Or. 109.5-6). Also, their number was reduced from 300 hundred (inTopics) or 29 (in Rhetoric) to up to 19 (depending on how we count).Here is a list of Cicero’s loci corresponding to the topoi in Aristotle’s RhetoricB 23 (Rubinelli, <strong>2009</strong>: 143):Topos from opposites: Locus ex contrarioTopos from correlativesTopos from grammatical forms of the same word: Locus ex coniugatisTopos from the more and the less: Ex comparatione maiorumEx comparatione minorumTopos from the belonging on a similar degree: Ex comparatione pariumTopos from definition: DefinitioTopos from division: Partium enumeratioTopos from induction: Ex similitudineTopos from a [previous] judgement: Loci extrinseciTopos from the parts: PartitioTopos from the consequence: Ex adiunctisTopos from analogy: Ex similitudineTopos from looking at contradictions: Ex repugnantibusTopos from the cause: Ex efficientibus rebusTopos from the meaning of a name: Notatio
TOPOI IN CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS65Although the list correlates pretty much (though not completely) withAristotle’s list from the Rhetoric B 23, there is a difference in use: this is alist of concepts that may trigger an associative process rather than acollection of (implicit) rules and precepts reducible to rules, as the topoiin Aristotle’s Topica are (as we have seen). In other words, Cicero’s locimostly function as subject-matter indicators and loci communes 12 .Or, in Rubinelli’s words (<strong>2009</strong>: 107):» A locus communis is a ready-made argument that, as Cicero correctlyremarks, may be transferable (...) to several similar cases. Thus, the adjectivecommunis refers precisely to the extensive applicability of thiskind of arguments; however, it is not to be equated to the extensiveapplicability of the Aristotelian topoi /.../. The latter are ‘subjectless’,while the former work on a much more specific lever: they are effectivemainly in juridical, deliberative and epideictic contexts.«But being ready-made, doesn’t mean that they prove anything specificabout the case that is being examined, or that they add any factualinformation to it. As Rubinelli puts it (<strong>2009</strong>: 148):»... a locus communis is a ready-made argument. It does not guidethe construction of an argument, but it can be transferable to severalsimilar cases and has the main function of putting the audiencein a favourable frame of mind.«Which brings us a bit closer to how topoi are used in DHA. In theworks quoted in this paper, the authors never construct or re-constructarguments from the discourse fragments they analyse by invoking topoi- despite the fact that they are repeatedly defining topoi as connecting argumentswith conclusions -, they just hint at them with short glosses (noteven definitions). And since there is no reconstruction of concrete argumentson the basis of topoi, hinting at certain topoi, referring to them orjust mentionning them, can only serve the purpose that could be describedas »putting the audience in a favourable frame of mind.« »Favourableframe of mind« in this respect would mean invoking or directing reader’sattention to a »commonly known or discussed« topic, but without explicitlyphrasing or reconstructing it, so the reader can never really know whatexactly the author had in mind and what exactly he/she wanted to say.Let us jump from the old rhetoric to the new rhetoric now, skipingmore than 2000 years of degeneration of rhetoric, as Chaim Perelman putsit in his influential work Traité de l'argumentation - La nouvelle rhétorique.
- Page 3:
VSEBINA LETNIK XX ŠTEVILKA 5/6 Z
- Page 7 and 8:
UVODNA NOTICAIgor Ž. ŽagarTole pi
- Page 9 and 10:
ZA KAJ GRE V KAD - PREGLEDZGODOVINE
- Page 11 and 12:
ZA KAJ GRE V KAD - PREGLED ZGODOVIN
- Page 13:
ZA KAJ GRE V KAD - PREGLED ZGODOVIN
- Page 17 and 18: ZA KAJ GRE V KAD - PREGLED ZGODOVIN
- Page 19 and 20: ZA KAJ GRE V KAD - PREGLED ZGODOVIN
- Page 21 and 22: ZA KAJ GRE V KAD - PREGLED ZGODOVIN
- Page 23 and 24: ZA KAJ GRE V KAD - PREGLED ZGODOVIN
- Page 25 and 26: ZA KAJ GRE V KAD - PREGLED ZGODOVIN
- Page 27 and 28: DISKURZ: FOUCAULT, LACLAU TERZAPOPA
- Page 29 and 30: DISKURZ: FOUCAULT, LACLAU TER ZAPOP
- Page 31 and 32: DISKURZ: FOUCAULT, LACLAU TER ZAPOP
- Page 33 and 34: DISKURZ: FOUCAULT, LACLAU TER ZAPOP
- Page 35 and 36: DISKURZ: FOUCAULT, LACLAU TER ZAPOP
- Page 37 and 38: DISKURZ: FOUCAULT, LACLAU TER ZAPOP
- Page 39 and 40: DISKURZ: FOUCAULT, LACLAU TER ZAPOP
- Page 41 and 42: DISKURZ: FOUCAULT, LACLAU TER ZAPOP
- Page 43 and 44: DISKURZ: FOUCAULT, LACLAU TER ZAPOP
- Page 45 and 46: DISKURZ: FOUCAULT, LACLAU TER ZAPOP
- Page 47 and 48: DISKURZ: FOUCAULT, LACLAU TER ZAPOP
- Page 49 and 50: TOPOI IN CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSI
- Page 51 and 52: TOPOI IN CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSI
- Page 53 and 54: TOPOI IN CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSI
- Page 55 and 56: TOPOI IN CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSI
- Page 57 and 58: TOPOI IN CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSI
- Page 59 and 60: TOPOI IN CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSI
- Page 61 and 62: TOPOI IN CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSI
- Page 63 and 64: TOPOI IN CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSI
- Page 65: TOPOI IN CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSI
- Page 69 and 70: TOPOI IN CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSI
- Page 71 and 72: TOPOI IN CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSI
- Page 73 and 74: TOPOI IN CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSI
- Page 75 and 76: TOPOI IN CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSI
- Page 77 and 78: University of Queensland, Centre fo
- Page 79 and 80: JOURNALISTIC (RE)PRODUCTION OF HIST
- Page 81 and 82: JOURNALISTIC (RE)PRODUCTION OF HIST
- Page 83 and 84: JOURNALISTIC (RE)PRODUCTION OF HIST
- Page 85 and 86: JOURNALISTIC (RE)PRODUCTION OF HIST
- Page 87 and 88: JOURNALISTIC (RE)PRODUCTION OF HIST
- Page 89 and 90: JOURNALISTIC (RE)PRODUCTION OF HIST
- Page 91 and 92: JOURNALISTIC (RE)PRODUCTION OF HIST
- Page 93 and 94: JOURNALISTIC (RE)PRODUCTION OF HIST
- Page 95 and 96: JOURNALISTIC (RE)PRODUCTION OF HIST
- Page 97 and 98: JOURNALISTIC (RE)PRODUCTION OF HIST
- Page 99 and 100: JOURNALISTIC (RE)PRODUCTION OF HIST
- Page 101 and 102: JOURNALISTIC (RE)PRODUCTION OF HIST
- Page 103 and 104: THE VOICE OF AN AGENDA-SETTINGAUTHO
- Page 105 and 106: THE VOICE OF AN AGENDA-SETTING AUTH
- Page 107 and 108: THE VOICE OF AN AGENDA-SETTING AUTH
- Page 109 and 110: THE VOICE OF AN AGENDA-SETTING AUTH
- Page 111 and 112: THE VOICE OF AN AGENDA-SETTING AUTH
- Page 113 and 114: THE VOICE OF AN AGENDA-SETTING AUTH
- Page 115 and 116: THE VOICE OF AN AGENDA-SETTING AUTH
- Page 117 and 118:
THE VOICE OF AN AGENDA-SETTING AUTH
- Page 119 and 120:
THE VOICE OF AN AGENDA-SETTING AUTH
- Page 121 and 122:
THE VOICE OF AN AGENDA-SETTING AUTH
- Page 123 and 124:
THE VOICE OF AN AGENDA-SETTING AUTH
- Page 125 and 126:
THE VOICE OF AN AGENDA-SETTING AUTH
- Page 127 and 128:
THE VOICE OF AN AGENDA-SETTING AUTH
- Page 129 and 130:
THE VOICE OF AN AGENDA-SETTING AUTH
- Page 131 and 132:
THE VOICE OF AN AGENDA-SETTING AUTH
- Page 133 and 134:
THE VOICE OF AN AGENDA-SETTING AUTH
- Page 135 and 136:
‘68 KOT HKRATNA KRIZA EVROPSKEGAZ
- Page 137 and 138:
‘68 KOT HKRATNA KRIZA EVROPSKEGA
- Page 139 and 140:
‘68 KOT HKRATNA KRIZA EVROPSKEGA
- Page 141 and 142:
‘68 KOT HKRATNA KRIZA EVROPSKEGA
- Page 143 and 144:
‘68 KOT HKRATNA KRIZA EVROPSKEGA
- Page 145 and 146:
‘68 KOT HKRATNA KRIZA EVROPSKEGA
- Page 147 and 148:
‘68 KOT HKRATNA KRIZA EVROPSKEGA
- Page 149 and 150:
‘68 KOT HKRATNA KRIZA EVROPSKEGA
- Page 151 and 152:
‘68 KOT HKRATNA KRIZA EVROPSKEGA
- Page 153 and 154:
‘68 KOT HKRATNA KRIZA EVROPSKEGA
- Page 155 and 156:
‘68 KOT HKRATNA KRIZA EVROPSKEGA
- Page 157 and 158:
‘68 KOT HKRATNA KRIZA EVROPSKEGA
- Page 159 and 160:
POVZETKI/ABSTRACTSZA KAJ GRE V KAD
- Page 161 and 162:
POVZETKI / ABSTRACTS159NOVINARSKA (
- Page 163 and 164:
POVZETKI / ABSTRACTS161‘68 AS PAR
- Page 165 and 166:
AVTORJI/AUTHORSRuth WodakRuth Wodak
- Page 168 and 169:
166 ŠOLSKO POLJE LETNIK XX ŠTEV
- Page 170 and 171:
168 ŠOLSKO POLJE LETNIK XX ŠTEV
- Page 172:
ZAHVALARevija Šolsko polje izhaja