46 ŠOLSKO POLJE LETNIK <strong>XX</strong> ŠTEVILKA 5/6Jaworski, A. in Coupland, N. (1999). Introduction: Perspectives on Discourse Analysis.V: Adam Jaworski in Nikolas Coupland (ur.), The Discourse Reader, str. 1–44.London: Routledge.Jørgensen, M. in Phillips, L. (2002). Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method.London: Sage.Laclau, E. (1993). Discourse. V: Robert E. Goodin in Philip Pettit (ur.), A Companion toContemporary Political Philosophy, str. 431–437. Oxford: Blackwell.--- (1996a). Emancipation(s). London: Verso.--- (1996b). Deconstruction, Pragmatics, Hegemony. V: Chantal Mouffe (ur.),Deconstruction and Pragmatism, str. 47–68. London: Routledge.--- (1999). Politics, Polemics and Academics: An Interview by Paul Bowman. Parallax5, 2, 93–107.--- (2005). On Populist Reason. London and New York: Verso.--- (2007). Emancipacija/emancipacije. Ljubljana: Založba ZRC.--- (2008). O populističnem umu. Ljubljana: Sophia.Laclau, E. in Mouffe, C. (1987). Hegemonija in socialistična strategija: k radikalnidemokratični politiki. Ljubljana: Partizanska knjiga.--- 1990. Post-Marxism without Apologies. V: Ernesto Laclau (ur.), New Reflections onthe Revolution of Our Time, str. 97–134. London, New York: Verso.Norval, A. (2004). Hegemony After Deconstruction: the Consequences ofUndecidability. Journal of Political Ideologies 9, 2, 139–157.--- (2005). Theorising Hegemony: Between Deconstruction and Psychoanalysis. V:Lars Tønder in Lasse Thomassen (ur.), Radical Democracy: Politics BetweenAboundance and Lack, str. 86–102. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Rorty, R. (1992). The Linguistic Turn: Essays in Philosophical Method: With TwoRetrospective Essays. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Torfing, J. (2005). Discourse Theory: Achievements, Arguments, and Challenges. V:David Howarth in Jacob Torfing (ur.), Discourse Theory in European Politics:Identity, Policy and Governance, str. 1–32. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
TOPOI IN CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSISIgor Ž. ŽagarThe Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA), pioneered by Ruth Wodak (seeWodak, de Cillia, Reisigl, Liebhart, 1999; Wodak, van Dijk, 2000; Wodak,Chilton, 2005; Wodak, Meyer, 2006; Wodak, <strong>2009</strong>), is one of the majorbranches of critical discourse analysis (CDA). In its own (programmatic)view, it embraces at least three interconnected aspects:»1. ‘Text or discourse immanent critique’ aims at discovering internalor discourseinternal structures.2. The ‘socio-diagnostic critique’ is concerned with the demystifyingexposure of the possibly persuasive or ‘manipulative’ character of discursivepractices.3. Prognostic critique contributes to the transformation and improvementof communication.« (Wodak, 2006: 65)CDA, in Wodak’s view,»is not concerned with evaluating what is ‘right’ or ‘wrong’. CDA ... shouldtry to make choices at each point in the research itself, and should makethese choices transparent.1 It should also justify theoretically why certaininterpretations of discursive events seem more valid than others.«»One of the methodical ways for critical discourse analysts to minimizethe risk of being biased is to follow the principle of triangulation.Thus one of the most salient distinguishing features of the DHA is itsendeavour to work with different approaches, multimethodically andon the basis of a variety of empirical data as well as backgroundinformation.« (Wodak, 2006: 65)One of the approaches DHA is using in its principle of triangulation isargumentation theory, more specifically the theory of topoi. Being a philosopherby formation, working within the field of argumentation theoryŠOLSKO POLJE LETNIK <strong>XX</strong> (<strong>2009</strong>) ŠTEVILKA 5/6 str. 47-73
- Page 3: VSEBINA LETNIK XX ŠTEVILKA 5/6 Z
- Page 7 and 8: UVODNA NOTICAIgor Ž. ŽagarTole pi
- Page 9 and 10: ZA KAJ GRE V KAD - PREGLEDZGODOVINE
- Page 11 and 12: ZA KAJ GRE V KAD - PREGLED ZGODOVIN
- Page 13: ZA KAJ GRE V KAD - PREGLED ZGODOVIN
- Page 17 and 18: ZA KAJ GRE V KAD - PREGLED ZGODOVIN
- Page 19 and 20: ZA KAJ GRE V KAD - PREGLED ZGODOVIN
- Page 21 and 22: ZA KAJ GRE V KAD - PREGLED ZGODOVIN
- Page 23 and 24: ZA KAJ GRE V KAD - PREGLED ZGODOVIN
- Page 25 and 26: ZA KAJ GRE V KAD - PREGLED ZGODOVIN
- Page 27 and 28: DISKURZ: FOUCAULT, LACLAU TERZAPOPA
- Page 29 and 30: DISKURZ: FOUCAULT, LACLAU TER ZAPOP
- Page 31 and 32: DISKURZ: FOUCAULT, LACLAU TER ZAPOP
- Page 33 and 34: DISKURZ: FOUCAULT, LACLAU TER ZAPOP
- Page 35 and 36: DISKURZ: FOUCAULT, LACLAU TER ZAPOP
- Page 37 and 38: DISKURZ: FOUCAULT, LACLAU TER ZAPOP
- Page 39 and 40: DISKURZ: FOUCAULT, LACLAU TER ZAPOP
- Page 41 and 42: DISKURZ: FOUCAULT, LACLAU TER ZAPOP
- Page 43 and 44: DISKURZ: FOUCAULT, LACLAU TER ZAPOP
- Page 45 and 46: DISKURZ: FOUCAULT, LACLAU TER ZAPOP
- Page 47: DISKURZ: FOUCAULT, LACLAU TER ZAPOP
- Page 51 and 52: TOPOI IN CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSI
- Page 53 and 54: TOPOI IN CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSI
- Page 55 and 56: TOPOI IN CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSI
- Page 57 and 58: TOPOI IN CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSI
- Page 59 and 60: TOPOI IN CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSI
- Page 61 and 62: TOPOI IN CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSI
- Page 63 and 64: TOPOI IN CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSI
- Page 65 and 66: TOPOI IN CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSI
- Page 67 and 68: TOPOI IN CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSI
- Page 69 and 70: TOPOI IN CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSI
- Page 71 and 72: TOPOI IN CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSI
- Page 73 and 74: TOPOI IN CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSI
- Page 75 and 76: TOPOI IN CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSI
- Page 77 and 78: University of Queensland, Centre fo
- Page 79 and 80: JOURNALISTIC (RE)PRODUCTION OF HIST
- Page 81 and 82: JOURNALISTIC (RE)PRODUCTION OF HIST
- Page 83 and 84: JOURNALISTIC (RE)PRODUCTION OF HIST
- Page 85 and 86: JOURNALISTIC (RE)PRODUCTION OF HIST
- Page 87 and 88: JOURNALISTIC (RE)PRODUCTION OF HIST
- Page 89 and 90: JOURNALISTIC (RE)PRODUCTION OF HIST
- Page 91 and 92: JOURNALISTIC (RE)PRODUCTION OF HIST
- Page 93 and 94: JOURNALISTIC (RE)PRODUCTION OF HIST
- Page 95 and 96: JOURNALISTIC (RE)PRODUCTION OF HIST
- Page 97 and 98: JOURNALISTIC (RE)PRODUCTION OF HIST
- Page 99 and 100:
JOURNALISTIC (RE)PRODUCTION OF HIST
- Page 101 and 102:
JOURNALISTIC (RE)PRODUCTION OF HIST
- Page 103 and 104:
THE VOICE OF AN AGENDA-SETTINGAUTHO
- Page 105 and 106:
THE VOICE OF AN AGENDA-SETTING AUTH
- Page 107 and 108:
THE VOICE OF AN AGENDA-SETTING AUTH
- Page 109 and 110:
THE VOICE OF AN AGENDA-SETTING AUTH
- Page 111 and 112:
THE VOICE OF AN AGENDA-SETTING AUTH
- Page 113 and 114:
THE VOICE OF AN AGENDA-SETTING AUTH
- Page 115 and 116:
THE VOICE OF AN AGENDA-SETTING AUTH
- Page 117 and 118:
THE VOICE OF AN AGENDA-SETTING AUTH
- Page 119 and 120:
THE VOICE OF AN AGENDA-SETTING AUTH
- Page 121 and 122:
THE VOICE OF AN AGENDA-SETTING AUTH
- Page 123 and 124:
THE VOICE OF AN AGENDA-SETTING AUTH
- Page 125 and 126:
THE VOICE OF AN AGENDA-SETTING AUTH
- Page 127 and 128:
THE VOICE OF AN AGENDA-SETTING AUTH
- Page 129 and 130:
THE VOICE OF AN AGENDA-SETTING AUTH
- Page 131 and 132:
THE VOICE OF AN AGENDA-SETTING AUTH
- Page 133 and 134:
THE VOICE OF AN AGENDA-SETTING AUTH
- Page 135 and 136:
‘68 KOT HKRATNA KRIZA EVROPSKEGAZ
- Page 137 and 138:
‘68 KOT HKRATNA KRIZA EVROPSKEGA
- Page 139 and 140:
‘68 KOT HKRATNA KRIZA EVROPSKEGA
- Page 141 and 142:
‘68 KOT HKRATNA KRIZA EVROPSKEGA
- Page 143 and 144:
‘68 KOT HKRATNA KRIZA EVROPSKEGA
- Page 145 and 146:
‘68 KOT HKRATNA KRIZA EVROPSKEGA
- Page 147 and 148:
‘68 KOT HKRATNA KRIZA EVROPSKEGA
- Page 149 and 150:
‘68 KOT HKRATNA KRIZA EVROPSKEGA
- Page 151 and 152:
‘68 KOT HKRATNA KRIZA EVROPSKEGA
- Page 153 and 154:
‘68 KOT HKRATNA KRIZA EVROPSKEGA
- Page 155 and 156:
‘68 KOT HKRATNA KRIZA EVROPSKEGA
- Page 157 and 158:
‘68 KOT HKRATNA KRIZA EVROPSKEGA
- Page 159 and 160:
POVZETKI/ABSTRACTSZA KAJ GRE V KAD
- Page 161 and 162:
POVZETKI / ABSTRACTS159NOVINARSKA (
- Page 163 and 164:
POVZETKI / ABSTRACTS161‘68 AS PAR
- Page 165 and 166:
AVTORJI/AUTHORSRuth WodakRuth Wodak
- Page 168 and 169:
166 ŠOLSKO POLJE LETNIK XX ŠTEV
- Page 170 and 171:
168 ŠOLSKO POLJE LETNIK XX ŠTEV
- Page 172:
ZAHVALARevija Šolsko polje izhaja