Å olsko polje, letnik XX, Å¡tevilka 5-6, 2009: Vloga ... - PedagoÅ¡ki inÅ¡titut

More documents

Recommendations

Info

46 ŠOLSKO POLJE LETNIK XX ŠTEVILKA 5/6Jaworski, A. in Coupland, N. (1999). Introduction: Perspectives on Discourse Analysis.V: Adam Jaworski in Nikolas Coupland (ur.), The Discourse Reader, str. 1–44.London: Routledge.Jørgensen, M. in Phillips, L. (2002). Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method.London: Sage.Laclau, E. (1993). Discourse. V: Robert E. Goodin in Philip Pettit (ur.), A Companion toContemporary Political Philosophy, str. 431–437. Oxford: Blackwell.--- (1996a). Emancipation(s). London: Verso.--- (1996b). Deconstruction, Pragmatics, Hegemony. V: Chantal Mouffe (ur.),Deconstruction and Pragmatism, str. 47–68. London: Routledge.--- (1999). Politics, Polemics and Academics: An Interview by Paul Bowman. Parallax5, 2, 93–107.--- (2005). On Populist Reason. London and New York: Verso.--- (2007). Emancipacija/emancipacije. Ljubljana: Založba ZRC.--- (2008). O populističnem umu. Ljubljana: Sophia.Laclau, E. in Mouffe, C. (1987). Hegemonija in socialistična strategija: k radikalnidemokratični politiki. Ljubljana: Partizanska knjiga.--- 1990. Post-Marxism without Apologies. V: Ernesto Laclau (ur.), New Reflections onthe Revolution of Our Time, str. 97–134. London, New York: Verso.Norval, A. (2004). Hegemony After Deconstruction: the Consequences ofUndecidability. Journal of Political Ideologies 9, 2, 139–157.--- (2005). Theorising Hegemony: Between Deconstruction and Psychoanalysis. V:Lars Tønder in Lasse Thomassen (ur.), Radical Democracy: Politics BetweenAboundance and Lack, str. 86–102. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Rorty, R. (1992). The Linguistic Turn: Essays in Philosophical Method: With TwoRetrospective Essays. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Torfing, J. (2005). Discourse Theory: Achievements, Arguments, and Challenges. V:David Howarth in Jacob Torfing (ur.), Discourse Theory in European Politics:Identity, Policy and Governance, str. 1–32. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
TOPOI IN CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSISIgor Ž. ŽagarThe Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA), pioneered by Ruth Wodak (seeWodak, de Cillia, Reisigl, Liebhart, 1999; Wodak, van Dijk, 2000; Wodak,Chilton, 2005; Wodak, Meyer, 2006; Wodak, 2009), is one of the majorbranches of critical discourse analysis (CDA). In its own (programmatic)view, it embraces at least three interconnected aspects:»1. ‘Text or discourse immanent critique’ aims at discovering internalor discourseinternal structures.2. The ‘socio-diagnostic critique’ is concerned with the demystifyingexposure of the possibly persuasive or ‘manipulative’ character of discursivepractices.3. Prognostic critique contributes to the transformation and improvementof communication.« (Wodak, 2006: 65)CDA, in Wodak’s view,»is not concerned with evaluating what is ‘right’ or ‘wrong’. CDA ... shouldtry to make choices at each point in the research itself, and should makethese choices transparent.1 It should also justify theoretically why certaininterpretations of discursive events seem more valid than others.«»One of the methodical ways for critical discourse analysts to minimizethe risk of being biased is to follow the principle of triangulation.Thus one of the most salient distinguishing features of the DHA is itsendeavour to work with different approaches, multimethodically andon the basis of a variety of empirical data as well as backgroundinformation.« (Wodak, 2006: 65)One of the approaches DHA is using in its principle of triangulation isargumentation theory, more specifically the theory of topoi. Being a philosopherby formation, working within the field of argumentation theoryŠOLSKO POLJE LETNIK XX (2009) ŠTEVILKA 5/6 str. 47-73
Page 3: VSEBINA LETNIK XX ŠTEVILKA 5/6 Z
Page 7 and 8: UVODNA NOTICAIgor Ž. ŽagarTole pi
Page 9 and 10: ZA KAJ GRE V KAD - PREGLEDZGODOVINE
Page 11 and 12: ZA KAJ GRE V KAD - PREGLED ZGODOVIN
Page 13: ZA KAJ GRE V KAD - PREGLED ZGODOVIN
Page 27 and 28: DISKURZ: FOUCAULT, LACLAU TERZAPOPA
Page 29 and 30: DISKURZ: FOUCAULT, LACLAU TER ZAPOP
Page 47: DISKURZ: FOUCAULT, LACLAU TER ZAPOP
Page 51 and 52: TOPOI IN CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSI
Page 77 and 78: University of Queensland, Centre fo
Page 79 and 80: JOURNALISTIC (RE)PRODUCTION OF HIST
Page 99 and 100:
JOURNALISTIC (RE)PRODUCTION OF HIST
Page 101 and 102:
JOURNALISTIC (RE)PRODUCTION OF HIST
Page 103 and 104:
THE VOICE OF AN AGENDA-SETTINGAUTHO
Page 105 and 106:
THE VOICE OF AN AGENDA-SETTING AUTH
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
‘68 KOT HKRATNA KRIZA EVROPSKEGAZ
Page 137 and 138:
‘68 KOT HKRATNA KRIZA EVROPSKEGA
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
POVZETKI/ABSTRACTSZA KAJ GRE V KAD
Page 161 and 162:
POVZETKI / ABSTRACTS159NOVINARSKA (
Page 163 and 164:
POVZETKI / ABSTRACTS161‘68 AS PAR
Page 165 and 166:
AVTORJI/AUTHORSRuth WodakRuth Wodak
Page 168 and 169:
166 ŠOLSKO POLJE LETNIK XX ŠTEV
Page 170 and 171:
168 ŠOLSKO POLJE LETNIK XX ŠTEV
Page 172:
ZAHVALARevija Šolsko polje izhaja
show all

Å olsko polje, letnik XX, Å¡tevilka 5-6, 2009: Vloga ... - PedagoÅ¡ki inÅ¡titut

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?