110 ŠOLSKO POLJE LETNIK <strong>XX</strong> ŠTEVILKA 5/6ries. If there was a topic that would fit in more than one category, I includedit in multiple categories 10 and provided charts for every topic’s annualdistribution in Appendix 2. Interestingly enough, the keyword analysisshowed a significant number of direct speech acts (Searle, 1975) or explicitsemi-performatives (Jacobs, 1999) 11 and due to their prominence,I decided to establish a separate ‘performatives’ category. These speechacts, when it comes to the HR, are almost all directives with full power ofperlocution 12 .It was also problematic to decide if the discourse of the OHR startedimmediately upon Dayton in late 1995, in 1996 when it technically started,or in 1998, when the first decisions on removals and laws on national insigniawere passed? After the Office was formed in 1995, the OHR startedwith official press releases in 1996. The first releases were far fewer, lesssophisticated and looked more like news reports. With the Bonn Powersand the strengthened OHR’s mandate in December 1997, Petritsch’s andAshdown’s press releases sounded more similar to political and viceregalspeeches (Kaminsky and Etz, 1999). The discourse of the ensuing Highrepresentatives, Schwarz-Schilling, Lajčak and Inzko, were not analyzed inthis paper.6. Research findingsThe results obtained by looking at keywords of the entire corpus in comparisonto the reference corpus were as follows 13 :1. Wordsmith List of Keywords from the entire corpus (the first 20)N WORDFREQ. UKUPNA.TXT % FREQ. POREDBA1.TXT % KEYNESS P1 THE 44,063 9.45 37,991 5.13 8,167.2 0.0000002 REPRESENTATIVE 3,591 0.77 28 6,543.0 0.0000003 BIH 2,884 0.62 26 5,221.9 0.0000004 HIGH 3,873 0.83 472 0.06 4,854.9 0.0000005 WILL 3,575 0.77 788 0.11 3,457.6 0.0000006 BOSNIA 1,916 0.41 33 3,344.9 0.0000007 HERZEGOVINA 1,728 0.37 27 3,036.3 0.0000008 BRCKO 1,247 0.27 0 2,372.7 0.0000009 FEDERATION 1,193 0.26 9 2,172.6 0.00000010 OHR 1,108 0.24 5 2,048.9 0.00000011 IMPLEMENTATION 1,017 0.22 12 1,815.8 0.00000012 RS 1,001 0.21 14 1,770.2 0.000000
THE VOICE OF AN AGENDA-SETTING AUTHORITY - CONTENT CHARACTERISTICS ...11113 DISTRICT 927 0.20 14 1,631.5 0.00000014 AUTHORITIES 904 0.19 22 1,533.1 0.00000015 AGREEMENT 892 0.19 28 1,473.5 0.00000016 PEACE 855 0.18 27 1,411.3 0.00000017 LAW 1,787 0.38 573 0.08 1,343.7 0.00000018COUNCIL 870 0.19 49 1,320.1 0.00000019 INTERNATIONAL 1,220 0.26 289 0.04 1,129.1 0.00000020 REPRESENTATIVE 674 0.14 22 1,108.1 0.0000002. Wordsmith List of keywords from the press releases’ headlines (the first 20)N WORD FREQ. KIKILIKI.TXT % FREQ. POREDBA1.DOC % KEYNESS P1 REPRESENTATIVE 494 3.71 4 2,761.1 0.0000002 HIGH 522 3.92 58 0.03 2,597.1 0.0000003 BRCKO 197 1.48 0 1,115.3 0.0000004 BIH 190 1.43 26 0.01 919.8 0.0000005 OHR 158 1.19 5 849.9 0.0000006 STATEMENT 94 0.71 9 471.5 0.0000007 DISTRICT 85 0.64 1 469.8 0.0000008 LAW 111 0.83 37 0.02 465.8 0.0000009 SUPERVISOR 77 0.58 0 435.3 0.00000010 FEDERATION 60 0.45 3 315.3 0.00000011 IMPLEMENTATION 57 0.43 1 312.1 0.00000012 COUNCIL 58 0.44 3 304.2 0.00000013 RS 65 0.49 14 295.3 0.00000014 MEETS 51 0.38 0 288.2 0.00000015 COMMISSION 52 0.39 1 284.0 0.00000016 ON 3 23 2.42 1,608 0.76 280.7 0.00000017 MOSTAR 49 0.37 0 276.9 0.00000018 OF 704 5.28 5,570 2.64 261.1 0.00000019 WELCOMES 46 0.35 0 259.9 0.00000020 APPOINTS 42 0.32 0 237.3 0.000000Few addresses to the HR were found in the corpus, or other-people quotations,which justifies this assumption. Some of the topics identified havenot even made it into the ‘keywords’ as can be seen in the examples below.Srebrenica and Hague Tribunal, two very important topics of today,didn’t even make it to the top twenty keywords. They became more pro-
- Page 3:
VSEBINA LETNIK XX ŠTEVILKA 5/6 Z
- Page 7 and 8:
UVODNA NOTICAIgor Ž. ŽagarTole pi
- Page 9 and 10:
ZA KAJ GRE V KAD - PREGLEDZGODOVINE
- Page 11 and 12:
ZA KAJ GRE V KAD - PREGLED ZGODOVIN
- Page 13:
ZA KAJ GRE V KAD - PREGLED ZGODOVIN
- Page 17 and 18:
ZA KAJ GRE V KAD - PREGLED ZGODOVIN
- Page 19 and 20:
ZA KAJ GRE V KAD - PREGLED ZGODOVIN
- Page 21 and 22:
ZA KAJ GRE V KAD - PREGLED ZGODOVIN
- Page 23 and 24:
ZA KAJ GRE V KAD - PREGLED ZGODOVIN
- Page 25 and 26:
ZA KAJ GRE V KAD - PREGLED ZGODOVIN
- Page 27 and 28:
DISKURZ: FOUCAULT, LACLAU TERZAPOPA
- Page 29 and 30:
DISKURZ: FOUCAULT, LACLAU TER ZAPOP
- Page 31 and 32:
DISKURZ: FOUCAULT, LACLAU TER ZAPOP
- Page 33 and 34:
DISKURZ: FOUCAULT, LACLAU TER ZAPOP
- Page 35 and 36:
DISKURZ: FOUCAULT, LACLAU TER ZAPOP
- Page 37 and 38:
DISKURZ: FOUCAULT, LACLAU TER ZAPOP
- Page 39 and 40:
DISKURZ: FOUCAULT, LACLAU TER ZAPOP
- Page 41 and 42:
DISKURZ: FOUCAULT, LACLAU TER ZAPOP
- Page 43 and 44:
DISKURZ: FOUCAULT, LACLAU TER ZAPOP
- Page 45 and 46:
DISKURZ: FOUCAULT, LACLAU TER ZAPOP
- Page 47 and 48:
DISKURZ: FOUCAULT, LACLAU TER ZAPOP
- Page 49 and 50:
TOPOI IN CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSI
- Page 51 and 52:
TOPOI IN CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSI
- Page 53 and 54:
TOPOI IN CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSI
- Page 55 and 56:
TOPOI IN CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSI
- Page 57 and 58:
TOPOI IN CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSI
- Page 59 and 60:
TOPOI IN CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSI
- Page 61 and 62: TOPOI IN CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSI
- Page 63 and 64: TOPOI IN CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSI
- Page 65 and 66: TOPOI IN CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSI
- Page 67 and 68: TOPOI IN CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSI
- Page 69 and 70: TOPOI IN CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSI
- Page 71 and 72: TOPOI IN CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSI
- Page 73 and 74: TOPOI IN CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSI
- Page 75 and 76: TOPOI IN CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSI
- Page 77 and 78: University of Queensland, Centre fo
- Page 79 and 80: JOURNALISTIC (RE)PRODUCTION OF HIST
- Page 81 and 82: JOURNALISTIC (RE)PRODUCTION OF HIST
- Page 83 and 84: JOURNALISTIC (RE)PRODUCTION OF HIST
- Page 85 and 86: JOURNALISTIC (RE)PRODUCTION OF HIST
- Page 87 and 88: JOURNALISTIC (RE)PRODUCTION OF HIST
- Page 89 and 90: JOURNALISTIC (RE)PRODUCTION OF HIST
- Page 91 and 92: JOURNALISTIC (RE)PRODUCTION OF HIST
- Page 93 and 94: JOURNALISTIC (RE)PRODUCTION OF HIST
- Page 95 and 96: JOURNALISTIC (RE)PRODUCTION OF HIST
- Page 97 and 98: JOURNALISTIC (RE)PRODUCTION OF HIST
- Page 99 and 100: JOURNALISTIC (RE)PRODUCTION OF HIST
- Page 101 and 102: JOURNALISTIC (RE)PRODUCTION OF HIST
- Page 103 and 104: THE VOICE OF AN AGENDA-SETTINGAUTHO
- Page 105 and 106: THE VOICE OF AN AGENDA-SETTING AUTH
- Page 107 and 108: THE VOICE OF AN AGENDA-SETTING AUTH
- Page 109 and 110: THE VOICE OF AN AGENDA-SETTING AUTH
- Page 111: THE VOICE OF AN AGENDA-SETTING AUTH
- Page 115 and 116: THE VOICE OF AN AGENDA-SETTING AUTH
- Page 117 and 118: THE VOICE OF AN AGENDA-SETTING AUTH
- Page 119 and 120: THE VOICE OF AN AGENDA-SETTING AUTH
- Page 121 and 122: THE VOICE OF AN AGENDA-SETTING AUTH
- Page 123 and 124: THE VOICE OF AN AGENDA-SETTING AUTH
- Page 125 and 126: THE VOICE OF AN AGENDA-SETTING AUTH
- Page 127 and 128: THE VOICE OF AN AGENDA-SETTING AUTH
- Page 129 and 130: THE VOICE OF AN AGENDA-SETTING AUTH
- Page 131 and 132: THE VOICE OF AN AGENDA-SETTING AUTH
- Page 133 and 134: THE VOICE OF AN AGENDA-SETTING AUTH
- Page 135 and 136: ‘68 KOT HKRATNA KRIZA EVROPSKEGAZ
- Page 137 and 138: ‘68 KOT HKRATNA KRIZA EVROPSKEGA
- Page 139 and 140: ‘68 KOT HKRATNA KRIZA EVROPSKEGA
- Page 141 and 142: ‘68 KOT HKRATNA KRIZA EVROPSKEGA
- Page 143 and 144: ‘68 KOT HKRATNA KRIZA EVROPSKEGA
- Page 145 and 146: ‘68 KOT HKRATNA KRIZA EVROPSKEGA
- Page 147 and 148: ‘68 KOT HKRATNA KRIZA EVROPSKEGA
- Page 149 and 150: ‘68 KOT HKRATNA KRIZA EVROPSKEGA
- Page 151 and 152: ‘68 KOT HKRATNA KRIZA EVROPSKEGA
- Page 153 and 154: ‘68 KOT HKRATNA KRIZA EVROPSKEGA
- Page 155 and 156: ‘68 KOT HKRATNA KRIZA EVROPSKEGA
- Page 157 and 158: ‘68 KOT HKRATNA KRIZA EVROPSKEGA
- Page 159 and 160: POVZETKI/ABSTRACTSZA KAJ GRE V KAD
- Page 161 and 162: POVZETKI / ABSTRACTS159NOVINARSKA (
- Page 163 and 164:
POVZETKI / ABSTRACTS161‘68 AS PAR
- Page 165 and 166:
AVTORJI/AUTHORSRuth WodakRuth Wodak
- Page 168 and 169:
166 ŠOLSKO POLJE LETNIK XX ŠTEV
- Page 170 and 171:
168 ŠOLSKO POLJE LETNIK XX ŠTEV
- Page 172:
ZAHVALARevija Šolsko polje izhaja