Evaluation Of The Provision Of Single Use Citric Acid Sachets To ...
Evaluation Of The Provision Of Single Use Citric Acid Sachets To ... Evaluation Of The Provision Of Single Use Citric Acid Sachets To ...
15vast majority (99%) reported that they usually used the single use sachets instead ofother acidifiers; that they used the sachets “every time” (299, 89%) or “most of the time”(30, 9%) they had injected in the previous three months. Two participants (
16That’s what I learnt from my mates. (35 year old male, Greater Glasgow)Seen others using it. (24 year old male, Greater Glasgow)Almo s t a ll the I DUs inte rvie wed (335, 99%) repo rte d that the y usua lly used no mo re tha n1 sachet per injecting episode. Two hundred and three participants (60%) used 1 sachetper injection, 55 (16%) used three-quarters of a sachet, 74 (22%) used half a sachet, and3 (1%) used less than half a sachet per injection. Two participants (
- Page 1 and 2: Effective Interventions UnitEVALUAT
- Page 3 and 4: iABSTRACTThree hundred and sixty in
- Page 5 and 6: 2diagnosed cases of HIV infected in
- Page 7 and 8: 4and is so ld in poo rly so luble b
- Page 9 and 10: 6CHAPTER 2 METHODOLOGYAims & Object
- Page 11 and 12: 8CHAPTER 3 RESULTSStudy Group Chara
- Page 13 and 14: 10more than any other drug also inj
- Page 15 and 16: 12Table 3.5. Reasons for using curr
- Page 17: 14The next most common eye problem
- Page 21 and 22: 18s imply re turn to the needle ex
- Page 23 and 24: 20rise in the numbe r o f visits is
- Page 25 and 26: 22proposed to amend the misuse of d
- Page 27 and 28: 24the era of needle/syringe exchang
- Page 29 and 30: 26O live r, K. J., S. R . Friedman,
- Page 31 and 32: APPENDIX B: Structured Questionnair
- Page 33 and 34: US ING THE C ITRIC AC ID S ACHETS22
- Page 35 and 36: 37. In the last 3 months, approxima
- Page 37: APPENDIX D: C itric Acid SachetSour
15vast majority (99%) reported that they usually used the single use sachets instead ofother acidifiers; that they used the sachets “every time” (299, 89%) or “most of the time”(30, 9%) they had injected in the previous three months. Two participants (