50 Doing Business <strong>2009</strong>Table 10.2Where is enforcing contracts the most efficient—and where the least?Procedures (number of steps)FewestIreland 20 Guinea 50Singapore 21 Kuwait 50Hong Kong, China 24 United Arab Emirates 50Rwanda 24 Belize 51Austria 25 Iraq 51Belgium 25 Oman 51Netherlands 25 Timor-Leste 51Iceland 26 Sudan 53Luxembourg 26 Syria 55Czech Republic 27 Brunei 58Time (days)Fastestof the court decision. Fully motivated,written court decisions are not needed.The 10 economies with the fastest averagetimes to enforce a contract tend tohave specialized commercial courts orspecialized commercial sections withinexisting courts and limits on the numberand length of adjournments once a casehas started.Reducing entry barriers in the marketfor legal services helps. Allowingwomen to enter the legal profession,for example, can increase competitionamong lawyers and reduce attorneys’MostSlowestSingapore 150 Sri Lanka 1,318Kyrgyz Republic 177 Trinidad and Tobago 1,340Uzbekistan 195 Colombia 1,346Lithuania 210 Slovenia 1,350Hong Kong, China 211 India 1,420New Zealand 216 Bangladesh 1,442Belarus 225 Guatemala 1,459Bhutan 225 Afghanistan 1,642Kazakhstan 230 Suriname 1,715Korea 230 Timor-Leste 1,800Cost (% of claim)LeastBhutan 0.1 Comoros 89.4Iceland 6.2 Cambodia 102.7Luxembourg 8.8 Burkina Faso 107.4United States 9.4 Papua New Guinea 110.3Norway 9.9 Indonesia 122.7Korea 10.3 Malawi 142.4Finland 10.4 Mozambique 142.5China 11.1 Sierra Leone 149.5Poland 12.0 Congo, Dem. Rep. 151.8Hungary 13.0 Timor-Leste 163.2Source: Doing Business database.Mostfees. Saudi Arabia saw its first female lawgraduates—170 of them—in June 2008.The Saudi government is sending thetop 4 to graduate programs abroad, toprepare them to return as the country’sfirst female law professors. Some countriesstill prohibit women from servingas judges. Others have recently startedallowing women on the bench. Bahrain,which did so in 2003, now has 3 femalejudges. And the first female federaljudge was appointed in Abu Dhabi in lateMarch 2008.Who reformed in 2007/08?Twelve economies reformed contract enforcementin 2007/08 (table 10.3). Thereforms reduced the time, cost or numberof steps in court proceedings by introducingspecialized commercial courtsand case management, simplifying rulesfor small cases, streamlining appealsand making enforcement of judgmentsmore efficient.Most reforms took place in EasternEurope and Central Asia—in Armenia,Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, the formerYugoslav Republic of Macedonia andRomania. Among OECD high-incomeeconomies, Austria, Belgium and Portugalreformed. In Africa, Mozambiqueand Rwanda did. In South Asia, Bhutanwas the only economy that improved itscourts in 2007/08. In East Asia, Chinawas the only reformer. The Middle Eastand North Africa had no reforms.Mozambique, the top reformer inenforcing contracts, reduced the averagetime to resolve a commercial disputefrom 1,010 days to 730. The newly establishedcommercial courts have started toproduce results. Since March 2008 thecountry has also gained 22 new judges—a 10% increase. Besides hiring morejudges, Mozambique introduced performancemeasures for them. And courtadministrators now take care of administrativetasks that judges used to handle,such as paying creditors after a publicauction of a debtor’s assets.In the former Yugoslav Republic ofMacedonia, the runner-up reformer, acommercial division of the Skopje civilcourt started operating in November2007, after initial difficulties with allocatingjudges were resolved. Startingin January 2008, all cases have beenelectronically recorded. The Skopje commercialdivision will soon have 15 additionalcomputers to begin electronicregistration of cases.In Rwanda specialized commercialcourts started operating in May 2008.Three lower commercial courts—in Kigaliand in the Northern and SouthernProvinces—cover commercial disputes(c) The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank
ENFORCING CONTRACTS 51Table 10.3Increasing procedural efficiency—the most popular reform feature in 2007/08Increased procedural efficiency at main trialcourtIntroduced or expanded specializedcommercial courtsMade enforcement of judgment more efficientSimplified rules for small claimsEstablished e-courtsStreamlined appealsSource: Doing Business database.with a value below about $37,000. Afourth commercial court, attached tothe high court, handles cases above thatvalue in addition to appeals of decisionsfrom the 3 lower courts. Commercialcourts not only resolve disputes faster;they also bring the needed expertise tocommercial cases.Bulgaria shortened trial times byrequiring judges to refuse incompletecourt filings rather than allow multipleextensions. To ensure compliance withdeadlines, disciplinary sanctions nowapply to judges who systematically violatethem. Bulgaria also reformed its appealsprocess. Appeals are now possibleonly on the basis of newly discoveredfacts and only against judgments exceedinglev 1,000 (about $800). And final appealsbefore the supreme court have beenlimited to substantive issues.Romania simplified the enforcementof judgments by eliminating theneed for an enforcement order and allowingthe attachment of credit balancesand accounts receivable. The reform reducedthe time to enforce a judgment bya month, from 120 days to 95.In Armenia procedural rules thatbecame effective in January 2008 introduceda new principle: all court decisionsbecome enforceable 1 month afterbeing issued. In addition, a May 2007 lawestablished specialized criminal and administrativejurisdictions and a new civilcourt that will deal with the financiallymost important cases.Azerbaijan reduced the average timeto enforce a contract from 267 days to237 by establishing a second specializedArmenia, Belgium, Bulgaria, former YugoslavRepublic of Macedonia, MozambiqueAzerbaijan, former Yugoslav Republic ofMacedonia, RwandaChina, RomaniaBhutan, PortugalAustriaBulgariacommercial court in Baku and increasingthe number of commercial court judgesfrom 5 to 9.In Western Europe, Austria madeelectronic filing mandatory in the civilcourts. All filings from lawyers in civillitigation and enforcement proceedingsnow go through an electronic data channeloperated by the Ministry of Justice.And judgments are delivered by e-mailrather than by the old hard-copy notificationprocess.Belgium adopted a law in 2007 tospeed court procedures. The law introduceda mandatory procedural calendarthat includes binding time limits tosubmit written pleadings. The agendais fixed by the parties or, if they failto agree, by the judge. If judges fail torender a judgment within a month afterhearing a case, they are subject to disciplinarysanctions. A separate law aimsto encourage experts to produce theirreports more quickly by having the courtcontrol the payment of their fees.Portugal expanded the scope of itssimplified proceedings to include allcases with a value up to €30,000.China adopted a new set of proceduralrules. The focus was on speedingthe enforcement of judgments. In EastAsia enforcement accounts for 34% onaverage of the time needed to resolve acommercial dispute—the largest shareamong all regions. In China, enforcing ajudgment takes up almost half the totaltime to resolve a commercial dispute.To reduce the time for enforcement,China’s new rules require parties to disclosetheir assets at the beginning of thecourt procedure. Those refusing to doso may be fined. Enforcement officerscan take measures to prevent partiesfrom concealing or transferring theirassets during or immediately after courtproceedings. And courts can prohibitparties from leaving the country if theyare suspected of trying to escape theenforcement of a decision.In South Asia, Bhutan transferred allland disputes—which account for about30% of cases before the Thimphu districtcourt—to a specialized land commission.The measure freed up more of the court’stime to handle commercial cases. The result:the Thimphu district court reducedthe average time to resolve commercialdisputes from 275 days to 225.What are the reform trends?Reformers considering ways to improvethe regulatory environment for businessesoften shy away from tacklingcourt reforms. This is not surprising. Thesuccess rate of court reforms is low: onaverage, only 1 in 4 attempted reformssucceed in reducing costs and delays.Even successful reforms often take yearsto produce visible results.As a general rule, economies thatrank high on the ease of enforcing contractscontinually reform their courtsto adjust to changing business realities.Denmark is an example. In 2006 it introducedspecial rules for cases below about$8,600. That reduced the number of casesbefore the general courts in Copenhagenby 38%. Reformers did not stop there.In March 2008 a new law introducedmediation after a successful pilot showedthat two-thirds of all cases referred tomediation in 2003–05 resulted in anamicable settlement. The message: stayfocused on improvement, even if you arealready doing well.Introducing commercial courtsin AfricaThe most popular reform feature inAfrica over the past 5 years has beenintroducing specialized commercialcourts or commercial sections within(c) The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank