Contents - AL-Tax
Contents - AL-Tax Contents - AL-Tax
42 3 Overview and Critique of Existing Transfer Pricing Methodsa broad geographic reach, the nexus between geographic location and particularprofit-generating activities is, in the view of many practitioners, not clearly drawn,and standalone firms operating in a single geographic market are not comparableessentially by definition. This perceived lack of fixed correspondence between contributionand location, and the dearth of genuinely comparable standalone firms,effectively precludes other traditional transfer pricing methods as well. In lieu ofthe “separate entity” approach that underlies all the conventional U.S. and OECDtransfer pricing methods, 40 the IRS has more or less endorsed a formulary apportionmentmethodology for certain types of global trading firms. 41In Notice 94–40, issued in 1994, the IRS described certain key characteristicsof Advance Pricing Agreements (APAs) that it has negotiated with taxpayersengaged in the global trading of derivative financial instruments or commoditieson a “functionally fully integrated” basis. According to the Notice, fullyintegrated trading operations manage their business “as one global position forpurposes of risk management rather than several discrete businesses.” The tradingbook is not independently maintained for each trading location, but instead,one book (the “global book”) is passed from one trading location to anotherin the adjacent time zone at the close of each trading day. To facilitate theeffective management of risk, a central credit department monitors the group’scredit-related exposure and establishes credit guidelines and customer creditlimits to be applied by traders in all locations. In addition, in a functionallyfully integrated global trading operation, the book for each product (or groupof products) typically has one head trader who allocates trading limits for eachtrading location and determines guidelines for the book. The head trader is alsoresponsible for the economic performance of that book, and, as such, he or sheis in frequent communication with, and oversees, other traders employed by thecompany.Notice 94–40 is “not intended to prescribe a method or factors that will necessarilyapply in all APAs with functionally fully integrated global trading operations,limit the use of other methods or factors” 42 or be used to allocate the trading profitsof firms that are not functionally fully integrated.The U.S. Treasury Department issued proposed transfer pricing regulationsaddressing transactions among participants in a global dealing operation in 1998. 43For purposes of these proposed regulations, a global dealing operation “consists ofthe execution of customer transactions, including marketing, sales, pricing and risk40 The “separate entity” approach is part and parcel of the arm’s length standard, in that the objectiveis to determine the amount of taxable income that each member of a controlled group wouldearn on a separate, standalone basis.41 See Notice 94–40, Global Trading Advance Pricing Agreements, 1994-1 C.B. 351; 1994 IRBLEXIS 213; 1994-17 I.R.B. 22, April 25, 2004.42 Ibid.43 IRS Proposed Rules on Allocation and Sourcing of Income and Deductions Among TaxpayersEngaged in Global Dealing Operations, REG-208299-90, 63 Fed. Reg. 11177, 3/6/98.
3.7 Global Dealing Regulations and Notice 94–40 43management activities, in a particular financial product or line of financial products,in multiple tax jurisdictions and/or through multiple participants ... The taking ofproprietary positions is not included within the definition of a global dealing operationunless the proprietary positions are entered into by a regular dealer in securitiesin its capacity as such a dealer ...” 44 The proposed global dealing regulations donot encompass commodities, although “the IRS solicit[ed] comments on whetherthese regulations should be extended to cover dealers in commodities ...” 45 To date,these regulations have not been finalized. Moreover, financial transactions in whichmembers of a global dealing operation engage are expressly exempted from theTemporary Regulations issued under Treas. Reg. Section 1.482-9T in 2006, whichmight otherwise have provided useful (and much-needed) guidance:Pending finalization of the global dealing regulations, taxpayers may rely on the proposedglobal dealing regulations, not the temporary services regulations, to govern financial transactionsentered into in connection with a global dealing operation as defined in proposedSection 1.482-8. Therefore, proposed regulations under IRC Section 1.482-9(m)(5) issuedelsewhere in the Federal Register clarify that a controlled services transaction does notinclude a financial transaction entered into in connection with a global dealing operation. 46Hence, global commodities and financial products trading firms have been ina regulatory limbo of sorts with regard to transfer pricing matters. Notice 94–40is not expressly relevant outside the context of an APA, and the proposed globaldealing regulations exempt global traders of non-financial products, as noted, aswell as firms that engage exclusively in proprietary trading activities. Further, theweight that one should attach to proposed regulations, as distinct from temporaryregulations, is somewhat unclear. As such, global trading firms have been facedwith even greater uncertainty in the transfer pricing arena than firms engaged inother types of economic activity (and they were among the first to avail themselvesof the APA option when it was introduced).3.7.2 Description of Notice 94–40 and Proposed Global DealingRegulationsNotice 94–40 states that, in the APAs that the IRS has concluded with functionallyfully integrated global traders, all parties (the IRS, the taxpayer and the relevanttreaty partner) agreed that worldwide income for each global book covered by theAPA should be allocated among the taxpayer’s trading locations pursuant to a profitsplit method that is keyed to three critical factors:44 See Prop. Treas. Reg. Section 1.482-8(a)(2).45 Ibid.46 See IRS Final, Temporary Rules on Services Treatment Under Section 482, Allocation of Incomeand Deductions From Intangibles, Stewardship Expenses, 26 CFR Parts 1 and 31, RIN 45-BB31,1545-AY38, 1545-BC52, “Explanation of Provisions,” Item 12, Coordination with Other TransferPricing Rules – Temp. Treas. Reg. Section 1.482-9T(m).
- Page 2 and 3: Transfer Pricing and Corporate Taxa
- Page 4 and 5: Elizabeth KingBeecher Consulting, L
- Page 6 and 7: AcknowledgementsI have worked with
- Page 8 and 9: xContents3.5.3 SummaryandPracticalI
- Page 10 and 11: xiiContents8.3 Analysis Under Exist
- Page 12 and 13: Part IEconomic and Accounting Rates
- Page 14 and 15: 8 2 Economic vs. Accounting Profit
- Page 16 and 17: 10 2 Economic vs. Accounting Profit
- Page 18 and 19: 12 3 Overview and Critique of Exist
- Page 20 and 21: 14 3 Overview and Critique of Exist
- Page 22 and 23: 16 3 Overview and Critique of Exist
- Page 24 and 25: 18 3 Overview and Critique of Exist
- Page 26 and 27: 20 3 Overview and Critique of Exist
- Page 28 and 29: 22 3 Overview and Critique of Exist
- Page 30 and 31: 24 3 Overview and Critique of Exist
- Page 32 and 33: 26 3 Overview and Critique of Exist
- Page 34 and 35: 28 3 Overview and Critique of Exist
- Page 36 and 37: 30 3 Overview and Critique of Exist
- Page 38 and 39: 32 3 Overview and Critique of Exist
- Page 40 and 41: 34 3 Overview and Critique of Exist
- Page 42 and 43: 36 3 Overview and Critique of Exist
- Page 44 and 45: 38 3 Overview and Critique of Exist
- Page 46 and 47: 40 3 Overview and Critique of Exist
- Page 50 and 51: 44 3 Overview and Critique of Exist
- Page 52 and 53: 46 3 Overview and Critique of Exist
- Page 54 and 55: 48 3 Overview and Critique of Exist
- Page 56 and 57: Chapter 4Some Alternative Approache
- Page 58 and 59: 4.1 Modified Comparable Uncontrolle
- Page 60 and 61: 4.3 Required Return on Debt and Equ
- Page 62 and 63: 4.3 Required Return on Debt and Equ
- Page 64 and 65: 4.3 Required Return on Debt and Equ
- Page 66 and 67: 4.3 Required Return on Debt and Equ
- Page 68 and 69: 4.6 Franchise Model 63relationship
- Page 70 and 71: Part IIICase Studies
- Page 72 and 73: 68 5 Intercompany Sale of Diamonds5
- Page 74 and 75: 70 5 Intercompany Sale of Diamonds
- Page 76 and 77: 72 5 Intercompany Sale of Diamondsa
- Page 78 and 79: 74 5 Intercompany Sale of Diamondsh
- Page 80 and 81: 76 5 Intercompany Sale of Diamondsw
- Page 82 and 83: 78 5 Intercompany Sale of DiamondsI
- Page 84 and 85: 80 5 Intercompany Sale of Diamondss
- Page 86 and 87: 82 5 Intercompany Sale of Diamondsw
- Page 88 and 89: 84 5 Intercompany Sale of DiamondsF
- Page 90 and 91: 86 5 Intercompany Sale of DiamondsT
- Page 92 and 93: 88 5 Intercompany Sale of Diamonds
- Page 94 and 95: 90 6 Intercompany Sale of Medical D
- Page 96 and 97: 92 6 Intercompany Sale of Medical D
3.7 Global Dealing Regulations and Notice 94–40 43management activities, in a particular financial product or line of financial products,in multiple tax jurisdictions and/or through multiple participants ... The taking ofproprietary positions is not included within the definition of a global dealing operationunless the proprietary positions are entered into by a regular dealer in securitiesin its capacity as such a dealer ...” 44 The proposed global dealing regulations donot encompass commodities, although “the IRS solicit[ed] comments on whetherthese regulations should be extended to cover dealers in commodities ...” 45 To date,these regulations have not been finalized. Moreover, financial transactions in whichmembers of a global dealing operation engage are expressly exempted from theTemporary Regulations issued under Treas. Reg. Section 1.482-9T in 2006, whichmight otherwise have provided useful (and much-needed) guidance:Pending finalization of the global dealing regulations, taxpayers may rely on the proposedglobal dealing regulations, not the temporary services regulations, to govern financial transactionsentered into in connection with a global dealing operation as defined in proposedSection 1.482-8. Therefore, proposed regulations under IRC Section 1.482-9(m)(5) issuedelsewhere in the Federal Register clarify that a controlled services transaction does notinclude a financial transaction entered into in connection with a global dealing operation. 46Hence, global commodities and financial products trading firms have been ina regulatory limbo of sorts with regard to transfer pricing matters. Notice 94–40is not expressly relevant outside the context of an APA, and the proposed globaldealing regulations exempt global traders of non-financial products, as noted, aswell as firms that engage exclusively in proprietary trading activities. Further, theweight that one should attach to proposed regulations, as distinct from temporaryregulations, is somewhat unclear. As such, global trading firms have been facedwith even greater uncertainty in the transfer pricing arena than firms engaged inother types of economic activity (and they were among the first to avail themselvesof the APA option when it was introduced).3.7.2 Description of Notice 94–40 and Proposed Global DealingRegulationsNotice 94–40 states that, in the APAs that the IRS has concluded with functionallyfully integrated global traders, all parties (the IRS, the taxpayer and the relevanttreaty partner) agreed that worldwide income for each global book covered by theAPA should be allocated among the taxpayer’s trading locations pursuant to a profitsplit method that is keyed to three critical factors:44 See Prop. Treas. Reg. Section 1.482-8(a)(2).45 Ibid.46 See IRS Final, Temporary Rules on Services Treatment Under Section 482, Allocation of Incomeand Deductions From Intangibles, Stewardship Expenses, 26 CFR Parts 1 and 31, RIN 45-BB31,1545-AY38, 1545-BC52, “Explanation of Provisions,” Item 12, Coordination with Other TransferPricing Rules – Temp. Treas. Reg. Section 1.482-9T(m).