Contents - AL-Tax
Contents - AL-Tax Contents - AL-Tax
158 11 Global Trading of Commoditiesensure access to product are also potentially important intangible assets in a tradingcontext. However, as with its reputation, the Group has historically developed suchrelationships jointly, not through investment per se, but in the ordinary course ofbusiness. (Moreover, in the alumina and aluminum markets in particular, establishedrelationships with customers and suppliers have greatly diminished in value recentlyas a result of China’s substantially reduced role in these markets.)Most trading firms utilize off-the-shelf software developed specifically for tradingapplications, and this Group is no exception. However, the software generallyhas to be extensively customized. Hence, the customization component constitutesan intangible asset of some significance, owned by FP in this case.In sum, FP has created an intangible asset through the customization of software.Expenditures on customization activities are a reasonable approximation ofthe asset’s value: One would not pay more than this amount to purchase the customizationfeatures, because the software engineering work can readily be replicated.11 The Group’s offtake arrangements have largely expired; if this were notthe case, they would also be valuable intangible assets, and ownership should beascribed to the Group member that is the legal counterparty. 12 A reputation forreliability, while a highly valuable intangible asset, has been developed jointly byall members of the Group, and, as such, cannot be used to allocate trading profitsamong members. Established relationships likewise have been developed jointly,and now have de minimis value in any event. More broadly, in circumstances whereone is justified in applying the formulary apportionment method, joint ownershipof intangible assets that are developed in the normal course of business is the rulerather than the exception.Where most intangible assets are jointly developed and owned by all members ofa controlled trading group (as in this case), the allocation of after-tax free cash flowsby entity should be based primarily on each entity’s contribution (or utilization)of capital over the course of the year, and the degree of risk assumed thereby. Asdescribed in the summary of key facts above, in many instances (including thiscase), individual group members have their own designated lines of credit, extendedby third party lenders, and bear the associated interest costs. Under these circumstances,the borrower should retain the after-tax free cash flows earned on all tradesfinanced by drawdowns on its credit lines (out of which it will repay principal andinterest). For swing lines, loans extended to the Group as a whole, or equity capital,the same basic logic applies: The entity that draws on such capital to finance tradesincurs the associated cost of capital, and should retain the associated after-tax freecash flows, out of which it compensates lenders and investors. 1311 The Constructive Cost Model (COCOMO) is a widely used means of estimating software developmentcosts.12 Under the U.S. Temporary Regulations issued in 2006, “[t]he legal owner of an intangible pursuantto the intellectual property law of the relevant jurisdiction ... will be considered the soleowner of the respective intangible ...” See Temp. Treas. Reg. Section 1.482-4T(f)(3)(i)(A).13 To illustrate, consider an extreme case where a single group member provides all of the capitalnecessary to finance transactions, while other group members employ only as much working
11.4 Analysis Under Alternative Regime 159A more readily available proxy for capital employed (and certain types of risksassumed thereby) may serve the same purpose. Commodities trading firms measureand monitor their market risk continuously. 14 They also invest significant resourcesin the development and refinement of risk models and stress testing. 15 Value atrisk (VaR) is one common means of measuring market risk. It entails quantifyingpotential losses resulting from adverse price movements of a given percentage overa specified time horizon. Trading firms generally calculate VaR on a position-bypositionbasis and aggregate these individual measures into an overall risk position.VaR measures jointly capture the amount of capital invested in a given positionand the degree of price risk associated with the position: The larger the investmentand/or the greater the risk (as calibrated by the assumed percentage price change),the higher the VaR, all other things equal. As such, individual group members withlarger VaRs will have a higher cost of capital.VaRs could serve as a proxy for the relative amount of, and risk to, capitalemployed by individual group members, for purposes of allocating after-tax freecash flows among them. Ideally, one would average VaRs over days, rather thanweeks or months, given the fluidity of trading firms’ positions. Such an analysispresupposes that individual group members own limited intangible assets. However,even where this is not the case (e.g., where one group member is the counterparty toan offtake arrangement with discounted pricing), allocations of intangible incomeare more readily handled separately, prior to a VaR-based allocation of the remainingtrading income. (Stated differently, the income allocated to individual group membersas a result of their ownership of intangible assets should be removed from thepool of after-tax free cash flows to be allocated based on average VaRs.) For thispurpose, intangible assets do not need to be valued explicitly. Instead, one needonly estimate the amount of income generated by each such asset during the periodat issue, a much more manageable task. Given the one- or two-step allocation ofcombined after-tax free cash flows based on (a) income generated by intangibleassets and/or (b) average VaRs, it remains to convert such flows into before-tax netincome (see Chapters 4 and 9 for discussions of this issue).It should be noted that VaRs measure market risk, not credit or counterparty risk.However, as the latter risks become more pronounced, trading firms’ measures ofrisk will be refined accordingly. As such, the more general point to be made is thatcapital as is necessary to maintain a staff and premises. The latter members are effectively servicesproviders and should retain only enough free cash flows to compensate the providers of workingcapital in limited quantities. All other free cash flows should accrue to the group member thatfinances transactions, inasmuch as it must pay its shareholders and lenders for the use of theirfunds on a much larger scale.14 For the results of a survey of 17 commodities trading firms’ risk management procedures andpractices, see Commodity Firms Regulatory Capital Working Group, “An Alternative Approach tothe Application of the full CRD to Commodity Firms Active in the EU,” 2006, Appendix 3.15 Stress testing entails assuming dire financial market conditions and determining whether thefirm could withstand these conditions.
- Page 110 and 111: 7.3 Value of Customer Relationships
- Page 112 and 113: 7.3 Value of Customer Relationships
- Page 114 and 115: 7.4 Analysis Under Existing Regime
- Page 116 and 117: 7.5 Analysis Under Alternative Regi
- Page 118 and 119: Chapter 8Replication of Internet-Ba
- Page 120 and 121: 8.1 Summary of Key Facts 117in a se
- Page 122 and 123: 8.3 Analysis Under Existing Regime
- Page 124 and 125: 8.4 Analysis Under Alternative Regi
- Page 126 and 127: 8.5 Conclusions 123USP should also
- Page 128 and 129: 126 9 Sale of Assets with Embedded
- Page 130 and 131: 128 9 Sale of Assets with Embedded
- Page 132 and 133: 130 9 Sale of Assets with Embedded
- Page 134 and 135: 132 9 Sale of Assets with Embedded
- Page 136 and 137: 134 9 Sale of Assets with Embedded
- Page 138 and 139: 136 9 Sale of Assets with Embedded
- Page 140 and 141: 138 10 Provision of CDN Services to
- Page 142 and 143: 140 10 Provision of CDN Services to
- Page 144 and 145: 142 10 Provision of CDN Services to
- Page 146 and 147: 144 10 Provision of CDN Services to
- Page 148 and 149: 146 11 Global Trading of Commoditie
- Page 150 and 151: 148 11 Global Trading of Commoditie
- Page 152 and 153: 150 11 Global Trading of Commoditie
- Page 154 and 155: 152 11 Global Trading of Commoditie
- Page 156 and 157: 154 11 Global Trading of Commoditie
- Page 158 and 159: 156 11 Global Trading of Commoditie
- Page 162 and 163: 160 11 Global Trading of Commoditie
- Page 164 and 165: 162 12 Decentralized Ownership of I
- Page 166 and 167: 164 12 Decentralized Ownership of I
- Page 168 and 169: 166 12 Decentralized Ownership of I
- Page 170 and 171: 168 12 Decentralized Ownership of I
- Page 172 and 173: 170 12 Decentralized Ownership of I
- Page 174 and 175: 172 12 Decentralized Ownership of I
- Page 176 and 177: 174 12 Decentralized Ownership of I
- Page 178 and 179: 176 12 Decentralized Ownership of I
- Page 180 and 181: 178 12 Decentralized Ownership of I
- Page 182 and 183: 180 12 Decentralized Ownership of I
- Page 184 and 185: Chapter 13Concluding ObservationsTh
- Page 186 and 187: 13 Concluding Observations 185The r
- Page 188 and 189: Chapter 1IntroductionNational tax a
- Page 190 and 191: 2 1 Introductionof specific transfe
- Page 192 and 193: 4 1 Introductionvenues. The propose
- Page 194 and 195: 188 IndexBusiness Judgment Rule, 28
- Page 196 and 197: 190 IndexFamily-owned, 81FASB, see
- Page 198 and 199: 192 IndexNumerical standards, 51-52
- Page 200: 194 IndexSwing lines, 149, 154, 158
11.4 Analysis Under Alternative Regime 159A more readily available proxy for capital employed (and certain types of risksassumed thereby) may serve the same purpose. Commodities trading firms measureand monitor their market risk continuously. 14 They also invest significant resourcesin the development and refinement of risk models and stress testing. 15 Value atrisk (VaR) is one common means of measuring market risk. It entails quantifyingpotential losses resulting from adverse price movements of a given percentage overa specified time horizon. Trading firms generally calculate VaR on a position-bypositionbasis and aggregate these individual measures into an overall risk position.VaR measures jointly capture the amount of capital invested in a given positionand the degree of price risk associated with the position: The larger the investmentand/or the greater the risk (as calibrated by the assumed percentage price change),the higher the VaR, all other things equal. As such, individual group members withlarger VaRs will have a higher cost of capital.VaRs could serve as a proxy for the relative amount of, and risk to, capitalemployed by individual group members, for purposes of allocating after-tax freecash flows among them. Ideally, one would average VaRs over days, rather thanweeks or months, given the fluidity of trading firms’ positions. Such an analysispresupposes that individual group members own limited intangible assets. However,even where this is not the case (e.g., where one group member is the counterparty toan offtake arrangement with discounted pricing), allocations of intangible incomeare more readily handled separately, prior to a VaR-based allocation of the remainingtrading income. (Stated differently, the income allocated to individual group membersas a result of their ownership of intangible assets should be removed from thepool of after-tax free cash flows to be allocated based on average VaRs.) For thispurpose, intangible assets do not need to be valued explicitly. Instead, one needonly estimate the amount of income generated by each such asset during the periodat issue, a much more manageable task. Given the one- or two-step allocation ofcombined after-tax free cash flows based on (a) income generated by intangibleassets and/or (b) average VaRs, it remains to convert such flows into before-tax netincome (see Chapters 4 and 9 for discussions of this issue).It should be noted that VaRs measure market risk, not credit or counterparty risk.However, as the latter risks become more pronounced, trading firms’ measures ofrisk will be refined accordingly. As such, the more general point to be made is thatcapital as is necessary to maintain a staff and premises. The latter members are effectively servicesproviders and should retain only enough free cash flows to compensate the providers of workingcapital in limited quantities. All other free cash flows should accrue to the group member thatfinances transactions, inasmuch as it must pay its shareholders and lenders for the use of theirfunds on a much larger scale.14 For the results of a survey of 17 commodities trading firms’ risk management procedures andpractices, see Commodity Firms Regulatory Capital Working Group, “An Alternative Approach tothe Application of the full CRD to Commodity Firms Active in the EU,” 2006, Appendix 3.15 Stress testing entails assuming dire financial market conditions and determining whether thefirm could withstand these conditions.