Contents - AL-Tax

Contents - AL-Tax Contents - AL-Tax

eduart0.tripod.com
from eduart0.tripod.com More from this publisher
11.07.2015 Views

138 10 Provision of CDN Services to Third Partiesbetween origin servers and the Internet (the “First Mile”); (b) the “hosting” segment,consisting of data centers and the network infrastructure that is housed inthese centers; (c) the “backbone” segment, which consists of the fiber connectionsthat link data centers to points of presence (“POPs”) and both public andprivate peering points; and, (d) the connection between end-users and the Internet(provided by Internet Service Providers, or ISPs, and referred to as the “LastMile”). 1 At each of these junctures, latency and reliability problems can and oftendo arise.If a content provider chooses to manage its own Internet-facing infrastructureand does not have sufficient bandwidth, the First Mile can cause significant delays,particularly during periods of traffic surges (for example, in response to short-termInternet marketing campaigns). Data centers, while generally better equipped withbandwidth, also suffer from traffic congestion on a regular basis. The Internet backboneis another common source of delays in data transmission, in part because ofthe complexity of its pathways. Data packets are routed from point to point on thepublic Internet, and each such “hop” requires router processing to determine thesubsequent destination. The number of hops and the potential for sub-optimal routingincreases latency. Moreover, Internet traffic may exceed the capacity of routingequipment. The Last Mile likewise has its own infrastructural shortcomings. Here,too, bandwidth constraints may be a problem. Moreover, peering points betweenISPs may be inefficient or non-functioning.CDN services providers came into being in response to shortcomings in thepublic Internet. In essence, they have knitted together parallel, private Internets,consisting of a large number of edge and storage servers, routers, switches, enablingsoftware and connectivity. These private networks have sufficient capacity and bandwidthto comfortably handle normal loads associated with rich media content, andto manage traffic spikes. CDN services providers also attempt to reduce latencyand bypass congestion entirely by caching (or storing) commonly requested objects(that is, various kinds of rich media content) on servers located in comparativelyclose physical proximity to end-users. Firms in the business of developing richmedia content utilize these alternative methods of delivering such content becausecustomer satisfaction turns on a positive viewing or listening experience, withoutdelays, freezes and other interruptions.First-generation CDN services providers built systems that were less-than-wellsuitedto handle rich media content, which requires the transfer of very large datafiles. Instead, they were built to handle the less data-intensive files initially transmittedover the Internet (e.g., web pages). Second- and third-generation CDN servicesproviders, such as Akamai, Limelight Networks, Level 3 Communications, MirrorImage, VitalStream (acquired by Internap Network Services Corporation) and PantherNetworks, designed systems that could handle a more diverse range of file sizes.To varying degrees, this mandate is manifested in:1 See Mirror Image, Powering Your Web Strategy with CDN Services, April 2007.

10.1 Summary of Key Facts 139 The particular configuration of individual CDN services providers’ edge andstorage servers; The lease of private line backbone capacity from independent companies, suchas Global Crossing, Inc.; Individual providers’ proprietary, internally-developed software that managesthe delivery of content objects, storage and retrieval of customer content libraries,activity logging and information reporting; and, Individual CDN services providers’ peering relationships with broadbandISPs.Akamai is currently the largest North American CDN services provider, withover 22,000 servers deployed globally. However, competing providers are growingrapidly, and count some of the largest multinational content providers amongtheir customers (e.g., Disney, Apple, Amazon.com, eBay, myspace.com, facebook,Microsoft and others). CDN services are marketed via webinars, newsletter sponsorships,trade shows, banner campaigns, cold calls, etc.The Group in this case employs approximately 220 people in sales and marketing,85 people in network engineering, 40 people in research and development(consisting predominantly of software engineers), and 35 people in general andadministrative capacities. Almost all of these individuals (with the exception of 15–18 people) are employed by USP, and are based in the United States. The remainingindividuals are employed by foreign affiliates, and are based overseas. The Grouphas numerous servers, routers and switches deployed throughout North America,Europe and Asia. As noted, foreign affiliates own all infrastructure assets locatedoutside North America (albeit not the proprietary software incorporated into theseassets), while USP owns all infrastructure assets within North America (and all proprietarysoftware used worldwide).As a starting point in our analysis (under both the current and proposed regimes),it is necessary to determine whether USP and its foreign affiliates collectively provideCDN services to third parties, or USP alone provides these services, albeit withthe use of servers, routers and switches owned by its foreign affiliates. We concludethat USP simply accesses network infrastructure assets owned by its foreign affiliatesand is the sole provider of CDN services as such. This conclusion is premisedon the following facts:1. The performance of CDN services requires network engineers, software engineersand administrators, and these individuals are, and will continue to be,employed solely by USP;2. In addition to hardware and enabling software, connectivity is a sine qua nonof CDN services. USP is the contract party on, and bears the cost of, its arm’slength lease of dedicated backbone network assets. It has also negotiated peeringagreements with numerous ISPs, and bears the associated settlement costs;and,3. USP is the contract party on all transactions with third party content providers.

10.1 Summary of Key Facts 139 The particular configuration of individual CDN services providers’ edge andstorage servers; The lease of private line backbone capacity from independent companies, suchas Global Crossing, Inc.; Individual providers’ proprietary, internally-developed software that managesthe delivery of content objects, storage and retrieval of customer content libraries,activity logging and information reporting; and, Individual CDN services providers’ peering relationships with broadbandISPs.Akamai is currently the largest North American CDN services provider, withover 22,000 servers deployed globally. However, competing providers are growingrapidly, and count some of the largest multinational content providers amongtheir customers (e.g., Disney, Apple, Amazon.com, eBay, myspace.com, facebook,Microsoft and others). CDN services are marketed via webinars, newsletter sponsorships,trade shows, banner campaigns, cold calls, etc.The Group in this case employs approximately 220 people in sales and marketing,85 people in network engineering, 40 people in research and development(consisting predominantly of software engineers), and 35 people in general andadministrative capacities. Almost all of these individuals (with the exception of 15–18 people) are employed by USP, and are based in the United States. The remainingindividuals are employed by foreign affiliates, and are based overseas. The Grouphas numerous servers, routers and switches deployed throughout North America,Europe and Asia. As noted, foreign affiliates own all infrastructure assets locatedoutside North America (albeit not the proprietary software incorporated into theseassets), while USP owns all infrastructure assets within North America (and all proprietarysoftware used worldwide).As a starting point in our analysis (under both the current and proposed regimes),it is necessary to determine whether USP and its foreign affiliates collectively provideCDN services to third parties, or USP alone provides these services, albeit withthe use of servers, routers and switches owned by its foreign affiliates. We concludethat USP simply accesses network infrastructure assets owned by its foreign affiliatesand is the sole provider of CDN services as such. This conclusion is premisedon the following facts:1. The performance of CDN services requires network engineers, software engineersand administrators, and these individuals are, and will continue to be,employed solely by USP;2. In addition to hardware and enabling software, connectivity is a sine qua nonof CDN services. USP is the contract party on, and bears the cost of, its arm’slength lease of dedicated backbone network assets. It has also negotiated peeringagreements with numerous ISPs, and bears the associated settlement costs;and,3. USP is the contract party on all transactions with third party content providers.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!