Contents - AL-Tax
Contents - AL-Tax Contents - AL-Tax
8.4 Analysis Under Alternative Regime 121Hence, for purposes of our transfer pricing analysis, we liken USP to a franchisorand FS to a franchisee and determine the former’s arm’s length consideration on thisbasis. However, despite our aggregation of most intercompany transactions, USPshould be separately compensated for certain ongoing services that it will renderto FS, but that franchisors do not routinely provide to their franchisees. Such servicesinclude accounting, tax, HR and legal support services. In contrast, USP’sMarketing and IT Groups’ activities serve primarily to enhance and refine its proprietarybusiness model and systems, and USP should not charge FS a separate feetherefor. Stated differently, USP will be fully compensated for most of these activitiesthrough its franchise fee. 4 Moreover, the regular meetings that USP’s seniorexecutives hold (via conference call) with FS’ Managing Director are similar to themeetings, conferences and newsletters that independent franchisors utilize to transferknow-how and disseminate information on an ongoing basis to their franchisees.As such, USP will be compensated for these latter contributions by means of itsfranchise fee as well.In sum, given the range of intangible assets that USP has transferred to FS, thefact that third parties do not typically license or buy and sell business concepts andsystems in isolation, and the fact that USP’s relationship with FS closely resemblesthat of a franchisor with a franchisee, we conclude that bundling transactionswill yield the most reliable results under the Best Method Rule in this instance. Inanalyzing these bundled transactions, we therefore look to arm’s length franchisearrangements.Bond’s Franchise Guide, an annual publication, is widely considered to be themost comprehensive source of information on U.S. franchises. 5 We developed oursample of comparable arm’s length franchise arrangements through a review of allfranchises included in this Guide and listed in the following categories: Business: Advertising & Promotions Business: Internet/Telecommunications/MiscellaneousThrough this process, we identified five broadly comparable franchise arrangements,summarized briefly below.1. Coupon Cash Saver: A direct mail Internet coupon company. Specializes indesigning ads for customers that increase their sales. Franchisor instructs franchiseeson system, customer acquisition and customer retention. Provides siteselection assistance, cooperative advertising, central data processing, centralizedpurchasing (at additional cost), field operations evaluation, field training andinventory control. Established in 1984. Has ten company-owned units and twofranchised units. Franchisees are required to pay an up-front fee of $9,500 and aroyalty of 6.0% of net sales on an ongoing basis.4 However, USP should be separately compensated for the relatively generic IT maintenance andsupport services that it will render and for the customizaton of its software for the European market.5 Bond, Robert E., Bond’s Franchise Guide (2007 Edition), California: Source Book Publications,2007.
122 8 Replication of Internet-Based Business Model2. RSVP Publications: A direct mail operation that targets upscale consumers.Publications reach approximately 8 million homes. Has over 11,000 clients.Offers extensive training to franchisees. Also provides central purchasing andfield training, organizes regional meetings, and operates an 800 hotline number.Established in 1985. Has no company-owned units and 80 franchised units. Franchiseespay an up-front fee of $30,000 and a royalty of 7.0% of net sales on anongoing basis.3. Impressions on Hold: An advertising company tied to the telecommunicationsindustry. Franchisees enable businesses to use the “on-hold” time of their phonesystem as a marketing tool. Franchisor provides central data processing, centralpurchasing, field operations evaluation and field training, publishes a franchiseenewsletter, organizes regional meetings (at additional cost) and operates an 800hotline number. Franchisees are required to pay an up-front fee of $47,000 anda running royalty of 4.0% of net sales. Franchisees must also contribute 1.0% ofnet sales to an advertising fund.4. Netspace: Consults with companies to help build their business. Utilizes technologyavailable through the Internet. Assists clients to increase sales, reduce costsand improve customer communications. Provides initial and quarterly training,central data processing, central purchasing, field operations evaluation and fieldtraining, assistance with initial store opening and inventory control (at additionalcost); publishes a franchisee newsletter, organizes regional meetings and operatesan 800 hotline number. Established in 1996. Has 40 franchised units and 1company-owned unit. Franchisees are required to pay an up-front fee of $39,500and a running royalty of 10.0% of net sales. Franchisees must also contribute1.0% of net sales to an advertising fund.5. WSI Consulting and Education: Franchisees assist clients (small and mediumsizedbusinesses) to assess their Internet needs and develop a customized Internetmarketing solution. Provides at additional cost central data processing, centralpurchasing, field operations evaluation and assistance with initial store opening;provides at no additional cost an 800 hotline number, publishes a franchiseenewsletter and organizes national meetings. Has 1,998 franchised units and 2company-owned units. Franchisees are required to pay a one-time fee of $49,700and a running royalty of 10.0% of net sales.The above sample of comparable B2B arm’s length franchise arrangements indicatesthat running royalties range from 4.0% to 10.0% of net sales, and entitlefranchisees to (a) initial training, (b) access to an established business model, (c)rights to use franchisors’ other intellectual property, and (d) certain limited ongoingsupport services. One-time fees range from $9,500 to $49,700.USP’s operations most closely resemble those of Coupon Cash Saver, Netspaceand WSI Consulting & Education, in terms of both mandate and medium. In contrast,Impressions On Hold’s direct marketing activities are tied to the telecommunicationsindustry, and RSVP Publications’ activities are tied to traditional hardcopypublishing. Based on these considerations, we conclude that USP should chargerunning royalty fees of 8%–10% of FS’ net sales.
- Page 74 and 75: 70 5 Intercompany Sale of Diamonds
- Page 76 and 77: 72 5 Intercompany Sale of Diamondsa
- Page 78 and 79: 74 5 Intercompany Sale of Diamondsh
- Page 80 and 81: 76 5 Intercompany Sale of Diamondsw
- Page 82 and 83: 78 5 Intercompany Sale of DiamondsI
- Page 84 and 85: 80 5 Intercompany Sale of Diamondss
- Page 86 and 87: 82 5 Intercompany Sale of Diamondsw
- Page 88 and 89: 84 5 Intercompany Sale of DiamondsF
- Page 90 and 91: 86 5 Intercompany Sale of DiamondsT
- Page 92 and 93: 88 5 Intercompany Sale of Diamonds
- Page 94 and 95: 90 6 Intercompany Sale of Medical D
- Page 96 and 97: 92 6 Intercompany Sale of Medical D
- Page 98 and 99: 94 6 Intercompany Sale of Medical D
- Page 100 and 101: 96 6 Intercompany Sale of Medical D
- Page 102 and 103: 98 6 Intercompany Sale of Medical D
- Page 104 and 105: Chapter 7Performance of Intercompan
- Page 106 and 107: 7.1 Summary of Key Facts 103orders,
- Page 108 and 109: 7.3 Value of Customer Relationships
- Page 110 and 111: 7.3 Value of Customer Relationships
- Page 112 and 113: 7.3 Value of Customer Relationships
- Page 114 and 115: 7.4 Analysis Under Existing Regime
- Page 116 and 117: 7.5 Analysis Under Alternative Regi
- Page 118 and 119: Chapter 8Replication of Internet-Ba
- Page 120 and 121: 8.1 Summary of Key Facts 117in a se
- Page 122 and 123: 8.3 Analysis Under Existing Regime
- Page 126 and 127: 8.5 Conclusions 123USP should also
- Page 128 and 129: 126 9 Sale of Assets with Embedded
- Page 130 and 131: 128 9 Sale of Assets with Embedded
- Page 132 and 133: 130 9 Sale of Assets with Embedded
- Page 134 and 135: 132 9 Sale of Assets with Embedded
- Page 136 and 137: 134 9 Sale of Assets with Embedded
- Page 138 and 139: 136 9 Sale of Assets with Embedded
- Page 140 and 141: 138 10 Provision of CDN Services to
- Page 142 and 143: 140 10 Provision of CDN Services to
- Page 144 and 145: 142 10 Provision of CDN Services to
- Page 146 and 147: 144 10 Provision of CDN Services to
- Page 148 and 149: 146 11 Global Trading of Commoditie
- Page 150 and 151: 148 11 Global Trading of Commoditie
- Page 152 and 153: 150 11 Global Trading of Commoditie
- Page 154 and 155: 152 11 Global Trading of Commoditie
- Page 156 and 157: 154 11 Global Trading of Commoditie
- Page 158 and 159: 156 11 Global Trading of Commoditie
- Page 160 and 161: 158 11 Global Trading of Commoditie
- Page 162 and 163: 160 11 Global Trading of Commoditie
- Page 164 and 165: 162 12 Decentralized Ownership of I
- Page 166 and 167: 164 12 Decentralized Ownership of I
- Page 168 and 169: 166 12 Decentralized Ownership of I
- Page 170 and 171: 168 12 Decentralized Ownership of I
- Page 172 and 173: 170 12 Decentralized Ownership of I
8.4 Analysis Under Alternative Regime 121Hence, for purposes of our transfer pricing analysis, we liken USP to a franchisorand FS to a franchisee and determine the former’s arm’s length consideration on thisbasis. However, despite our aggregation of most intercompany transactions, USPshould be separately compensated for certain ongoing services that it will renderto FS, but that franchisors do not routinely provide to their franchisees. Such servicesinclude accounting, tax, HR and legal support services. In contrast, USP’sMarketing and IT Groups’ activities serve primarily to enhance and refine its proprietarybusiness model and systems, and USP should not charge FS a separate feetherefor. Stated differently, USP will be fully compensated for most of these activitiesthrough its franchise fee. 4 Moreover, the regular meetings that USP’s seniorexecutives hold (via conference call) with FS’ Managing Director are similar to themeetings, conferences and newsletters that independent franchisors utilize to transferknow-how and disseminate information on an ongoing basis to their franchisees.As such, USP will be compensated for these latter contributions by means of itsfranchise fee as well.In sum, given the range of intangible assets that USP has transferred to FS, thefact that third parties do not typically license or buy and sell business concepts andsystems in isolation, and the fact that USP’s relationship with FS closely resemblesthat of a franchisor with a franchisee, we conclude that bundling transactionswill yield the most reliable results under the Best Method Rule in this instance. Inanalyzing these bundled transactions, we therefore look to arm’s length franchisearrangements.Bond’s Franchise Guide, an annual publication, is widely considered to be themost comprehensive source of information on U.S. franchises. 5 We developed oursample of comparable arm’s length franchise arrangements through a review of allfranchises included in this Guide and listed in the following categories: Business: Advertising & Promotions Business: Internet/Telecommunications/MiscellaneousThrough this process, we identified five broadly comparable franchise arrangements,summarized briefly below.1. Coupon Cash Saver: A direct mail Internet coupon company. Specializes indesigning ads for customers that increase their sales. Franchisor instructs franchiseeson system, customer acquisition and customer retention. Provides siteselection assistance, cooperative advertising, central data processing, centralizedpurchasing (at additional cost), field operations evaluation, field training andinventory control. Established in 1984. Has ten company-owned units and twofranchised units. Franchisees are required to pay an up-front fee of $9,500 and aroyalty of 6.0% of net sales on an ongoing basis.4 However, USP should be separately compensated for the relatively generic IT maintenance andsupport services that it will render and for the customizaton of its software for the European market.5 Bond, Robert E., Bond’s Franchise Guide (2007 Edition), California: Source Book Publications,2007.