Contents - AL-Tax
Contents - AL-Tax Contents - AL-Tax
7.3 Value of Customer Relationships 107customers (although disks and drives are customized). This is necessarily the casein part because customers routinely dual-source. Moreover, firms must comportwith certain industry standards, as noted. 7 Additionally, disk drive suppliers’ andmagnetic disk suppliers’ extremely high fixed costs make it imperative to produceat the highest volume possible, in order to exploit economies of scale. The need togain and maintain market share further contributes to intense price competition; itis in individual firms’ interest to produce at any price that covers its variable costsand some fraction (even a very small fraction) of its fixed costs. While incurring aloss at such prices, firms will nonetheless reduce the loss (equal to fixed costs) thatthey would otherwise bear.The factors discussed above—homogenous products and high fixed costs—arewidely recognized and relatively generic factors contributing to price competition.Additionally, a variety of industry-specific factors heighten competition in the marketsfor magnetic disks and disk drives. In both markets, certain suppliers are verticallyintegrated or horizontally diversified, as noted. More specifically, certain manufacturersof disk drives also manufacture other computer components and/or sellcomputers; certain manufacturers of magnetic disks also manufacture disk drives.Integrated suppliers are able to price disk drives or magnetic disks very aggressivelyand recoup profits on other components or complete systems. Moreover, those diskdrive suppliers (and computer manufacturers) that both manufacture and externallysource disks (or disk drives), and have underutilized capacity, will only purchaseexternally if the purchase price is lower than their own manufacturing costs.The volatility of demand for magnetic disks and disk drives further contributesto price competition. As noted, demand for computer and storage systems and consumerelectronics products is closely correlated with broad, macroeconomic trends,and demand for magnetic disks and disk drives is derived therefrom. As such, itrises and falls with business cycles. The cycling of demand for magnetic disks anddisk drives is exacerbated on the upside by manufacturers’ practice of hoarding corecomponents in anticipation of shortages, and on the downside by the rapid buildupof excess inventories and firms’ efforts to liquidate these stocks. The introduction ofnew operating systems or semiconductor improvements can also exaggerate swingsin demand.As discussed below in greater detail, the rate of technological change isextremely rapid in the computer, disk drive and magnetic media industries. As acorollary, the rate of obsolescence is similarly high. As disk drives and disks held instock become obsolete, firms price these products extremely aggressively. Finally,highly concentrated customer bases are another important factor contributing toprice competitiveness in the disk drive and magnetic disk markets. 8 This state of7 As such, suppliers are unable to differentiate their products significantly, one common means ofameliorating pricing pressures by circumventing head-to-head competition.8 As Seagate Technology puts it, “[s]ome of our key customers, including Hewlett-Packard, Dell,EMC, Microsoft and IBM, account for a large portion of our disk drive revenue.” See SeagateTechnology’s Form 10-K filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission for its fiscal year2006.
108 7 Performance of Intercompany Servicesaffairs, coupled with the fact that suppliers intermittently have excess capacity,means that customers can exercise a significant amount of market power vis-a-vistheir suppliers. As expressed by Western Digital Corporation, “[c]ustomers have avariety of suppliers to choose from and therefore can make substantial demands onus, including demands on product pricing and on contractual terms ....” 97.3.2 Rapid Rates of Technological ChangeThe introduction of new products is a common form of non-price competition. If agiven firm is first to market with a new disk drive or magnetic disk with expandedfunctionality, it will make substantial gains in market share and realize the associatedscale economies. New product introductions are also a means of counterbalancingdeclining prices over the life cycle of a product. At any point in time, asupplier’s revenue stream is a volume-weighted average of revenues earned on thesale of products at various phases of their respective life cycles.There are also several factors specific to the computer industry that motivate verylarge investments in R&D throughout the supply chain. Demand for computers isdriven in large part by new functionality (greater storage capacity, faster computingspeed, faster access to data, higher screen resolution, greater reliability, etc.). Suchimprovements render installed systems obsolete. Stated differently, the economicallyuseful lives of computers must be significantly shorter than their physical livesto sustain the current level of demand for computers. The functionality of computersdepends principally on the functionality of disk drives (and certain other componentry).The functionality of disk drives, in turn, is highly dependent on the areal densityof magnetic media (the number of bits that can be stored per square inch of disk),as is evident in a general sense from Western Digital Corporation’s commentary:[T]he success of our [disk drive] products depends on our ability to gain access to andintegrate parts [magnetic media and heads] that are “best in class” from reliable componentsuppliers. 10This technological interdependence throughout the supply chain induces computermanufacturers and disk drive manufacturers to exert a great deal of pressure ontheir respective suppliers to innovate continuously. Moreover, because components(e.g., disks and heads) must be compatible, technological innovations must be synchronized.Such alignment of “product roadmaps” requires very close collaborationbetween computer manufacturers and disk drive suppliers, on the one hand, and diskdrive suppliers and magnetic media (and head) suppliers, on the other.9 See Western Digital Corporation’s Form 10-K filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission,covering its 2006 taxable year.10 Ibid, p. 26.
- Page 60 and 61: 4.3 Required Return on Debt and Equ
- Page 62 and 63: 4.3 Required Return on Debt and Equ
- Page 64 and 65: 4.3 Required Return on Debt and Equ
- Page 66 and 67: 4.3 Required Return on Debt and Equ
- Page 68 and 69: 4.6 Franchise Model 63relationship
- Page 70 and 71: Part IIICase Studies
- Page 72 and 73: 68 5 Intercompany Sale of Diamonds5
- Page 74 and 75: 70 5 Intercompany Sale of Diamonds
- Page 76 and 77: 72 5 Intercompany Sale of Diamondsa
- Page 78 and 79: 74 5 Intercompany Sale of Diamondsh
- Page 80 and 81: 76 5 Intercompany Sale of Diamondsw
- Page 82 and 83: 78 5 Intercompany Sale of DiamondsI
- Page 84 and 85: 80 5 Intercompany Sale of Diamondss
- Page 86 and 87: 82 5 Intercompany Sale of Diamondsw
- Page 88 and 89: 84 5 Intercompany Sale of DiamondsF
- Page 90 and 91: 86 5 Intercompany Sale of DiamondsT
- Page 92 and 93: 88 5 Intercompany Sale of Diamonds
- Page 94 and 95: 90 6 Intercompany Sale of Medical D
- Page 96 and 97: 92 6 Intercompany Sale of Medical D
- Page 98 and 99: 94 6 Intercompany Sale of Medical D
- Page 100 and 101: 96 6 Intercompany Sale of Medical D
- Page 102 and 103: 98 6 Intercompany Sale of Medical D
- Page 104 and 105: Chapter 7Performance of Intercompan
- Page 106 and 107: 7.1 Summary of Key Facts 103orders,
- Page 108 and 109: 7.3 Value of Customer Relationships
- Page 112 and 113: 7.3 Value of Customer Relationships
- Page 114 and 115: 7.4 Analysis Under Existing Regime
- Page 116 and 117: 7.5 Analysis Under Alternative Regi
- Page 118 and 119: Chapter 8Replication of Internet-Ba
- Page 120 and 121: 8.1 Summary of Key Facts 117in a se
- Page 122 and 123: 8.3 Analysis Under Existing Regime
- Page 124 and 125: 8.4 Analysis Under Alternative Regi
- Page 126 and 127: 8.5 Conclusions 123USP should also
- Page 128 and 129: 126 9 Sale of Assets with Embedded
- Page 130 and 131: 128 9 Sale of Assets with Embedded
- Page 132 and 133: 130 9 Sale of Assets with Embedded
- Page 134 and 135: 132 9 Sale of Assets with Embedded
- Page 136 and 137: 134 9 Sale of Assets with Embedded
- Page 138 and 139: 136 9 Sale of Assets with Embedded
- Page 140 and 141: 138 10 Provision of CDN Services to
- Page 142 and 143: 140 10 Provision of CDN Services to
- Page 144 and 145: 142 10 Provision of CDN Services to
- Page 146 and 147: 144 10 Provision of CDN Services to
- Page 148 and 149: 146 11 Global Trading of Commoditie
- Page 150 and 151: 148 11 Global Trading of Commoditie
- Page 152 and 153: 150 11 Global Trading of Commoditie
- Page 154 and 155: 152 11 Global Trading of Commoditie
- Page 156 and 157: 154 11 Global Trading of Commoditie
- Page 158 and 159: 156 11 Global Trading of Commoditie
108 7 Performance of Intercompany Servicesaffairs, coupled with the fact that suppliers intermittently have excess capacity,means that customers can exercise a significant amount of market power vis-a-vistheir suppliers. As expressed by Western Digital Corporation, “[c]ustomers have avariety of suppliers to choose from and therefore can make substantial demands onus, including demands on product pricing and on contractual terms ....” 97.3.2 Rapid Rates of Technological ChangeThe introduction of new products is a common form of non-price competition. If agiven firm is first to market with a new disk drive or magnetic disk with expandedfunctionality, it will make substantial gains in market share and realize the associatedscale economies. New product introductions are also a means of counterbalancingdeclining prices over the life cycle of a product. At any point in time, asupplier’s revenue stream is a volume-weighted average of revenues earned on thesale of products at various phases of their respective life cycles.There are also several factors specific to the computer industry that motivate verylarge investments in R&D throughout the supply chain. Demand for computers isdriven in large part by new functionality (greater storage capacity, faster computingspeed, faster access to data, higher screen resolution, greater reliability, etc.). Suchimprovements render installed systems obsolete. Stated differently, the economicallyuseful lives of computers must be significantly shorter than their physical livesto sustain the current level of demand for computers. The functionality of computersdepends principally on the functionality of disk drives (and certain other componentry).The functionality of disk drives, in turn, is highly dependent on the areal densityof magnetic media (the number of bits that can be stored per square inch of disk),as is evident in a general sense from Western Digital Corporation’s commentary:[T]he success of our [disk drive] products depends on our ability to gain access to andintegrate parts [magnetic media and heads] that are “best in class” from reliable componentsuppliers. 10This technological interdependence throughout the supply chain induces computermanufacturers and disk drive manufacturers to exert a great deal of pressure ontheir respective suppliers to innovate continuously. Moreover, because components(e.g., disks and heads) must be compatible, technological innovations must be synchronized.Such alignment of “product roadmaps” requires very close collaborationbetween computer manufacturers and disk drive suppliers, on the one hand, and diskdrive suppliers and magnetic media (and head) suppliers, on the other.9 See Western Digital Corporation’s Form 10-K filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission,covering its 2006 taxable year.10 Ibid, p. 26.