Percent (between 0 to 1) / $100 spent0.120.10.080.060.040.020Fruits andvegetablesDairyproductsEggsFish andseafoodBeef, pork,poultry, andother meatsBeef Pork PoultryFigure 1: Percent of <strong>Food</strong>borne Illnesses Traced to <strong>Food</strong> Groups per $100 Spentshould be treated, we are also debating the safety of our food. In the next section, weexplore the ways in which animal well-being can be improved and the concomitantchange in food safety we should expect.Natural Animal Behaviors and Safe <strong>Food</strong>Animal scientists and consumers often have different notions about what makesfor a happy animal. According to many animal scientists in the U.S., high welfare primarilyrequires a clean, healthy environment where animals are provided with all theirphysiological needs, are provided adequate shelter and are protected from predators.According to this perspective, there are synergies between animal welfare and foodsafety, as both can be provided in the same environment.According to our survey work, roughly 40 percent of Americans agree with this perspective(another 11 percent say they care little about the well-being of farm animals).This leaves 48 percent of Americans who disagree with our depiction of the animalscientists’ view, and believe animals must also be allowed to exhibit natural behaviorsif they are to experience high levels of well-being. 9 These behaviors include the abilityto move around freely, access to the outdoors and the opportunity to socialize withanimals of their species.Allowing free expression of natural animal behaviors should reduce stress in theanimal, and as a consequence may 10 (but may not 11 ) reduce the shedding of pathogens.12 These improvements, however, often come at a cost. Layers raised in a cagefreesetting can suffer from injury by other hens, creating stress and even death. Sowsmoved from a gestation stall into a group pen can now turn around freely, but mayturn to encounter an aggressive sow—again, creating stress. We once visited a free-rangeegg farm where the birds had access to pasture but were continually preyed upon byhawks—this fear would certainly create stress. While there is no guarantee that theseimprovements are good for animal welfare or food safety, most published researchcontends that replacing battery cages with cage-free systems (or enhanced cages) 13and converting gestation stalls to group pens 14 improve animal welfare. And if animalwelfare is improved, it is reasonable to believe stress and the shedding of pathogensare lowered—but there are no guarantees. We once talked to an egg farmer raising bothcaged and cage-free eggs, and his employees would not eat the eggs from the cage-freesystem, believing the difficulty of identifying and culling sick hens in a cage-free systemmakes the average egg more risky to eat.The relationship between animal well-being and food safety becomes more complexwhen a farm uses a free-range system, where animals have access to both comfortableshelter and the outdoors. Hogs love mud, and mud is rarely sterile. Hogs eagerlyroot and engage in continuous social interactions. While such a “natural” setting islikely to increase animal well-being in one dimension, it may also make a hog sick, ashogs can more easily come into contactwith the feces of other hogs and wildlife,as well as a broad array of worms andother parasites not normally found ona concrete floor. Increased prospects fordisease, infection and parasites can turn ahappy hog into a sick hog.One of the original motivations forconfining hogs to concrete floors insidebuildings (i.e., today’s conventional hogfarm) was to separate hogs from parasitesand pathogens. Lungworms wereonce found in at least one-half of hogsin the 1940s, but today the parasite is ararity. The same can be said for kidneyworms. Pork was once thought dangerousto eat if undercooked. The threatwas trichinosis—another threat that istoday almost nonexistent. 15, 16 Farmersonce deliberately raised hogs in the samepastures as cows, knowing hogs wouldeat undigested grain from cow feces.Chickens would do the same. 17 An eggstudy found greater Salmonella contaminationin free-range eggs, probably dueto the easy access rodents have to thechicken feed. Not only do the rodentsdefecate in the chicken feed, but “micedroppings can be actively sought outby birds when mixed in the feed and orbedding because of their seed-like sizeand appearance.” 18 However pleasant thesmall, diversified farm seems, most consumersdon’t like to eat animals that atethe feces of other animals. Farmers didnot confine animals to cramped cageson hard floors out of malevolence butto reduce parasites and disease. Animalwelfare may be compromised by confinement,but animal health is improved,and with it food safety.Comparing hog health today with 70years ago isn’t an entirely fair comparison.Given the scientific advancementsin animal production since the 1940s,it might be possible to allow hogs outdooraccess without the concomitantpathogens and parasites experienced bythe 1940 farmer. Yet even today, researchfinds that hogs given outdoor accessexperience higher rates of Salmonella,Toxoplasma and Trichinella than hogson conventional farms. 19, 20 In outdoorsystems, Salmonella is spread throughsows’ wallowing in the same mudhole, 2150 F o o d S a f e t y M a g a z i n e
presenting a dilemma for farmers whowant to produce safe pork in an outdoorenvironment.Free-range systems for layers andbroilers face similar problems. Some ofthese systems confine the birds at nightin large cages on wheels, taking the birdsto different locations where they mayforage naturally. This more “natural”existence, however, brings the birds incontact with the feces of deer, rodentsand feral hogs, and because these wildanimals can contaminate vegetables withSalmonella, 22 then free-range poultry canbe contaminated also. Free-range poultryoften share the pasture with cattle, sheepor goats, allowing cross-contaminationbetween species.Scientists have measured Salmonellaprevalence in poultry meat derived frompasture and organic systems, and tend tofind the rates are comparable or higherthan in conventionally produced poultrymeat. 23 Another study tested broilerchickens for Salmonella and found that60 percent from an organic-free rangeproducer tested positive, leading them to conclude, “Consumers should not assumethat free-range or organic conditions will have anything to do with the Salmonellastatus of the chicken.” 24 While organic meats are generally more contaminated withpathogens, those pathogens are less likely to be resistant to antibiotics, so it is difficultto say whether organic meats are riskier to eat. 25 The point is that one cannot assumeorganics are safer.Other articles on the welfare-safety link 26 considered animal treatment beforeslaughter, so we concentrate on other production stages in this paper. Contrary toother discussions on this issue, we also ignore antibiotic resistance in livestock. Thereis a widely held notion that animals can be raised in cramped confinement only ifthey are routinely fed antibiotics to prevent the spread of disease. This does not seemto be the case. Our European contacts testify that the ban on antibiotics in Sweden,Denmark, the United Kingdom and other nations has not altered the production systemsused. 27Consumer PerceptionsPerceptions of food safety are just as important as actual safety, insofar as drivingconsumer choice and retail sales. <strong>Food</strong> producers face a daunting challenge. Notonly must they raise live animals that are naturally covered with bacteria, viruses andprions, and then transform the animal products into safe foods, producers must convincethe public that the food is safe. Their success is already astonishing if not publiclyacknowledged—for every 39 million Americans, only 1 will die of a food-relatedillness, and he or she is typically very old, very young or has a compromised immunesystem. 28 However, food activists will go to great lengths to convince the public theirfood is unsafe, so livestock industries must not only battle bacteria and germs but sensationalizedinformation as well.Our new Autoplate ® Spiral Plating System: the hot new lab accessory.Now you can spiral plate bacteria with blazing speed and performance that other platers can’t touch.Our new Autoplate delivers 35-second cycle times with three new spiral plating modes. Its innovativeauto-clean capability avoids cross-contamination. And it offers a quick learning curve plus state-of-the-artease of use via an intuitive Windows ® CE touchscreen. Get automated plating productivity fromAdvanced Instruments that’s so hot, it’s really cool!www.aicompanies.com/Auto1 +1 781.320.90001318002 Autoplate<strong>Food</strong><strong>Safety</strong>.indd 1 1/8/13 9:39 AMF e b r u a r y • M a r c h 2 0 1 3 51
- Page 4 and 5: February/March 2013Vol. 19, No. 1FE
- Page 6: Editor’s LetterWe at Food Safety
- Page 10 and 11: USDA Seeks Comments on ProposedFroz
- Page 12: TestingBy Katerina Mastovska, Ph.D.
- Page 15 and 16: Testingheat treatment, the toxins c
- Page 17 and 18: staying connectedto your data hasne
- Page 19 and 20: PROCESS CONTROL1. Scope2. Normative
- Page 21 and 22: SANITATIONapproach, 1, 2 while effe
- Page 23 and 24: SANITATIONis a matter of legal liab
- Page 25 and 26: Accreditationment undertaken by the
- Page 27 and 28: AccreditationFood Microbiological L
- Page 29 and 30: MANAGEMENTcertain spices. As no acc
- Page 31 and 32: MANAGEMENTtook so long to be resolv
- Page 33 and 34: Choose ConfidenceChoose Confidence
- Page 35 and 36: Special advertising supplement pres
- Page 37 and 38: AccuracyQualitySafetyHACCP Monitori
- Page 39 and 40: THE SANITARY CHOICEFOR FOOD SAFETYT
- Page 41 and 42: Specialists in Food & BeverageSampl
- Page 44 and 45: PACKAGING(continued from page 34)fo
- Page 46 and 47: Animal Welfareand Food SafetyBy F.
- Page 48 and 49: Animals versus PlantsBefore discuss
- Page 52 and 53: Despite developments in traceabilit
- Page 54 and 55: INGREDIENTSBy Rupa Das, M.Sc.Qualit
- Page 56 and 57: SEAFOODBy Gary P. Richards, Ph.D.,
- Page 58 and 59: SEAFOODfoods is essential to reduci
- Page 60 and 61: SEAFOOD(infectious and noninfectiou
- Page 62 and 63: Product ShowcaseShelf-Life Extender
- Page 64 and 65: Coupler BrakeForce Control Industri
- Page 66 and 67: Advertisers IndexAdvanced Instrumen
- Page 68 and 69: Allergens LabeledSanitation Verifie
- Page 70 and 71: Solutions for Today,Planning for To
- Page 72 and 73: keynote theatre special events2013
- Page 74 and 75: WORKSHOPS • TUESDAY, APRIL 30WORK
- Page 76 and 77: Sessions • WednESDAY, May 1SESSIO
- Page 78 and 79: Sessions • WednESDAY, May 1SESSIO
- Page 80 and 81: Sessions • ThurSDAY, May 2SESSION
- Page 82 and 83: Exhibit hall — where solutions ar
- Page 84: 155 N. Pfingsten Rd., Suite 205Deer