PACKAGING(continued from page 34)food production, creating additionalvalues from biomass. Edible coatingsand films are not studied with the aim ofsubstituting traditional packaging materials.Due to their distinctive properties,they can be used to provide additionalfunctionalities to the food. <strong>Food</strong> preservationcan be therefore improved,and one may also reduce the cost andamount of traditional packaging used.The biopolymer used to develop ediblefilms and coatings is usually based onhydrocolloids, such as polysaccharideslike cellulose, starch, alginates, chitosan,gums, pectins and proteins, from vegetableor animal origin. Their functionalproperties can be used to modify the barrierto gases and moisture and, in moreadvanced developments, serve as carriersof food additives and nutrients. Blendsor composites with other additives andfillers are also developed to optimizethe barrier properties or to control therelease kinetics of substance. 8The most important property thesenatural biopolymers must possess is thepossibility of forming films with suitablemechanical and barrier properties. Thechemical, molecular and supramolecularstructures are, therefore, important featuresof natural biopolymers that permitdesign of the physicochemical propertiesof the films as well as the processingtechnology for the manufacture of theproducts.Cellulose and cellulose derivatives,obtained by chemical substitution ofsome hydroxyl groups along the chain,permit development of films with ionicproperties (carboxymethylcellulose) andnonionic cellulose ethers (methylcellulose,hydroxypropylcellulose andhydroxypropyl methylcellulose). Filmsmade by these derivatives are usuallyvery sensitive to water but resistant tooil and fat. They can be used to incorporatefunctional additives and antimicrobials,such as, for example, nisinor rosemary, and tea extract to reducelipid oxidative rancidity. Antimicrobialfilms based on starch and starch derivativescan be obtained by incorporatingpotassium sorbate or chitosan into thefilms. However, the presence of thesesubstances could modify the crystallinestructures of the films, thus reducing thebarrier to gases.Alginates, biomacromolecules extractedfrom brown seaweeds, are other interestingpolysaccharides due to their capabilityto react irreversibly with polyvalentmetal cations, in particular calcium ions,to produce water-insoluble polymers.For these classes ofpolysaccharide materials,the release ofpotassium sorbate orother antimicrobial additivesis controlled bymodulating the physicalproperties of thebiomacromolecularstructure, in particular,through control of thereticular density.Chitosan, extractedfrom the shells ofcrustaceans, is a highmolecularweight cationicpolysaccharide that is widely usedto make films with antibacterial and antifungalactivity. It has been extensivelyused to protect, improve quality and extendthe shelf life of fresh and processedfoods.Proteins represent another class ofbiomacromolecules employed for ediblefilms and coatings. They can haveimpressive barrier properties to oxygen,carbon dioxide, oil and fats. However,mechanical and water vapor barrier propertiesof films produced from these materialsare inferior to those of syntheticorigin. 9Both agro- and animal-based proteinssuch as wheat gluten, corn zein, soyprotein, whey proteins, casein, egg white,keratin, collagen, gelatin and myofibrillarproteins have been used to prepare filmsand edible coatings by using the solventcasting process. Very few publicationshave reported on the thermoplasticizationand the extrusion of these proteinsto produce films. The development ofextrusion-based technologies with goodreproducibility and control over themolecular architecture and spatial conformationof the natural macromolecule“The packagerepresents a protectionof the food againstnegative effectsfrom the externalenvironment.”is among the main scientific and technologicalchallenges to exploiting the use ofprotein-based films and coatings.While thermoplastic starches (TPS)have been widely studied and successfullyapplied in industry, including blendingTPS with other synthetic polymers,the thermoplasticization of proteins hasbeen reported only recently, and it hasbeen investigated ongluten, zein, soy, wheyand gelatine. 9Several factorsmust be taken intoaccount when choosingbetween differentpossible plasticizers forthe development ofthermoplastic proteins.The most commonlyused plasticizer is glycerol,which is misciblein most cases. Othersystems that have beeninvestigated includepolyfunctional alcohols, such as sorbitoland propylene glycol, as well as di- andtriethanolamine. Heat and shear stressescontribute to the unfolding of the proteinin the presence of the plasticizerduring the extrusion process. Proper processingconditions such as temperatureprofile, residence time and screw designare therefore necessary to supply theneeded mechanical and thermal energyto the proteins/plasticizer systems. Byoptimizing protein/plasticizer systemsand processing conditions, one couldobtain materials with rheological propertiessuitable for film-blowing technologies.10However, one should be aware thatthe use of extrusion-based processingcould affect the functionalities of antimicrobialcompounds embedded in thepolymeric matrix. These substances aregenerally heat sensitive and thermallyunstable; thus, they may become inactiveduring processing, mainly becauseof the high temperature, high shear ratesand high pressure an extruder can reach. 9ConclusionsThe ongoing scientific and techno-44 F o o d S a f e t y M a g a z i n e
PACKAGINGlogical interest in developing more efficientways to use renewable resourceswill foster the development of novel andadvanced substrates based on vegetablebiomass. Bio-based materials for addedvalueapplications, such as biomedicaluses, drug delivery and advanced packagingsystems, could be developed bymimicking the synergy between differentbiomacromolecules that are naturallyassembled in hierarchical structures.Challenging researcher activities areexpected to take place in the field ofnanocellulose and “nanopapers,” and onprotein/polysaccharide self-assemblingnanosystems to develop hybrid andsupramolecular structures with uniqueproperties not achievable by simpleblending or through a “composite” approach.Fully bio-based, edible structureswith superhydrophobic, stimuli-responsiveproperties coupled with high barrierand mechanical properties are just someexamples of the possible functional andstructural features achievable with anovel material/manufacturing platformbased on such biomacromolecules andby using novel nano- and self-assemblingtechnology approaches. However, wemust take into account that in nature,biology accomplished much sophisticatedconstruction from molecular bottomup to visible organisms and structures.Construction of hieararchical structuresonly from a bottom-up approach couldbe very difficult to exploit at industrialscale. Fusion with the well-developed,top down-type nanofabrication shouldbe taken into consideration for morerapid development of these innovativetechnologies in added-value applications,included advanced packaging. 11 •Giovanna Buonocore, Ph.D.,is currently a researcher at theInstitute for Composites andBiomedical Materials (IMCB) –National Research Council.SalvatoreIannace, Ph.D., is a chemicalengineer and senior scientist at theIMCB and serves as adjunct professorat the University of Naples inItaly.References1. Lee, D.S., K.L. Yam and L. Piergiovanni. 2008.<strong>Food</strong> packaging science and technology. CRCPress.2. Restuccia, D., U.G. Spizzirri, O.I. Parisi, G.Cirillo, M. Curcio, F. Iemma, F. Puoci, G. Vinci andN. Picci. 2010. New EU regulation aspects andglobal market of active and intelligent packagingfor food industry applications. <strong>Food</strong> Cont21:1425–1435.3. Incoronato, A.L., G.G. Buonocore, A. Conte,M. Lavorgna and M.A. Del Nobile. 2010. Activesystems based on silver-montmorillonite nanoparticlesembedded into bio-based polymermatrices for food packaging applications. J <strong>Food</strong>Prot 73:2256–2262.4. Ukmar, T. and O. Planinšek. 2010. Acta Pharm60:373–385.5. Mehdi, A., C. Reye and R. Corriu. 2011. ChemSoc Rev 40:563–574.6. Gargiulo, N., I. Attianese, G.G. Buonocore,D. Caputo, M. Lavorgna, G. Mensitieri and M.Lavorgna. 2012. a-Tocopherol release from activepolymer films loaded with functionalized SBA-15 mesoporous silica. Micropor Mesopor Mat,DOI:10.1016/j.micromeso.2012.07.037.7. Stuart, M.A.C., W.T.S. Hyck, J. Genzer, M.Muller, C. Ober, M. Stamm, G.B. Sukhorukov,I. Szleifer, V.V. Tsukruk, M. Urban, F. Winnik,S. Zauscher, I. Luzinov and S. Minko. 2010.Emerging applications of stimuli-responsive polymermaterials. Nature Mater 9:101.8. Campos, C.A., L.N. Gerschenson and S.K.Flores. 2011. Development of edible filmsand coatings with antimicrobial activity. <strong>Food</strong>Bioprocess Technol 4:849–875.9. Mensitieri, G., E. Di Maio, G. Buonocore, I.Nedi, M. Oliviero, L. Sansone and S. Iannace.2011. Processing and shelf life issues of selectedfood packaging materials and structures fromrenewable resources. Trends <strong>Food</strong> Sci Technol22:72–80.10. Oliviero, M., E. Di Maio and S. Iannace. 2010.Effect of molecular structure on film blowingability of thermoplastic zein. J Appl Polym Sci115(1):277–287.11. Ariga, K., J.P. Hill, M.V. Lee, A. Vinu, R. Charvetand S. Acharya 2008. Challenges and breakthroughsin recent research on self-assembly. SciTechnol Adv Mater 9:014109.Is your surface testingall it’s cracked up to be?You can’t afford even a twinge of doubt when it comes touncovering any hidden contaminants. Get cracking withPuritan environmental swabs — known to deliver superiorcollection for reliable results. Our top-quality swabs come invarious sizes, shapes, and tip fibers, with and without media.To request free samples of environmental swabs,scan the code at left or visit our website atpuritanmedproducts.com/enviro.800-321-2313 • puritanmedproducts.comPuritan Medical Products Company LLC, Guilford, Maine 04443-0149 USAAn affiliate of Hardwood Products Company ISO 9001:2008facebook.com/PuritanUSA twitter.com/PuritanUSA linkedin.com/company/PuritanUSAUS MANUFACTUREDF e b r u a r y • M a r c h 2 0 1 3 45
- Page 4 and 5: February/March 2013Vol. 19, No. 1FE
- Page 6: Editor’s LetterWe at Food Safety
- Page 10 and 11: USDA Seeks Comments on ProposedFroz
- Page 12: TestingBy Katerina Mastovska, Ph.D.
- Page 15 and 16: Testingheat treatment, the toxins c
- Page 17 and 18: staying connectedto your data hasne
- Page 19 and 20: PROCESS CONTROL1. Scope2. Normative
- Page 21 and 22: SANITATIONapproach, 1, 2 while effe
- Page 23 and 24: SANITATIONis a matter of legal liab
- Page 25 and 26: Accreditationment undertaken by the
- Page 27 and 28: AccreditationFood Microbiological L
- Page 29 and 30: MANAGEMENTcertain spices. As no acc
- Page 31 and 32: MANAGEMENTtook so long to be resolv
- Page 33 and 34: Choose ConfidenceChoose Confidence
- Page 35 and 36: Special advertising supplement pres
- Page 37 and 38: AccuracyQualitySafetyHACCP Monitori
- Page 39 and 40: THE SANITARY CHOICEFOR FOOD SAFETYT
- Page 41 and 42: Specialists in Food & BeverageSampl
- Page 46 and 47: Animal Welfareand Food SafetyBy F.
- Page 48 and 49: Animals versus PlantsBefore discuss
- Page 50 and 51: Percent (between 0 to 1) / $100 spe
- Page 52 and 53: Despite developments in traceabilit
- Page 54 and 55: INGREDIENTSBy Rupa Das, M.Sc.Qualit
- Page 56 and 57: SEAFOODBy Gary P. Richards, Ph.D.,
- Page 58 and 59: SEAFOODfoods is essential to reduci
- Page 60 and 61: SEAFOOD(infectious and noninfectiou
- Page 62 and 63: Product ShowcaseShelf-Life Extender
- Page 64 and 65: Coupler BrakeForce Control Industri
- Page 66 and 67: Advertisers IndexAdvanced Instrumen
- Page 68 and 69: Allergens LabeledSanitation Verifie
- Page 70 and 71: Solutions for Today,Planning for To
- Page 72 and 73: keynote theatre special events2013
- Page 74 and 75: WORKSHOPS • TUESDAY, APRIL 30WORK
- Page 76 and 77: Sessions • WednESDAY, May 1SESSIO
- Page 78 and 79: Sessions • WednESDAY, May 1SESSIO
- Page 80 and 81: Sessions • ThurSDAY, May 2SESSION
- Page 82 and 83: Exhibit hall — where solutions ar
- Page 84: 155 N. Pfingsten Rd., Suite 205Deer