Accreditationan ILAC-recognized AB are accepted bygovernments and industries worldwide.Jesse Lamas Calvillo, laboratory managerfor AGQ Labs, Spain, says, “Internationalaccreditation not only assuresthe quality of data being emitted to ourclients from our laboratory, but benefitsthe company by guaranteeing uniformityof standards across the board on theworld stage. AGQ has seven laboratoriesthroughout the world, which allow us tooperate in over 20 countries, and ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation has been criticalwithin every one of those food safetymarkets. Beyond the more apparentbenefits of having an internationally recognizedaccreditation, being on the sameplaying field as national agrifood laboratoriesin Europe and abroad heightensour profile and lends credibility any timewe have to represent our clients in adispute.”Governmental regulatory agenciessuch as the Consumer Product <strong>Safety</strong>Commission, the U.S. EnvironmentalProtection Agency and the NuclearRegulatory Commission require accreditationto verify the technical competenceof organizations like laboratories, inspectionbodies and/or certification agencies.Laboratories seeking accreditationfrom anILAC memberorganizationmustdemonstratethat theirtesting andcalibrationmethods areconducted inaccordancewith internationallyrecognizedstandards,and within the framework of ISO/IEC17025, General requirements for the competenceof testing and calibration laboratories.Figure 1: Certificate of AccreditationSystematic AssessmentThe first step in the accreditation processis for the laboratory to submit qualitymanagement system documentationto the AB, describing its managementand technical procedures for compliancewith ISO/IEC 17025. The documentationcomprises the laboratory’s qualitysystem manual, details on the laboratory’sequipment, a proposed scope ofaccreditation, list of test methodologiesand procedures, and capabilities forAnticipated Regulatory Changes Push for Accreditation StandardsAccording to the <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> Modernization Act (FSMA), FDA must establishmodel accreditation standards to ensure that accredited labs have the followingcontrols by <strong>2013</strong>:• Methods to ensure that appropriate sampling and analytical procedures arefollowed• Certification of reports of analyses• Internal quality systems• Complaint-handling procedures• Training/experience requirementsOf course, these types of Good Laboratory Practices and controls are alreadycommon in many accredited laboratories currently operating throughout theworld. In fact, many of these would be eligible for accreditation under FSMA,which would cover government and private labs, both U.S. and foreign. Althoughnon-third party, in-house laboratories of food manufacturers are eligiblefor FSMA accreditation, FDA has not yet decided on this issue and has declinedto provide guidance at this time.However, the agency stated that to facilitate FDA assessment, a certificationbody could seek accreditation from an AB that is operating in accordance withISO/IEC 17011:2004, and that the certification bodies should have access toaccredited laboratory services needed to support the audit program functions(see www.fda.gov/RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm). Theselaboratories should conform to ISO/IEC 17025:2005.establishingand estimatingmeasurementuncertaintyfor thetesting to beperformed.After reviewingthisdocumentation,the ABconducts anon-site assessmentusing ateam of qualitysystem and technical experts matchedto the laboratory’s scope to confirmcompliance with the standard. For instance,a food laboratory may proposea scope of accreditation that includesbiological testing for Salmonella using theFDA-Bacteriological Analytical Manual,which outlines procedures for the detectionof pathogens such as Salmonella infood products. Another example couldbe the use of a regulatory method likeU.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)-Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook(MLG) for the microbiological analysisof meat, poultry and egg products.Competency of the laboratory staff toperform the intended work and ongoingtraining is another critical area reviewedby the AB.Dr. Sri Ghanthan, a veteran IAS assessor,says, “Certainly the primary focus ofthe assessment team is to identify nonconformances.However, they might alsolook for ways to share knowledge aboutindustry best practices. In the food safetybusiness, it’s not enough to just meetthe standard[s]. Accreditation bodiesmust also see evidence of a laboratory’scommitment to continuous improvementof its processes, people and toolsas well as evidence of preventive actionsto proactively address potential problemareas. That means looking at the testingprocesses, interviewing people, determiningequipment capabilities and even theway samples are received, identified andstored. The goal of continuous improvementis to improve long-term efficiencyand accuracy.”26 F o o d S a f e t y M a g a z i n e
Accreditation<strong>Food</strong> Microbiological Laboratories’Calicchia recalls, “During our on-siteassessment, the evaluators recommendedthat we chronicle our improvementprojects as well as improvementsto methodologies, systems, facilities,communications and personnel. Thedocumentation would help us recognizewhere we focused our energies most. Forinstance, if we focused more on improvingmethodologies, but very little onfacilities, we might have missed some opportunities.The documentation wouldhelp us identify gaps where there mightbe inconsistencies.”Once a testing laboratory has demonstratedtechnical competence andcompliance with the accreditation criteria,it is granted a Certificate of Accreditation—CA—(Figure1). The certificate,which includes a scope that describesthe laboratory’s technical capabilities,is given to the laboratory and a copy isplaced on the AB’s website. The CA alsois made available to consumers, potentialcustomers, stakeholders and regulatorybodies.Reading between the LinesWhen an AB issues a CA to a laboratory,it will include the name and contactinformation for the laboratory, thestandard (ISO/IEC 17025) used for theaccreditation and the scope of the accreditation.Keep in mind, ISO/IEC 17025 is ageneric standard used to accredit laboratoriesin many different fields, rangingfrom biological testing (food testing) toelectrical testing (fiber optics) and othertechnical disciplines. It is important toreview the details in a laboratory’s CAbefore contracting with the laboratoryfor its services. The scope will list thedetails of the laboratory’s qualificationsunder the accreditation.Just because a laboratory is accreditedto ISO/IEC 17025 doesn’t mean it isqualified to perform Listeria testing asper the USDA-MLG. The ability of thelaboratory to perform the relevant testingmust be listed on its scope of accreditation.A review of the laboratory’s CA andscope will help customers select appropriatelaboratories to perform therequired tests and/or calibrations. •Mohan Sabaratnam is qualitymanager with International AccreditationService Inc. (IAS). He has beeninvolved in the development andoperation of laboratory accreditationprograms for the last 16 years andcurrently manages the IAS food safety managementsystem accreditation program.Pat McCullen is vice presidentand chief technical officer and isresponsible for overseeing technicalactivities for IAS. He has over 30years of experience in laboratorytesting, inspection, product certificationand conformity assessment. He was instrumentalin launching the IAS technical advisory council on foodsafety, serving as chairman at the inaugural meeting.F e b r u a r y • M a r c h 2 0 1 3 27Pickering_AminoAcid_<strong>Food</strong><strong>Safety</strong>.p1 Pickering_AminoAcid_<strong>Food</strong><strong>Safety</strong>.indd 1 15/19/10 2:00:32 PM 5/18/10 5:43:25 PM
- Page 4 and 5: February/March 2013Vol. 19, No. 1FE
- Page 6: Editor’s LetterWe at Food Safety
- Page 10 and 11: USDA Seeks Comments on ProposedFroz
- Page 12: TestingBy Katerina Mastovska, Ph.D.
- Page 15 and 16: Testingheat treatment, the toxins c
- Page 17 and 18: staying connectedto your data hasne
- Page 19 and 20: PROCESS CONTROL1. Scope2. Normative
- Page 21 and 22: SANITATIONapproach, 1, 2 while effe
- Page 23 and 24: SANITATIONis a matter of legal liab
- Page 25: Accreditationment undertaken by the
- Page 29 and 30: MANAGEMENTcertain spices. As no acc
- Page 31 and 32: MANAGEMENTtook so long to be resolv
- Page 33 and 34: Choose ConfidenceChoose Confidence
- Page 35 and 36: Special advertising supplement pres
- Page 37 and 38: AccuracyQualitySafetyHACCP Monitori
- Page 39 and 40: THE SANITARY CHOICEFOR FOOD SAFETYT
- Page 41 and 42: Specialists in Food & BeverageSampl
- Page 44 and 45: PACKAGING(continued from page 34)fo
- Page 46 and 47: Animal Welfareand Food SafetyBy F.
- Page 48 and 49: Animals versus PlantsBefore discuss
- Page 50 and 51: Percent (between 0 to 1) / $100 spe
- Page 52 and 53: Despite developments in traceabilit
- Page 54 and 55: INGREDIENTSBy Rupa Das, M.Sc.Qualit
- Page 56 and 57: SEAFOODBy Gary P. Richards, Ph.D.,
- Page 58 and 59: SEAFOODfoods is essential to reduci
- Page 60 and 61: SEAFOOD(infectious and noninfectiou
- Page 62 and 63: Product ShowcaseShelf-Life Extender
- Page 64 and 65: Coupler BrakeForce Control Industri
- Page 66 and 67: Advertisers IndexAdvanced Instrumen
- Page 68 and 69: Allergens LabeledSanitation Verifie
- Page 70 and 71: Solutions for Today,Planning for To
- Page 72 and 73: keynote theatre special events2013
- Page 74 and 75: WORKSHOPS • TUESDAY, APRIL 30WORK
- Page 76 and 77:
Sessions • WednESDAY, May 1SESSIO
- Page 78 and 79:
Sessions • WednESDAY, May 1SESSIO
- Page 80 and 81:
Sessions • ThurSDAY, May 2SESSION
- Page 82 and 83:
Exhibit hall — where solutions ar
- Page 84:
155 N. Pfingsten Rd., Suite 205Deer