24.11.2012 Views

Lightweight Electric/Hybrid Vehicle Design

Lightweight Electric/Hybrid Vehicle Design

Lightweight Electric/Hybrid Vehicle Design

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Fig. 1.18 Gas turbine technology.<br />

Current EV design approaches 21<br />

1.3.7 HGV<br />

The heavy goods vehicle is an articulated truck which weighs 40 tonnes. Often omitted from clean<br />

air schemes on the grounds of low numbers they travel intercontinental distances every year and<br />

are major emitters of NO and solid particles. Their presence is felt where there are congested<br />

x<br />

urban motorways, and each one typically deposits a dustbin-full of carbon alone into the atmosphere<br />

every day, the industry declining to collect and dispose of this material! What is the solution? Use<br />

hybrid drivelines based on gas turbine technology; these vehicles would be series hybrids.<br />

A gas turbine/alternator/transistor active rectifier, Fig. 1.18, provides a fixed DC link of 500 V.<br />

This is backed up by a battery plus DC/DC converter. A battery of 220 V (totally insulated) is used<br />

for safety. High quality thermal management would be vital to ensure long battery life; 2 tonnes of<br />

lead–acid units would be needed (144 × 6 V × 110 Ah) to be able to draw 400 bhp of peak power.<br />

It is likely that capital cost would be offset by fuel cost savings. Another benefit is that the gas<br />

turbine can be multifuel and operation from LNG could be especially beneficial. The drive wheels<br />

are typically 1 metre in diameter giving 683 rpm at 80 mph. Usually there are 3:1 hub reductions<br />

in the wheels and a 2:1 ratio in the rear axle, giving a motor top speed of 4000 rpm. Translated into<br />

torque speed this means 2866 Nm at 1000 rpm, falling to 716 Nm at 4000 rpm. All motors are<br />

viable at this power; however, two factors dominate: (a) low cost and (b) low maintenance. DC<br />

brushed motors with 3000 hour brush life are unlikely contenders! PM brushless DC is unlikely<br />

on cost grounds, requiring 36 kg of magnets for 2900 Nm of torque. Both induction motors and<br />

switched reluctance are viable contenders but switched reluctance wins on efficiency and weight.<br />

The contenders are tabulated at Fig. 1.17(c).<br />

In the above review of four motor technologies for three vehicle categories, there is no clear<br />

winner under all situations but a range of technologies is evident which are optimal under specific<br />

conditions. Continuing development should improve the electronically commutated machines<br />

especially brushless DC and switched reluctance types. The relative success of these machines<br />

will be determined by improvements in magnet technology, especially plastic magnets, and cost<br />

reduction with volume of usage. On the device front, development is approaching a near ideal<br />

with 1/2 micron line width insulated gate bipolar transistors (40 kHz switching/l.5 V VCE saturated)<br />

but reduction in packaging cost must be the next major goal.<br />

1.4 Inverter technology<br />

Inverters are one area where progress is being made in just about every area 3 : silicon, packaging,<br />

control, processors and transducers. The task is to find a way down the learning curve as quickly<br />

as possible. Polaron believe the lowest cost will come from packaging motor and inverter as a<br />

single unit. The major development this year is that of reliable wire bond packaging for high

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!