24.11.2012 Views

Lightweight Electric/Hybrid Vehicle Design

Lightweight Electric/Hybrid Vehicle Design

Lightweight Electric/Hybrid Vehicle Design

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TRAVEL ELECTRIFIED, %<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

STRATEGY OF USE<br />

MAXIMUM USE<br />

50 EV OR HV<br />

PREFERENCE<br />

40<br />

MAXIMUM USE<br />

30<br />

EV OR HV<br />

PREFERENCE<br />

(a)<br />

0<br />

0 20 30 40 50 70 100<br />

ELECTRIC RANGE, miles<br />

200<br />

EV<br />

HV<br />

HV<br />

EV<br />

PRIMARY<br />

STORAGE<br />

PRIMARY<br />

ENERGY<br />

TRANSFER<br />

DEVICE<br />

<strong>Hybrid</strong> vehicle design 145<br />

6.2.2 JUSTIFYING HYBRID DRIVE, FIG. 6.4<br />

Studies carried out at the General Research Corporation in California, where legislation on zero<br />

emission vehicles is hotly contested, have shown that the 160 km range electric car could electrify<br />

some 80% of urban travel based on the average range requirements of city households, (a). It is<br />

unlikely, however, that a driver would take trips such that the full range of electric cars could be<br />

totally used before switching to the IC engine car for the remainder of the day’s travel. This does<br />

not arise with a hybrid car whose entire electric range could be utilized before switching and it has<br />

been estimated that with similar electric range such a vehicle would cover 96% of urban travel<br />

requirements. In two or more car households, the second (and more) car could meet 100% of<br />

urban demand, if of the hybrid drive type.<br />

Because of the system complexities of hybrid-drive vehicles, computer techniques have been<br />

developed to optimize the operating strategies. Ford researchers3 , as well as studying series and<br />

parallel systems, have also examined the combined series/parallel one shown at (b). The complexity<br />

of the analysis is shown by the fact that in one system, having four clutches, there are 16 possible<br />

configurations depending on state of engagement. They also differentiated between types with<br />

and without wall-plug re-energization of the batteries between trips.<br />

6.2.3 MIXED HYBRID-DRIVE CONFIGURATIONS<br />

Coauthor Ron Hodkinson argues that while initially parallel and series hybrid-drive configurations<br />

were seen as possible contenders (parallel for small vehicles and series for larger ones) it has been<br />

found in building ‘real world’ vehicles that a mixture of the two is needed. For cars a mainly<br />

parallel layout is required with a small series element. The latter is required in case the vehicle<br />

becomes stationary for a long time in a traffic jam to make sure the traction battery always remains<br />

charged to sustain the ‘hotel loads’ (air conditioning etc.) on the vehicle’s electrical system. Cars<br />

like the Toyota Prius have 3–4 kW series capability but detail configuration of the system as a<br />

Fig. 6.4 Justifying the hybrid: (a) EV traffic<br />

potential; (b) combined series–parallel mode.<br />

PRIMARY TO<br />

SECONDARY<br />

DEVICE<br />

(b)<br />

PRIMARY CLUTCH<br />

(P)<br />

SERIES<br />

CLUTCH<br />

PRIMARY<br />

TRANSMISSION<br />

SECONDARY<br />

CLUTCH<br />

(C)<br />

(S)<br />

TIME<br />

LOSS<br />

Σ 2<br />

DRIVE<br />

CLUTCH<br />

Σ1 (D)<br />

SECONDARY<br />

TRANSMISSION<br />

SECONDARY<br />

ENERGY<br />

TRANSFER<br />

DEVICE<br />

Σ 3<br />

SECONDARY<br />

STORAGE<br />

AUX<br />

LOSS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!