11.07.2015 Views

addressing climate change adaptation in regional transportation plans

addressing climate change adaptation in regional transportation plans

addressing climate change adaptation in regional transportation plans

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Address<strong>in</strong>g Climate Change Adaptation <strong>in</strong> Regional Transportation PlansA Guide for California MPOs and RTPAsClimate Change Scenarios Assessment (Cayan et al., 2009), a subset of availableGCMs were selected based on their representation of historic seasonalprecipitation and temperature, the variability of annual precipitation, andEl Niño/Southern Oscillation (ENSO).Downscal<strong>in</strong>gGCMs are designed to represent <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> processes at the global scale.Models can show differences <strong>in</strong> the rate of <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> at different locations,but only on the cont<strong>in</strong>ental scale. The size of the GCM grid cells, and thus thespatial resolution of the <strong>climate</strong> projections, is limited by the comput<strong>in</strong>g powernecessary to solve the equations for all of the grid cells at hourly (or shorter) timesteps for runs which may span 100 years or more. Thus, the <strong>climate</strong> models atthe time of the latest IPCC report <strong>in</strong> 2007 produced output at spatial scales ofroughly 120 to 180 miles.Particularly <strong>in</strong> mounta<strong>in</strong>ous regions, such as the California coastal ranges andthe Sierra Nevada, this scale is too coarse to capture the many important effectsof topography on <strong>climate</strong>, as seen <strong>in</strong> Figure 3.7.For example, because mounta<strong>in</strong> ranges are averaged with adjacent valleys, theSierra Nevada, as represented <strong>in</strong> the GCMs, tops out at around 6,000 feet. Thescale of GCM output is also too coarse to use as <strong>in</strong>put for many modelspredict<strong>in</strong>g environmental impacts, such as bas<strong>in</strong>-scale hydrologic and watersystem models, or wildlife habitat models. Therefore, techniques to reduce thespatial scale of the GCM output (that is, downscal<strong>in</strong>g) are needed for most userapplications.Statistical downscal<strong>in</strong>g. Statistical relationships between the <strong>regional</strong>circulation and aspects of the local <strong>climate</strong> (e.g., temperature, precipitation,w<strong>in</strong>d) are used to apply GCM results to a particular place.A <strong>regional</strong> <strong>climate</strong> model (RCM) uses output from a general circulationmodel, but simulates processes at much higher resolution over the particularregion. A RCM is very much like a GCM, except that it uses much f<strong>in</strong>erresolution and covers a limited area. So a <strong>regional</strong> model may have a 10-milegrid spac<strong>in</strong>g over specific regions, compared with 120 to 180 miles for aGCM.When mak<strong>in</strong>g use of downscaled <strong>climate</strong> projections, as with the underly<strong>in</strong>gGCM output, a range of projections should be considered rather than one or two.In the case of statistical downscal<strong>in</strong>g, several GCM projections are typicallydownscaled us<strong>in</strong>g the same method. Likewise with RCM downscal<strong>in</strong>g, it isimportant to consider projections produced by multiple RCM-GCMcomb<strong>in</strong>ations.Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 3-11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!