addressing climate change adaptation in regional transportation plans
addressing climate change adaptation in regional transportation plans addressing climate change adaptation in regional transportation plans
Southeast Sierra RegionCounties: Alpine, Inyo, MonoCities (CDOF, 2011): Mammoth Lakes (8,286); Bishop (3,893)Total 2010 PopulationSoutheastSierra33,923Alpine 1,175Inyo 18,546Mono 14,202[U.S. Census Bureau, 2010]The Southeast Sierra is a combination mountainous and desert region and is themost sparsely settled (33,000+ people) of all the climate regions. A few smalltowns scattered along Highway 395 are heavily used for tourism access to LasVegas and Lake Tahoe to the north as well as the Sierra Nevada to the west. Thelargest settlement is the ski resort town of Mammoth Lakes (8,200+), where thewinter population swells with ski season. Tourism is a major economic activityin this region, with 50 percent or more of new home construction in Alpineand Mono counties being second home development. There are also modestagricultural operations in this region.Communities located in the Southeast Sierra region should consider evaluatingthe following climate change impacts:• Increased temperatures• Reduced precipitation• Reduced tourism• Substantially reduced snowpack• FloodingPAGE 80APG: UNDERSTANDING REGIONAL CHARACTERISTICS
Cal-Adapt ProjectionsTable 33. Summary of Cal-Adapt Climate Projections for the Southeast Sierra RegionEffectRangesTemperatureChange,1990-2100PrecipitationHeat WaveSnowpackWildfire RiskJanuary increase in average temperatures: 1.5°F to 2.5°F by 2050 and 5°F to 10°F by 2100.July increase in average temperatures: 3°F to 5°F by 2050 and 8°F to 10°F(Modeled high temperatures; average of all models; high carbon emissions scenario)Potential precipitation decline is between 0 and 4 inches by 2050 and 1 and15 inches by 2100. The range varies widely depending on location. Someareas receive less than 6 inches annually, with projected reductions bringingtotals under 4 inches by 2090. In other areas, total rainfall exceeds 45inches per year and is projected to decrease by roughly 15 inches by 2090.(CCSM3 climate model; high carbon emissions scenario)There is a lot of variation in heat wave threshold in this region. To the north a heat waveis five days over temperatures in the 80s. To the south, a heat wave is five days overtemperatures as high as 115°F. By 2050, there will be 2 to 3 more heat waves per year,increasing up to over 14 to 16 per year by 2100.Snowpack levels are projected to decline dramaticallyby 2090 in some areas, with drops of over 50 percent.(CCSM3 climate model; high carbon emissions scenario)By 2085, wildfire risk is projected to increase substantially (up to 19.1times) over current levels in Alpine County and the northern part of MonoCounty. The rest of Mono County and all of Inyo County is projected tohave a wildfire risk between 1.1 to 4.8 times greater than current levels.(GFDL climate model; high carbon emissions scenario)[Public Interest Energy Research, 2011. Cal-Adapt. Retrieved from http://cal-adapt.org. Sierra Nevada Alliance, 2010.]Water SourcesThis climate region occupies the southern portion of the North Lahontanhydrologic region and the Mono and Inyo county portions of the South Lahontanhydrologic region. Groundwater meets over 65 percent of urban, agricultural, andenvironmental water demands in the South Lahontan. Locally developed surfacewater accounts for 90 percent of water consumption in the region (DWR,2009). Much of the surface water, however, is not available locally because ofwater appropriation rights that lay claim to the region’s water resources. Forexample, Inyo County has a joint agreement with the Los Angeles Departmentof Water and Power for groundwater pumping and surface water managementin the Owens Valley. The Owens Valley Basin has an estimated capacity of 30 to35 million acre-feet (DWR, 2009). Replenishment of the basin comes primarilyfrom percolation of the surrounding mountains’ stream flow. Major water bodiesinclude Mono Lake, June Lake, Grant Lake, and Lundy Reservoir (Mono CountyCommunity Development Department, Planning Division, 2007).APG: UNDERSTANDING REGIONAL CHARACTERISTICS PAGE 81
- Page 224 and 225: the Sacramento and San Joaquin rive
- Page 226 and 227: Table 12. Selected Population Data
- Page 228 and 229: Sea level rise is also expected to
- Page 230 and 231: Additional Resources• Public Heal
- Page 232 and 233: Cal-Adapt ProjectionsTable 13. Summ
- Page 234 and 235: Selected Infrastructure and Regiona
- Page 236 and 237: Table 16. Selected Population Data
- Page 238 and 239: As with crops, climate change impac
- Page 240 and 241: Additional Resources• Wildfire Re
- Page 242 and 243: elevations, increased static levee
- Page 244 and 245: The ecosystem functions of the Delt
- Page 246 and 247: Setting and HistoryThe California D
- Page 248 and 249: The islands in the lower Bay-Delta
- Page 250 and 251: Some of the questions that should b
- Page 252 and 253: Southern Central Valley RegionCount
- Page 254 and 255: Biophysical CharacteristicsThe west
- Page 256 and 257: The crops produced are varied and i
- Page 258 and 259: Communities in this region should e
- Page 260 and 261: Cal-Adapt ProjectionsTable 25. Summ
- Page 262 and 263: Selected Infrastructure and Regiona
- Page 264 and 265: have the resources to prepare for,
- Page 266 and 267: Additional Resources• Sea Level R
- Page 268 and 269: Cal-Adapt ProjectionsTable 29. Summ
- Page 270 and 271: Selected Infrastructure and Regiona
- Page 272 and 273: Timber practices have also had ecos
- Page 276 and 277: Biophysical CharacteristicsThe sout
- Page 278 and 279: ultimately result in reduced water
- Page 280 and 281: Cal-Adapt ProjectionsTable 37. Summ
- Page 282 and 283: Selected Infrastructure and Regiona
- Page 284 and 285: particular concern are populations
- Page 286 and 287: Additional Resources• Sea Level R
- Page 288 and 289: Cal-Adapt ProjectionsTable 41. Summ
- Page 290 and 291: Selected Infrastructure and Regiona
- Page 292 and 293: industry around Big Bear. As there
- Page 294 and 295: California Natural Resources Agency
Cal-Adapt ProjectionsTable 33. Summary of Cal-Adapt Climate Projections for the Southeast Sierra RegionEffectRangesTemperatureChange,1990-2100PrecipitationHeat WaveSnowpackWildfire RiskJanuary <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> average temperatures: 1.5°F to 2.5°F by 2050 and 5°F to 10°F by 2100.July <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> average temperatures: 3°F to 5°F by 2050 and 8°F to 10°F(Modeled high temperatures; average of all models; high carbon emissions scenario)Potential precipitation decl<strong>in</strong>e is between 0 and 4 <strong>in</strong>ches by 2050 and 1 and15 <strong>in</strong>ches by 2100. The range varies widely depend<strong>in</strong>g on location. Someareas receive less than 6 <strong>in</strong>ches annually, with projected reductions br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>gtotals under 4 <strong>in</strong>ches by 2090. In other areas, total ra<strong>in</strong>fall exceeds 45<strong>in</strong>ches per year and is projected to decrease by roughly 15 <strong>in</strong>ches by 2090.(CCSM3 <strong>climate</strong> model; high carbon emissions scenario)There is a lot of variation <strong>in</strong> heat wave threshold <strong>in</strong> this region. To the north a heat waveis five days over temperatures <strong>in</strong> the 80s. To the south, a heat wave is five days overtemperatures as high as 115°F. By 2050, there will be 2 to 3 more heat waves per year,<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g up to over 14 to 16 per year by 2100.Snowpack levels are projected to decl<strong>in</strong>e dramaticallyby 2090 <strong>in</strong> some areas, with drops of over 50 percent.(CCSM3 <strong>climate</strong> model; high carbon emissions scenario)By 2085, wildfire risk is projected to <strong>in</strong>crease substantially (up to 19.1times) over current levels <strong>in</strong> Alp<strong>in</strong>e County and the northern part of MonoCounty. The rest of Mono County and all of Inyo County is projected tohave a wildfire risk between 1.1 to 4.8 times greater than current levels.(GFDL <strong>climate</strong> model; high carbon emissions scenario)[Public Interest Energy Research, 2011. Cal-Adapt. Retrieved from http://cal-adapt.org. Sierra Nevada Alliance, 2010.]Water SourcesThis <strong>climate</strong> region occupies the southern portion of the North Lahontanhydrologic region and the Mono and Inyo county portions of the South Lahontanhydrologic region. Groundwater meets over 65 percent of urban, agricultural, andenvironmental water demands <strong>in</strong> the South Lahontan. Locally developed surfacewater accounts for 90 percent of water consumption <strong>in</strong> the region (DWR,2009). Much of the surface water, however, is not available locally because ofwater appropriation rights that lay claim to the region’s water resources. Forexample, Inyo County has a jo<strong>in</strong>t agreement with the Los Angeles Departmentof Water and Power for groundwater pump<strong>in</strong>g and surface water management<strong>in</strong> the Owens Valley. The Owens Valley Bas<strong>in</strong> has an estimated capacity of 30 to35 million acre-feet (DWR, 2009). Replenishment of the bas<strong>in</strong> comes primarilyfrom percolation of the surround<strong>in</strong>g mounta<strong>in</strong>s’ stream flow. Major water bodies<strong>in</strong>clude Mono Lake, June Lake, Grant Lake, and Lundy Reservoir (Mono CountyCommunity Development Department, Plann<strong>in</strong>g Division, 2007).APG: UNDERSTANDING REGIONAL CHARACTERISTICS PAGE 81