addressing climate change adaptation in regional transportation plans
addressing climate change adaptation in regional transportation plans addressing climate change adaptation in regional transportation plans
Table 16. Selected Population Data for the Northern Central Valley RegionTotal 2010 Pop.Pop.
Flooding and damage to infrastructure can put large populations at risk (CDPH,2008), including:• The elderly and children less than five years of age, who are isolated ordependent on others for evacuation. As an example, Sutter County is one ofCalifornia’s counties with a high proportion of elderly living in nursing homes(English et al., 2007).• Populations that may lack the resources or knowledge to prepare orrespond to disaster due to language or economic status, including havingaccess to transportation, which would allow them to escape flooding, at leasttemporarily.Addressing the flood threats in this region may require regional collaboration.This collaboration should include counties, cities, special districts, the CaliforniaDepartment of Water Resources (DWR), the California Emergency ManagementAgency (Cal EMA), the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), theCentral Valley Flood Protection District, and other entities.AgricultureThe Northern Central Valley is one of the largest agricultural producing regions,not only in California, but in the United States. Between climate change impactson water availability and seasonal temperature regimes, the health of livestock,and productivity of trees and crops are likely to be affected.Agriculture in this region is varied, with rice, nuts (almonds, walnuts, pistachios),and dairy being three of the most predominant products. Others include pears,cattle, wine grapes, chicken, sweet potatoes, and plums.Each crop is likely to react slightly differently to alteration in seasonaltemperature regimes and water availability. Rice is projected to experiencea moderate loss in productivity (less than 10 percent; CCCC, 2009). In thecase of nut trees, it is the reduction in nighttime cooling that may have themost impact (Luedeling et al., 2011). Jurisdictions reliant on almonds, walnuts,pistachios, or other nuts should specifically evaluate projected changes in dailylow temperatures and/or loss of nighttime chill hours. It is difficult to specificallyproject the production impact on crops because this relates to many factors inaddition to temperature and precipitation, including pest regimes, availability ofimported or groundwater irrigation water, and management practices (Luedelinget al, 2011).PAGE 43APG: UNDERSTANDING REGIONAL CHARACTERISTICS
- Page 185 and 186: C A L I F O R N I AADAPTATIONPLANNI
- Page 188 and 189: (This Page Intentionally Left Blank
- Page 190 and 191: Adaptation Planning Guide - Advisor
- Page 192 and 193: List of Tables (cont’d.)Table 6.
- Page 194 and 195: Climate Impact RegionsThe APG is or
- Page 196 and 197: APGSTART HERE:PLANNING FOR ADAPTIVE
- Page 198 and 199: What are the designated climate imp
- Page 200 and 201: CA Climate Adaptation Planning Guid
- Page 202 and 203: CA Climate Adaptation Planning Guid
- Page 204 and 205: CA Climate Adaptation Planning Guid
- Page 206 and 207: • Selected Demographic Data. Sele
- Page 208 and 209: Cal-Adapt ProjectionsTable 1. Summa
- Page 210 and 211: Selected Infrastructure and Regiona
- Page 212 and 213: illnesses due to air pollution resu
- Page 214 and 215: Additional Resources• Sea level r
- Page 216 and 217: Cal-Adapt ProjectionsTable 5. Summa
- Page 218 and 219: Selected Infrastructure and Regiona
- Page 220 and 221: frequency can harm forests. Large i
- Page 222 and 223: Bay Area RegionCounties: Alameda, C
- Page 224 and 225: the Sacramento and San Joaquin rive
- Page 226 and 227: Table 12. Selected Population Data
- Page 228 and 229: Sea level rise is also expected to
- Page 230 and 231: Additional Resources• Public Heal
- Page 232 and 233: Cal-Adapt ProjectionsTable 13. Summ
- Page 234 and 235: Selected Infrastructure and Regiona
- Page 238 and 239: As with crops, climate change impac
- Page 240 and 241: Additional Resources• Wildfire Re
- Page 242 and 243: elevations, increased static levee
- Page 244 and 245: The ecosystem functions of the Delt
- Page 246 and 247: Setting and HistoryThe California D
- Page 248 and 249: The islands in the lower Bay-Delta
- Page 250 and 251: Some of the questions that should b
- Page 252 and 253: Southern Central Valley RegionCount
- Page 254 and 255: Biophysical CharacteristicsThe west
- Page 256 and 257: The crops produced are varied and i
- Page 258 and 259: Communities in this region should e
- Page 260 and 261: Cal-Adapt ProjectionsTable 25. Summ
- Page 262 and 263: Selected Infrastructure and Regiona
- Page 264 and 265: have the resources to prepare for,
- Page 266 and 267: Additional Resources• Sea Level R
- Page 268 and 269: Cal-Adapt ProjectionsTable 29. Summ
- Page 270 and 271: Selected Infrastructure and Regiona
- Page 272 and 273: Timber practices have also had ecos
- Page 274 and 275: Southeast Sierra RegionCounties: Al
- Page 276 and 277: Biophysical CharacteristicsThe sout
- Page 278 and 279: ultimately result in reduced water
- Page 280 and 281: Cal-Adapt ProjectionsTable 37. Summ
- Page 282 and 283: Selected Infrastructure and Regiona
- Page 284 and 285: particular concern are populations
Table 16. Selected Population Data for the Northern Central Valley RegionTotal 2010 Pop.Pop.