addressing climate change adaptation in regional transportation plans

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Addressing Climate Change Adaptation in Regional Transportation PlansA Guide for California MPOs and RTPAsAppendixEcoAdapt and Island Press. (2011). CAKE: Climate Adaptation KnowledgeExchange. Accessed October 2011 from http://www.cakex.org/Federal Highway Administration. (2009). Literature Review: Climate ChangeVulnerability Assessment, Risk Assessment, and Adaptation Approaches.http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/hep/climate/ccvaraaa.htm.Federal Highway Administration. (2012). Climate Change Adaptation PeerExchanges: Comprehensive Report: The Role of State Departments ofTransportation and Metropolitan Transportation Organizations inClimate Change Adaptation. FHWA-HEP-13-001/ DTFJ61-11-F-00003.www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/climate_change/adaptation/workshops_and_peer_exchanges/2011-2012_summary/20112012summary.pdf.Forster, P., V. Ramaswamy, P. Artaxo, T. Berntsen, R. Betts, D. W. Fahey,J. Haywood, J. Lean, D. C. Lowe, G. Myhre, J. Nganga, R. Prinn, G. Raga,M. Schulz, and R. Van Dorland. (2007). Changes in atmosphericconstituents and in radiative forcing. In: Climate Change 2007: ThePhysical Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the FourthAssessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change[Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K. B. Averyt,M. Tignor, and H. L. Miller (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press,pp. 129-234.Heberger, M., H. Cooley, P. Herrera, P. H. Gleick, and E. Moore. (2009). TheImpacts of Sea-Level Rise on the California Coast. A Pacific Institute paperfrom the California Climate Change Center funded by the CaliforniaEnergy Commission, the California Environmental Protection Agency,Metropolitan Transportation Commission, California Department ofTransportation, and the California Ocean Protection Council.Houston-Galveston Area Council. (2008). Foresight Panel on EnvironmentalEffects Report.ICF International (ICF). (2007). The Potential Impacts of Global Sea-Level Rise onTransportation Infrastructure. Phase 1 – Final Report: the District ofColumbia, Maryland, North Carolina and Virginia.LaHood, Ray. (2011). Policy Statement on Climate Change Adaptation. U.S.Department of Transportation. June 2011.Le Treut, H., R. Somerville, U. Cubasch, Y. Ding, C. Mauritzen, A. Mokssit,Y. Peterson, and M. Prather. (2007). Historical Overview of ClimateChange. In: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contributionof Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of theIntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Solomon, S., D. Qin,M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K. B. Averyt, M. Tignor, andH. L. Miller (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press.Mastrandrea, M. D., C. Tebaldi, C. P. Snyder, and S. H. Schneider. (2009).Current and Future Impacts of Extreme Events in California. PIER ResearchA-2 Cambridge Systematics, Inc.
Addressing Climate Change Adaptation in Regional Transportation PlansA Guide for California MPOs and RTPAsAppendixReport, CEC-500-2009-026-D, Sacramento, CA:Commission.California EnergyMetropolitan Transportation Commission. (2011). Adapting to Rising Tides:Transportation Vulnerability and Risk Assessment Pilot Project: TechnicalReport, November 2011.National Research Council of the National Academies (NRC). (2010). America’sClimate Choices. Accessed October 2011 fromhttp://dels.nas.edu/Report/Americas-Climate-Choices/12781.National Research Council of the National Academies (NRC). (2008). PotentialImpacts of Climate Change on U.S. Transportation. TransportationResearch Board Special Report 290. Washington, D.C.National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP). (n.d.). ClimateChange and the Highway System: Impacts and Adaptation Approaches,NCHRP 20-83.http://apps.trb.org/cmsfeed/TRBNetProjectDisplay.asp?ProjectID=2631NCHRP. (2011). NCHRP #20-83(5) Task 3.2 Position Paper: Approach forEvaluating Cost-Effectiveness of Adaptation Strategies. April 2011.Nakicenovic, N., Swart, R. (2000). Emissions scenarios. Special report of theIntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.570 pNorth Jersey Transportation Planning Authority (NJTPA), New JerseyDepartment of Transportation (NJDOT) et al. (2012). Climate ChangeVulnerability and Risk Assessment of New Jersey’s TransportationInfrastructure, http://www.njtpa.org/plan/Element/Climate/documents/CCVR_REPORT_FINAL_4_2_12_ENTIRE.pdf. April 2012.New York City Panel on Climate Change (NPCC). (2010). Climate ChangeAdaptation in New York City: Building a Risk Management Response,2010 Report, Volume 1196.Oahu Metropolitan Planning Organization (OahuMPO). (2011). TransportationVulnerability Due to Climate Change, http://www.oahumpo.org/reports/transportation_vulnerability_due_to_climate_change.html.Ocean Protection Council (OPC). (2011). State of California Sea-Level Rise InterimGuidance Document. Ocean Protection Council.Oregon Climate Change Integration Group (Oregon CCIG). (2008). Final Reportto the Governor A Framework for Addressing Rapid Climate Change.Rial, J. A., R. A. Pielke Sr., M. Beniston, M. Claussen, J. Canadell, P. Cox, H. Held,N. De Noblet-Ducoudré, et al. (2004). “Nonlinearities, Feedbacks andCritical Thresholds within the Earth’s Climate System”. ClimaticChange 65: 11–00Cambridge Systematics, Inc. A-3
Page 1:
Addressing Climate Change Adaptatio
Page 7:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 101 and 102: Addressing Climate Change Adaptatio
Page 127: Addressing Climate Change Adaptatio
Page 157: appendix b reportState-of-the-Pract
Page 161 and 162: State-of-the-Practice Climate Chang
Page 181: State-of-the-Practice Climate Chang
Page 185 and 186: C A L I F O R N I AADAPTATIONPLANNI
Page 188 and 189: (This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Page 190 and 191: Adaptation Planning Guide - Advisor
Page 192 and 193: List of Tables (cont’d.)Table 6.
Page 194 and 195: Climate Impact RegionsThe APG is or
Page 196 and 197: APGSTART HERE:PLANNING FOR ADAPTIVE
Page 198 and 199: What are the designated climate imp
Page 200 and 201:
CA Climate Adaptation Planning Guid
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
• Selected Demographic Data. Sele
Page 208 and 209:
Cal-Adapt ProjectionsTable 1. Summa
Page 210 and 211:
Selected Infrastructure and Regiona
Page 212 and 213:
illnesses due to air pollution resu
Page 214 and 215:
Additional Resources• Sea level r
Page 216 and 217:
Cal-Adapt ProjectionsTable 5. Summa
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
frequency can harm forests. Large i
Page 222 and 223:
Bay Area RegionCounties: Alameda, C
Page 224 and 225:
the Sacramento and San Joaquin rive
Page 226 and 227:
Table 12. Selected Population Data
Page 228 and 229:
Sea level rise is also expected to
Page 230 and 231:
Additional Resources• Public Heal
Page 232 and 233:
Cal-Adapt ProjectionsTable 13. Summ
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Table 16. Selected Population Data
Page 238 and 239:
As with crops, climate change impac
Page 240 and 241:
Additional Resources• Wildfire Re
Page 242 and 243:
elevations, increased static levee
Page 244 and 245:
The ecosystem functions of the Delt
Page 246 and 247:
Setting and HistoryThe California D
Page 248 and 249:
The islands in the lower Bay-Delta
Page 250 and 251:
Some of the questions that should b
Page 252 and 253:
Southern Central Valley RegionCount
Page 254 and 255:
Biophysical CharacteristicsThe west
Page 256 and 257:
The crops produced are varied and i
Page 258 and 259:
Communities in this region should e
Page 260 and 261:
Page 262 and 263:
Page 264 and 265:
have the resources to prepare for,
Page 266 and 267:
Additional Resources• Sea Level R
Page 268 and 269:
Page 270 and 271:
Page 272 and 273:
Timber practices have also had ecos
Page 274 and 275:
Southeast Sierra RegionCounties: Al
Page 276 and 277:
Biophysical CharacteristicsThe sout
Page 278 and 279:
ultimately result in reduced water
Page 280 and 281:
Page 282 and 283:
Page 284 and 285:
particular concern are populations
Page 286 and 287:
Additional Resources• Sea Level R
Page 288 and 289:
Page 290 and 291:
Page 292 and 293:
industry around Big Bear. As there
Page 294 and 295:
California Natural Resources Agency
show all

addressing climate change adaptation in regional transportation plans

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?