11.07.2015 Views

addressing climate change adaptation in regional transportation plans

addressing climate change adaptation in regional transportation plans

addressing climate change adaptation in regional transportation plans

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Address<strong>in</strong>g Climate Change Adaptation <strong>in</strong> Regional Transportation PlansA Guide for California MPOs and RTPAs12.2 DEVELOPING ADAPTATION STRATEGIESDeterm<strong>in</strong>e Climate Hazard Protection W<strong>in</strong>dowsA limited selection of priority asset/stressor group<strong>in</strong>gs are advanced from therapid assessment described <strong>in</strong> Module 3 for more rigorous and detailedconsideration <strong>in</strong> Module 4. At this stage, it is understood that the assetsthemselves are considered critical, often highly critical, and therefore that thepotential consequences of exposure to <strong>climate</strong> stressors could be significant. It isalso understood that these assets have a substantial future likelihood, perhaps ahigh likelihood, of exposure to one or more <strong>climate</strong> stressors at thresholds thatmay pose a threat.However, the rapid assessment’s focus is on whether assets and stressorsco<strong>in</strong>cide physically, without necessarily 22 consider<strong>in</strong>g temporal concurrence(they overlap <strong>in</strong> space, but do they overlap <strong>in</strong> time as well?) or <strong>change</strong>s <strong>in</strong> thecondition or characteristics of assets over time. The Climate Hazard ProtectionW<strong>in</strong>dow concept was developed help capture the role of time <strong>in</strong> determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gexposure. The W<strong>in</strong>dow describes the period dur<strong>in</strong>g which an asset is likely bothto be <strong>in</strong> service and susceptible to the impacts of one or more <strong>climate</strong> stressors.The W<strong>in</strong>dow opens when a <strong>climate</strong> hazard first poses significant risk to the assetand closes at the projected end of the asset’s lifespan (with multiple stressorexposures there may be multiple W<strong>in</strong>dows). Understand<strong>in</strong>g of two keytimeframes is therefore necessary to produce a W<strong>in</strong>dow (these are described <strong>in</strong>greater depth, below):Asset Lifespan and Asset Renewal Cycles. When is the asset due forreplacement? What opportunities for <strong>adaptation</strong> action might co<strong>in</strong>cide withstandard asset renewal cycles? Advanced assessments may also explore the<strong>in</strong>teraction between deteriorat<strong>in</strong>g asset condition and <strong>in</strong>creased susceptibilityto stressors.Stressor Occurrence. When are stressors likely to beg<strong>in</strong> pos<strong>in</strong>g significantrisks to assets due <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g severity (such as exceedance of a hazardthreshold) or frequency? In some <strong>in</strong>stances, the answer may be “today.”22 The previous exposure assessment may <strong>in</strong>clude time as an element as well. Forexample, the asset <strong>in</strong>ventory may <strong>in</strong>clude future projects from the TIP or LRTP.Hypothetically, where sufficient attribute data is available, even <strong>change</strong>s <strong>in</strong> assetcondition based on deterioration curves or asset renewal cycles could be <strong>in</strong>corporated.Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 12-3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!