11.07.2015 Views

addressing climate change adaptation in regional transportation plans

addressing climate change adaptation in regional transportation plans

addressing climate change adaptation in regional transportation plans

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Address<strong>in</strong>g Climate Change Adaptation <strong>in</strong> Regional Transportation PlansA Guide for California MPOs and RTPAsFigure 11.1 Conduct<strong>in</strong>g a Vulnerability and Risk AssessmentCLIMATESTRESSORDATAASSETINVENTORY &CRITICALITYDETERMINE STRESSOREXPOSUREYESNODETERMINE RISK ORMAGNITUDE OFCONSEQUENCES(CRITICALITY)HIGHMEDIUMLOWESTIMATE LIKELIHOODOF IMPACTS(STRESSOR LEVEL ORFREQUENCY)CONDITION DATA(PRIORITIZED FOR ADAPTATION ASSESSMENT)CHARACTERIZE RISKADAPTATIONSource: Cambridge Systematics, Inc., 2012.11.2 CONDUCTING A VULNERABILITY AND RISKASSESSMENTDeterm<strong>in</strong>e Stressor ExposureDeterm<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g potential stressor exposure is the foundation of the vulnerabilityassessment. If an asset is not exposed to the effects of a given <strong>climate</strong> stressor, itcannot be impacted by it, and that stressor/asset comb<strong>in</strong>ation need not beconsidered further. For example, it can be fairly assumed that far <strong>in</strong>land assetsare not – and will not be – exposed to storm surge/coastal flood<strong>in</strong>g events. Inthis case, pursu<strong>in</strong>g an assessment of this asset and stressor comb<strong>in</strong>ation wouldbe a poor, and unfruitful, use of analytical resources.The first task <strong>in</strong> determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g exposure is select<strong>in</strong>g the appropriate <strong>climate</strong>scenario from Module 2b. For each <strong>climate</strong> stressor, there is a “low” and a “high”projection. In the near future, the difference between these two scenarios is oftennegligible, but as the time horizon extends toward 2100, the range of estimates<strong>in</strong>creases. Occasionally, even the expected direction of the trend may differ (forexample, precipitation may <strong>in</strong>crease under one scenario, and fall under another).The issue of uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty <strong>in</strong> the degree and direction of stressor <strong>change</strong> isunavoidable – and challeng<strong>in</strong>g – but should not derail the assessment. It mayhelp to consider these projections as the bookends of the range of reasonable<strong>climate</strong> futures.In select<strong>in</strong>g the preferred scenario (or scenarios), an agency’s tolerance for riskshould be a key factor. Risk tolerance may be uniform across the entiremultimodal <strong>transportation</strong> system, or may be partitioned by asset or asset types.11-2 Cambridge Systematics, Inc.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!