INSPECTION REPORT Brune Park Community School ... - Ofsted

INSPECTION REPORT Brune Park Community School ... - Ofsted INSPECTION REPORT Brune Park Community School ... - Ofsted

ofsted.gov.uk
from ofsted.gov.uk More from this publisher
24.11.2012 Views

INSPECTION REPORT Brune Park Community School Gosport, Hampshire LEA area: Hampshire Unique reference number: 116472 Headteacher: Dr Ian Johnson Lead inspector: Val Lynch Dates of inspection: 1 st - 4 th November 2004 Inspection number: 268360 Inspection carried out under section 10 of the School Inspections Act 1996

<strong>INSPECTION</strong> <strong>REPORT</strong><br />

<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong><br />

Gosport, Hampshire<br />

LEA area: Hampshire<br />

Unique reference number: 116472<br />

Headteacher: Dr Ian Johnson<br />

Lead inspector: Val Lynch<br />

Dates of inspection: 1 st - 4 th November 2004<br />

Inspection number: 268360<br />

Inspection carried out under section 10 of the <strong>School</strong> Inspections Act 1996


© Crown copyright 2004-05<br />

This report may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes,<br />

provided that all extracts quoted are reproduced verbatim without adaptation and on condition that<br />

the source and date thereof are stated.<br />

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the <strong>School</strong> Inspections Act 1996,<br />

the school must provide a copy of this report and/or its summary free of charge to certain categories<br />

of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies<br />

supplied.<br />

<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 2


INFORMATION ABOUT THE SCHOOL<br />

Type of school: Comprehensive<br />

<strong>School</strong> category: <strong>Community</strong><br />

Age range of pupils: 11 - 16<br />

Gender of pupils: Mixed<br />

Number on roll; 1650<br />

<strong>School</strong> address: Military Road<br />

Gosport<br />

Hampshire<br />

Postcode: PO12 3BU<br />

Telephone number: 023 9261 6000<br />

Fax number: 023 9261 6006<br />

Appropriate authority: Local Education Authority<br />

Name of chair of governors: Father John Draper<br />

Date of previous inspection: January 1999<br />

CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SCHOOL<br />

<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> is a very large and oversubscribed 11-16 comprehensive school of 1,650 pupils. It is<br />

located to the north of the centre of Gosport. The school has recently been awarded specialist<br />

school status as a performing arts college. Despite a heavy naval presence in the area, the local<br />

community is relatively stable and very few pupils join or leave the school during the school year.<br />

Attainment on entry is below average. The school has very few higher ability pupils joining the<br />

school in Year 7. A higher than average proportion of Year 7 pupils have low levels of literacy and<br />

numeracy. The proportion of pupils whose heritage language is not English is very small. The<br />

proportion of pupils with special educational needs is broadly average and the proportion with<br />

Statements of Special Educational Need is below average. The school is accredited as an Investors<br />

in People organisation and in 2003 gained a <strong>School</strong> Achievement Award. The proportion of pupils<br />

eligible for free school meals is below average but this figure does not reflect the below average<br />

socio-economic circumstances of the areas. The school successfully encourages the community to<br />

make use of its accommodation through hiring its facilities or by participating in adult evening<br />

classes arranged through a local further education college.<br />

INFORMATION ABOUT THE <strong>INSPECTION</strong> TEAM<br />

<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 3


Members of the inspection team Subject responsibilities<br />

1475 Val Lynch Lead inspector English as an additional language<br />

10173 Catherine Hinds Lay inspector<br />

32281 James Garbutt Team inspector Mathematics<br />

12568 Chris Morris Team inspector English<br />

24453 Gordon Jackson Team inspector Science<br />

31096 John Thornhill Team inspector Information and communication<br />

technology<br />

15606 Christine Hill Team inspector Art and design<br />

Special educational needs<br />

32672 Stephen Hammond-Evans Team inspector Design and technology<br />

32147 Ann Wallis Team inspector Geography<br />

3755 Trevor Hulbert Team inspector Citizenship<br />

History<br />

11838 Derek Cronin Team inspector Modern foreign languages<br />

31701 Graeme Rudland Team inspector Music<br />

23137 Ron Fewtrell Team inspector Physical education<br />

4372 Ralph Fordham Team inspector Religious education<br />

19414 Janet Flisher Team inspector Drama<br />

Work-related learning<br />

The inspection contractor was:<br />

ALTECQ <strong>INSPECTION</strong>S LTD<br />

102 Bath Road<br />

Cheltenham<br />

Gloucestershire<br />

GL53 7JX<br />

Any concerns or complaints about the inspection or the report should be made initially to the<br />

contractor. The procedures are set out in the leaflet ‘Complaining about <strong>Ofsted</strong> Inspections’, which<br />

is available from <strong>Ofsted</strong> Publications Centre (telephone 07002 637833) or <strong>Ofsted</strong>’s website<br />

(www.ofsted.gov.uk).<br />

<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 4


<strong>REPORT</strong> CONTENTS<br />

PART A: SUMMARY OF THE <strong>REPORT</strong> 6<br />

PART B: COMMENTARY ON THE MAIN <strong>INSPECTION</strong> FINDINGS<br />

STANDARDS ACHIEVED BY PUPILS 8<br />

Standards achieved in areas of learning, subjects and courses<br />

Pupils’ attitudes, values and other personal qualities<br />

QUALITY OF EDUCATION PROVIDED BY THE SCHOOL 11<br />

Teaching and learning<br />

The curriculum<br />

Care, guidance and support<br />

Partnership with parents, other schools and the community<br />

LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT 16<br />

OTHER SPECIFIED FEATURES – Work-related learning 17<br />

PART C: THE QUALITY OF EDUCATION IN SUBJECTS AND COURSES 19<br />

SUBJECTS IN KEY STAGES 3 AND 4<br />

PART D: SUMMARY OF THE MAIN <strong>INSPECTION</strong> JUDGEMENTS 34<br />

<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 5<br />

Page


PART A: SUMMARY OF THE <strong>REPORT</strong><br />

OVERALL EVALUATION<br />

<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> is a good school. Standards achieved by the end of Year 9 are average and<br />

achievement is good. By the end of Year 11 standards are slightly below average and achievement<br />

is satisfactory. Teaching and learning are good and assessment is satisfactory. The leadership of<br />

the headteacher is very good. Leadership and management at all levels are good. The school<br />

provides good value for money.<br />

The school’s main strengths and weaknesses are:<br />

• Pupils’ good behaviour, their positive attitudes and good relationships help them achieve well in<br />

most lessons.<br />

• The school has worked hard to improve teaching and learning. In a high proportion of lessons<br />

teaching and learning are good.<br />

• Subject teachers and tutors are neither rigorous nor consistent in their monitoring of pupils’<br />

progress and then intervening where there is underachievement.<br />

• Marking and assessment do not always tell pupils what they have achieved and what they need<br />

to do to improve.<br />

• Pupils with low levels of literacy and numeracy when they join the school get very good support<br />

and make very good progress in these basic skills.<br />

• The leadership of the headteacher is sincere and resolute; he and staff value all pupils.<br />

Improvement since the previous inspection is good. Test results at the end of Year 9 have improved<br />

at a faster rate than results nationally. GCSE results improved until 2002 but dipped in 2003 and<br />

dipped further in 2004. Attendance has improved but is still unsatisfactory in Year 11. Some<br />

alternative arrangements have been made for the least motivated pupils in Years 10 and 11 and a<br />

more relevant curriculum is being developed for 2005. Links with other agencies have been<br />

strengthened. Support in lessons for pupils with specific needs has been extended. Developments<br />

in ICT were very limited until two years ago. Equipment was purchased but the school did not<br />

provide the necessary experiences for pupils. Although there has been work done with lower ability<br />

pupils, not enough priority has been given to developing the literacy and numeracy skills of all<br />

pupils.<br />

STANDARDS ACHIEVED<br />

When pupils join the school their standards are below average. By the end of Year 9 they have<br />

achieved well to reach standards that are average. Results in tests at the end of Year 9 in 2003<br />

were much better than results in similar schools. Results in 2004 are similar to those in 2003. Over<br />

the last four years, test results have improved at a faster rate than in other schools, significantly so<br />

in mathematics. Results in English are better than those in mathematics and science. The gap<br />

between boys and girls results has narrowed as boys’ results have improved. Pupils achieve very<br />

well in art and design, music and dance reflecting the school’s status as a performing arts college.<br />

They achieve well in design and technology, geography, physical education and religious education.<br />

Standards are below expectations in Year 9 in ICT. In Years 7 and 8, standards in ICT are better<br />

and pupils achieve well.<br />

Year 11 results<br />

Performance in GCSE/GNVQ<br />

examinations at the end of Year 11,<br />

compared with:<br />

<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 6<br />

all schools similar<br />

schools<br />

2001 2002 2003 2003<br />

N/A C D C<br />

Key: A - well above average; B – above average; C – average; D – below average; E – well below average<br />

Similar schools are those whose pupils attained similarly at the end of Year 9.


In 2003, the proportion of pupils gaining five or more grades A* to G was well below average. In<br />

2004 these results improved but the proportion of pupils gaining five or more A* to C grades fell and<br />

was well below the school’s target. A significant number of pupils gained D grades when they<br />

should have achieved C grades. Very few pupils gained the higher GCSE grades. In 2003 results<br />

were below average in all subjects with the exception of science where results were average. In<br />

2004, results improved in English language, mathematics, art and design, French and Spanish but<br />

declined in science, design and technology, drama and geography. Pupils achieve very well in<br />

dance and art and design. Standards are as expected in all other subjects with the exception of<br />

design and technology, history, ICT and music. In history and ICT achievement is unsatisfactory.<br />

Pupils with special educational needs and those for whom English is not their home language<br />

achieve as well as other pupils. Pupils’ achievement in other subjects, including English,<br />

mathematics and science is good and evidence suggests that results might be better in 2005.<br />

Pupils’ personal qualities including their spiritual, moral, social and cultural development are good.<br />

Pupils’ attitudes and behaviour are good and relationships within the school are very positive.<br />

Attendance and punctuality are satisfactory.<br />

QUALITY OF EDUCATION<br />

The quality of education provided by the school is good. Teaching and learning are good and<br />

assessment is satisfactory. As a result of a focus on improving teaching, lessons are well planned<br />

and structured and have a variety of activities that interest pupils and motivate them to learn. The<br />

curriculum is good but there are not enough vocational courses in Years 10 and 11 to meet the<br />

needs of all pupils. Arrangements to ensure pupils’ care, welfare and safety are very good. The<br />

school provides good support, advice and guidance and involves pupils well in its work and<br />

development. The main weakness is the lack of rigour in checking pupils’ progress to make sure<br />

that they all do as well as they can in their examinations. The school has satisfactory links with<br />

parents and very good links with other schools and colleges. Good links with the community<br />

enhance personal, social and health education lessons.<br />

LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT<br />

Leadership and management throughout the school are good. The headteacher provides very good<br />

leadership and has steadily built on the work of his predecessor. Other key staff provide good<br />

leadership. The effectiveness of management is good throughout the school although not all middle<br />

leaders are sufficiently involved in monitoring and evaluating work in their areas. Governance is<br />

good and has successfully led the school to achieve performing arts college status and to be seen<br />

as a centre for learning in the community. Governors have not done enough in the past to make<br />

sure that the school meets its statutory responsibility to provide ICT for all pupils.<br />

PARENTS’ AND PUPILS’ VIEWS OF THE SCHOOL<br />

Pupils and parents like the school. They praise the good teaching which promotes hard work. They<br />

value the individual support the school provides. Pupils and parents say that a few pupils misbehave<br />

but the school handles any incidents effectively and pupils feel secure in the school. Pupils and<br />

parents expressed concerns about the inconsistency in the use of homework and the quality of the<br />

marking of pupils work. Inspection findings agree with all these parents and pupils’ views.<br />

IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED<br />

The most important things the school should do to improve are:<br />

• Agree, implement and monitor a revised policy on marking and assessment.<br />

• Monitor the progress of individual pupils both in and across their subjects and put in place<br />

coherent programmes to reduce any potential underachievement.<br />

• Develop an approach to school self-evaluation that focuses on monitoring and evaluating the<br />

impact of agreed policies and actions on standards and teaching and learning.<br />

and, to meet statutory requirements:<br />

• Ensure that the ICT provision reflects the National Curriculum both as a taught subject and in<br />

other subjects.<br />

• Explore and implement ways of providing for a daily act of collective worship<br />

<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 7


PART B: COMMENTARY ON THE <strong>INSPECTION</strong> FINDINGS<br />

STANDARDS ACHIEVED BY PUPILS<br />

Standards achieved in areas of learning, subjects and courses<br />

Achievement is good in Years 7 to 9. By the end of Year 9, standards are average. GCSE results<br />

are below average. Although examination results dipped in 2003 and 2004, the standard of work<br />

seen is close to what is expected in most subjects. Achievement in Years 10 and 11 is satisfactory.<br />

Main strengths and weaknesses<br />

• Test results at the end of Year 9 have improved over the last three years and are above<br />

average in English.<br />

• Pupils whose literacy and numeracy skills are below average when they join the school<br />

achieve very well, particularly in Year 7.<br />

• The proportion of pupils gaining five or more A* to G grades in 2004 was much better than in<br />

2003. The proportion gaining five or more A* to C grades in 2004 was well down on 2003<br />

and well below the school’s target.<br />

• Standards are above average in dance and below average in design and technology and<br />

history and well below average in ICT. In history and ICT achievement is unsatisfactory.<br />

Commentary<br />

Standards achieved in Years 7 to 9<br />

Standards in national tests at the end of Year 9 – average point scores in 2003<br />

Standards in: <strong>School</strong> results National results<br />

English 34.3 (35.8) 33.4 (33.3)<br />

Mathematics 34.2 (33.5) 35.4 (34.7)<br />

Science 32.8 (33.2) 33.6 (33.3)<br />

There were 321 pupils in the year group. Figures in brackets are for the previous year.<br />

1. When pupils join the school the standard of their work is below average. There are very few<br />

pupils who are working at standards above those expected by the end of Year 6. By the end<br />

of Year 9 standards are average, reflecting good achievement. Results in tests at the end of<br />

Year 9 in 2003 were much better than results in similar schools. Results in 2004 are similar<br />

to those in 2003. However, results fell short of the school’s targets in English, mathematics<br />

and science. Over the last four years, test results have improved at a faster rate than in<br />

other schools, significantly so in mathematics. Results in English are better than those in<br />

mathematics and science. In English, a higher than average proportion of pupils reach<br />

standards above those expected nationally. The gap between boys’ and girls’ results has<br />

narrowed as boys’ results have improved. Pupils whose test results at the end of their<br />

primary years are well below average and those with special educational needs make very<br />

good progress and achieve very well. A team of staff work intensively with these pupils to<br />

improve their numeracy skills and their English teachers focus on developing their literacy<br />

skills. They are well supported in lessons by specialist staff and their subject teachers.<br />

Pupils whose home language is not English also achieve well.<br />

2. Pupils achieve very well in art and design, music and dance reflecting the school’s status as<br />

a performing arts college. They achieve well in design and technology, geography, physical<br />

education and religious education. Standards are below expectations in Year 9 in ICT. Until<br />

two years ago ICT was not timetabled in a way that ensured all pupils experienced the<br />

National Curriculum programme of study. In Years 7 and 8 there is a timetabled course,<br />

<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 8


standards are better and pupils achieve well. Standards are below expectations in design<br />

and technology but this is due to pupils’ limited experiences in primary schools. In modern<br />

foreign languages standards are below expectations. Pupils’ achievement is satisfactory but<br />

is limited by an unusual lack of enthusiasm for languages in these early years.<br />

Standards achieved in Years 10 and 11<br />

Standards in GCSE/GNVQ examinations at the end of Year 11 in 2003<br />

Percentage of pupils gaining 5 or more A*-C<br />

grades<br />

Percentage of pupils gaining 5 or more A*-G<br />

grades<br />

Percentage of pupils gaining 1 or more A*-G<br />

grades<br />

Average point score per pupil (best eight<br />

subjects)<br />

<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 9<br />

<strong>School</strong> results National results<br />

42.0 (42.0) 52.0 (50)<br />

82 (90) 91.0 (91)<br />

96 (97) 96.0 (96)<br />

29.7 (32.5) 34.7 (34.8)<br />

There were 307 pupils in the year group. The percentages include the equivalent GCSE grades obtained in GNVQ<br />

assessments. Figures in brackets are for the previous year.<br />

3. GCSE results in 2003 were below average and slightly below those in 2002. However, they<br />

were as good as results in similar schools. The proportion of pupils gaining five or more<br />

grades A* to G was well below average. In 2004 these results improved but the proportion of<br />

pupils gaining five or more A* to C grades fell and was well below the school’s target. A<br />

significant number of pupils gained D grades when they should have achieved C grades.<br />

The school provided a lot of additional support for these pupils but not enough work was<br />

done by all subject teachers and tutors to track the progress of all pupils’ and to intervene<br />

when necessary. Very few pupils gained the higher GCSE grades and, although the school<br />

has very few higher attaining pupils, teachers and tutors did not monitor these pupils closely<br />

enough. In 2003 results were below average in all subjects with the exception of science<br />

where results were average. In 2004, results improved in English language, mathematics, art<br />

and design, French and Spanish but declined in science, design and technology, drama and<br />

geography.<br />

4. Standards of work in Years 10 and 11 are well above expectations in dance and art and<br />

design and in these subjects pupils achieve very well. Standards are as expected in all other<br />

subjects with the exception of design and technology, history, ICT and music. In history and<br />

ICT achievement is unsatisfactory. In ICT pupils have not had the opportunity to catch up on<br />

the work they missed when they were lower down the school. In history a significant number<br />

of boys are not interested in the course they are following. Pupils with special educational<br />

needs and those for whom English is not their home language achieve as well as other<br />

pupils. Pupils’ achievement in other subjects, including English, mathematics and science is<br />

good and evidence suggests that results might be better in 2005.<br />

5. When pupils join the school a high proportion have low levels of literacy and numeracy. By<br />

the end of Year 7 these pupils have made good progress and have the skills needed to learn<br />

in other subjects. The literacy and numeracy skills of average and above average pupils are<br />

satisfactory but could be better if there was a focus on literacy and numeracy across the<br />

ability range. ICT skills are good in Years 7 and 8 but are below average in other years. In<br />

some subjects if teachers want pupils to use ICT then they have to teach them the<br />

necessary skills.<br />

Pupils’ attitudes, values and other personal qualities


Attendance is satisfactory and has improved since the previous inspection. Pupils’ attitudes and<br />

behaviour are good and relationships within the school are very positive. Provision for their spiritual,<br />

moral, social and cultural development is good overall.<br />

Main strengths and weaknesses<br />

• Pupils’ good attitudes make strong contributions to the standards they attain and their<br />

achievements.<br />

• Pupils’ behaviour is good. They are polite and self-confident and show a keen desire to<br />

learn.<br />

• The school’s ethos and high expectations and the very good range of sporting activities<br />

make a particularly strong contribution to pupils’ moral and social development.<br />

• The lack of co-ordination of spiritual, moral, social and cultural development across the<br />

school does not provide opportunities for a planned and co-ordinated approach.<br />

• Not enough is done to enable pupils to appreciate their own cultural heritage and the rich<br />

variety of cultures and traditions that exist in multicultural Britain.<br />

Commentary<br />

6. In 2002/03, attendance was well below average but improved in 2003/4. Attendance this<br />

term is better still. There has been a clear improvement in the level of attendance since the<br />

previous inspection in all years, except for Year 11 where it is still far too low. Too many<br />

parents still do not ensure that their children come to school and this limits what they could<br />

achieve. Punctuality is satisfactory and this is commendable in view of the very large school<br />

site.<br />

Attendance in the latest complete reporting year (%)<br />

Authorised absence Unauthorised absence<br />

<strong>School</strong> data 11.6 <strong>School</strong> data 3.0<br />

National data 7.2 National data 1.1<br />

The table gives the percentage of half days (sessions) missed through absence for the latest complete reporting year.<br />

7. Pupils have a good work ethic and determination to succeed. The number of pupils taking<br />

part in the wide range of enrichment activities provided, especially in sport, is very good. The<br />

small number of pupils from minority ethnic heritages, and pupils with special educational<br />

needs, are fully integrated into the school community. One important feature of the school is<br />

the mutual respect evident between staff and pupils. Pupils are valued for their individuality<br />

and helped to do well in as many ways as possible. They respond positively to this and<br />

develop during their time at school into confident young people. There are many<br />

opportunities for collaborative or group work to further develop pupils’ social skills and they<br />

willingly share and support each other in their learning The distinctive ethos of the school,<br />

which is a significant strength, encourages pupils to accept responsibility for their actions<br />

and treat everyone with respect. Pupils are well aware of right and wrong actions, have a<br />

very clear knowledge of what is expected of them and they respond well.<br />

8. Behaviour in lessons and around the school is good. Pupils state that bullying is<br />

unacceptable within the school and rarely happens. Most were confident that such matters<br />

were dealt with promptly and effectively. On the few occasions where the behaviour of pupils<br />

is unsatisfactory, it is directly related to the quality of the teaching. The school does all it can<br />

to deal with disaffected pupils within the school, only excluding them when there is no<br />

alternative. The current number of pupil exclusions has fallen as a result.<br />

<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 10


Ethnic background of pupils Exclusions in the last school year<br />

Categories used in the Annual <strong>School</strong><br />

Census<br />

No of<br />

pupils on<br />

roll<br />

<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 11<br />

Number of<br />

fixed<br />

period<br />

exclusions<br />

Number of<br />

permanent<br />

exclusions<br />

White – British 1567 240 11<br />

White – any other White background 2<br />

Mixed – White and Black African 2<br />

Asian or Asian British – Indian 5<br />

Asian or Asian British – Bangladeshi 6<br />

Black or Black British – Caribbean 4 1<br />

Black or Black British – any other Black<br />

background<br />

1 11 1<br />

Chinese 2 2<br />

Any other ethnic group 2<br />

The table gives the number of exclusions, which may be different from the number of pupils excluded.<br />

9. Religious education provides very good opportunities for the spiritual development of pupils,<br />

and opportunities exist in other subjects such as citizenship, drama and dance. The school<br />

council provides some opportunities for pupils to develop their communication skills and<br />

make important contributions to the life of the school. Pupils are self-confident and are<br />

developing well as responsible members of the community. Pupils have a limited awareness<br />

of their own cultural heritage and that of others. In addition, their cultural development does<br />

not extend sufficiently to develop an awareness and appreciation of the rich variety of<br />

different cultures and traditions that exist in this country. The school lacks a co-ordinated<br />

approach to pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development and so opportunities are<br />

missed.<br />

QUALITY OF EDUCATION PROVIDED BY THE SCHOOL<br />

The quality of education is good. Teaching and learning are good. The curriculum is satisfactory.<br />

The care, guidance and support of students are good. The school’s links with parents are<br />

satisfactory. Links with the community, business and other schools and colleges are good.<br />

Teaching and learning<br />

The quality of teaching and learning is good. The quality of assessment is satisfactory.<br />

Main strengths and weaknesses<br />

• Teaching and learning are good in all year groups with a higher proportion of very good and<br />

excellent lessons in Years 7 to 9.<br />

• Teachers are knowledgeable and plan and structure their lessons well so that pupils work<br />

hard and are productive.


• The assessment and marking of pupils’ work are inconsistent so pupils are not always clear<br />

how well they are doing or how to improve their work.<br />

• Pupil support staff make a very good contribution to the learning of pupils with special<br />

educational needs.<br />

• Teaching is very good in dance and in drama in Years 10 and 11 and in music in Years 7 to<br />

9.<br />

Commentary<br />

Summary of teaching observed during the inspection in 117 lessons<br />

Excellent Very good Good Satisfactor<br />

y<br />

<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 12<br />

Unsatisfactor<br />

y<br />

Poor Very Poor<br />

4 (3%) 20 (17%) 47 (40%) 40 (35%) 5 (4%) 1 (1%) 0 (0%)<br />

The table gives the number of lessons observed in each of the seven categories used to make judgements about<br />

lessons; figures in brackets show percentages where 30 or more lessons are seen.<br />

10. The quality of teaching and learning is good and higher than at the time of the previous<br />

inspection. Although there were a higher proportion of lessons in Years 7 to 9 where<br />

teaching was very good or excellent, overall teaching is good in all years. Teachers use their<br />

good subject knowledge well to extend pupils’ understanding and improve their skills.<br />

Lessons are well planned and carefully structured so that pupils move smoothly from one<br />

task to the next and learn well. In the best lessons, for example, in music, dance and drama,<br />

enthusiastic teaching challenges and interests all the pupils so they achieve very well.<br />

However, in some subjects higher attaining pupils are not always sufficiently challenged by<br />

the work set. Teachers relate well to most pupils and give them confidence to learn in an<br />

atmosphere of respect and trust. A good variety and balance of teaching methods ensure<br />

that boys and girls learn effectively. In some subjects homework is not set regularly or<br />

planned systematically and some of the homework set is not demanding enough. Where<br />

lessons were less than satisfactory there was a slow pace and activities did not interest<br />

pupils sufficiently to motivate them to learn. Senior managers who have responsibility for<br />

particular subject areas monitor teaching and learning effectively.<br />

11. Pupils’ literacy and numerical skills are being developed satisfactorily. Very good additional<br />

help is targeted at a large group of lower attaining pupils in Years 7 to 9, which results in a<br />

considerable improvement in their literacy and numeracy skills. In Years 7 to 9 pupils are<br />

competent in using ICT but in Years 10 and 11 not all pupils are able to use ICT effectively<br />

because they have not been taught the basics lower down the school.<br />

12. Pupils with special educational needs respond well to the very good teaching they receive<br />

and achieve very well. Support staff and teachers help to raise pupils’ literacy standards by<br />

setting very effective short-term targets, which motivate pupils to learn. The progress of<br />

pupils with special educational needs is assessed and monitored very well.<br />

13. Some subject departments and individual teachers assess and mark pupils work well but this<br />

good practice is not consistent across the whole school. <strong>School</strong> policies allow subject<br />

departments to develop their own systems for marking and assessment, which results in<br />

these inconsistencies. This means that pupils are not always clear about how well they are<br />

doing or how to improve their work. In many departments the results of assessments are not<br />

used fully to plan pupils’ work and set them realistic targets for improvement. New methods<br />

of assessment are being used well in some subjects but have not yet been shared and<br />

adopted by other departments.


The curriculum<br />

The curriculum in Years 7 to 9 is good, and is satisfactory in Years 10 and 11. There is a good<br />

range of enrichment activities. The match of teachers to the curriculum is good and they are<br />

supported by good resources and accommodation.<br />

Main strengths and weaknesses<br />

• The range and quality of courses is good in Years 7 to 9 but the range of courses in Years<br />

10 and 11 does not fully meet the needs of pupils.<br />

• There is very good support and a good curriculum for pupils with special educational needs.<br />

• There are good extra-curricular activities for all pupils, particularly in sport.<br />

• Performing arts college status is enhancing provision in music, dance and drama.<br />

• Teachers and support staff are well qualified and experienced, but support staff are not<br />

available to all subjects.<br />

Commentary<br />

14. In Years 7 to 9, the curriculum is good. It is well planned for all pupils and provides<br />

particularly well for pupils with special educational needs. In Years 10 and 11 the range of<br />

courses is not wide enough to meet the needs of all pupils. There are not enough vocational<br />

courses with only design and technology and ICT providing such courses. A wide range of<br />

academic courses is provided though in history the course does not generate the interest of<br />

the pupils. In modern foreign languages all pupils are still required to study a language, with<br />

the result that some pupils have unacceptable attitudes. The recognition of the school’s<br />

status as a performing arts college is beginning to have an impact and will rightly build on<br />

and extend the good provision in music, dance and drama. The school has ambitious plans<br />

for the curriculum in 2005 that will provide all pupils with a wider choice of appropriate<br />

academic and vocational courses.<br />

15. The school meets statutory requirements with regard to the National Curriculum with the<br />

exception of a planned programme of ICT for all pupils in Year 11. The school does not meet<br />

requirements with regard to a daily act of collective worship. The personal, social and health<br />

education programme makes a good contribution to pupils’ personal development. Provision<br />

for careers education and work-related learning is good.<br />

16. Provision for pupils with special learning needs is very good. A detailed programme of<br />

support is provided for these pupils in Year 7 to develop their literacy and numeracy skills.<br />

Gifted and talented pupils are identified but the provision of tasks within lessons to help them<br />

achieve in line with their higher abilities is only satisfactory. The school has provided an<br />

effective alternative curriculum for a small number of pupils in Years 10 and 11 who are at<br />

risk of becoming disaffected.<br />

17. There is good support for learning outside the school day, including homework clubs and<br />

opportunities for pupils to discuss their work with teachers. Teachers provide a wide range of<br />

activities, but the take up of these is limited. However, there is good participation in sports<br />

<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 13


and arts activities as well as a good range of instrumental teaching in Years 7 to 9. The<br />

school has reviewed its arrangements for activities week so that all pupils can participate in<br />

all the activities offered.<br />

18. The school has a good team of qualified teachers. Teaching assistants and support staff are<br />

experienced and hard working. Where they are available in lessons their activities are well<br />

planned to support specific pupils. However, a number of subjects do not have support from<br />

such staff. Teachers and pupils in modern foreign languages enjoy support from language<br />

assistants in each language they study. Accommodation supports pupils’ learning well. The<br />

site is large, clean and welcoming. There are adequate toilets, dining and social areas for<br />

pupils. Resources for learning are good. A number of subjects have interactive white boards<br />

that are well used to enhance teaching styles and demonstrations. However, not all subjects<br />

have sufficient access to ICT facilities. The continuing programme of development is tackling<br />

this issue well. The Information Centre is well managed and provides a good range of ICT<br />

resources to support pupils’ learning.<br />

Care, guidance and support<br />

Arrangements to ensure pupils’ care, welfare and safety are very good. The school provides good<br />

support, advice and guidance and involves pupils well in its work and development.<br />

Main strengths and weaknesses<br />

• Day to day procedures for ensuring pupils’ well-being are very effective.<br />

• Well-planned induction procedures help incoming pupils to settle quickly.<br />

• Procedures for monitoring pupils’ academic progress lack rigour, so that underachievement<br />

is not identified early enough.<br />

• Pupils receive very good advice to help them make decisions about subject choices and<br />

career paths.<br />

• Pupils are given opportunities to express their views, and feel that their views are valued.<br />

Commentary<br />

19. The school takes very good care of its pupils. Staff work effectively with partner primary<br />

schools to ensure a smooth transition into Year 7. Pupils confirm that they settle well in their<br />

new surroundings and quickly establish good relationships with staff. They feel that there is<br />

always someone they can trust to help them if they have concerns or problems. Health and<br />

safety arrangements are rigorous, for example, risk assessments in science and design and<br />

technology, and Internet screening. Child protection arrangements are very good. All staff<br />

receive appropriate training, and new staff and student teachers are made fully aware of<br />

procedures. The Pupil Support Service works effectively to cater for individual learning<br />

needs, and is successful in reducing the number of exclusions. A full-time nurse is employed<br />

and liases well with other staff to ensure that thorough records are kept of illness and<br />

accidents. The school has earned a Healthy <strong>School</strong>s Award and encourages pupils to think<br />

about personal health and environmental issues. For example, Year 7 pupils use some of<br />

their tutor time on a ‘Fit To Learn’ exercise programme led by Junior Sports Leaders from<br />

Year 11.<br />

20. Arrangements for monitoring pupils’ academic achievement are less effective because they<br />

are inconsistent and unclear. The principal method of communication is a pupil information<br />

record form. Pupils confirm that staff use this inconsistently. Two days per year are set aside<br />

for individual progress reviews. However, arrangements for collecting the data needed to<br />

agree targets are inadequate, and subsequent communication of subject-specific targets to<br />

the relevant teachers is also flawed. Consequently information on underachievement is not<br />

picked up and acted on quickly enough. This contributed to the disappointing GCSE results<br />

in 2004. The school is aware of shortcomings in this area of provision and is formulating<br />

plans to make the role of the form tutor more effective. The lack of a well managed<br />

<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 14


homework schedule concerns pupils, who find they have too much some days, and none on<br />

other days.<br />

21. Pupils benefit from clear and helpful guidance in Year 9 when they are choosing courses for<br />

Years 10 and 11. From Year 7, careers education is included in their personal, social and<br />

health education programme. The quality of careers information and guidance is very good.<br />

The school liases very well with outside agencies. Its careers partner, Connexions, for<br />

example, attends parents’ consultation evenings, and provides individual careers interviews.<br />

Pupils have opportunities to express their views through year councils and the school<br />

council. They feel that their views are valued. For example, the provision of high quality,<br />

secure bicycle sheds is a response to their wishes.<br />

Partnership with parents, other schools and the community<br />

The school has satisfactory links with parents, very good links with other schools and colleges<br />

and good links with the community.<br />

Main strengths and weaknesses<br />

• The school works very well with the parents of pupils experiencing difficulty in school.<br />

• Secure links with local primary schools ensure the very smooth transfer of pupils to <strong>Brune</strong><br />

<strong>Park</strong>.<br />

• The school successfully harnesses the interests and skills of local people to the benefit of<br />

pupils and staff.<br />

• The school misses opportunities to foster the interest of all parents in their child’s education.<br />

Commentary<br />

22. <strong>School</strong> staff know pupils and their families well and involve parents quickly when any<br />

intervention is necessary. Staff are particularly conscientious about communicating with<br />

parents of pupils who have any special education or additional needs or those returning from<br />

being excluded. The school arranges very effective support from a wide range of agencies<br />

and ensures that parents are partners in this collaboration. Parents are therefore confident<br />

that the school meets their child’s individual needs and value the support given. The school<br />

organises a good range of information evenings to help parents. A course about coping with<br />

teenagers was well attended during the inspection week. The majority of parents are very<br />

supportive of the school but, despite the school’s best efforts, there remains a small, but<br />

significant minority who refuse to work positively with the school in, for instance, securing<br />

their child’s regular attendance.<br />

23. Parents report that their concerns are handled promptly using correct procedures. A small<br />

minority of parents are uncertain about the procedures for leaving messages. Parents value<br />

the monthly bulletin and welcome the opportunity to return comments about the school. This<br />

bulletin, however, does not reflect the vibrant quality of school life nor contain sufficient<br />

advance warning of all key dates and events.<br />

24. Parents receive good information about the curriculum in pupils’ reports. In about half of the<br />

subjects, however, the language used is over-elaborate and difficult for parents and pupils to<br />

interpret. The school is not clear with parents about its homework policy. This restricts<br />

parents’ ability to support their child’s learning at home.<br />

25. The school is energetic in its search for community partners including local industries. Pupils<br />

benefit from a good range of activities. Staff absorb the skills and resources offered into the<br />

daily life of the school. Many partners, for instance, provide outstanding support to the<br />

careers education, the personal and social education and citizenship programmes. Many<br />

people from the community use the schools facilities regularly.<br />

<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 15


26. The school is sincerely committed to working in partnership with other schools and colleges.<br />

Other schools often use <strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong>’s facilities. Teachers participate regularly in subject<br />

activities with the local cluster of primary schools. The school plays a lead role in the<br />

continuous development of these clusters. Performing arts college status, and the additional<br />

funds this attracts, enables teachers to share their expertise with other schools.<br />

Arrangements to help pupils choose and transfer to post-16 institutions, training providers or<br />

employment are very thorough. These close links secure efficient information exchange<br />

about the curriculum and individual pupils so that transition and induction are very effective.<br />

The school works very well with colleges, universities and training providers. Pupils<br />

attending college courses praise the courses and the chance to meet with pupils from other<br />

schools. These activities successfully foster the pupils’ confidence, self-esteem and<br />

aspirations for their future.<br />

LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT<br />

The overall quality of leadership and management throughout the school is good. The headteacher<br />

provides very good leadership. Other key staff with responsibility provide good leadership. The<br />

effectiveness of management is good throughout the school. The overall quality of governance is<br />

good.<br />

Main strengths and weaknesses<br />

• The headteacher has created an atmosphere where staff are given responsibilities and their<br />

contribution to the school is valued.<br />

• Whole school policies are not explicit enough in ensuring consistently good practice across<br />

all departments.<br />

• Performance management and the professional development of staff are very good.<br />

• The governing body is well organised and has a clear vision for the direction of the school. In<br />

the past governors have not made sure that the school fulfilled all its statutory<br />

responsibilities.<br />

• Leadership and management at departmental and year level is good overall and has the<br />

capacity to work together to achieve greater consistency of practice.<br />

Commentary<br />

27. The headteacher’s very good leadership has been a key factor in the school’s success. His<br />

clarity of vision and measured implementation of change have influenced all aspects of the<br />

school’s work. With good support from other key staff he has created a climate for innovation<br />

that shows in the quality of teaching and the attitude of pupils to their studies. Throughout<br />

the school there is a strong sense of shared purpose, which communicates itself to pupils<br />

and parents. Pupils appreciate the secure, ordered and pleasant climate for learning created<br />

by all the staff. Leaders, at all levels, work hard to ensure that the school’s aims are realised.<br />

Whilst the school development plan is built on good consultation with staff and governors<br />

and focuses clearly on whole school priorities, links with departmental plans are not<br />

sufficiently identified. Some aspects of the plan are repetitive and it does not yet provide a<br />

strong basis for school self-evaluation.<br />

28. The school is well managed. Members of the senior management team monitor the work of<br />

departments through regular reviews of teaching and learning and by a critical analysis of<br />

examination results. The monitoring and evaluation process for some whole school policies,<br />

such as assessment, marking and homework, are not sufficiently explicit. These policies<br />

currently give too much freedom for subject leaders to make their own decisions on practice.<br />

There is also not enough involvement of middle leaders in monitoring and evaluating the<br />

quality of work in their areas of responsibility. As a result this process does not ensure<br />

consistency of good practice across all departments. Leadership and management at<br />

departmental level are inconsistent but good overall. Leadership is excellent and<br />

inspirational in art and design, but unsatisfactory in history. Leadership and management of<br />

<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 16


the provision for pupils with special educational needs are very good and focus especially<br />

well on individual needs.<br />

29. The school values its staff who clearly enjoy working in the school. The professional<br />

development of all staff is related to individual and school priorities and provides a wide<br />

range of opportunities for staff to improve their contribution to the work of the school. There<br />

is excellent support in place for the 11 newly qualified teachers at the school. Performance<br />

management is a well-established process, used with all staff. As a result all those working<br />

at the school are encouraged to raise their expectations and contribute to the development<br />

of others. In addition considerable effort has successfully been made to recruit and retain<br />

high quality staff.<br />

30. The financial management of the school is a strength. There is an effective system in place<br />

for making informed decisions about school priorities and the school applies value for money<br />

principles effectively. Through securing financial support for the performing arts school bid<br />

the school realised that funding could be found in different ways. The school is now very<br />

successful at identifying and accessing limited grants and other financial support.<br />

Financial information<br />

Financial information for the year April 2003 to March 2004<br />

Income and expenditure (£) Balances (£)<br />

Total income 5,900,393 Balance from previous year 348,555<br />

Total expenditure 6,013,082 Balance carried forward to the<br />

next<br />

Expenditure per pupil 3,721<br />

<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 17<br />

235,866<br />

31. The overall quality of governance is good. The governors are committed to the school’s<br />

continued development and there is a well-organised committee structure that ensures that<br />

developments are closely monitored. The governors have a good understanding of the<br />

strengths and weaknesses of the school and a clear vision for its future direction. They<br />

played an important role in supporting the successful bid for specialist performing arts<br />

college status. Until two years ago, governors had not ensured the school fulfilled its<br />

statutory duty to provide ICT in all years. It is now in place in all years with the exception of<br />

Year 11. The new ICT co-ordinator has plans, supported by governors, to ensure that<br />

statutory requirements are fully met from 2005. The school does not provide a daily act of<br />

collective worship.<br />

OTHER SPECIFIED FEATURES<br />

Work-related learning<br />

Provision for work related learning is good.<br />

Main strengths and weaknesses<br />

• The school has successfully built on previous good practice in careers education and work<br />

experience.<br />

• The management and co-ordination of work-related learning is very good.<br />

• The current range of vocational subjects is too narrow.<br />

Commentary


32. The school has made a good response to the very recently introduced statutory<br />

requirements for work-related learning. Its commitment to this area of learning is<br />

demonstrated by the appointment of a non-teaching co-ordinator. The college already had a<br />

programme of work shadowing and work experience that has been held up as a model<br />

locally and this has provided a very good base for further development.<br />

33. Partnerships with a wide range of small and multi-national businesses provide opportunities<br />

for pupils to gain insights into the world of work and the skills and qualities that are needed<br />

for success. All pupils undertake a two-week placement and benefit from very good<br />

preparation and follow-up. There is very effective careers education through the personal,<br />

social and health education programme, links with Connexions, and advice on CVs and job<br />

applications and mock interviews with representatives from the local business community. A<br />

Skills for Work day gives pupils problem solving and team enterprise opportunities and<br />

enables them to understand how business works.<br />

34. There are limited opportunities for pupils to follow vocational courses in Years 10 and 11 but<br />

this situation is being addressed and more vocational courses are planned for 2005. In<br />

addition to the school's own provision there are opportunities for pupils to follow vocational<br />

courses at Fareham College and local training providers. A small number of high attaining<br />

pupils are following courses in marine and motor engineering and larger numbers of lower<br />

attaining pupils follow appropriate courses in, for example, catering and motor vehicle<br />

maintenance. A group of pupils in each of Years 10 and 11 who are unable to cope with the<br />

demands of school follow a full-time course at Fairport Training Organisation. They are<br />

meeting with great success and speak movingly of the quality and value of this alternative<br />

education.<br />

35. This area of the college's work is well led and co-ordinated. Very regular contact is made<br />

with off-site providers of vocational courses and monitoring of pupils' progress is effectively<br />

conducted. An audit has been taken of actual and potential provision for work-related<br />

learning in subjects but as yet it is too early to judge its impact on achievement in subjects.<br />

<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 18


PART C: THE QUALITY OF EDUCATION IN SUBJECTS AND COURSES<br />

SUBJECTS IN KEY STAGES 3 AND 4<br />

ENGLISH AND MODERN FOREIGN LANGUAGES<br />

English<br />

Provision in English is good.<br />

Main strengths and weaknesses<br />

• Pupils achieve well and results in Year 9 tests in 2003 were above average. Results in<br />

GCSE English literature are too low.<br />

• The quality of teaching is consistently good and ensures all pupils enjoy English lessons.<br />

• Good relationships between teachers and pupils promote confidence and a willingness to<br />

attempt difficult work.<br />

• Marking is inconsistent and in some cases does not provide adequate guidance on how to<br />

improve.<br />

• Effective support is provided for the lowest attaining pupils, both by subject staff and support<br />

assistants.<br />

Commentary<br />

36. In Year 9, standards are average and have improved markedly since the previous<br />

inspection. In national tests in 2003, results were above average and were well above<br />

average compared with schools with pupils with similar prior attainment. Unconfirmed results<br />

for 2004 are close to national expectations. These standards are reflected in work seen<br />

during the inspection. Pupils enter the school with below average attainment and thus<br />

achieve well by Year 9. GCSE results in English language and English literature in 2003<br />

were below average. Unconfirmed results for 2004 show an improvement in language and a<br />

drop in literature results. Work seen during the inspection shows standards in line with<br />

national expectations in language and close to the school target. In literature, where results<br />

are consistently below average, a major factor is that the school enters all pupils for the<br />

examination course, whereas a much smaller proportion of pupils are entered nationally.<br />

Year 11 entered the school well below average in English and so have achieved well in<br />

English language. This good achievement applies to all pupils including those with special<br />

educational needs. Although the attainment of girls is better than that of boys, this reflects<br />

the national pattern.<br />

37. By Year 9 nearly all pupils participate confidently in discussions and listen attentively to each<br />

other. By Year 11 higher attaining pupils have made good progress in using different tone<br />

and vocabulary relevant to the task. Pupils read enthusiastically. By Year 9 all but the<br />

weakest have started to identify salient features and themes in fiction. By Year 11 a majority<br />

identify how writers use different styles and techniques. By Year 9 most pupils write in a<br />

range of styles. Although weaker pupils encounter difficulties with technical accuracy, many<br />

make good progress in this area. By Year 11 the most successful pupils structure and<br />

extend writing effectively and develop arguments coherently.<br />

38. Teaching and learning are consistently good and some lessons are very good. Good<br />

questioning techniques are a major feature of the department. They involve pupils of all<br />

abilities and enable teachers to evaluate understanding. On occasions there are not enough<br />

opportunities for extended oral work to make demands on the most able pupils.<br />

Relationships between teachers and pupils are very good and help engender confidence.<br />

Lessons are usually well structured and contain a good balance of activities reflecting<br />

successful implementation of aspects of the National Key Stage 3 Strategy. A good range of<br />

activities also permeates the best lessons in Year 10 and 11. The one aspect of lesson<br />

structure that is less well applied is a summing up or review at the end. Too often this is<br />

<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 19


ushed or slightly cursory. Pupils with special educational needs are well supported, both by<br />

subject teachers and pupil support and literacy support assistants. Marking of pupils’ work is<br />

far too variable. At best, it carefully recognises achievement and gives guidance on how to<br />

improve. In other instances, it is far too sketchy with an inadequate focus on areas to be<br />

addressed. Pupils respond to the good teaching and good relationships with an enthusiastic<br />

approach. They collaborate well when given opportunities and are keen to participate.<br />

39. The curriculum for Years 7 to 9 ensures consistency across the department. Opportunities<br />

for extended writing that are a good preparation for work in Years 10 and 11 are, however,<br />

relatively limited. There are currently no alternative courses for the large number of pupils<br />

who fail to achieve higher grades in GCSE English literature. The department contributes<br />

well to the social, moral and cultural development of pupils. Opportunities for the<br />

development of ICT skills are included in planning for Years 7 and 8, and some good work<br />

achieved. In other years such opportunities are not formally planned in the curriculum.<br />

40. Leadership and management of English are good. There is consistency both in the approach<br />

to teaching and the resulting good quality of lessons. Teachers have a corporate<br />

understanding of priorities and view lesson observations positively as professional<br />

development. The monitoring of marking is not yet sufficient to ensure the same consistency<br />

as occurs in lessons. Improvements in the issues raised in the previous report are good.<br />

Language and literacy across the curriculum<br />

41. Standards in literacy and language are sufficient to support learning across the curriculum.<br />

Reading skills are better developed than writing skills. The provision for developing such<br />

skills is satisfactory overall but there is variability in practice between and within<br />

departments. Successful whole school training on developing different aspects of writing has<br />

taken place. There is, however, neither a literacy co-ordinator nor a whole school literacy<br />

policy so a corporate and managed approach is lacking. The provision for addressing<br />

weaknesses in literacy for very low attaining pupils including those with special educational<br />

needs is very good. A successful literacy intervention strategy is well taught, co-ordinated<br />

and monitored. The teaching of literacy for other pupils is satisfactory but inconsistent. There<br />

is good practice in a number of departments. In religious education, writing frames are used<br />

effectively to support extended writing. In geography and music there is a strong emphasis<br />

on key vocabulary. The marking of literacy varies greatly between departments and<br />

individual teachers.<br />

Modern foreign languages<br />

Provision in modern foreign languages is satisfactory.<br />

Main strengths and weaknesses<br />

• Standards at the end of Year 9 and at GCSE were well below average in 2003, but improved<br />

in 2004 in both French and Spanish.<br />

• The quality of teaching and learning is satisfactory and could be better.<br />

• Negative attitudes to the subject present a barrier to learning, especially in Years 10 and 11.<br />

• High quality accommodation and resources are helping teachers to improve attitudes and<br />

standards.<br />

Commentary<br />

42. Teachers’ assessments show that standards in French and Spanish were well below<br />

average in 2003. There was significant improvement in 2004. GCSE results in French and<br />

Spanish at grades A* to C were well below average in 2003, for both boys and girls.<br />

Although there was good improvement in 2004, pupils did worse in languages than in other<br />

subjects. Boys improved in 2004 to perform equally with girls. Very few pupils gained A* and<br />

<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 20


A grades. Almost all pupils must study a language to GCSE, which causes some<br />

resentment. This accounts for below average results across the full range of grades, A* to G.<br />

43. Standards are below expectations by the end of Year 9. However, this indicates satisfactory<br />

progress and achievement given that pupils have no modern foreign language experience in<br />

their primary schools. Higher attainers recall vocabulary better, so that they speak and write<br />

at greater length and have better comprehension skills than other pupils, including those with<br />

special educational needs. In Year 11 higher attaining pupils reach average standards, but<br />

standards remain below expectations overall, especially in speaking and listening.<br />

Structured support for coursework helps pupils to write coherently. Standards continue to<br />

improve because revised teaching methods are having an impact on learning, so that<br />

achievement in Years 10 and 11 is satisfactory. However, substantial numbers of pupils<br />

express negative attitudes, which impede their progress.<br />

44. Teaching and learning are satisfactory. There is some good teaching, especially in Spanish.<br />

Where teaching is unsatisfactory it is because activities lack purpose and fail to engage<br />

pupils in learning. Teachers’ use of interactive whiteboards is improving visual support for<br />

learning and is instrumental in improving boys’ standards and the attitudes of younger pupils.<br />

Some teachers’ over-use of English in lessons contributes to unsatisfactory listening skills.<br />

In too many lessons, and in homework, pupils are not sufficiently challenged. This applies<br />

especially to more able pupils, as the focus in lessons is usually in raising standards to the<br />

average rather than extending all learners. Consequently, planning provides few<br />

opportunities for pupils to work independently. Marking is inconsistent, although teachers set<br />

appropriate targets for improvement.<br />

45. Leadership and management are satisfactory. The department functions well on a day-today<br />

basis. The head of department uses new technology very well and is helping a<br />

committed team to develop their ICT skills. He has a good grasp of national developments in<br />

languages. Arrangements for monitoring the work of the department are good, but have not<br />

led to effective strategies for ensuring greater consistency in teaching. The department<br />

development plan is not sufficiently focused on how to improve attitudes and girls’ standards.<br />

Improvement since the previous inspection has been satisfactory. Very good<br />

accommodation and a good range of resources give teachers the tools to sustain current<br />

improvement.<br />

MATHEMATICS<br />

Provision In mathematics is good.<br />

Main strengths and weaknesses<br />

• Pupils achieve well and enjoy mathematics because of the good teaching and learning.<br />

• Good leadership has identified key priorities for improvement.<br />

• The work done with pupils with low levels of numeracy skills when they join the school has a<br />

significant impact on the standards they reach.<br />

• Very good links with primary schools ensure pupils make good progress in Year 7.<br />

• Monitoring of pupil progress is not sufficiently developed.<br />

• Assessment is unsatisfactory and pupils are not always clear about what they need to do to<br />

improve.<br />

Commentary<br />

46. Pupils enter the school with standards of attainment that are well below average. By the end<br />

of Years 9 and 11 standards are average and higher than expected for schools with pupils<br />

who attained similarly at the start of Year 7. A much higher proportion of pupils than<br />

expected are entered for GCSE examinations. This represents good progress and<br />

achievement and overall the school provides well for its pupils.<br />

<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 21


47. Both boys and girls make similarly good progress and achieve well. Pupils with special<br />

educational needs are well supported by teachers and teaching assistants and achieve well<br />

in their GCSE examinations. In Year 7 there is a programme of intervention that enables<br />

pupils with special educational needs to achieve levels beyond expectation. The<br />

achievement of this group of pupils is very good. The programme is being extended to<br />

include pupils currently studying for GCSE in 2005. Standards of work seen in books are in<br />

line with national expectations. The most able pupils are attaining the highest levels in their<br />

class work and are able to solve complex questions confidently. Number skills have<br />

improved and are now satisfactory, however, there is insufficient use of mathematics for<br />

problem solving.<br />

48. The quality of teaching is good overall. The department now has a stable, well-qualified staff<br />

who work very hard to achieve the best for pupils. Teachers are well supported by a<br />

dedicated group of teaching assistants who make a significant impact on the learning of the<br />

pupils they support. There are several examples of lessons where teaching is good or very<br />

good and on rare occasions teaching that is poor. Where teaching is very good, lessons are<br />

well planned and make good use of ICT to enhance the learning. The pace of the lesson is<br />

brisk and challenging, work is well matched to pupils’ needs and the good use of questions<br />

enthuses the pupils to rise to the challenge and achieve their best. On the rare occasion that<br />

teaching is less than satisfactory there are low expectations, insufficient challenge in the<br />

work and the pace of the lesson is slow. The resulting decline in behaviour hinders the<br />

progress of pupils in the group. The quality of marking is inconsistent. There are examples of<br />

detailed marking which provides good quality information to pupils about their work.<br />

However, on too many occasions marking is brief and pupils are not clear about the reasons<br />

for errors and how to improve a piece of work. Pupils often mark their own work and there<br />

are instances where incorrect answers are marked correct.<br />

49. Links with primary schools are well developed. The department analyses Year 6 tests in<br />

detail and uses the information to plan for Year 7. This ensures very good support is<br />

provided for pupils when they enter Year 7 and is raising standards of achievement in Year 7<br />

to 9. The mathematics department is inviting and attractive. Teachers have their own rooms<br />

equipped with interactive white boards, which are used effectively to introduce lessons.<br />

Good teacher-pupil relationships based on teachers’ secure subject knowledge and<br />

understanding of the learning needs of pupils improve the quality of learning and<br />

achievement. Pupils are pleasant and enthusiastic, but they do not always recall earlier work<br />

as well as they should. Although the department has a lot of data about pupils and there are<br />

target-setting systems in place, staff have focussed on groups rather than the monitoring the<br />

progress of individual pupils. Teachers do not effectively identify the necessary early<br />

warnings for those pupils at risk of falling below expected levels of attainment. New<br />

procedures are being put into place and there are signs that these are having the required<br />

effect. The department is on line to achieve its current targets.<br />

50. Leadership of the department is good and management is satisfactory. The head of<br />

department has accurately identified what needed to be done. Detailed schemes of work<br />

now provide good guidance to teachers. Teachers use the guidance in the National<br />

Numeracy Strategy well so that lessons follow a similar format. There is a regular<br />

programme of lesson monitoring that supports the performance management of staff. The<br />

outcomes of the monitoring inform the professional development programme for the<br />

department. There is, however, inconsistency in the application of some of the procedures<br />

identified in departmental policies. There has been good improvement since the previous<br />

inspection.<br />

Mathematics across the curriculum<br />

<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 22


51. Overall the provision for mathematics across the curriculum is satisfactory. Whole school<br />

training has been provided on how mathematics can be used and promoted in other<br />

subjects. A successful programme in Year 7 improves the numeracy skills of the lowest<br />

attainers to levels that enable them to cope with work in other subjects. As with literacy,<br />

there is no co-ordinator to ensure that the numeracy skills of pupils of all abilities are<br />

successfully developed and improved.<br />

SCIENCE<br />

Provision in science is good.<br />

Main strengths and weaknesses<br />

• Pupils do well in examinations in comparison to their standards when they join the school.<br />

• The department is very well led and well managed.<br />

• Teaching and learning are good which leads to good achievement in most lessons.<br />

• Pupils are not given enough opportunities for independent learning.<br />

• Teachers and pupils have good relationships, contributing to a good learning environment.<br />

• There is an imbalance in the number of subject specialist teachers, which creates<br />

difficulties when matching groups with teachers.<br />

Commentary<br />

52. Pupils enter the school with below average attainment with relatively few having higher<br />

levels. Results in the 2003 national tests at the end of Year 9 were just below average, due<br />

to the smaller number of higher attaining pupils. Compared to similar schools, science<br />

results are above average and achievement is good. Apart from a slight fall in 2003, results<br />

have improved in line with results nationally. Attainment of girls is now close to that of boys.<br />

Results in 2004 were similar. Work seen in lessons and in pupils’ books indicates that this<br />

standard has been maintained, although it is affected by low literacy levels of many pupils.<br />

53. GCSE results were slightly above average in 2003 though, as with other subjects, they fell<br />

slightly in 2004. Attainment of girls is very close to that of boys and for both groups is<br />

significantly above that of other subjects. Relatively few pupils attain above grade C.<br />

Standards of work seen matches expectation and shows good progress. Coursework is well<br />

presented using pupils’ ICT skills developed by the department. By the end of Year 11 pupils<br />

achieve well. Only a small proportion of pupils are entered for the higher grade papers on<br />

the basis of proven ability during the GCSE course. The achievement of students with<br />

special educational needs is also good. This is due to the support provided in lessons by<br />

teachers who are fully aware of individual needs<br />

54. Teaching and learning are good. The relatively large number of teachers forms an effective<br />

team with a broad range of experience. Newly qualified teachers are well supported within<br />

the team, which contributes to the overall effectiveness of lessons. Teachers share very<br />

good relationships with the students who work in a co-operative manner. Pupils’ good<br />

attitudes lead to a good learning environment. Lessons are well planned and structured and<br />

involve frequent use of practical work. Pupils enjoy these activities which contribute to the<br />

development of skills needed for coursework. In lessons there are often insufficient<br />

opportunities for pupils to have responsibility for their own learning which would enhance the<br />

degree of challenge. This is especially true for those pupils capable of higher grade passes.<br />

ICT resources are well used to enhance the learning, though resources for whole class use<br />

within the department are limited. Teachers mark students’ work regularly with appropriate<br />

use of praise and effort grades. However, there was a lack of consistency in terms of pupils<br />

receiving written detailed comments on how to improve. Pupils are not always aware of the<br />

standard of their work, apart from test and module results, and were often vague about their<br />

target grades.<br />

<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 23


55. Leadership of the department is very good. The experienced team leader has developed a<br />

strong team ethos that is shared with the hard working technicians, who support the<br />

department well. Leadership places a high priority in helping to develop teachers’ skills and<br />

sharing their good practice. Although there is a shortage of specialist chemistry and physics<br />

teachers the department leader addresses this by organising effective training and support<br />

material. However, some teachers still have inadequate depth of specialist knowledge<br />

outside their own subject discipline. This contributes to inadequate challenge for higher<br />

ability groups. Areas requiring attention are already being addressed or included in the<br />

development plan.<br />

56. Management is good. A comprehensive pupil database has been developed by the<br />

department and is very well used to monitor progress of pupils and attainments of teaching<br />

groups against clear targets. This monitoring and action taken contribute to the pupils’<br />

successes in GCSE examinations. Routine monitoring of teaching and marking is shared<br />

between senior department staff and management. Although the department has produced<br />

clear policies and monitoring guidelines, there are inconsistencies within the department.<br />

Overall improvement since the previous inspection has been good. This is especially true of<br />

standards, which have been maintained at close to national levels and are now above those<br />

of similar schools. An applied science course at GCSE is being trialed, which provides an<br />

alternative option though it is not yet available to all pupils.<br />

INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY<br />

The provision for ICT is unsatisfactory.<br />

Main strengths and weaknesses<br />

• Standards are well below average at the end of Year 9 although standards are much better<br />

in Years 7 and 8.<br />

• Good planning, structured lessons and vocational courses are improving learning.<br />

• Pupils are not involved in target setting and assessment, so are not fully aware of how to<br />

improve their work.<br />

• The school does not fully comply with statutory requirements in Years 10 and 11.<br />

Commentary<br />

57. Teacher assessments at end of Year 9 in 2003 were well below average. This position<br />

continued in 2004. These pupils, however, had only been taught a structured ICT course in<br />

Year 9. The introduction of the national strategy for all pupils in Years 7 to 9 is beginning to<br />

raise standards, but pupils’ work is still below national expectations. Achievement is<br />

satisfactory<br />

58. There were no ICT timetabled lessons in Years 10 and 11 before 2004. All pupils in Year 10<br />

are now taught ICT, but the standard of their work is well below national expectations. A third<br />

of pupils in Year 10 also follow vocational courses. The standard of their work is improving,<br />

but is still below national expectations. Achievement overall is unsatisfactory. Pupils are<br />

gaining good skills in using ICT and some knowledge about the facilities of software and how<br />

ICT is used in the real world. They do not have sufficient opportunities to apply their<br />

understanding of ICT.<br />

59. Teaching and learning are satisfactory in Years 7 to 10. Good planning and lesson structure,<br />

with challenging tasks, ensure pupils acquire skills and knowledge. Teachers do not always<br />

use suitable activities to ensure pupils understand how and why ICT is used. They give<br />

individual support to pupils with special educational needs, but there is not always different<br />

work for them to do so that they achieve as well as other pupils. The provision of additional<br />

activities for higher attaining pupils is inconsistent so they do not always progress as well as<br />

they are able. Pupils’ work in Years 7 to 9 is accurately assessed against National<br />

Curriculum levels, though they are not involved in setting their targets. They do not always<br />

<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 24


know what to do to reach higher levels. Homework is set regularly, but there is inconsistent<br />

use of comments to help pupils understand how they can improve. Opportunities to develop<br />

literacy and numeracy skills are not yet fully developed.<br />

60. Leadership and management are now good. There had been no expansion of ICT until two<br />

years ago. The head of department’s good vision of how to improve pupils’ experiences in<br />

ICT has led to positive developments. The curriculum in Years 7 to 9 and the school’s first<br />

vocational courses in Year 10 meet pupils’ needs. Timetabling constraints prevent all pupils<br />

from following the vocational courses. Pupils in Year 11 do not receive any ICT and the core<br />

curriculum offered to all pupils in Year 10 does not provide the full range of ICT. Pupils do<br />

not fully experience measurement and control or modelling. The well-led team of teachers is<br />

dedicated to raising standards. Assessment procedures have been introduced. Resources to<br />

support learning have been increased, but not all pupils have individual access to a<br />

computer. Development is continuing, to ensure that the pupil-computer ratio matches the<br />

national picture and improves network stability. An Internet policy is in place, but pupils and<br />

parents are not required to sign up to it. These developments represent good improvement<br />

over the last two years.<br />

Information and communication technology across the curriculum<br />

61. The school has completed a helpful audit of how other subjects contribute to pupils’ ICT<br />

experiences. Teachers, in a number of subjects, make good use of ICT, particularly<br />

interactive white boards, to demonstrate lesson topics and tasks. However, only one or two<br />

departments use ICT to extend pupils’ learning. A number of teachers are eager to expand<br />

this aspect of learning but the limited resources and access currently prevent this. However,<br />

the developments currently taking place will address some of these concerns. The previous<br />

patchy ICT experiences of pupils in Years 7 to 9 prevent them from effectively using the full<br />

range of ICT in Years 10 and 11. Pupils make good use of the resources in the Information<br />

Centre to research and create presentations.<br />

HUMANITIES<br />

History<br />

Provision in history is unsatisfactory.<br />

Main strengths and weaknesses<br />

• Achievement in Years 7 to 9 is good but recent standards at GCSE were well below<br />

average.<br />

• Irregular attendance and poor attitudes to learning by a significant minority reduce the<br />

impact of teaching.<br />

• Subject management has not secured consistently good practice in teaching or marking.<br />

Performance data is not used to identify under-performance early enough.<br />

• Pupils find the topics studied up to Year 9 interesting and history is a very popular choice at<br />

GCSE.<br />

Commentary<br />

62. Standards are unsatisfactory overall. 2003 teacher assessments placed standards at the<br />

end of Year 9 above average, with similar judgements in 2004. Work seen was not as good<br />

as these assessments indicate and is in line with national expectations. As many pupils<br />

enter the school with limited skills in history, achievement is good.<br />

63. GCSE results in 2003 were well below the national average for both boys and girls and<br />

achievement was unsatisfactory. Results in 2004 were similar. Work seen in Year 11<br />

indicates there has been some improvement but standards remain below expectations.<br />

Irregular attendance by some pupils and their reluctance to attend revision sessions reduces<br />

<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 25


the proportion of higher grades achieved. Pupils with Statements of Educational Needs are<br />

well supported and make good progress.<br />

64. Teaching quality varies but is satisfactory overall. In the best lessons, teachers use good<br />

subject knowledge to plan a variety of interesting activities. Pupils enjoy these lessons and<br />

respond well when asked challenging question. Pupils say they like the topics offered in<br />

Years 7 to 9 and this results in above average numbers entering GCSE courses but some<br />

do not understand how much written work is then required. Where there are limited lesson<br />

objectives combined with too little variety in learning tasks, pupils become bored and<br />

restless. The best marking carefully explains the strengths of pupils’ work and provides<br />

targets for improvement. This is mostly the case in Year 9, but pupils in Years 7 and 8 do not<br />

understand how to improve. Marking of GCSE work is good and includes assessments that<br />

are closely linked to examination mark schemes. Even so, many pupils do not use the<br />

information from the assessments well and treat the grade given as a prediction. This<br />

reduces ambition and limits efforts to improve. Learning in some lessons is less good than<br />

teaching because their immature attitudes prevent pupils from learning from each other and<br />

their teachers. Whilst they remember facts well, pupils are too dependent on being asked<br />

supplementary questions. This means that in test/exam conditions they do not produce the<br />

detailed answers needed to earn higher marks. In some cases this is because they do not<br />

have the writing skills to justify their views. In others, the cause appears to be low motivation.<br />

Many GCSE students do not meet course submission deadlines in spite of the energetic<br />

efforts of their teachers.<br />

65. Leadership and management are unsatisfactory. The scheme of work is detailed and is<br />

supported by good opportunities for local fieldwork. The head of department is a good role<br />

model but his effective teaching approaches are not sufficiently widely adopted. Standards at<br />

GCSE remain low. Monitoring has failed to achieve consistency in teaching and marking.<br />

There has been little improvement since the previous inspection. Plans are in place to use<br />

consultants and make better use of marks to track pupils’ progress. These actions have not<br />

yet improved standards.<br />

Geography<br />

Provision in geography is good.<br />

Main strengths and weaknesses<br />

• In the GCSE examinations in 2003 pupils gained better results in geography than in most<br />

other subjects they took.<br />

• Lessons are well planned and structured so most pupils are productive and achieve well.<br />

• The range of teaching and learning methods used is too narrow to fully engage pupils’<br />

interest in the subject.<br />

Commentary<br />

66. GCSE results in 2003 were average but pupils gained better grades in geography than in<br />

most other subjects they took. <strong>School</strong> data indicates that results declined slightly in 2004 but<br />

pupils still did as well in geography as in other subjects. In the 2003 teacher assessments at<br />

the end of Year 9 results were average and increased to just above average in 2004. These<br />

results represent good achievement for the pupils concerned when compared to their<br />

attainment on entry to the school.<br />

67. In work seen standards are in line with expectations and pupils’ achievement is good at the<br />

end of Year 9 and Year 11. All pupils in Year 9 recognise geographical terminology and<br />

higher attaining pupils use this confidently and accurately. Pupils are given very clear<br />

guidance about examination requirements, which helps them to achieve well. In Year 11<br />

pupils research geographical issues and analyse their data effectively to reach balanced<br />

conclusions.<br />

<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 26


68. Students achieve well because teaching and learning are good. Teaching is never less than<br />

satisfactory. Teachers plan and structure their lessons well so that most pupils are<br />

productive and move smoothly from one task to the next. However, teachers are not yet<br />

using a wide enough variety of teaching methods to engage the interest of all pupils. Most<br />

pupils respond well to the good teaching they receive and are given the confidence to<br />

contribute to discussions and answer questions. Pupils work well collaboratively and share<br />

information sensibly. A minority of lower attaining boys lose concentration in some lessons<br />

and their pace of learning slows down.<br />

69. The leadership and management of the department are good. The new head of department<br />

has identified appropriate priorities for development. These include introducing new systems<br />

for the assessment of pupils work to ensure they know how well they are doing and how to<br />

improve. New resources have been purchased and schemes of work are being revised in<br />

order to maintain pupils interest in geography. These strategies are designed to increase the<br />

comparatively low numbers of pupils currently opting to study geography for the GCSE.<br />

Improvement since the previous inspection is good because standards have risen and<br />

teaching and learning continue to improve. The department has both the capacity and the<br />

commitment to improve further.<br />

Religious education<br />

Provision in religious education is good.<br />

Main strengths and weaknesses<br />

• Teaching is good and contributes well to pupils’ achievement.<br />

• The subject makes a very good contribution to the spiritual, moral, social and cultural<br />

development of pupils.<br />

• The monitoring of teachers and pupils’ work is well developed.<br />

• Good leadership and very good management of the subject ensure that pupils receive a rich<br />

curriculum.<br />

• Not enough is done to ensure that assessment is used to identify and respond to individual<br />

pupils’ needs.<br />

Commentary<br />

70. By Year 9, standards are average in relation to the Hampshire Local Education Authority<br />

Agreed Syllabus, an improvement since the previous inspection. Given pupils’ below<br />

average standards on entry to the school, this represents good achievement. Pupils are well<br />

able to link their knowledge of religion with their everyday experiences. Standards in the<br />

GCSE full course in 2003 were below average. In the short course, the first time taken,<br />

results were well below average. However, in the 2004 short course standards rose<br />

considerably because there was a closer match between the teaching and examination<br />

requirements.<br />

71. By Year 11, standards are in line with expectations. Pupils extend their knowledge and<br />

understanding of how they can learn from religion. They are developing their skills of<br />

investigation and interpretation well. They make good gains in their knowledge and<br />

understanding of religious concepts. Their achievement is good because they can apply their<br />

learning to new situations. However, they do not always question and explore their own<br />

attitudes in sufficient depth owing to insufficient curriculum time for the GCSE short course.<br />

Pupils’ spiritual and moral awareness is very good. They demonstrate a clear respect for the<br />

views and beliefs of each other. They show an awareness of moral choices, and reflect very<br />

well on serious religious and moral issues.<br />

72. Teaching is good and has improved since the previous inspection. Teachers’ good use of<br />

discussion and questioning enables pupils to express their opinions and form clear<br />

<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 27


judgements about religious and moral issues. The achievement of pupils with special<br />

educational needs is good, because pupils are provided with good support and work that<br />

matches their needs. The use of key words and subject specific language enable pupils to<br />

improve their speaking and listening skills. Pupils make good progress as a result of the<br />

teachers’ very good knowledge of the subject and an awareness of individual pupil needs.<br />

Teachers’ good use of a range of effective teaching methods, coupled with clear<br />

expectations and challenge enables all pupils to make good gains in their knowledge and<br />

understanding of religious and moral issues. Homework is well used to allow for individual<br />

research and to extend pupils’ understanding. Assessment procedures are satisfactory.<br />

Although targets and levels are used, they do not, as yet, respond sufficiently to individual<br />

pupils’ needs.<br />

73. Leadership is good with a clear sense of purpose and direction. The head of the department<br />

has a clear view of the needs of the subject. The subject is managed very well with very<br />

good planning and effective monitoring of teachers’ and pupils’ work. This represents a<br />

significant improvement since the previous inspection.<br />

TECHNOLOGY<br />

Design and technology<br />

Provision in design and technology is satisfactory.<br />

Main strengths and weaknesses<br />

• The subject knowledge of the teachers leads to good learning.<br />

• Teachers do not encourage pupils to find their own solutions to problems and to use their<br />

own ideas.<br />

• The choice of project work in resistant materials limits the progress of the high attaining<br />

pupils.<br />

• The positive attitudes and behaviour of the pupils have a positive impact on the learning.<br />

• The inconsistent approach to assessment often means that pupils do not know if they are<br />

successful or how to improve.<br />

Commentary<br />

74. Standards seen are below average at the end of Year 9 but represent good achievement as<br />

pupils enter the school with standards well below average. This good achievement is made<br />

possible by good teaching and learning and very good teamwork. GCSE results at A* to C<br />

were well below average in 2003. Standards seen are currently below average in Year 11<br />

and achievement is satisfactory. Standards seen show a rapid improvement, particularly in<br />

Years 7 to 9. Teachers’ assessments in Year 9 are accurate, reflecting this improvement.<br />

This improvement, if sustained will provide a sound basis for better work in Years 10 and 11.<br />

75. Teaching and learning are satisfactory in all years with some good features. The best<br />

teaching was seen in textiles, food, graphics and electronics. Subject knowledge that the<br />

teachers bring to the classroom is an important factor in motivating and capturing the<br />

attention of the pupils. Pupils respond well and show positive attitudes and good behaviour<br />

which impacts positively on their learning. Standards are being held back by some teachers<br />

providing solutions to problems rather than ensuring that pupils develop their individual<br />

approaches and personal ideas. The important skills of hand drawing, analysing products<br />

and showing a wide range of ideas, do not have enough emphasis in Years 7 to 9. In<br />

resistant materials, the teacher’s choice of project work is limiting the standards that high<br />

attaining pupils can reach. It does not provide sufficient challenge and demand. Assessment<br />

is not applied consistently across the department. Some pupils do not know if they are being<br />

successful and do not know what to do to improve. Pupils with special educational needs are<br />

identified and helped to make good progress across the department. When they are<br />

<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 28


supported by the well focused special needs support staff they make very good progress in<br />

lessons.<br />

76. Leadership and management of the subject are satisfactory with good features. The head of<br />

department has a vision that is shared by the team of teachers. Very good sharing of ideas<br />

and skills takes place and the active encouragement of learning from each other is evident.<br />

Monitoring and evaluation of teaching are fully established. Improvement since the previous<br />

inspection has been satisfactory. Improvements in standards and achievement have been<br />

made.<br />

VISUAL AND PERFORMING ARTS<br />

Dance was sampled. In the two lessons seen standards and achievement were very good.<br />

Teachers know their subject well and are able to get a high standard of creativity and composition<br />

from pupils. Leadership and management of the team of teachers are very good and the subject will<br />

make a very positive contribution to the school developing as a performing arts college.<br />

Art and design<br />

The provision for art and design is very good.<br />

Main strengths and weaknesses<br />

• Inspirational leadership and management are focused on ensuring that pupils make<br />

progress.<br />

• A wide range of challenging learning opportunities for younger pupils makes for very good<br />

progress.<br />

• Very good assessment and monitoring of pupils by all teachers makes sure what is taught<br />

matches what each pupil needs to learn.<br />

• The department is totally focused on raising standards of all pupils.<br />

Commentary<br />

77. Very good leadership and management is raising standards for pupils of all ages on two<br />

fronts. The art curriculum for younger pupils has been improved to include more three-<br />

dimensional work and to broaden the range of cultural contexts. The use of test information<br />

and practical assessments, especially when pupils enter the school, helps the setting of<br />

clear targets for learning and for monitoring how well pupils are doing. In 2003 standards in<br />

Year 9 were below average but achievement was good from very low levels on entry to the<br />

school. In 2004 standards were at the level expected and achievement was very good. This<br />

improvement in standards is being maintained in the current work seen.<br />

78. In 2003, although GCSE results were below average, older pupils achieved well. There have<br />

been some informed changes to the curriculum, especially for researching historical<br />

contexts, to give pupils better learning opportunities. In 2004 achievement was very good<br />

and standards improved. Standards of work of the current Year 11 are as expected at this<br />

stage in the course. However, attendance is a problem for a significant number of Year 11<br />

pupils and affects the production of coursework and progress against their targets.<br />

79. Teaching for all ages and abilities is very good. Assessment informs the planning so what is<br />

taught challenges pupils at the right level and to do better. Lessons are very well prepared<br />

and teachers use their knowledge of art and of pupils well to inform the styles they use to<br />

engage and keep pupils learning. Sometimes teachers talk too much when introducing<br />

lessons. Relationships are very good and pupils enjoy their art. Resources are used well<br />

especially when pupils are exploring different styles and techniques but there are not enough<br />

of them and teachers frequently have to produce their own and bring books from home.<br />

<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 29


80. The department is very well led and managed. The head of art tracks pupils’ progress,<br />

monitoring the standards reached against the targets set. In a very short time good<br />

teamwork has put the department on a sure footing with a unity of purpose that has had a<br />

very big impact on standards. Teaching is monitored and schemes of work are adapted<br />

where necessary to make sure they meet the needs of all pupils. The use of ICT is<br />

developing but there is a lack of reference texts to support the curriculum especially for older<br />

pupils researching historical contexts. There has been a good improvement since the<br />

previous inspection.<br />

Music<br />

Provision in music is good.<br />

Main strengths and weaknesses<br />

• Achievement in Years 7 to 9 is very good because of very good teaching.<br />

• Vigorous and determined leadership has created a robust and effective framework within<br />

which the department operates efficiently.<br />

• Numbers taking music in Years 10 and 11 are low because most pupils do not place high<br />

value on the subject.<br />

• Pupils have very good opportunities to perform in the locality.<br />

Commentary<br />

81. Attainment at the end of Year 9 is average. This represents good achievement from Year 7<br />

because standards on entry to the school are below expectations. In lessons, achievement<br />

is very good, reflecting more stable staffing in the department. Results in the 2003 GCSE<br />

examination were below average and no pupils were entered in 2004. Attainment in Year 11<br />

is below average and this represents satisfactory achievement. This is because only a small<br />

number of pupils choose to study music and within the group there are a higher proportion of<br />

less able musicians than more able ones.<br />

82. In Year 7, pupils quickly learn how to work together, and develop a strong foundation of<br />

keyboard skills. In Year 9 they compose music with understanding of a range of techniques<br />

and some display a sense of style in their work. Pupils in Year 11 compose within prescribed<br />

styles but few display imagination. They are restricted in the resources available to support<br />

them. There is very good emphasis on the development of skills in all years, but pupils do<br />

not utilise these to create music which is personal to them. Therefore they do not perceive<br />

the value of the subject and the number entering the examination course is half the national<br />

average.<br />

83. Teaching and learning are good. Well-organised lessons engage pupils in a variety of<br />

interesting activities that help them to learn. Teachers have high expectations and behaviour<br />

is very good. The best teaching and learning are in Years 7 to 9 where well paced lessons<br />

and good supporting worksheets enable pupils of all abilities to progress very well. Pupils<br />

make very good improvements because they are regularly involved in thinking about what<br />

they have done and how to improve. There is no consistent strategy for using homework to<br />

extend and consolidate learning.<br />

84. Leadership and management are good. Firmness and determination has resulted in good<br />

improvements since the previous inspection. However, this has not yet impacted significantly<br />

on the popularity of the subject. Effective routines and policies exist and very good planning<br />

supports teaching and learning well. The intensive focus on developing the subject has not<br />

taken into account pupils’ whole educational experience, and the department works in<br />

relative isolation. Instrumental tuition is very well managed and generously supported<br />

financially, but the teaching of freelance tutors is not systematically monitored.<br />

<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 30


85. Musical events are mounted regularly, but few pupils use the department on a day-to-day<br />

basis to develop their music making through organised or individually motivated work.<br />

Performances of music in the community are arranged regularly, and groups of pupils have<br />

opportunities to work with visiting artists to gain insights into music of different cultures. The<br />

department is developing very good links with local primary schools and is committed to<br />

working with them to help raise standards. There is no clear strategy for how this<br />

commitment will be realised and therefore the initiative is slow to move forward. Classroom<br />

facilities are very good. Wall displays create a warm and supportive environment that helps<br />

learning. Storage and practice facilities are inadequate, and this impacts on the amount of<br />

effective group work that can be undertaken in lessons.<br />

Drama<br />

Provision in drama is good.<br />

Main strengths and weaknesses<br />

• Achievement in drama in Years 10 and 11 is good because of the challenging nature of the<br />

teaching.<br />

• Most pupils enjoy their drama, have positive attitudes and value the practical nature of the<br />

subject and what it does for them.<br />

• The new acting head of drama has vision and is moving the department rapidly through a<br />

period of expansion and change.<br />

• Some boys in Years 7 to 9 have yet to recognise that drama is not just an opportunity to<br />

play.<br />

Commentary<br />

86. After some years of above average results, GCSE results in 2003 were below average.<br />

Those in 2004 were similar but only slightly below the target for the proportion of A* to C<br />

grades. These lower results coincided with a substantial increase in numbers taking the<br />

subject. Students currently in Years 10 and 11 are achieving well and standards are as<br />

expected at this stage in the course. Strategies put in place to improve written aspects of<br />

course work are raising standards. The department looks likely to meet its target in 2005.<br />

Standards in Years 7 to 9 are broadly as expected and achievement is satisfactory.<br />

However, in some lessons higher attaining pupils are not given work that is hard enough for<br />

them to demonstrate their full talents.<br />

87. Teaching and learning are good overall and very good in Years 10 and 11. In Years 7 to 9<br />

teaching seen ranged from excellent to unsatisfactory. This is partly because some boys<br />

have not yet made the leap from thinking that drama is an opportunity to mess around to the<br />

realisation that drama, while enjoyable, is also a serious and demanding subject. These<br />

pupils present a challenge to new and inexperienced teachers. Where teaching is at its best,<br />

lessons are conducted at a brisk pace and pupils are encouraged to be independent, to<br />

create, plan and develop their own work. This enables them to explore ideas and develop<br />

their creative and imaginative skills. Very good use of assessment helps pupils in all years to<br />

identify quality and improve their own standards. Some moments in lessons take pupils<br />

beyond the everyday and ordinary to recognise how drama can help us understand feelings,<br />

emotions and experiences that we cannot explain. Older pupils in particular can describe<br />

what is different about drama and how it enriches them as people and improves skills of<br />

communication, problem solving and working with others.<br />

88. The department is well led and managed and some aspects of the leadership of the new<br />

acting head of drama are very good. She is leading the drive towards higher standards<br />

through her vision, energy, enthusiasm and very good teaching and is very well supported<br />

by senior staff. The quality of drama in the college has been recognised by its recent status<br />

as a performing arts college. This has already enabled the school to employ a specialist<br />

technician and to make significant improvements to the technical resources, which will lead<br />

<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 31


to the broadening of curriculum opportunities. There has been good improvement since the<br />

previous inspection and the subject is growing in popularity with almost half of the pupils in<br />

Years 10 and 11 choosing to take it to GCSE. However, not all drama teachers share the<br />

common purpose and direction of the majority and, if this situation continues, it will impede<br />

the rate of change.<br />

PHYSICAL EDUCATION<br />

Provision in physical education is good.<br />

Main strengths and weaknesses<br />

• Very good indoor and outdoor facilities have a positive effect on learning and achievement.<br />

• Teaching, learning and pupils’ achievement in practical work is good overall. Pupils’ written<br />

work in GCSE is unsatisfactory.<br />

• There is a very good range of extra-curricular clubs and teams.<br />

• Assessment and monitoring procedures are insufficiently developed.<br />

• Good relationships between teachers and pupils have a positive effect on learning and<br />

achievement.<br />

Commentary<br />

89. Teachers’ assessments in 2003 and work seen at the end of Year 9 are average. They<br />

indicate good achievement, since pupils’ standards on entry to the school are below<br />

expectations. GCSE results in 2003 were below average. Standards in work seen in<br />

practical lessons in Years 10 and 11 are in line with national expectations but below<br />

expectations in GCSE written work. These standards represent satisfactory achievement in<br />

practical work but unsatisfactory achievement in written work. All pupils follow a physical<br />

education course in Years 10 and 11 and their achievement is satisfactory.<br />

90. Teaching and learning are good overall. Lessons are well planned and delivered. Teachers<br />

have good subject knowledge and pupils respond positively to the encouragement given.<br />

Relationships between teachers and pupils are good and this enhances pupil motivation and<br />

learning. Learning and achievement are also improved by the effective use of very good<br />

indoor and outdoor facilities. Whilst assessment is well used for practical work in GCSE<br />

classes, it is insufficiently developed for pupils in Years 7 to 9. In GCSE theory classes, the<br />

lack of a rigorous approach to homework, marking and the monitoring of standards restrict<br />

learning. In addition there is insufficient use of ICT by pupils.<br />

91. Overall there is good leadership and management of the subject and the teachers in the<br />

department work well as an effective team. Teachers act as good role models and insist on<br />

high standards of appearance and behaviour from pupils. Very good support is given to two<br />

newly qualified teachers and provision for the professional development of all the teachers is<br />

well established and effective. Teachers give generously of their time and offer a very good<br />

range of extra-curricular clubs and teams, which are well supported by pupils. In addition a<br />

large number of pupils benefit from participation in the Junior Sports Leadership Award<br />

Scheme. Pupils benefit from the links that have been established with sports cubs and<br />

coaches from outside the school. Since the previous inspection the many good features that<br />

were identified have been maintained and there has been an increase in the number of<br />

pupils choosing physical education at GCSE level.<br />

PERSONAL, SOCIAL AND HEALTH EDUCATION AND CITIZENSHIP<br />

<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 32


Personal, social and health education includes citizenship and careers education. Most of the<br />

evidence to make judgements on citizenship came from observing personal and social education<br />

lessons.<br />

Citizenship<br />

Provision in citizenship is good.<br />

Main strengths and weaknesses<br />

• Teaching is good overall and makes a clear contribution to pupils’ understanding of the<br />

subject and they achieve well.<br />

• Very good leadership ensures a rich variety of experiences for pupils.<br />

• There is some variation in the quality of teaching and marking because every year there are<br />

teachers in the team who are new to the subject.<br />

• The course makes particularly good use of visitors from community services, local<br />

businesses and voluntary organisations.<br />

Commentary<br />

92. The school recognises the importance of personal, social and health education lessons and<br />

has successfully embedded both citizenship and careers within the programme. Learning is<br />

well supported by related themes and topics covered in other subjects, especially in<br />

humanities. Throughout the school, pupils achieve well and the standards of their work are<br />

what they are expected to be. Pupils acquire good knowledge and understanding of<br />

responsible citizenship and develop good personal skills. Pupils with individual special<br />

needs also make good progress because teachers provide challenge and support.<br />

93. Pupils enjoy the subject because they are taught well. Most teachers are experienced,<br />

confident and comfortable with the course materials. This helps pupils to develop important<br />

skills of discussion and presentation as well as of analysis and evaluation. A few lessons are<br />

less successful because the teacher has less relevant experience and is therefore not as<br />

confident about adapting lessons to the particular needs of each class.<br />

94. An extensive range of people from the community and local organisations support and help<br />

develop pupils’ positive attitudes to the subject. Regular and systematic use of high quality<br />

visiting experts extend what teachers can provide and are appreciated by pupils.<br />

Contributions from community nurses and the fire and prison services encourage pupils to<br />

consider their own responses to sensitive issues. Year’s 10 and 11 pupils particularly value<br />

the contacts with business and industry.<br />

95. Very good leadership provides a clear vision for the subject. Personal, social and health<br />

education and citizenship have got a high status within the school. Teaching is very well<br />

supported by a comprehensive scheme of work, excellent community contacts and clear<br />

assessment procedures. The school provides a good range of additional opportunities to<br />

develop an understanding of responsible citizenship and the democratic process through<br />

activities such as drama productions, the school and year councils. Management is<br />

satisfactory. Timetabling determines who is free to teach the subject to complete the team of<br />

up to 16 teachers, some of which are recognised experts. Regular monitoring is limited<br />

because of the size of this team and the annual change of teachers. Not all teachers use the<br />

most effective approaches and some lessons are more successful than others.<br />

<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 33


PART D: SUMMARY OF THE MAIN <strong>INSPECTION</strong> JUDGEMENTS<br />

Inspection judgement Grade<br />

The overall effectiveness of the school 3<br />

How inclusive the school is 2<br />

How the school’s effectiveness has changed since its last inspection 3<br />

Value for money provided by the school 3<br />

Overall standards achieved 4<br />

Pupils’ achievement 3<br />

Pupils’ attitudes, values and personal qualities (ethos) 3<br />

Attendance 4<br />

Attitudes 3<br />

Behaviour, including the extent of exclusions 3<br />

Pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 3<br />

The quality of education provided by the school 3<br />

The quality of teaching 3<br />

How well pupils learn 3<br />

The quality of assessment 4<br />

How well the curriculum meets pupils needs 4<br />

Enrichment of the curriculum, including out-of-school activities 3<br />

Accommodation and resources 3<br />

Pupils’ care, welfare, health and safety 2<br />

Support, advice and guidance for pupils 3<br />

How well the school seeks and acts on pupils’ views 3<br />

The effectiveness of the school’s links with parents 4<br />

The quality of the school’s links with the community 3<br />

The school’s links with other schools and colleges 2<br />

The leadership and management of the school 3<br />

The governance of the school 3<br />

The leadership of the headteacher 2<br />

The leadership of other key staff 3<br />

The effectiveness of management 3<br />

Inspectors make judgements on a scale: excellent (grade 1); very good (2); good (3); satisfactory (4); unsatisfactory (5);<br />

<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 34


poor (6); very poor (7).<br />

<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!