INSPECTION REPORT Brune Park Community School ... - Ofsted
INSPECTION REPORT Brune Park Community School ... - Ofsted INSPECTION REPORT Brune Park Community School ... - Ofsted
INSPECTION REPORT Brune Park Community School Gosport, Hampshire LEA area: Hampshire Unique reference number: 116472 Headteacher: Dr Ian Johnson Lead inspector: Val Lynch Dates of inspection: 1 st - 4 th November 2004 Inspection number: 268360 Inspection carried out under section 10 of the School Inspections Act 1996
- Page 2 and 3: © Crown copyright 2004-05 This rep
- Page 4 and 5: Members of the inspection team Subj
- Page 6 and 7: PART A: SUMMARY OF THE REPORT OVERA
- Page 8 and 9: PART B: COMMENTARY ON THE INSPECTIO
- Page 10 and 11: Attendance is satisfactory and has
- Page 12 and 13: • The assessment and marking of p
- Page 14 and 15: and arts activities as well as a go
- Page 16 and 17: 26. The school is sincerely committ
- Page 18 and 19: 32. The school has made a good resp
- Page 20 and 21: ushed or slightly cursory. Pupils w
- Page 22 and 23: 47. Both boys and girls make simila
- Page 24 and 25: 55. Leadership of the department is
- Page 26 and 27: the proportion of higher grades ach
- Page 28 and 29: judgements about religious and mora
- Page 30 and 31: 80. The department is very well led
- Page 32 and 33: to the broadening of curriculum opp
- Page 34 and 35: PART D: SUMMARY OF THE MAIN INSPECT
<strong>INSPECTION</strong> <strong>REPORT</strong><br />
<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong><br />
Gosport, Hampshire<br />
LEA area: Hampshire<br />
Unique reference number: 116472<br />
Headteacher: Dr Ian Johnson<br />
Lead inspector: Val Lynch<br />
Dates of inspection: 1 st - 4 th November 2004<br />
Inspection number: 268360<br />
Inspection carried out under section 10 of the <strong>School</strong> Inspections Act 1996
© Crown copyright 2004-05<br />
This report may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes,<br />
provided that all extracts quoted are reproduced verbatim without adaptation and on condition that<br />
the source and date thereof are stated.<br />
Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the <strong>School</strong> Inspections Act 1996,<br />
the school must provide a copy of this report and/or its summary free of charge to certain categories<br />
of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies<br />
supplied.<br />
<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 2
INFORMATION ABOUT THE SCHOOL<br />
Type of school: Comprehensive<br />
<strong>School</strong> category: <strong>Community</strong><br />
Age range of pupils: 11 - 16<br />
Gender of pupils: Mixed<br />
Number on roll; 1650<br />
<strong>School</strong> address: Military Road<br />
Gosport<br />
Hampshire<br />
Postcode: PO12 3BU<br />
Telephone number: 023 9261 6000<br />
Fax number: 023 9261 6006<br />
Appropriate authority: Local Education Authority<br />
Name of chair of governors: Father John Draper<br />
Date of previous inspection: January 1999<br />
CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SCHOOL<br />
<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> is a very large and oversubscribed 11-16 comprehensive school of 1,650 pupils. It is<br />
located to the north of the centre of Gosport. The school has recently been awarded specialist<br />
school status as a performing arts college. Despite a heavy naval presence in the area, the local<br />
community is relatively stable and very few pupils join or leave the school during the school year.<br />
Attainment on entry is below average. The school has very few higher ability pupils joining the<br />
school in Year 7. A higher than average proportion of Year 7 pupils have low levels of literacy and<br />
numeracy. The proportion of pupils whose heritage language is not English is very small. The<br />
proportion of pupils with special educational needs is broadly average and the proportion with<br />
Statements of Special Educational Need is below average. The school is accredited as an Investors<br />
in People organisation and in 2003 gained a <strong>School</strong> Achievement Award. The proportion of pupils<br />
eligible for free school meals is below average but this figure does not reflect the below average<br />
socio-economic circumstances of the areas. The school successfully encourages the community to<br />
make use of its accommodation through hiring its facilities or by participating in adult evening<br />
classes arranged through a local further education college.<br />
INFORMATION ABOUT THE <strong>INSPECTION</strong> TEAM<br />
<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 3
Members of the inspection team Subject responsibilities<br />
1475 Val Lynch Lead inspector English as an additional language<br />
10173 Catherine Hinds Lay inspector<br />
32281 James Garbutt Team inspector Mathematics<br />
12568 Chris Morris Team inspector English<br />
24453 Gordon Jackson Team inspector Science<br />
31096 John Thornhill Team inspector Information and communication<br />
technology<br />
15606 Christine Hill Team inspector Art and design<br />
Special educational needs<br />
32672 Stephen Hammond-Evans Team inspector Design and technology<br />
32147 Ann Wallis Team inspector Geography<br />
3755 Trevor Hulbert Team inspector Citizenship<br />
History<br />
11838 Derek Cronin Team inspector Modern foreign languages<br />
31701 Graeme Rudland Team inspector Music<br />
23137 Ron Fewtrell Team inspector Physical education<br />
4372 Ralph Fordham Team inspector Religious education<br />
19414 Janet Flisher Team inspector Drama<br />
Work-related learning<br />
The inspection contractor was:<br />
ALTECQ <strong>INSPECTION</strong>S LTD<br />
102 Bath Road<br />
Cheltenham<br />
Gloucestershire<br />
GL53 7JX<br />
Any concerns or complaints about the inspection or the report should be made initially to the<br />
contractor. The procedures are set out in the leaflet ‘Complaining about <strong>Ofsted</strong> Inspections’, which<br />
is available from <strong>Ofsted</strong> Publications Centre (telephone 07002 637833) or <strong>Ofsted</strong>’s website<br />
(www.ofsted.gov.uk).<br />
<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 4
<strong>REPORT</strong> CONTENTS<br />
PART A: SUMMARY OF THE <strong>REPORT</strong> 6<br />
PART B: COMMENTARY ON THE MAIN <strong>INSPECTION</strong> FINDINGS<br />
STANDARDS ACHIEVED BY PUPILS 8<br />
Standards achieved in areas of learning, subjects and courses<br />
Pupils’ attitudes, values and other personal qualities<br />
QUALITY OF EDUCATION PROVIDED BY THE SCHOOL 11<br />
Teaching and learning<br />
The curriculum<br />
Care, guidance and support<br />
Partnership with parents, other schools and the community<br />
LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT 16<br />
OTHER SPECIFIED FEATURES – Work-related learning 17<br />
PART C: THE QUALITY OF EDUCATION IN SUBJECTS AND COURSES 19<br />
SUBJECTS IN KEY STAGES 3 AND 4<br />
PART D: SUMMARY OF THE MAIN <strong>INSPECTION</strong> JUDGEMENTS 34<br />
<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 5<br />
Page
PART A: SUMMARY OF THE <strong>REPORT</strong><br />
OVERALL EVALUATION<br />
<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> is a good school. Standards achieved by the end of Year 9 are average and<br />
achievement is good. By the end of Year 11 standards are slightly below average and achievement<br />
is satisfactory. Teaching and learning are good and assessment is satisfactory. The leadership of<br />
the headteacher is very good. Leadership and management at all levels are good. The school<br />
provides good value for money.<br />
The school’s main strengths and weaknesses are:<br />
• Pupils’ good behaviour, their positive attitudes and good relationships help them achieve well in<br />
most lessons.<br />
• The school has worked hard to improve teaching and learning. In a high proportion of lessons<br />
teaching and learning are good.<br />
• Subject teachers and tutors are neither rigorous nor consistent in their monitoring of pupils’<br />
progress and then intervening where there is underachievement.<br />
• Marking and assessment do not always tell pupils what they have achieved and what they need<br />
to do to improve.<br />
• Pupils with low levels of literacy and numeracy when they join the school get very good support<br />
and make very good progress in these basic skills.<br />
• The leadership of the headteacher is sincere and resolute; he and staff value all pupils.<br />
Improvement since the previous inspection is good. Test results at the end of Year 9 have improved<br />
at a faster rate than results nationally. GCSE results improved until 2002 but dipped in 2003 and<br />
dipped further in 2004. Attendance has improved but is still unsatisfactory in Year 11. Some<br />
alternative arrangements have been made for the least motivated pupils in Years 10 and 11 and a<br />
more relevant curriculum is being developed for 2005. Links with other agencies have been<br />
strengthened. Support in lessons for pupils with specific needs has been extended. Developments<br />
in ICT were very limited until two years ago. Equipment was purchased but the school did not<br />
provide the necessary experiences for pupils. Although there has been work done with lower ability<br />
pupils, not enough priority has been given to developing the literacy and numeracy skills of all<br />
pupils.<br />
STANDARDS ACHIEVED<br />
When pupils join the school their standards are below average. By the end of Year 9 they have<br />
achieved well to reach standards that are average. Results in tests at the end of Year 9 in 2003<br />
were much better than results in similar schools. Results in 2004 are similar to those in 2003. Over<br />
the last four years, test results have improved at a faster rate than in other schools, significantly so<br />
in mathematics. Results in English are better than those in mathematics and science. The gap<br />
between boys and girls results has narrowed as boys’ results have improved. Pupils achieve very<br />
well in art and design, music and dance reflecting the school’s status as a performing arts college.<br />
They achieve well in design and technology, geography, physical education and religious education.<br />
Standards are below expectations in Year 9 in ICT. In Years 7 and 8, standards in ICT are better<br />
and pupils achieve well.<br />
Year 11 results<br />
Performance in GCSE/GNVQ<br />
examinations at the end of Year 11,<br />
compared with:<br />
<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 6<br />
all schools similar<br />
schools<br />
2001 2002 2003 2003<br />
N/A C D C<br />
Key: A - well above average; B – above average; C – average; D – below average; E – well below average<br />
Similar schools are those whose pupils attained similarly at the end of Year 9.
In 2003, the proportion of pupils gaining five or more grades A* to G was well below average. In<br />
2004 these results improved but the proportion of pupils gaining five or more A* to C grades fell and<br />
was well below the school’s target. A significant number of pupils gained D grades when they<br />
should have achieved C grades. Very few pupils gained the higher GCSE grades. In 2003 results<br />
were below average in all subjects with the exception of science where results were average. In<br />
2004, results improved in English language, mathematics, art and design, French and Spanish but<br />
declined in science, design and technology, drama and geography. Pupils achieve very well in<br />
dance and art and design. Standards are as expected in all other subjects with the exception of<br />
design and technology, history, ICT and music. In history and ICT achievement is unsatisfactory.<br />
Pupils with special educational needs and those for whom English is not their home language<br />
achieve as well as other pupils. Pupils’ achievement in other subjects, including English,<br />
mathematics and science is good and evidence suggests that results might be better in 2005.<br />
Pupils’ personal qualities including their spiritual, moral, social and cultural development are good.<br />
Pupils’ attitudes and behaviour are good and relationships within the school are very positive.<br />
Attendance and punctuality are satisfactory.<br />
QUALITY OF EDUCATION<br />
The quality of education provided by the school is good. Teaching and learning are good and<br />
assessment is satisfactory. As a result of a focus on improving teaching, lessons are well planned<br />
and structured and have a variety of activities that interest pupils and motivate them to learn. The<br />
curriculum is good but there are not enough vocational courses in Years 10 and 11 to meet the<br />
needs of all pupils. Arrangements to ensure pupils’ care, welfare and safety are very good. The<br />
school provides good support, advice and guidance and involves pupils well in its work and<br />
development. The main weakness is the lack of rigour in checking pupils’ progress to make sure<br />
that they all do as well as they can in their examinations. The school has satisfactory links with<br />
parents and very good links with other schools and colleges. Good links with the community<br />
enhance personal, social and health education lessons.<br />
LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT<br />
Leadership and management throughout the school are good. The headteacher provides very good<br />
leadership and has steadily built on the work of his predecessor. Other key staff provide good<br />
leadership. The effectiveness of management is good throughout the school although not all middle<br />
leaders are sufficiently involved in monitoring and evaluating work in their areas. Governance is<br />
good and has successfully led the school to achieve performing arts college status and to be seen<br />
as a centre for learning in the community. Governors have not done enough in the past to make<br />
sure that the school meets its statutory responsibility to provide ICT for all pupils.<br />
PARENTS’ AND PUPILS’ VIEWS OF THE SCHOOL<br />
Pupils and parents like the school. They praise the good teaching which promotes hard work. They<br />
value the individual support the school provides. Pupils and parents say that a few pupils misbehave<br />
but the school handles any incidents effectively and pupils feel secure in the school. Pupils and<br />
parents expressed concerns about the inconsistency in the use of homework and the quality of the<br />
marking of pupils work. Inspection findings agree with all these parents and pupils’ views.<br />
IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED<br />
The most important things the school should do to improve are:<br />
• Agree, implement and monitor a revised policy on marking and assessment.<br />
• Monitor the progress of individual pupils both in and across their subjects and put in place<br />
coherent programmes to reduce any potential underachievement.<br />
• Develop an approach to school self-evaluation that focuses on monitoring and evaluating the<br />
impact of agreed policies and actions on standards and teaching and learning.<br />
and, to meet statutory requirements:<br />
• Ensure that the ICT provision reflects the National Curriculum both as a taught subject and in<br />
other subjects.<br />
• Explore and implement ways of providing for a daily act of collective worship<br />
<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 7
PART B: COMMENTARY ON THE <strong>INSPECTION</strong> FINDINGS<br />
STANDARDS ACHIEVED BY PUPILS<br />
Standards achieved in areas of learning, subjects and courses<br />
Achievement is good in Years 7 to 9. By the end of Year 9, standards are average. GCSE results<br />
are below average. Although examination results dipped in 2003 and 2004, the standard of work<br />
seen is close to what is expected in most subjects. Achievement in Years 10 and 11 is satisfactory.<br />
Main strengths and weaknesses<br />
• Test results at the end of Year 9 have improved over the last three years and are above<br />
average in English.<br />
• Pupils whose literacy and numeracy skills are below average when they join the school<br />
achieve very well, particularly in Year 7.<br />
• The proportion of pupils gaining five or more A* to G grades in 2004 was much better than in<br />
2003. The proportion gaining five or more A* to C grades in 2004 was well down on 2003<br />
and well below the school’s target.<br />
• Standards are above average in dance and below average in design and technology and<br />
history and well below average in ICT. In history and ICT achievement is unsatisfactory.<br />
Commentary<br />
Standards achieved in Years 7 to 9<br />
Standards in national tests at the end of Year 9 – average point scores in 2003<br />
Standards in: <strong>School</strong> results National results<br />
English 34.3 (35.8) 33.4 (33.3)<br />
Mathematics 34.2 (33.5) 35.4 (34.7)<br />
Science 32.8 (33.2) 33.6 (33.3)<br />
There were 321 pupils in the year group. Figures in brackets are for the previous year.<br />
1. When pupils join the school the standard of their work is below average. There are very few<br />
pupils who are working at standards above those expected by the end of Year 6. By the end<br />
of Year 9 standards are average, reflecting good achievement. Results in tests at the end of<br />
Year 9 in 2003 were much better than results in similar schools. Results in 2004 are similar<br />
to those in 2003. However, results fell short of the school’s targets in English, mathematics<br />
and science. Over the last four years, test results have improved at a faster rate than in<br />
other schools, significantly so in mathematics. Results in English are better than those in<br />
mathematics and science. In English, a higher than average proportion of pupils reach<br />
standards above those expected nationally. The gap between boys’ and girls’ results has<br />
narrowed as boys’ results have improved. Pupils whose test results at the end of their<br />
primary years are well below average and those with special educational needs make very<br />
good progress and achieve very well. A team of staff work intensively with these pupils to<br />
improve their numeracy skills and their English teachers focus on developing their literacy<br />
skills. They are well supported in lessons by specialist staff and their subject teachers.<br />
Pupils whose home language is not English also achieve well.<br />
2. Pupils achieve very well in art and design, music and dance reflecting the school’s status as<br />
a performing arts college. They achieve well in design and technology, geography, physical<br />
education and religious education. Standards are below expectations in Year 9 in ICT. Until<br />
two years ago ICT was not timetabled in a way that ensured all pupils experienced the<br />
National Curriculum programme of study. In Years 7 and 8 there is a timetabled course,<br />
<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 8
standards are better and pupils achieve well. Standards are below expectations in design<br />
and technology but this is due to pupils’ limited experiences in primary schools. In modern<br />
foreign languages standards are below expectations. Pupils’ achievement is satisfactory but<br />
is limited by an unusual lack of enthusiasm for languages in these early years.<br />
Standards achieved in Years 10 and 11<br />
Standards in GCSE/GNVQ examinations at the end of Year 11 in 2003<br />
Percentage of pupils gaining 5 or more A*-C<br />
grades<br />
Percentage of pupils gaining 5 or more A*-G<br />
grades<br />
Percentage of pupils gaining 1 or more A*-G<br />
grades<br />
Average point score per pupil (best eight<br />
subjects)<br />
<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 9<br />
<strong>School</strong> results National results<br />
42.0 (42.0) 52.0 (50)<br />
82 (90) 91.0 (91)<br />
96 (97) 96.0 (96)<br />
29.7 (32.5) 34.7 (34.8)<br />
There were 307 pupils in the year group. The percentages include the equivalent GCSE grades obtained in GNVQ<br />
assessments. Figures in brackets are for the previous year.<br />
3. GCSE results in 2003 were below average and slightly below those in 2002. However, they<br />
were as good as results in similar schools. The proportion of pupils gaining five or more<br />
grades A* to G was well below average. In 2004 these results improved but the proportion of<br />
pupils gaining five or more A* to C grades fell and was well below the school’s target. A<br />
significant number of pupils gained D grades when they should have achieved C grades.<br />
The school provided a lot of additional support for these pupils but not enough work was<br />
done by all subject teachers and tutors to track the progress of all pupils’ and to intervene<br />
when necessary. Very few pupils gained the higher GCSE grades and, although the school<br />
has very few higher attaining pupils, teachers and tutors did not monitor these pupils closely<br />
enough. In 2003 results were below average in all subjects with the exception of science<br />
where results were average. In 2004, results improved in English language, mathematics, art<br />
and design, French and Spanish but declined in science, design and technology, drama and<br />
geography.<br />
4. Standards of work in Years 10 and 11 are well above expectations in dance and art and<br />
design and in these subjects pupils achieve very well. Standards are as expected in all other<br />
subjects with the exception of design and technology, history, ICT and music. In history and<br />
ICT achievement is unsatisfactory. In ICT pupils have not had the opportunity to catch up on<br />
the work they missed when they were lower down the school. In history a significant number<br />
of boys are not interested in the course they are following. Pupils with special educational<br />
needs and those for whom English is not their home language achieve as well as other<br />
pupils. Pupils’ achievement in other subjects, including English, mathematics and science is<br />
good and evidence suggests that results might be better in 2005.<br />
5. When pupils join the school a high proportion have low levels of literacy and numeracy. By<br />
the end of Year 7 these pupils have made good progress and have the skills needed to learn<br />
in other subjects. The literacy and numeracy skills of average and above average pupils are<br />
satisfactory but could be better if there was a focus on literacy and numeracy across the<br />
ability range. ICT skills are good in Years 7 and 8 but are below average in other years. In<br />
some subjects if teachers want pupils to use ICT then they have to teach them the<br />
necessary skills.<br />
Pupils’ attitudes, values and other personal qualities
Attendance is satisfactory and has improved since the previous inspection. Pupils’ attitudes and<br />
behaviour are good and relationships within the school are very positive. Provision for their spiritual,<br />
moral, social and cultural development is good overall.<br />
Main strengths and weaknesses<br />
• Pupils’ good attitudes make strong contributions to the standards they attain and their<br />
achievements.<br />
• Pupils’ behaviour is good. They are polite and self-confident and show a keen desire to<br />
learn.<br />
• The school’s ethos and high expectations and the very good range of sporting activities<br />
make a particularly strong contribution to pupils’ moral and social development.<br />
• The lack of co-ordination of spiritual, moral, social and cultural development across the<br />
school does not provide opportunities for a planned and co-ordinated approach.<br />
• Not enough is done to enable pupils to appreciate their own cultural heritage and the rich<br />
variety of cultures and traditions that exist in multicultural Britain.<br />
Commentary<br />
6. In 2002/03, attendance was well below average but improved in 2003/4. Attendance this<br />
term is better still. There has been a clear improvement in the level of attendance since the<br />
previous inspection in all years, except for Year 11 where it is still far too low. Too many<br />
parents still do not ensure that their children come to school and this limits what they could<br />
achieve. Punctuality is satisfactory and this is commendable in view of the very large school<br />
site.<br />
Attendance in the latest complete reporting year (%)<br />
Authorised absence Unauthorised absence<br />
<strong>School</strong> data 11.6 <strong>School</strong> data 3.0<br />
National data 7.2 National data 1.1<br />
The table gives the percentage of half days (sessions) missed through absence for the latest complete reporting year.<br />
7. Pupils have a good work ethic and determination to succeed. The number of pupils taking<br />
part in the wide range of enrichment activities provided, especially in sport, is very good. The<br />
small number of pupils from minority ethnic heritages, and pupils with special educational<br />
needs, are fully integrated into the school community. One important feature of the school is<br />
the mutual respect evident between staff and pupils. Pupils are valued for their individuality<br />
and helped to do well in as many ways as possible. They respond positively to this and<br />
develop during their time at school into confident young people. There are many<br />
opportunities for collaborative or group work to further develop pupils’ social skills and they<br />
willingly share and support each other in their learning The distinctive ethos of the school,<br />
which is a significant strength, encourages pupils to accept responsibility for their actions<br />
and treat everyone with respect. Pupils are well aware of right and wrong actions, have a<br />
very clear knowledge of what is expected of them and they respond well.<br />
8. Behaviour in lessons and around the school is good. Pupils state that bullying is<br />
unacceptable within the school and rarely happens. Most were confident that such matters<br />
were dealt with promptly and effectively. On the few occasions where the behaviour of pupils<br />
is unsatisfactory, it is directly related to the quality of the teaching. The school does all it can<br />
to deal with disaffected pupils within the school, only excluding them when there is no<br />
alternative. The current number of pupil exclusions has fallen as a result.<br />
<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 10
Ethnic background of pupils Exclusions in the last school year<br />
Categories used in the Annual <strong>School</strong><br />
Census<br />
No of<br />
pupils on<br />
roll<br />
<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 11<br />
Number of<br />
fixed<br />
period<br />
exclusions<br />
Number of<br />
permanent<br />
exclusions<br />
White – British 1567 240 11<br />
White – any other White background 2<br />
Mixed – White and Black African 2<br />
Asian or Asian British – Indian 5<br />
Asian or Asian British – Bangladeshi 6<br />
Black or Black British – Caribbean 4 1<br />
Black or Black British – any other Black<br />
background<br />
1 11 1<br />
Chinese 2 2<br />
Any other ethnic group 2<br />
The table gives the number of exclusions, which may be different from the number of pupils excluded.<br />
9. Religious education provides very good opportunities for the spiritual development of pupils,<br />
and opportunities exist in other subjects such as citizenship, drama and dance. The school<br />
council provides some opportunities for pupils to develop their communication skills and<br />
make important contributions to the life of the school. Pupils are self-confident and are<br />
developing well as responsible members of the community. Pupils have a limited awareness<br />
of their own cultural heritage and that of others. In addition, their cultural development does<br />
not extend sufficiently to develop an awareness and appreciation of the rich variety of<br />
different cultures and traditions that exist in this country. The school lacks a co-ordinated<br />
approach to pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development and so opportunities are<br />
missed.<br />
QUALITY OF EDUCATION PROVIDED BY THE SCHOOL<br />
The quality of education is good. Teaching and learning are good. The curriculum is satisfactory.<br />
The care, guidance and support of students are good. The school’s links with parents are<br />
satisfactory. Links with the community, business and other schools and colleges are good.<br />
Teaching and learning<br />
The quality of teaching and learning is good. The quality of assessment is satisfactory.<br />
Main strengths and weaknesses<br />
• Teaching and learning are good in all year groups with a higher proportion of very good and<br />
excellent lessons in Years 7 to 9.<br />
• Teachers are knowledgeable and plan and structure their lessons well so that pupils work<br />
hard and are productive.
• The assessment and marking of pupils’ work are inconsistent so pupils are not always clear<br />
how well they are doing or how to improve their work.<br />
• Pupil support staff make a very good contribution to the learning of pupils with special<br />
educational needs.<br />
• Teaching is very good in dance and in drama in Years 10 and 11 and in music in Years 7 to<br />
9.<br />
Commentary<br />
Summary of teaching observed during the inspection in 117 lessons<br />
Excellent Very good Good Satisfactor<br />
y<br />
<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 12<br />
Unsatisfactor<br />
y<br />
Poor Very Poor<br />
4 (3%) 20 (17%) 47 (40%) 40 (35%) 5 (4%) 1 (1%) 0 (0%)<br />
The table gives the number of lessons observed in each of the seven categories used to make judgements about<br />
lessons; figures in brackets show percentages where 30 or more lessons are seen.<br />
10. The quality of teaching and learning is good and higher than at the time of the previous<br />
inspection. Although there were a higher proportion of lessons in Years 7 to 9 where<br />
teaching was very good or excellent, overall teaching is good in all years. Teachers use their<br />
good subject knowledge well to extend pupils’ understanding and improve their skills.<br />
Lessons are well planned and carefully structured so that pupils move smoothly from one<br />
task to the next and learn well. In the best lessons, for example, in music, dance and drama,<br />
enthusiastic teaching challenges and interests all the pupils so they achieve very well.<br />
However, in some subjects higher attaining pupils are not always sufficiently challenged by<br />
the work set. Teachers relate well to most pupils and give them confidence to learn in an<br />
atmosphere of respect and trust. A good variety and balance of teaching methods ensure<br />
that boys and girls learn effectively. In some subjects homework is not set regularly or<br />
planned systematically and some of the homework set is not demanding enough. Where<br />
lessons were less than satisfactory there was a slow pace and activities did not interest<br />
pupils sufficiently to motivate them to learn. Senior managers who have responsibility for<br />
particular subject areas monitor teaching and learning effectively.<br />
11. Pupils’ literacy and numerical skills are being developed satisfactorily. Very good additional<br />
help is targeted at a large group of lower attaining pupils in Years 7 to 9, which results in a<br />
considerable improvement in their literacy and numeracy skills. In Years 7 to 9 pupils are<br />
competent in using ICT but in Years 10 and 11 not all pupils are able to use ICT effectively<br />
because they have not been taught the basics lower down the school.<br />
12. Pupils with special educational needs respond well to the very good teaching they receive<br />
and achieve very well. Support staff and teachers help to raise pupils’ literacy standards by<br />
setting very effective short-term targets, which motivate pupils to learn. The progress of<br />
pupils with special educational needs is assessed and monitored very well.<br />
13. Some subject departments and individual teachers assess and mark pupils work well but this<br />
good practice is not consistent across the whole school. <strong>School</strong> policies allow subject<br />
departments to develop their own systems for marking and assessment, which results in<br />
these inconsistencies. This means that pupils are not always clear about how well they are<br />
doing or how to improve their work. In many departments the results of assessments are not<br />
used fully to plan pupils’ work and set them realistic targets for improvement. New methods<br />
of assessment are being used well in some subjects but have not yet been shared and<br />
adopted by other departments.
The curriculum<br />
The curriculum in Years 7 to 9 is good, and is satisfactory in Years 10 and 11. There is a good<br />
range of enrichment activities. The match of teachers to the curriculum is good and they are<br />
supported by good resources and accommodation.<br />
Main strengths and weaknesses<br />
• The range and quality of courses is good in Years 7 to 9 but the range of courses in Years<br />
10 and 11 does not fully meet the needs of pupils.<br />
• There is very good support and a good curriculum for pupils with special educational needs.<br />
• There are good extra-curricular activities for all pupils, particularly in sport.<br />
• Performing arts college status is enhancing provision in music, dance and drama.<br />
• Teachers and support staff are well qualified and experienced, but support staff are not<br />
available to all subjects.<br />
Commentary<br />
14. In Years 7 to 9, the curriculum is good. It is well planned for all pupils and provides<br />
particularly well for pupils with special educational needs. In Years 10 and 11 the range of<br />
courses is not wide enough to meet the needs of all pupils. There are not enough vocational<br />
courses with only design and technology and ICT providing such courses. A wide range of<br />
academic courses is provided though in history the course does not generate the interest of<br />
the pupils. In modern foreign languages all pupils are still required to study a language, with<br />
the result that some pupils have unacceptable attitudes. The recognition of the school’s<br />
status as a performing arts college is beginning to have an impact and will rightly build on<br />
and extend the good provision in music, dance and drama. The school has ambitious plans<br />
for the curriculum in 2005 that will provide all pupils with a wider choice of appropriate<br />
academic and vocational courses.<br />
15. The school meets statutory requirements with regard to the National Curriculum with the<br />
exception of a planned programme of ICT for all pupils in Year 11. The school does not meet<br />
requirements with regard to a daily act of collective worship. The personal, social and health<br />
education programme makes a good contribution to pupils’ personal development. Provision<br />
for careers education and work-related learning is good.<br />
16. Provision for pupils with special learning needs is very good. A detailed programme of<br />
support is provided for these pupils in Year 7 to develop their literacy and numeracy skills.<br />
Gifted and talented pupils are identified but the provision of tasks within lessons to help them<br />
achieve in line with their higher abilities is only satisfactory. The school has provided an<br />
effective alternative curriculum for a small number of pupils in Years 10 and 11 who are at<br />
risk of becoming disaffected.<br />
17. There is good support for learning outside the school day, including homework clubs and<br />
opportunities for pupils to discuss their work with teachers. Teachers provide a wide range of<br />
activities, but the take up of these is limited. However, there is good participation in sports<br />
<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 13
and arts activities as well as a good range of instrumental teaching in Years 7 to 9. The<br />
school has reviewed its arrangements for activities week so that all pupils can participate in<br />
all the activities offered.<br />
18. The school has a good team of qualified teachers. Teaching assistants and support staff are<br />
experienced and hard working. Where they are available in lessons their activities are well<br />
planned to support specific pupils. However, a number of subjects do not have support from<br />
such staff. Teachers and pupils in modern foreign languages enjoy support from language<br />
assistants in each language they study. Accommodation supports pupils’ learning well. The<br />
site is large, clean and welcoming. There are adequate toilets, dining and social areas for<br />
pupils. Resources for learning are good. A number of subjects have interactive white boards<br />
that are well used to enhance teaching styles and demonstrations. However, not all subjects<br />
have sufficient access to ICT facilities. The continuing programme of development is tackling<br />
this issue well. The Information Centre is well managed and provides a good range of ICT<br />
resources to support pupils’ learning.<br />
Care, guidance and support<br />
Arrangements to ensure pupils’ care, welfare and safety are very good. The school provides good<br />
support, advice and guidance and involves pupils well in its work and development.<br />
Main strengths and weaknesses<br />
• Day to day procedures for ensuring pupils’ well-being are very effective.<br />
• Well-planned induction procedures help incoming pupils to settle quickly.<br />
• Procedures for monitoring pupils’ academic progress lack rigour, so that underachievement<br />
is not identified early enough.<br />
• Pupils receive very good advice to help them make decisions about subject choices and<br />
career paths.<br />
• Pupils are given opportunities to express their views, and feel that their views are valued.<br />
Commentary<br />
19. The school takes very good care of its pupils. Staff work effectively with partner primary<br />
schools to ensure a smooth transition into Year 7. Pupils confirm that they settle well in their<br />
new surroundings and quickly establish good relationships with staff. They feel that there is<br />
always someone they can trust to help them if they have concerns or problems. Health and<br />
safety arrangements are rigorous, for example, risk assessments in science and design and<br />
technology, and Internet screening. Child protection arrangements are very good. All staff<br />
receive appropriate training, and new staff and student teachers are made fully aware of<br />
procedures. The Pupil Support Service works effectively to cater for individual learning<br />
needs, and is successful in reducing the number of exclusions. A full-time nurse is employed<br />
and liases well with other staff to ensure that thorough records are kept of illness and<br />
accidents. The school has earned a Healthy <strong>School</strong>s Award and encourages pupils to think<br />
about personal health and environmental issues. For example, Year 7 pupils use some of<br />
their tutor time on a ‘Fit To Learn’ exercise programme led by Junior Sports Leaders from<br />
Year 11.<br />
20. Arrangements for monitoring pupils’ academic achievement are less effective because they<br />
are inconsistent and unclear. The principal method of communication is a pupil information<br />
record form. Pupils confirm that staff use this inconsistently. Two days per year are set aside<br />
for individual progress reviews. However, arrangements for collecting the data needed to<br />
agree targets are inadequate, and subsequent communication of subject-specific targets to<br />
the relevant teachers is also flawed. Consequently information on underachievement is not<br />
picked up and acted on quickly enough. This contributed to the disappointing GCSE results<br />
in 2004. The school is aware of shortcomings in this area of provision and is formulating<br />
plans to make the role of the form tutor more effective. The lack of a well managed<br />
<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 14
homework schedule concerns pupils, who find they have too much some days, and none on<br />
other days.<br />
21. Pupils benefit from clear and helpful guidance in Year 9 when they are choosing courses for<br />
Years 10 and 11. From Year 7, careers education is included in their personal, social and<br />
health education programme. The quality of careers information and guidance is very good.<br />
The school liases very well with outside agencies. Its careers partner, Connexions, for<br />
example, attends parents’ consultation evenings, and provides individual careers interviews.<br />
Pupils have opportunities to express their views through year councils and the school<br />
council. They feel that their views are valued. For example, the provision of high quality,<br />
secure bicycle sheds is a response to their wishes.<br />
Partnership with parents, other schools and the community<br />
The school has satisfactory links with parents, very good links with other schools and colleges<br />
and good links with the community.<br />
Main strengths and weaknesses<br />
• The school works very well with the parents of pupils experiencing difficulty in school.<br />
• Secure links with local primary schools ensure the very smooth transfer of pupils to <strong>Brune</strong><br />
<strong>Park</strong>.<br />
• The school successfully harnesses the interests and skills of local people to the benefit of<br />
pupils and staff.<br />
• The school misses opportunities to foster the interest of all parents in their child’s education.<br />
Commentary<br />
22. <strong>School</strong> staff know pupils and their families well and involve parents quickly when any<br />
intervention is necessary. Staff are particularly conscientious about communicating with<br />
parents of pupils who have any special education or additional needs or those returning from<br />
being excluded. The school arranges very effective support from a wide range of agencies<br />
and ensures that parents are partners in this collaboration. Parents are therefore confident<br />
that the school meets their child’s individual needs and value the support given. The school<br />
organises a good range of information evenings to help parents. A course about coping with<br />
teenagers was well attended during the inspection week. The majority of parents are very<br />
supportive of the school but, despite the school’s best efforts, there remains a small, but<br />
significant minority who refuse to work positively with the school in, for instance, securing<br />
their child’s regular attendance.<br />
23. Parents report that their concerns are handled promptly using correct procedures. A small<br />
minority of parents are uncertain about the procedures for leaving messages. Parents value<br />
the monthly bulletin and welcome the opportunity to return comments about the school. This<br />
bulletin, however, does not reflect the vibrant quality of school life nor contain sufficient<br />
advance warning of all key dates and events.<br />
24. Parents receive good information about the curriculum in pupils’ reports. In about half of the<br />
subjects, however, the language used is over-elaborate and difficult for parents and pupils to<br />
interpret. The school is not clear with parents about its homework policy. This restricts<br />
parents’ ability to support their child’s learning at home.<br />
25. The school is energetic in its search for community partners including local industries. Pupils<br />
benefit from a good range of activities. Staff absorb the skills and resources offered into the<br />
daily life of the school. Many partners, for instance, provide outstanding support to the<br />
careers education, the personal and social education and citizenship programmes. Many<br />
people from the community use the schools facilities regularly.<br />
<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 15
26. The school is sincerely committed to working in partnership with other schools and colleges.<br />
Other schools often use <strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong>’s facilities. Teachers participate regularly in subject<br />
activities with the local cluster of primary schools. The school plays a lead role in the<br />
continuous development of these clusters. Performing arts college status, and the additional<br />
funds this attracts, enables teachers to share their expertise with other schools.<br />
Arrangements to help pupils choose and transfer to post-16 institutions, training providers or<br />
employment are very thorough. These close links secure efficient information exchange<br />
about the curriculum and individual pupils so that transition and induction are very effective.<br />
The school works very well with colleges, universities and training providers. Pupils<br />
attending college courses praise the courses and the chance to meet with pupils from other<br />
schools. These activities successfully foster the pupils’ confidence, self-esteem and<br />
aspirations for their future.<br />
LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT<br />
The overall quality of leadership and management throughout the school is good. The headteacher<br />
provides very good leadership. Other key staff with responsibility provide good leadership. The<br />
effectiveness of management is good throughout the school. The overall quality of governance is<br />
good.<br />
Main strengths and weaknesses<br />
• The headteacher has created an atmosphere where staff are given responsibilities and their<br />
contribution to the school is valued.<br />
• Whole school policies are not explicit enough in ensuring consistently good practice across<br />
all departments.<br />
• Performance management and the professional development of staff are very good.<br />
• The governing body is well organised and has a clear vision for the direction of the school. In<br />
the past governors have not made sure that the school fulfilled all its statutory<br />
responsibilities.<br />
• Leadership and management at departmental and year level is good overall and has the<br />
capacity to work together to achieve greater consistency of practice.<br />
Commentary<br />
27. The headteacher’s very good leadership has been a key factor in the school’s success. His<br />
clarity of vision and measured implementation of change have influenced all aspects of the<br />
school’s work. With good support from other key staff he has created a climate for innovation<br />
that shows in the quality of teaching and the attitude of pupils to their studies. Throughout<br />
the school there is a strong sense of shared purpose, which communicates itself to pupils<br />
and parents. Pupils appreciate the secure, ordered and pleasant climate for learning created<br />
by all the staff. Leaders, at all levels, work hard to ensure that the school’s aims are realised.<br />
Whilst the school development plan is built on good consultation with staff and governors<br />
and focuses clearly on whole school priorities, links with departmental plans are not<br />
sufficiently identified. Some aspects of the plan are repetitive and it does not yet provide a<br />
strong basis for school self-evaluation.<br />
28. The school is well managed. Members of the senior management team monitor the work of<br />
departments through regular reviews of teaching and learning and by a critical analysis of<br />
examination results. The monitoring and evaluation process for some whole school policies,<br />
such as assessment, marking and homework, are not sufficiently explicit. These policies<br />
currently give too much freedom for subject leaders to make their own decisions on practice.<br />
There is also not enough involvement of middle leaders in monitoring and evaluating the<br />
quality of work in their areas of responsibility. As a result this process does not ensure<br />
consistency of good practice across all departments. Leadership and management at<br />
departmental level are inconsistent but good overall. Leadership is excellent and<br />
inspirational in art and design, but unsatisfactory in history. Leadership and management of<br />
<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 16
the provision for pupils with special educational needs are very good and focus especially<br />
well on individual needs.<br />
29. The school values its staff who clearly enjoy working in the school. The professional<br />
development of all staff is related to individual and school priorities and provides a wide<br />
range of opportunities for staff to improve their contribution to the work of the school. There<br />
is excellent support in place for the 11 newly qualified teachers at the school. Performance<br />
management is a well-established process, used with all staff. As a result all those working<br />
at the school are encouraged to raise their expectations and contribute to the development<br />
of others. In addition considerable effort has successfully been made to recruit and retain<br />
high quality staff.<br />
30. The financial management of the school is a strength. There is an effective system in place<br />
for making informed decisions about school priorities and the school applies value for money<br />
principles effectively. Through securing financial support for the performing arts school bid<br />
the school realised that funding could be found in different ways. The school is now very<br />
successful at identifying and accessing limited grants and other financial support.<br />
Financial information<br />
Financial information for the year April 2003 to March 2004<br />
Income and expenditure (£) Balances (£)<br />
Total income 5,900,393 Balance from previous year 348,555<br />
Total expenditure 6,013,082 Balance carried forward to the<br />
next<br />
Expenditure per pupil 3,721<br />
<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 17<br />
235,866<br />
31. The overall quality of governance is good. The governors are committed to the school’s<br />
continued development and there is a well-organised committee structure that ensures that<br />
developments are closely monitored. The governors have a good understanding of the<br />
strengths and weaknesses of the school and a clear vision for its future direction. They<br />
played an important role in supporting the successful bid for specialist performing arts<br />
college status. Until two years ago, governors had not ensured the school fulfilled its<br />
statutory duty to provide ICT in all years. It is now in place in all years with the exception of<br />
Year 11. The new ICT co-ordinator has plans, supported by governors, to ensure that<br />
statutory requirements are fully met from 2005. The school does not provide a daily act of<br />
collective worship.<br />
OTHER SPECIFIED FEATURES<br />
Work-related learning<br />
Provision for work related learning is good.<br />
Main strengths and weaknesses<br />
• The school has successfully built on previous good practice in careers education and work<br />
experience.<br />
• The management and co-ordination of work-related learning is very good.<br />
• The current range of vocational subjects is too narrow.<br />
Commentary
32. The school has made a good response to the very recently introduced statutory<br />
requirements for work-related learning. Its commitment to this area of learning is<br />
demonstrated by the appointment of a non-teaching co-ordinator. The college already had a<br />
programme of work shadowing and work experience that has been held up as a model<br />
locally and this has provided a very good base for further development.<br />
33. Partnerships with a wide range of small and multi-national businesses provide opportunities<br />
for pupils to gain insights into the world of work and the skills and qualities that are needed<br />
for success. All pupils undertake a two-week placement and benefit from very good<br />
preparation and follow-up. There is very effective careers education through the personal,<br />
social and health education programme, links with Connexions, and advice on CVs and job<br />
applications and mock interviews with representatives from the local business community. A<br />
Skills for Work day gives pupils problem solving and team enterprise opportunities and<br />
enables them to understand how business works.<br />
34. There are limited opportunities for pupils to follow vocational courses in Years 10 and 11 but<br />
this situation is being addressed and more vocational courses are planned for 2005. In<br />
addition to the school's own provision there are opportunities for pupils to follow vocational<br />
courses at Fareham College and local training providers. A small number of high attaining<br />
pupils are following courses in marine and motor engineering and larger numbers of lower<br />
attaining pupils follow appropriate courses in, for example, catering and motor vehicle<br />
maintenance. A group of pupils in each of Years 10 and 11 who are unable to cope with the<br />
demands of school follow a full-time course at Fairport Training Organisation. They are<br />
meeting with great success and speak movingly of the quality and value of this alternative<br />
education.<br />
35. This area of the college's work is well led and co-ordinated. Very regular contact is made<br />
with off-site providers of vocational courses and monitoring of pupils' progress is effectively<br />
conducted. An audit has been taken of actual and potential provision for work-related<br />
learning in subjects but as yet it is too early to judge its impact on achievement in subjects.<br />
<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 18
PART C: THE QUALITY OF EDUCATION IN SUBJECTS AND COURSES<br />
SUBJECTS IN KEY STAGES 3 AND 4<br />
ENGLISH AND MODERN FOREIGN LANGUAGES<br />
English<br />
Provision in English is good.<br />
Main strengths and weaknesses<br />
• Pupils achieve well and results in Year 9 tests in 2003 were above average. Results in<br />
GCSE English literature are too low.<br />
• The quality of teaching is consistently good and ensures all pupils enjoy English lessons.<br />
• Good relationships between teachers and pupils promote confidence and a willingness to<br />
attempt difficult work.<br />
• Marking is inconsistent and in some cases does not provide adequate guidance on how to<br />
improve.<br />
• Effective support is provided for the lowest attaining pupils, both by subject staff and support<br />
assistants.<br />
Commentary<br />
36. In Year 9, standards are average and have improved markedly since the previous<br />
inspection. In national tests in 2003, results were above average and were well above<br />
average compared with schools with pupils with similar prior attainment. Unconfirmed results<br />
for 2004 are close to national expectations. These standards are reflected in work seen<br />
during the inspection. Pupils enter the school with below average attainment and thus<br />
achieve well by Year 9. GCSE results in English language and English literature in 2003<br />
were below average. Unconfirmed results for 2004 show an improvement in language and a<br />
drop in literature results. Work seen during the inspection shows standards in line with<br />
national expectations in language and close to the school target. In literature, where results<br />
are consistently below average, a major factor is that the school enters all pupils for the<br />
examination course, whereas a much smaller proportion of pupils are entered nationally.<br />
Year 11 entered the school well below average in English and so have achieved well in<br />
English language. This good achievement applies to all pupils including those with special<br />
educational needs. Although the attainment of girls is better than that of boys, this reflects<br />
the national pattern.<br />
37. By Year 9 nearly all pupils participate confidently in discussions and listen attentively to each<br />
other. By Year 11 higher attaining pupils have made good progress in using different tone<br />
and vocabulary relevant to the task. Pupils read enthusiastically. By Year 9 all but the<br />
weakest have started to identify salient features and themes in fiction. By Year 11 a majority<br />
identify how writers use different styles and techniques. By Year 9 most pupils write in a<br />
range of styles. Although weaker pupils encounter difficulties with technical accuracy, many<br />
make good progress in this area. By Year 11 the most successful pupils structure and<br />
extend writing effectively and develop arguments coherently.<br />
38. Teaching and learning are consistently good and some lessons are very good. Good<br />
questioning techniques are a major feature of the department. They involve pupils of all<br />
abilities and enable teachers to evaluate understanding. On occasions there are not enough<br />
opportunities for extended oral work to make demands on the most able pupils.<br />
Relationships between teachers and pupils are very good and help engender confidence.<br />
Lessons are usually well structured and contain a good balance of activities reflecting<br />
successful implementation of aspects of the National Key Stage 3 Strategy. A good range of<br />
activities also permeates the best lessons in Year 10 and 11. The one aspect of lesson<br />
structure that is less well applied is a summing up or review at the end. Too often this is<br />
<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 19
ushed or slightly cursory. Pupils with special educational needs are well supported, both by<br />
subject teachers and pupil support and literacy support assistants. Marking of pupils’ work is<br />
far too variable. At best, it carefully recognises achievement and gives guidance on how to<br />
improve. In other instances, it is far too sketchy with an inadequate focus on areas to be<br />
addressed. Pupils respond to the good teaching and good relationships with an enthusiastic<br />
approach. They collaborate well when given opportunities and are keen to participate.<br />
39. The curriculum for Years 7 to 9 ensures consistency across the department. Opportunities<br />
for extended writing that are a good preparation for work in Years 10 and 11 are, however,<br />
relatively limited. There are currently no alternative courses for the large number of pupils<br />
who fail to achieve higher grades in GCSE English literature. The department contributes<br />
well to the social, moral and cultural development of pupils. Opportunities for the<br />
development of ICT skills are included in planning for Years 7 and 8, and some good work<br />
achieved. In other years such opportunities are not formally planned in the curriculum.<br />
40. Leadership and management of English are good. There is consistency both in the approach<br />
to teaching and the resulting good quality of lessons. Teachers have a corporate<br />
understanding of priorities and view lesson observations positively as professional<br />
development. The monitoring of marking is not yet sufficient to ensure the same consistency<br />
as occurs in lessons. Improvements in the issues raised in the previous report are good.<br />
Language and literacy across the curriculum<br />
41. Standards in literacy and language are sufficient to support learning across the curriculum.<br />
Reading skills are better developed than writing skills. The provision for developing such<br />
skills is satisfactory overall but there is variability in practice between and within<br />
departments. Successful whole school training on developing different aspects of writing has<br />
taken place. There is, however, neither a literacy co-ordinator nor a whole school literacy<br />
policy so a corporate and managed approach is lacking. The provision for addressing<br />
weaknesses in literacy for very low attaining pupils including those with special educational<br />
needs is very good. A successful literacy intervention strategy is well taught, co-ordinated<br />
and monitored. The teaching of literacy for other pupils is satisfactory but inconsistent. There<br />
is good practice in a number of departments. In religious education, writing frames are used<br />
effectively to support extended writing. In geography and music there is a strong emphasis<br />
on key vocabulary. The marking of literacy varies greatly between departments and<br />
individual teachers.<br />
Modern foreign languages<br />
Provision in modern foreign languages is satisfactory.<br />
Main strengths and weaknesses<br />
• Standards at the end of Year 9 and at GCSE were well below average in 2003, but improved<br />
in 2004 in both French and Spanish.<br />
• The quality of teaching and learning is satisfactory and could be better.<br />
• Negative attitudes to the subject present a barrier to learning, especially in Years 10 and 11.<br />
• High quality accommodation and resources are helping teachers to improve attitudes and<br />
standards.<br />
Commentary<br />
42. Teachers’ assessments show that standards in French and Spanish were well below<br />
average in 2003. There was significant improvement in 2004. GCSE results in French and<br />
Spanish at grades A* to C were well below average in 2003, for both boys and girls.<br />
Although there was good improvement in 2004, pupils did worse in languages than in other<br />
subjects. Boys improved in 2004 to perform equally with girls. Very few pupils gained A* and<br />
<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 20
A grades. Almost all pupils must study a language to GCSE, which causes some<br />
resentment. This accounts for below average results across the full range of grades, A* to G.<br />
43. Standards are below expectations by the end of Year 9. However, this indicates satisfactory<br />
progress and achievement given that pupils have no modern foreign language experience in<br />
their primary schools. Higher attainers recall vocabulary better, so that they speak and write<br />
at greater length and have better comprehension skills than other pupils, including those with<br />
special educational needs. In Year 11 higher attaining pupils reach average standards, but<br />
standards remain below expectations overall, especially in speaking and listening.<br />
Structured support for coursework helps pupils to write coherently. Standards continue to<br />
improve because revised teaching methods are having an impact on learning, so that<br />
achievement in Years 10 and 11 is satisfactory. However, substantial numbers of pupils<br />
express negative attitudes, which impede their progress.<br />
44. Teaching and learning are satisfactory. There is some good teaching, especially in Spanish.<br />
Where teaching is unsatisfactory it is because activities lack purpose and fail to engage<br />
pupils in learning. Teachers’ use of interactive whiteboards is improving visual support for<br />
learning and is instrumental in improving boys’ standards and the attitudes of younger pupils.<br />
Some teachers’ over-use of English in lessons contributes to unsatisfactory listening skills.<br />
In too many lessons, and in homework, pupils are not sufficiently challenged. This applies<br />
especially to more able pupils, as the focus in lessons is usually in raising standards to the<br />
average rather than extending all learners. Consequently, planning provides few<br />
opportunities for pupils to work independently. Marking is inconsistent, although teachers set<br />
appropriate targets for improvement.<br />
45. Leadership and management are satisfactory. The department functions well on a day-today<br />
basis. The head of department uses new technology very well and is helping a<br />
committed team to develop their ICT skills. He has a good grasp of national developments in<br />
languages. Arrangements for monitoring the work of the department are good, but have not<br />
led to effective strategies for ensuring greater consistency in teaching. The department<br />
development plan is not sufficiently focused on how to improve attitudes and girls’ standards.<br />
Improvement since the previous inspection has been satisfactory. Very good<br />
accommodation and a good range of resources give teachers the tools to sustain current<br />
improvement.<br />
MATHEMATICS<br />
Provision In mathematics is good.<br />
Main strengths and weaknesses<br />
• Pupils achieve well and enjoy mathematics because of the good teaching and learning.<br />
• Good leadership has identified key priorities for improvement.<br />
• The work done with pupils with low levels of numeracy skills when they join the school has a<br />
significant impact on the standards they reach.<br />
• Very good links with primary schools ensure pupils make good progress in Year 7.<br />
• Monitoring of pupil progress is not sufficiently developed.<br />
• Assessment is unsatisfactory and pupils are not always clear about what they need to do to<br />
improve.<br />
Commentary<br />
46. Pupils enter the school with standards of attainment that are well below average. By the end<br />
of Years 9 and 11 standards are average and higher than expected for schools with pupils<br />
who attained similarly at the start of Year 7. A much higher proportion of pupils than<br />
expected are entered for GCSE examinations. This represents good progress and<br />
achievement and overall the school provides well for its pupils.<br />
<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 21
47. Both boys and girls make similarly good progress and achieve well. Pupils with special<br />
educational needs are well supported by teachers and teaching assistants and achieve well<br />
in their GCSE examinations. In Year 7 there is a programme of intervention that enables<br />
pupils with special educational needs to achieve levels beyond expectation. The<br />
achievement of this group of pupils is very good. The programme is being extended to<br />
include pupils currently studying for GCSE in 2005. Standards of work seen in books are in<br />
line with national expectations. The most able pupils are attaining the highest levels in their<br />
class work and are able to solve complex questions confidently. Number skills have<br />
improved and are now satisfactory, however, there is insufficient use of mathematics for<br />
problem solving.<br />
48. The quality of teaching is good overall. The department now has a stable, well-qualified staff<br />
who work very hard to achieve the best for pupils. Teachers are well supported by a<br />
dedicated group of teaching assistants who make a significant impact on the learning of the<br />
pupils they support. There are several examples of lessons where teaching is good or very<br />
good and on rare occasions teaching that is poor. Where teaching is very good, lessons are<br />
well planned and make good use of ICT to enhance the learning. The pace of the lesson is<br />
brisk and challenging, work is well matched to pupils’ needs and the good use of questions<br />
enthuses the pupils to rise to the challenge and achieve their best. On the rare occasion that<br />
teaching is less than satisfactory there are low expectations, insufficient challenge in the<br />
work and the pace of the lesson is slow. The resulting decline in behaviour hinders the<br />
progress of pupils in the group. The quality of marking is inconsistent. There are examples of<br />
detailed marking which provides good quality information to pupils about their work.<br />
However, on too many occasions marking is brief and pupils are not clear about the reasons<br />
for errors and how to improve a piece of work. Pupils often mark their own work and there<br />
are instances where incorrect answers are marked correct.<br />
49. Links with primary schools are well developed. The department analyses Year 6 tests in<br />
detail and uses the information to plan for Year 7. This ensures very good support is<br />
provided for pupils when they enter Year 7 and is raising standards of achievement in Year 7<br />
to 9. The mathematics department is inviting and attractive. Teachers have their own rooms<br />
equipped with interactive white boards, which are used effectively to introduce lessons.<br />
Good teacher-pupil relationships based on teachers’ secure subject knowledge and<br />
understanding of the learning needs of pupils improve the quality of learning and<br />
achievement. Pupils are pleasant and enthusiastic, but they do not always recall earlier work<br />
as well as they should. Although the department has a lot of data about pupils and there are<br />
target-setting systems in place, staff have focussed on groups rather than the monitoring the<br />
progress of individual pupils. Teachers do not effectively identify the necessary early<br />
warnings for those pupils at risk of falling below expected levels of attainment. New<br />
procedures are being put into place and there are signs that these are having the required<br />
effect. The department is on line to achieve its current targets.<br />
50. Leadership of the department is good and management is satisfactory. The head of<br />
department has accurately identified what needed to be done. Detailed schemes of work<br />
now provide good guidance to teachers. Teachers use the guidance in the National<br />
Numeracy Strategy well so that lessons follow a similar format. There is a regular<br />
programme of lesson monitoring that supports the performance management of staff. The<br />
outcomes of the monitoring inform the professional development programme for the<br />
department. There is, however, inconsistency in the application of some of the procedures<br />
identified in departmental policies. There has been good improvement since the previous<br />
inspection.<br />
Mathematics across the curriculum<br />
<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 22
51. Overall the provision for mathematics across the curriculum is satisfactory. Whole school<br />
training has been provided on how mathematics can be used and promoted in other<br />
subjects. A successful programme in Year 7 improves the numeracy skills of the lowest<br />
attainers to levels that enable them to cope with work in other subjects. As with literacy,<br />
there is no co-ordinator to ensure that the numeracy skills of pupils of all abilities are<br />
successfully developed and improved.<br />
SCIENCE<br />
Provision in science is good.<br />
Main strengths and weaknesses<br />
• Pupils do well in examinations in comparison to their standards when they join the school.<br />
• The department is very well led and well managed.<br />
• Teaching and learning are good which leads to good achievement in most lessons.<br />
• Pupils are not given enough opportunities for independent learning.<br />
• Teachers and pupils have good relationships, contributing to a good learning environment.<br />
• There is an imbalance in the number of subject specialist teachers, which creates<br />
difficulties when matching groups with teachers.<br />
Commentary<br />
52. Pupils enter the school with below average attainment with relatively few having higher<br />
levels. Results in the 2003 national tests at the end of Year 9 were just below average, due<br />
to the smaller number of higher attaining pupils. Compared to similar schools, science<br />
results are above average and achievement is good. Apart from a slight fall in 2003, results<br />
have improved in line with results nationally. Attainment of girls is now close to that of boys.<br />
Results in 2004 were similar. Work seen in lessons and in pupils’ books indicates that this<br />
standard has been maintained, although it is affected by low literacy levels of many pupils.<br />
53. GCSE results were slightly above average in 2003 though, as with other subjects, they fell<br />
slightly in 2004. Attainment of girls is very close to that of boys and for both groups is<br />
significantly above that of other subjects. Relatively few pupils attain above grade C.<br />
Standards of work seen matches expectation and shows good progress. Coursework is well<br />
presented using pupils’ ICT skills developed by the department. By the end of Year 11 pupils<br />
achieve well. Only a small proportion of pupils are entered for the higher grade papers on<br />
the basis of proven ability during the GCSE course. The achievement of students with<br />
special educational needs is also good. This is due to the support provided in lessons by<br />
teachers who are fully aware of individual needs<br />
54. Teaching and learning are good. The relatively large number of teachers forms an effective<br />
team with a broad range of experience. Newly qualified teachers are well supported within<br />
the team, which contributes to the overall effectiveness of lessons. Teachers share very<br />
good relationships with the students who work in a co-operative manner. Pupils’ good<br />
attitudes lead to a good learning environment. Lessons are well planned and structured and<br />
involve frequent use of practical work. Pupils enjoy these activities which contribute to the<br />
development of skills needed for coursework. In lessons there are often insufficient<br />
opportunities for pupils to have responsibility for their own learning which would enhance the<br />
degree of challenge. This is especially true for those pupils capable of higher grade passes.<br />
ICT resources are well used to enhance the learning, though resources for whole class use<br />
within the department are limited. Teachers mark students’ work regularly with appropriate<br />
use of praise and effort grades. However, there was a lack of consistency in terms of pupils<br />
receiving written detailed comments on how to improve. Pupils are not always aware of the<br />
standard of their work, apart from test and module results, and were often vague about their<br />
target grades.<br />
<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 23
55. Leadership of the department is very good. The experienced team leader has developed a<br />
strong team ethos that is shared with the hard working technicians, who support the<br />
department well. Leadership places a high priority in helping to develop teachers’ skills and<br />
sharing their good practice. Although there is a shortage of specialist chemistry and physics<br />
teachers the department leader addresses this by organising effective training and support<br />
material. However, some teachers still have inadequate depth of specialist knowledge<br />
outside their own subject discipline. This contributes to inadequate challenge for higher<br />
ability groups. Areas requiring attention are already being addressed or included in the<br />
development plan.<br />
56. Management is good. A comprehensive pupil database has been developed by the<br />
department and is very well used to monitor progress of pupils and attainments of teaching<br />
groups against clear targets. This monitoring and action taken contribute to the pupils’<br />
successes in GCSE examinations. Routine monitoring of teaching and marking is shared<br />
between senior department staff and management. Although the department has produced<br />
clear policies and monitoring guidelines, there are inconsistencies within the department.<br />
Overall improvement since the previous inspection has been good. This is especially true of<br />
standards, which have been maintained at close to national levels and are now above those<br />
of similar schools. An applied science course at GCSE is being trialed, which provides an<br />
alternative option though it is not yet available to all pupils.<br />
INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY<br />
The provision for ICT is unsatisfactory.<br />
Main strengths and weaknesses<br />
• Standards are well below average at the end of Year 9 although standards are much better<br />
in Years 7 and 8.<br />
• Good planning, structured lessons and vocational courses are improving learning.<br />
• Pupils are not involved in target setting and assessment, so are not fully aware of how to<br />
improve their work.<br />
• The school does not fully comply with statutory requirements in Years 10 and 11.<br />
Commentary<br />
57. Teacher assessments at end of Year 9 in 2003 were well below average. This position<br />
continued in 2004. These pupils, however, had only been taught a structured ICT course in<br />
Year 9. The introduction of the national strategy for all pupils in Years 7 to 9 is beginning to<br />
raise standards, but pupils’ work is still below national expectations. Achievement is<br />
satisfactory<br />
58. There were no ICT timetabled lessons in Years 10 and 11 before 2004. All pupils in Year 10<br />
are now taught ICT, but the standard of their work is well below national expectations. A third<br />
of pupils in Year 10 also follow vocational courses. The standard of their work is improving,<br />
but is still below national expectations. Achievement overall is unsatisfactory. Pupils are<br />
gaining good skills in using ICT and some knowledge about the facilities of software and how<br />
ICT is used in the real world. They do not have sufficient opportunities to apply their<br />
understanding of ICT.<br />
59. Teaching and learning are satisfactory in Years 7 to 10. Good planning and lesson structure,<br />
with challenging tasks, ensure pupils acquire skills and knowledge. Teachers do not always<br />
use suitable activities to ensure pupils understand how and why ICT is used. They give<br />
individual support to pupils with special educational needs, but there is not always different<br />
work for them to do so that they achieve as well as other pupils. The provision of additional<br />
activities for higher attaining pupils is inconsistent so they do not always progress as well as<br />
they are able. Pupils’ work in Years 7 to 9 is accurately assessed against National<br />
Curriculum levels, though they are not involved in setting their targets. They do not always<br />
<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 24
know what to do to reach higher levels. Homework is set regularly, but there is inconsistent<br />
use of comments to help pupils understand how they can improve. Opportunities to develop<br />
literacy and numeracy skills are not yet fully developed.<br />
60. Leadership and management are now good. There had been no expansion of ICT until two<br />
years ago. The head of department’s good vision of how to improve pupils’ experiences in<br />
ICT has led to positive developments. The curriculum in Years 7 to 9 and the school’s first<br />
vocational courses in Year 10 meet pupils’ needs. Timetabling constraints prevent all pupils<br />
from following the vocational courses. Pupils in Year 11 do not receive any ICT and the core<br />
curriculum offered to all pupils in Year 10 does not provide the full range of ICT. Pupils do<br />
not fully experience measurement and control or modelling. The well-led team of teachers is<br />
dedicated to raising standards. Assessment procedures have been introduced. Resources to<br />
support learning have been increased, but not all pupils have individual access to a<br />
computer. Development is continuing, to ensure that the pupil-computer ratio matches the<br />
national picture and improves network stability. An Internet policy is in place, but pupils and<br />
parents are not required to sign up to it. These developments represent good improvement<br />
over the last two years.<br />
Information and communication technology across the curriculum<br />
61. The school has completed a helpful audit of how other subjects contribute to pupils’ ICT<br />
experiences. Teachers, in a number of subjects, make good use of ICT, particularly<br />
interactive white boards, to demonstrate lesson topics and tasks. However, only one or two<br />
departments use ICT to extend pupils’ learning. A number of teachers are eager to expand<br />
this aspect of learning but the limited resources and access currently prevent this. However,<br />
the developments currently taking place will address some of these concerns. The previous<br />
patchy ICT experiences of pupils in Years 7 to 9 prevent them from effectively using the full<br />
range of ICT in Years 10 and 11. Pupils make good use of the resources in the Information<br />
Centre to research and create presentations.<br />
HUMANITIES<br />
History<br />
Provision in history is unsatisfactory.<br />
Main strengths and weaknesses<br />
• Achievement in Years 7 to 9 is good but recent standards at GCSE were well below<br />
average.<br />
• Irregular attendance and poor attitudes to learning by a significant minority reduce the<br />
impact of teaching.<br />
• Subject management has not secured consistently good practice in teaching or marking.<br />
Performance data is not used to identify under-performance early enough.<br />
• Pupils find the topics studied up to Year 9 interesting and history is a very popular choice at<br />
GCSE.<br />
Commentary<br />
62. Standards are unsatisfactory overall. 2003 teacher assessments placed standards at the<br />
end of Year 9 above average, with similar judgements in 2004. Work seen was not as good<br />
as these assessments indicate and is in line with national expectations. As many pupils<br />
enter the school with limited skills in history, achievement is good.<br />
63. GCSE results in 2003 were well below the national average for both boys and girls and<br />
achievement was unsatisfactory. Results in 2004 were similar. Work seen in Year 11<br />
indicates there has been some improvement but standards remain below expectations.<br />
Irregular attendance by some pupils and their reluctance to attend revision sessions reduces<br />
<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 25
the proportion of higher grades achieved. Pupils with Statements of Educational Needs are<br />
well supported and make good progress.<br />
64. Teaching quality varies but is satisfactory overall. In the best lessons, teachers use good<br />
subject knowledge to plan a variety of interesting activities. Pupils enjoy these lessons and<br />
respond well when asked challenging question. Pupils say they like the topics offered in<br />
Years 7 to 9 and this results in above average numbers entering GCSE courses but some<br />
do not understand how much written work is then required. Where there are limited lesson<br />
objectives combined with too little variety in learning tasks, pupils become bored and<br />
restless. The best marking carefully explains the strengths of pupils’ work and provides<br />
targets for improvement. This is mostly the case in Year 9, but pupils in Years 7 and 8 do not<br />
understand how to improve. Marking of GCSE work is good and includes assessments that<br />
are closely linked to examination mark schemes. Even so, many pupils do not use the<br />
information from the assessments well and treat the grade given as a prediction. This<br />
reduces ambition and limits efforts to improve. Learning in some lessons is less good than<br />
teaching because their immature attitudes prevent pupils from learning from each other and<br />
their teachers. Whilst they remember facts well, pupils are too dependent on being asked<br />
supplementary questions. This means that in test/exam conditions they do not produce the<br />
detailed answers needed to earn higher marks. In some cases this is because they do not<br />
have the writing skills to justify their views. In others, the cause appears to be low motivation.<br />
Many GCSE students do not meet course submission deadlines in spite of the energetic<br />
efforts of their teachers.<br />
65. Leadership and management are unsatisfactory. The scheme of work is detailed and is<br />
supported by good opportunities for local fieldwork. The head of department is a good role<br />
model but his effective teaching approaches are not sufficiently widely adopted. Standards at<br />
GCSE remain low. Monitoring has failed to achieve consistency in teaching and marking.<br />
There has been little improvement since the previous inspection. Plans are in place to use<br />
consultants and make better use of marks to track pupils’ progress. These actions have not<br />
yet improved standards.<br />
Geography<br />
Provision in geography is good.<br />
Main strengths and weaknesses<br />
• In the GCSE examinations in 2003 pupils gained better results in geography than in most<br />
other subjects they took.<br />
• Lessons are well planned and structured so most pupils are productive and achieve well.<br />
• The range of teaching and learning methods used is too narrow to fully engage pupils’<br />
interest in the subject.<br />
Commentary<br />
66. GCSE results in 2003 were average but pupils gained better grades in geography than in<br />
most other subjects they took. <strong>School</strong> data indicates that results declined slightly in 2004 but<br />
pupils still did as well in geography as in other subjects. In the 2003 teacher assessments at<br />
the end of Year 9 results were average and increased to just above average in 2004. These<br />
results represent good achievement for the pupils concerned when compared to their<br />
attainment on entry to the school.<br />
67. In work seen standards are in line with expectations and pupils’ achievement is good at the<br />
end of Year 9 and Year 11. All pupils in Year 9 recognise geographical terminology and<br />
higher attaining pupils use this confidently and accurately. Pupils are given very clear<br />
guidance about examination requirements, which helps them to achieve well. In Year 11<br />
pupils research geographical issues and analyse their data effectively to reach balanced<br />
conclusions.<br />
<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 26
68. Students achieve well because teaching and learning are good. Teaching is never less than<br />
satisfactory. Teachers plan and structure their lessons well so that most pupils are<br />
productive and move smoothly from one task to the next. However, teachers are not yet<br />
using a wide enough variety of teaching methods to engage the interest of all pupils. Most<br />
pupils respond well to the good teaching they receive and are given the confidence to<br />
contribute to discussions and answer questions. Pupils work well collaboratively and share<br />
information sensibly. A minority of lower attaining boys lose concentration in some lessons<br />
and their pace of learning slows down.<br />
69. The leadership and management of the department are good. The new head of department<br />
has identified appropriate priorities for development. These include introducing new systems<br />
for the assessment of pupils work to ensure they know how well they are doing and how to<br />
improve. New resources have been purchased and schemes of work are being revised in<br />
order to maintain pupils interest in geography. These strategies are designed to increase the<br />
comparatively low numbers of pupils currently opting to study geography for the GCSE.<br />
Improvement since the previous inspection is good because standards have risen and<br />
teaching and learning continue to improve. The department has both the capacity and the<br />
commitment to improve further.<br />
Religious education<br />
Provision in religious education is good.<br />
Main strengths and weaknesses<br />
• Teaching is good and contributes well to pupils’ achievement.<br />
• The subject makes a very good contribution to the spiritual, moral, social and cultural<br />
development of pupils.<br />
• The monitoring of teachers and pupils’ work is well developed.<br />
• Good leadership and very good management of the subject ensure that pupils receive a rich<br />
curriculum.<br />
• Not enough is done to ensure that assessment is used to identify and respond to individual<br />
pupils’ needs.<br />
Commentary<br />
70. By Year 9, standards are average in relation to the Hampshire Local Education Authority<br />
Agreed Syllabus, an improvement since the previous inspection. Given pupils’ below<br />
average standards on entry to the school, this represents good achievement. Pupils are well<br />
able to link their knowledge of religion with their everyday experiences. Standards in the<br />
GCSE full course in 2003 were below average. In the short course, the first time taken,<br />
results were well below average. However, in the 2004 short course standards rose<br />
considerably because there was a closer match between the teaching and examination<br />
requirements.<br />
71. By Year 11, standards are in line with expectations. Pupils extend their knowledge and<br />
understanding of how they can learn from religion. They are developing their skills of<br />
investigation and interpretation well. They make good gains in their knowledge and<br />
understanding of religious concepts. Their achievement is good because they can apply their<br />
learning to new situations. However, they do not always question and explore their own<br />
attitudes in sufficient depth owing to insufficient curriculum time for the GCSE short course.<br />
Pupils’ spiritual and moral awareness is very good. They demonstrate a clear respect for the<br />
views and beliefs of each other. They show an awareness of moral choices, and reflect very<br />
well on serious religious and moral issues.<br />
72. Teaching is good and has improved since the previous inspection. Teachers’ good use of<br />
discussion and questioning enables pupils to express their opinions and form clear<br />
<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 27
judgements about religious and moral issues. The achievement of pupils with special<br />
educational needs is good, because pupils are provided with good support and work that<br />
matches their needs. The use of key words and subject specific language enable pupils to<br />
improve their speaking and listening skills. Pupils make good progress as a result of the<br />
teachers’ very good knowledge of the subject and an awareness of individual pupil needs.<br />
Teachers’ good use of a range of effective teaching methods, coupled with clear<br />
expectations and challenge enables all pupils to make good gains in their knowledge and<br />
understanding of religious and moral issues. Homework is well used to allow for individual<br />
research and to extend pupils’ understanding. Assessment procedures are satisfactory.<br />
Although targets and levels are used, they do not, as yet, respond sufficiently to individual<br />
pupils’ needs.<br />
73. Leadership is good with a clear sense of purpose and direction. The head of the department<br />
has a clear view of the needs of the subject. The subject is managed very well with very<br />
good planning and effective monitoring of teachers’ and pupils’ work. This represents a<br />
significant improvement since the previous inspection.<br />
TECHNOLOGY<br />
Design and technology<br />
Provision in design and technology is satisfactory.<br />
Main strengths and weaknesses<br />
• The subject knowledge of the teachers leads to good learning.<br />
• Teachers do not encourage pupils to find their own solutions to problems and to use their<br />
own ideas.<br />
• The choice of project work in resistant materials limits the progress of the high attaining<br />
pupils.<br />
• The positive attitudes and behaviour of the pupils have a positive impact on the learning.<br />
• The inconsistent approach to assessment often means that pupils do not know if they are<br />
successful or how to improve.<br />
Commentary<br />
74. Standards seen are below average at the end of Year 9 but represent good achievement as<br />
pupils enter the school with standards well below average. This good achievement is made<br />
possible by good teaching and learning and very good teamwork. GCSE results at A* to C<br />
were well below average in 2003. Standards seen are currently below average in Year 11<br />
and achievement is satisfactory. Standards seen show a rapid improvement, particularly in<br />
Years 7 to 9. Teachers’ assessments in Year 9 are accurate, reflecting this improvement.<br />
This improvement, if sustained will provide a sound basis for better work in Years 10 and 11.<br />
75. Teaching and learning are satisfactory in all years with some good features. The best<br />
teaching was seen in textiles, food, graphics and electronics. Subject knowledge that the<br />
teachers bring to the classroom is an important factor in motivating and capturing the<br />
attention of the pupils. Pupils respond well and show positive attitudes and good behaviour<br />
which impacts positively on their learning. Standards are being held back by some teachers<br />
providing solutions to problems rather than ensuring that pupils develop their individual<br />
approaches and personal ideas. The important skills of hand drawing, analysing products<br />
and showing a wide range of ideas, do not have enough emphasis in Years 7 to 9. In<br />
resistant materials, the teacher’s choice of project work is limiting the standards that high<br />
attaining pupils can reach. It does not provide sufficient challenge and demand. Assessment<br />
is not applied consistently across the department. Some pupils do not know if they are being<br />
successful and do not know what to do to improve. Pupils with special educational needs are<br />
identified and helped to make good progress across the department. When they are<br />
<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 28
supported by the well focused special needs support staff they make very good progress in<br />
lessons.<br />
76. Leadership and management of the subject are satisfactory with good features. The head of<br />
department has a vision that is shared by the team of teachers. Very good sharing of ideas<br />
and skills takes place and the active encouragement of learning from each other is evident.<br />
Monitoring and evaluation of teaching are fully established. Improvement since the previous<br />
inspection has been satisfactory. Improvements in standards and achievement have been<br />
made.<br />
VISUAL AND PERFORMING ARTS<br />
Dance was sampled. In the two lessons seen standards and achievement were very good.<br />
Teachers know their subject well and are able to get a high standard of creativity and composition<br />
from pupils. Leadership and management of the team of teachers are very good and the subject will<br />
make a very positive contribution to the school developing as a performing arts college.<br />
Art and design<br />
The provision for art and design is very good.<br />
Main strengths and weaknesses<br />
• Inspirational leadership and management are focused on ensuring that pupils make<br />
progress.<br />
• A wide range of challenging learning opportunities for younger pupils makes for very good<br />
progress.<br />
• Very good assessment and monitoring of pupils by all teachers makes sure what is taught<br />
matches what each pupil needs to learn.<br />
• The department is totally focused on raising standards of all pupils.<br />
Commentary<br />
77. Very good leadership and management is raising standards for pupils of all ages on two<br />
fronts. The art curriculum for younger pupils has been improved to include more three-<br />
dimensional work and to broaden the range of cultural contexts. The use of test information<br />
and practical assessments, especially when pupils enter the school, helps the setting of<br />
clear targets for learning and for monitoring how well pupils are doing. In 2003 standards in<br />
Year 9 were below average but achievement was good from very low levels on entry to the<br />
school. In 2004 standards were at the level expected and achievement was very good. This<br />
improvement in standards is being maintained in the current work seen.<br />
78. In 2003, although GCSE results were below average, older pupils achieved well. There have<br />
been some informed changes to the curriculum, especially for researching historical<br />
contexts, to give pupils better learning opportunities. In 2004 achievement was very good<br />
and standards improved. Standards of work of the current Year 11 are as expected at this<br />
stage in the course. However, attendance is a problem for a significant number of Year 11<br />
pupils and affects the production of coursework and progress against their targets.<br />
79. Teaching for all ages and abilities is very good. Assessment informs the planning so what is<br />
taught challenges pupils at the right level and to do better. Lessons are very well prepared<br />
and teachers use their knowledge of art and of pupils well to inform the styles they use to<br />
engage and keep pupils learning. Sometimes teachers talk too much when introducing<br />
lessons. Relationships are very good and pupils enjoy their art. Resources are used well<br />
especially when pupils are exploring different styles and techniques but there are not enough<br />
of them and teachers frequently have to produce their own and bring books from home.<br />
<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 29
80. The department is very well led and managed. The head of art tracks pupils’ progress,<br />
monitoring the standards reached against the targets set. In a very short time good<br />
teamwork has put the department on a sure footing with a unity of purpose that has had a<br />
very big impact on standards. Teaching is monitored and schemes of work are adapted<br />
where necessary to make sure they meet the needs of all pupils. The use of ICT is<br />
developing but there is a lack of reference texts to support the curriculum especially for older<br />
pupils researching historical contexts. There has been a good improvement since the<br />
previous inspection.<br />
Music<br />
Provision in music is good.<br />
Main strengths and weaknesses<br />
• Achievement in Years 7 to 9 is very good because of very good teaching.<br />
• Vigorous and determined leadership has created a robust and effective framework within<br />
which the department operates efficiently.<br />
• Numbers taking music in Years 10 and 11 are low because most pupils do not place high<br />
value on the subject.<br />
• Pupils have very good opportunities to perform in the locality.<br />
Commentary<br />
81. Attainment at the end of Year 9 is average. This represents good achievement from Year 7<br />
because standards on entry to the school are below expectations. In lessons, achievement<br />
is very good, reflecting more stable staffing in the department. Results in the 2003 GCSE<br />
examination were below average and no pupils were entered in 2004. Attainment in Year 11<br />
is below average and this represents satisfactory achievement. This is because only a small<br />
number of pupils choose to study music and within the group there are a higher proportion of<br />
less able musicians than more able ones.<br />
82. In Year 7, pupils quickly learn how to work together, and develop a strong foundation of<br />
keyboard skills. In Year 9 they compose music with understanding of a range of techniques<br />
and some display a sense of style in their work. Pupils in Year 11 compose within prescribed<br />
styles but few display imagination. They are restricted in the resources available to support<br />
them. There is very good emphasis on the development of skills in all years, but pupils do<br />
not utilise these to create music which is personal to them. Therefore they do not perceive<br />
the value of the subject and the number entering the examination course is half the national<br />
average.<br />
83. Teaching and learning are good. Well-organised lessons engage pupils in a variety of<br />
interesting activities that help them to learn. Teachers have high expectations and behaviour<br />
is very good. The best teaching and learning are in Years 7 to 9 where well paced lessons<br />
and good supporting worksheets enable pupils of all abilities to progress very well. Pupils<br />
make very good improvements because they are regularly involved in thinking about what<br />
they have done and how to improve. There is no consistent strategy for using homework to<br />
extend and consolidate learning.<br />
84. Leadership and management are good. Firmness and determination has resulted in good<br />
improvements since the previous inspection. However, this has not yet impacted significantly<br />
on the popularity of the subject. Effective routines and policies exist and very good planning<br />
supports teaching and learning well. The intensive focus on developing the subject has not<br />
taken into account pupils’ whole educational experience, and the department works in<br />
relative isolation. Instrumental tuition is very well managed and generously supported<br />
financially, but the teaching of freelance tutors is not systematically monitored.<br />
<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 30
85. Musical events are mounted regularly, but few pupils use the department on a day-to-day<br />
basis to develop their music making through organised or individually motivated work.<br />
Performances of music in the community are arranged regularly, and groups of pupils have<br />
opportunities to work with visiting artists to gain insights into music of different cultures. The<br />
department is developing very good links with local primary schools and is committed to<br />
working with them to help raise standards. There is no clear strategy for how this<br />
commitment will be realised and therefore the initiative is slow to move forward. Classroom<br />
facilities are very good. Wall displays create a warm and supportive environment that helps<br />
learning. Storage and practice facilities are inadequate, and this impacts on the amount of<br />
effective group work that can be undertaken in lessons.<br />
Drama<br />
Provision in drama is good.<br />
Main strengths and weaknesses<br />
• Achievement in drama in Years 10 and 11 is good because of the challenging nature of the<br />
teaching.<br />
• Most pupils enjoy their drama, have positive attitudes and value the practical nature of the<br />
subject and what it does for them.<br />
• The new acting head of drama has vision and is moving the department rapidly through a<br />
period of expansion and change.<br />
• Some boys in Years 7 to 9 have yet to recognise that drama is not just an opportunity to<br />
play.<br />
Commentary<br />
86. After some years of above average results, GCSE results in 2003 were below average.<br />
Those in 2004 were similar but only slightly below the target for the proportion of A* to C<br />
grades. These lower results coincided with a substantial increase in numbers taking the<br />
subject. Students currently in Years 10 and 11 are achieving well and standards are as<br />
expected at this stage in the course. Strategies put in place to improve written aspects of<br />
course work are raising standards. The department looks likely to meet its target in 2005.<br />
Standards in Years 7 to 9 are broadly as expected and achievement is satisfactory.<br />
However, in some lessons higher attaining pupils are not given work that is hard enough for<br />
them to demonstrate their full talents.<br />
87. Teaching and learning are good overall and very good in Years 10 and 11. In Years 7 to 9<br />
teaching seen ranged from excellent to unsatisfactory. This is partly because some boys<br />
have not yet made the leap from thinking that drama is an opportunity to mess around to the<br />
realisation that drama, while enjoyable, is also a serious and demanding subject. These<br />
pupils present a challenge to new and inexperienced teachers. Where teaching is at its best,<br />
lessons are conducted at a brisk pace and pupils are encouraged to be independent, to<br />
create, plan and develop their own work. This enables them to explore ideas and develop<br />
their creative and imaginative skills. Very good use of assessment helps pupils in all years to<br />
identify quality and improve their own standards. Some moments in lessons take pupils<br />
beyond the everyday and ordinary to recognise how drama can help us understand feelings,<br />
emotions and experiences that we cannot explain. Older pupils in particular can describe<br />
what is different about drama and how it enriches them as people and improves skills of<br />
communication, problem solving and working with others.<br />
88. The department is well led and managed and some aspects of the leadership of the new<br />
acting head of drama are very good. She is leading the drive towards higher standards<br />
through her vision, energy, enthusiasm and very good teaching and is very well supported<br />
by senior staff. The quality of drama in the college has been recognised by its recent status<br />
as a performing arts college. This has already enabled the school to employ a specialist<br />
technician and to make significant improvements to the technical resources, which will lead<br />
<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 31
to the broadening of curriculum opportunities. There has been good improvement since the<br />
previous inspection and the subject is growing in popularity with almost half of the pupils in<br />
Years 10 and 11 choosing to take it to GCSE. However, not all drama teachers share the<br />
common purpose and direction of the majority and, if this situation continues, it will impede<br />
the rate of change.<br />
PHYSICAL EDUCATION<br />
Provision in physical education is good.<br />
Main strengths and weaknesses<br />
• Very good indoor and outdoor facilities have a positive effect on learning and achievement.<br />
• Teaching, learning and pupils’ achievement in practical work is good overall. Pupils’ written<br />
work in GCSE is unsatisfactory.<br />
• There is a very good range of extra-curricular clubs and teams.<br />
• Assessment and monitoring procedures are insufficiently developed.<br />
• Good relationships between teachers and pupils have a positive effect on learning and<br />
achievement.<br />
Commentary<br />
89. Teachers’ assessments in 2003 and work seen at the end of Year 9 are average. They<br />
indicate good achievement, since pupils’ standards on entry to the school are below<br />
expectations. GCSE results in 2003 were below average. Standards in work seen in<br />
practical lessons in Years 10 and 11 are in line with national expectations but below<br />
expectations in GCSE written work. These standards represent satisfactory achievement in<br />
practical work but unsatisfactory achievement in written work. All pupils follow a physical<br />
education course in Years 10 and 11 and their achievement is satisfactory.<br />
90. Teaching and learning are good overall. Lessons are well planned and delivered. Teachers<br />
have good subject knowledge and pupils respond positively to the encouragement given.<br />
Relationships between teachers and pupils are good and this enhances pupil motivation and<br />
learning. Learning and achievement are also improved by the effective use of very good<br />
indoor and outdoor facilities. Whilst assessment is well used for practical work in GCSE<br />
classes, it is insufficiently developed for pupils in Years 7 to 9. In GCSE theory classes, the<br />
lack of a rigorous approach to homework, marking and the monitoring of standards restrict<br />
learning. In addition there is insufficient use of ICT by pupils.<br />
91. Overall there is good leadership and management of the subject and the teachers in the<br />
department work well as an effective team. Teachers act as good role models and insist on<br />
high standards of appearance and behaviour from pupils. Very good support is given to two<br />
newly qualified teachers and provision for the professional development of all the teachers is<br />
well established and effective. Teachers give generously of their time and offer a very good<br />
range of extra-curricular clubs and teams, which are well supported by pupils. In addition a<br />
large number of pupils benefit from participation in the Junior Sports Leadership Award<br />
Scheme. Pupils benefit from the links that have been established with sports cubs and<br />
coaches from outside the school. Since the previous inspection the many good features that<br />
were identified have been maintained and there has been an increase in the number of<br />
pupils choosing physical education at GCSE level.<br />
PERSONAL, SOCIAL AND HEALTH EDUCATION AND CITIZENSHIP<br />
<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 32
Personal, social and health education includes citizenship and careers education. Most of the<br />
evidence to make judgements on citizenship came from observing personal and social education<br />
lessons.<br />
Citizenship<br />
Provision in citizenship is good.<br />
Main strengths and weaknesses<br />
• Teaching is good overall and makes a clear contribution to pupils’ understanding of the<br />
subject and they achieve well.<br />
• Very good leadership ensures a rich variety of experiences for pupils.<br />
• There is some variation in the quality of teaching and marking because every year there are<br />
teachers in the team who are new to the subject.<br />
• The course makes particularly good use of visitors from community services, local<br />
businesses and voluntary organisations.<br />
Commentary<br />
92. The school recognises the importance of personal, social and health education lessons and<br />
has successfully embedded both citizenship and careers within the programme. Learning is<br />
well supported by related themes and topics covered in other subjects, especially in<br />
humanities. Throughout the school, pupils achieve well and the standards of their work are<br />
what they are expected to be. Pupils acquire good knowledge and understanding of<br />
responsible citizenship and develop good personal skills. Pupils with individual special<br />
needs also make good progress because teachers provide challenge and support.<br />
93. Pupils enjoy the subject because they are taught well. Most teachers are experienced,<br />
confident and comfortable with the course materials. This helps pupils to develop important<br />
skills of discussion and presentation as well as of analysis and evaluation. A few lessons are<br />
less successful because the teacher has less relevant experience and is therefore not as<br />
confident about adapting lessons to the particular needs of each class.<br />
94. An extensive range of people from the community and local organisations support and help<br />
develop pupils’ positive attitudes to the subject. Regular and systematic use of high quality<br />
visiting experts extend what teachers can provide and are appreciated by pupils.<br />
Contributions from community nurses and the fire and prison services encourage pupils to<br />
consider their own responses to sensitive issues. Year’s 10 and 11 pupils particularly value<br />
the contacts with business and industry.<br />
95. Very good leadership provides a clear vision for the subject. Personal, social and health<br />
education and citizenship have got a high status within the school. Teaching is very well<br />
supported by a comprehensive scheme of work, excellent community contacts and clear<br />
assessment procedures. The school provides a good range of additional opportunities to<br />
develop an understanding of responsible citizenship and the democratic process through<br />
activities such as drama productions, the school and year councils. Management is<br />
satisfactory. Timetabling determines who is free to teach the subject to complete the team of<br />
up to 16 teachers, some of which are recognised experts. Regular monitoring is limited<br />
because of the size of this team and the annual change of teachers. Not all teachers use the<br />
most effective approaches and some lessons are more successful than others.<br />
<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 33
PART D: SUMMARY OF THE MAIN <strong>INSPECTION</strong> JUDGEMENTS<br />
Inspection judgement Grade<br />
The overall effectiveness of the school 3<br />
How inclusive the school is 2<br />
How the school’s effectiveness has changed since its last inspection 3<br />
Value for money provided by the school 3<br />
Overall standards achieved 4<br />
Pupils’ achievement 3<br />
Pupils’ attitudes, values and personal qualities (ethos) 3<br />
Attendance 4<br />
Attitudes 3<br />
Behaviour, including the extent of exclusions 3<br />
Pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 3<br />
The quality of education provided by the school 3<br />
The quality of teaching 3<br />
How well pupils learn 3<br />
The quality of assessment 4<br />
How well the curriculum meets pupils needs 4<br />
Enrichment of the curriculum, including out-of-school activities 3<br />
Accommodation and resources 3<br />
Pupils’ care, welfare, health and safety 2<br />
Support, advice and guidance for pupils 3<br />
How well the school seeks and acts on pupils’ views 3<br />
The effectiveness of the school’s links with parents 4<br />
The quality of the school’s links with the community 3<br />
The school’s links with other schools and colleges 2<br />
The leadership and management of the school 3<br />
The governance of the school 3<br />
The leadership of the headteacher 2<br />
The leadership of other key staff 3<br />
The effectiveness of management 3<br />
Inspectors make judgements on a scale: excellent (grade 1); very good (2); good (3); satisfactory (4); unsatisfactory (5);<br />
<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 34
poor (6); very poor (7).<br />
<strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>School</strong> - 35