24.11.2012 Views

RBF_Cover (for eps) - National Water Research Institute

RBF_Cover (for eps) - National Water Research Institute

RBF_Cover (for eps) - National Water Research Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Session 4: Siting<br />

<strong>Water</strong>-Quality Management <strong>for</strong> Existing Riverbank-<br />

Filtration Sites along the Elbe River in Germany<br />

Prof. Dr.-Ing. Thomas Grischek<br />

University of Applied Sciences Dresden<br />

Dresden, Germany<br />

Introduction<br />

In <strong>for</strong>mer times, the management of <strong>RBF</strong> sites in Germany focused on water quantity — how much<br />

water could be abstracted and what groundwater levels would result. Control measures were based<br />

on measurements of river and groundwater levels and pumping rates and on black-box models to<br />

estimate the portion of riverbank filtrate abstracted (e.g., Luckner and Nestler, 1982). The<br />

development of computer programs <strong>for</strong> groundwater flow and transport simulations resulted in<br />

increasing management applications <strong>for</strong> <strong>RBF</strong> sites (e.g., Koster et al., 1994; Heinzmann, 1998;<br />

Eckert et al., 2000).<br />

The number of published papers dealing with the complex management of water quality at <strong>RBF</strong><br />

sites is very low. Besides work done by Sontheimer (1991) and Schubert (1999) at sites along the<br />

Rhine River, a control and management concept <strong>for</strong> the Hengsen site on the Ruhr River<br />

(Schöttler and Sommer, 1992) must be highlighted. At the end of the 1980s, water-quality<br />

management also became a subject <strong>for</strong> <strong>RBF</strong> sites on the Elbe River due to problems with river and<br />

raw-water quality. Initial work done by Müller, Schwan, and others between 1985 and 1989 was<br />

continued by Nestler et al. (1998).<br />

<strong>Water</strong>-quality management must be based on detailed knowledge of groundwater flow conditions<br />

and monitoring measures to obtain sufficient data on water quality; however, this is not the case<br />

<strong>for</strong> every site. Of course, <strong>for</strong> small waterworks, such investigations and investments may be higher<br />

than the cost savings resulting from water-quality management. But, the optimization of water<br />

abstraction can have long-term effects on raw-water quality and treatment cost savings. <strong>Water</strong>quality<br />

management systems are well established at sites where problems with contamination have<br />

occurred (e.g., high concentrations of nitrate, organic halogens). In such cases, experiences may<br />

not be published to give the impression of a “no problem waterworks” or because a clear<br />

description is not easy due to the large amount of data needed to understand the complex system<br />

and site-specific boundary conditions.<br />

General <strong>Water</strong>-Quality Management Measures<br />

The first step in water-quality management is to clarify which advantage of <strong>RBF</strong> is the most<br />

important and to identify the main aims or problems. At one site, the nitrate concentration in the<br />

raw water should be decreased; at another site, the concentration of DOC, dissolved iron, or an<br />

organic contaminant should decrease.<br />

Correspondence should be addressed to:<br />

Prof. Dr.-Ing. Thomas Grischek<br />

Professor<br />

<strong>Institute</strong> <strong>for</strong> Geotechnics & <strong>Water</strong> Sciences<br />

University of Applied Sciences Dresden • Friedrich-List-Platz 1 • 01069 Dresden, Germany<br />

Phone: +49 351 4623350 • Fax: +49 351 4623567 • Email: grischek@htw-dresden.de<br />

63

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!