RBF_Cover (for eps) - National Water Research Institute

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Conference Schedule & Abstracts Contents Wednesday, September 17, 2003 All sessions will take place in the Continental Room 7:00 am Registration Mezzanine Level 7:00 am Speaker Breakfast Rosewood Room 8:00 am Welcome Continental Room Ronald B. Linsky, National Water Research Institute, California 8:15 am Keynote Address Riverbank Filtration: The American Experience . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Edward J. Bouwer, Ph.D., The Johns Hopkins University, Maryland 8:45 am Session 1: Costs Moderated by William D. Gollnitz, Greater Cincinnati Water Works, Ohio The Costs and Benefits of Riverbank-Filtration Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Stephen A. Hubbs, P.E., Louisville Water Company, Kentucky 9:15 am Session 2: Operations Moderated by Chittaranjan Ray, Ph.D., P.E., University of Hawaii at Mañoa, Hawaii Bridging Research and Practical Design Applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 David L. Haas, P.E., Jordan, Jones & Goulding, Inc., Georgia Construction and Maintenance of Wells for Riverbank Filtration . . . . . . . 17 Henry C. Hunt, CPG, Collector Wells International, Inc., Ohio Aquifer Storage and Recharge Pretreatment: Synergies of Bank Filtration, Ozonation, and Ultraviolet Disinfection . . . 23 Robert S. Cushing, Ph.D., Carollo Engineers, Florida Evolution from a Conventional Well Field to a Riverbank-Filtration System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 John D. North, Cedar Rapids Water Department, Iowa 11:15 am Session 3A: Hydraulic Aspects Moderated by Rudolf Irmscher, Ph.D., Stadtwerke Düsseldorf, Germany Groundwater Flow and Water-Quality – A Flowpath Study in the Seminole Well Field, Cedar Rapids, Iowa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 Douglas J. Schnoebelen, Ph.D., United States Geological Survey, Iowa The Use of Aquifer Testing and Groundwater Modeling to Evaluate Changes in Aquifer/River Hydraulics at the Louisville Water Company . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 David C. Schafer, David Schafer & Associates, Minnesota 12:15 pm Lunch Rosewood Room v
vi 1:30 pm Session 3B: Hydraulic Aspects Moderated by Rudolf Irmscher, Ph.D., Stadtwerke Düsseldorf, Germany Plugging in Riverbank-Filtration Systems: Evaluating Yield-Limiting Factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 Stephen A. Hubbs, P.E., Louisville Water Company, Kentucky Application of Different Tracers to Evaluate the Flow Regime at Riverbank-Filtration Sites in Berlin, Germany . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 Dr. Gudrun Massman, Free University of Berlin, Germany 2:30 pm Session 4: Siting Moderated by Henry C. Hunt, CPG, Collector Wells International, Inc., Ohio Siting and Testing Procedures for Riverbank-Filtration Systems . . . . . . . . 57 Samuel M. Stowe, P.G., CPG, International Water Consultants, Inc., Ohio Water Quality Management for Existing Riverbank Filtration Sites along the Elbe River in Germany. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 Prof. Dr.-Ing. Thomas Grischek, University of Applied Sciences Dresden, Germany 3:30 pm Session 5: Dynamics Moderated by Prof. Dr.-Ing. Thomas Grischek, University of Applied Sciences Dresden, Germany Using Models to Predict Filtrate Quality at Riverbank-Filtration Sites – What Is the Adequate Level of Modeling?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 Chittaranjan Ray, Ph.D., P.E., University of Hawaii at Mañoa, Hawaii The 100-Year Flood of the Elbe River in 2002 and Its Effects on Riverbank-Filtration Sites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 Dipl.-Ing. Matthias Krueger, Fernwasserversorgung Elbaue-Ostharz GmbH, Germany Temporal Changes of Natural Attenuation Processes During Bank Filtration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 Paul Eckert, Ph.D., Stadtwerke Düsseldorf AG, Germany An Update of the City of Guelph’s Response to Regulation 459/00: Effective Natural In Situ Filtration of Several Groundwater Under the Direct Influence of Surface-Water Supplies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 Dennis E. Mutti, P.E., Associated Engineering Limited, Canada On Bank Filtration and Reactive Transport Modeling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 Dr.-Ing. Ekkehard Holzbecher, Humboldt University, Germany 6:00 pm Reception Pavilion Foyer 6:30 pm Dinner Pavilion Ballroom Dinner Speaker: Hydraulic Sensitivities and Reduction Potential Correlated with the Distance Between the Riverbank and Production Well . . . . . . . . 99 Bernhard Wett, Ph.D., University of Innsbruck, Austria
Page 1 and 2: 2RBF The National Water Research In
Page 3 and 4: Published by the NATIONAL WATER RES
Page 6: Foreword In 1999, the National Wate
Page 11 and 12: viii 1:15 pm Session 8: Emerging Co
Page 14 and 15: Acronyms ADA ß-alaninediacetic aci
Page 16: Conference Abstracts
Page 19 and 20: 2 conventional treatment train on c
Page 21 and 22: 4 The Louisville Water Company also
Page 23 and 24: 6 Treatment Capital Cost Annual O&M
Page 25 and 26: 8 design engineers needed to addres
Page 27 and 28: 10 Ohio River Pump Station Collecto
Page 29 and 30: 12 Figure 4. Wet/dry tunnel concept
Page 31 and 32: 14 The turbidity of well water is t
Page 34 and 35: Session 2: Operations Construction
Page 36 and 37: Land Surface lengths of well screen
Page 38: Summary Well systems can be constru
Page 41 and 42: 24 Traditionally, ASR has been used
Page 43 and 44: 26 plans for a pilot-scale bank-fil
Page 46 and 47: Session 2: Operations Evolution fro
Page 48 and 49: Today, Cedar Rapids obtains all of
Page 50: REFERENCES AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The
Page 53 and 54: 36 source of most nitrate detected
Page 55 and 56: 38 Hallberg, G.R., D.G. Riley, J.R.
Page 57 and 58:
40 Two 10-MGD capacity pumps were i
Page 60 and 61:
Session 3: Hydraulic Aspects Pluggi
Page 62 and 63:
iverbed scouring. This analysis sho
Page 64:
REFERENCES Schafer, D.C. (2003).
Page 67 and 68:
50 TS GWA Tegel TS Wannsee TS Tegel
Page 69 and 70:
52 contains the lowest concentratio
Page 71 and 72:
54 δ 18 O [ 0⁄00 versus Standard
Page 73 and 74:
56 Acknowledgements We would like t
Page 75 and 76:
58 Phase 1 Investigations Once the
Page 77 and 78:
60 pumping is discontinued and the
Page 80 and 81:
Session 4: Siting Water-Quality Man
Page 82 and 83:
Torgau Case Study The highly produc
Page 84 and 85:
The mean concentration in the “mi
Page 86 and 87:
Session 5: Dynamics Using Models to
Page 88 and 89:
source of induced infiltration to t
Page 90 and 91:
affect the amount of contaminant en
Page 92 and 93:
intuitive system behavior. In the c
Page 94 and 95:
entering the well can be carried ou
Page 96:
Ray, C., T.W. Soong, Y.Q. Lian, and
Page 99 and 100:
82 Riverbank Filtration Near Torgau
Page 101 and 102:
84 drinking-water quality. Drinking
Page 104 and 105:
Session 5: Dynamics Temporal Change
Page 106 and 107:
• Equalization of fluctuating con
Page 108 and 109:
Session 5: Dynamics An Update of th
Page 110 and 111:
Session 5: Dynamics On Bank Filtrat
Page 112 and 113:
Figure 2. Streamlines for two wells
Page 114 and 115:
well galleries near the Unterhavel
Page 116 and 117:
Dinner Presentation Hydraulic Sensi
Page 118 and 119:
conductivity k (especially of the r
Page 120 and 121:
parameter value: Figure 6. Initial
Page 122 and 123:
Keynote Presentation Riverbank Filt
Page 124 and 125:
esulted in a significant improvemen
Page 126 and 127:
Fritz, B. (2002). Uferfiltration un
Page 128 and 129:
Session 6: Microorganisms Using Mic
Page 130 and 131:
was independent of finished water t
Page 132 and 133:
Session 6: Microorganisms Transport
Page 134 and 135:
Session 6: Microorganisms Laborator
Page 136 and 137:
Cryptosporidium are unreliable, lab
Page 138 and 139:
Pathogen Concentration (pathogens/1
Page 140 and 141:
Session 6: Microorganisms Fate of D
Page 142 and 143:
treatment train optimized for turbi
Page 144 and 145:
Acknowledgements We gratefully ackn
Page 146 and 147:
Session 6: Microorganisms Assessmen
Page 148 and 149:
screens along the entire lateral le
Page 150 and 151:
Table 3. Average Distribution of Ri
Page 152 and 153:
Location Number of Sampling Events
Page 154 and 155:
Session 7: Organics Removal Riverba
Page 156 and 157:
uncontaminated groundwater could le
Page 158 and 159:
Sacher, F., H.-J. Brauch, and W. K
Page 160 and 161:
Session 7: Organics Removal Organic
Page 162 and 163:
TOC (mg/L) 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Site 1
Page 164 and 165:
Conclusions RBF is very effective i
Page 166 and 167:
Lunch Presentation Potential Uses o
Page 168 and 169:
Session 8: Emerging Contaminants Re
Page 170 and 171:
H 3C O O N N H3C N CH3 Cl AMDOPH Be
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Results and Conclusion The Santa An
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
echarge is not well understood. Our
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
The MS conditions were as follows:
Page 184 and 185:
Session 9: Public Policy and Regula
Page 186 and 187:
FEET 1,000 900 800 700 600 VERTICAL
Page 188 and 189:
The surficial aquifers in Midwester
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
that multiple samples should be eva
Page 196 and 197:
turbidity. Endospores, Giardia, Cry
Page 198 and 199:
Session 9: Public Policy and Regist
Page 200 and 201:
For the first phase of the Dyje Pro
Page 202 and 203:
Concentration mg.l 1 60 50 40 30 20
Page 204 and 205:
Session 11: Case Studies “Lessons
Page 206 and 207:
Concentration (mg/L) 35 30 25 20 15
Page 208 and 209:
REFERENCE Koterba, M.T, F.D. Wilde,
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
REFERENCES Laszlo , F., and Z. Homo
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Figure 2. A sketch of the study are
Page 218 and 219:
By analyzing the δ 15 N-NO 3 of si
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Microbial growth was weak in all la
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Objectives The aim of the study was
Page 228 and 229:
6000 4000 2000 Suspended Solids (mg
Page 230 and 231:
REFERENCES American Public Health A
Page 232 and 233:
show all

RBF_Cover (for eps) - National Water Research Institute

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?