24.11.2012 Views

RBF_Cover (for eps) - National Water Research Institute

RBF_Cover (for eps) - National Water Research Institute

RBF_Cover (for eps) - National Water Research Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Session 1: Costs<br />

The Costs and Benefits of Riverbank-Filtration Systems<br />

Stephen A. Hubbs, P.E.<br />

Louisville <strong>Water</strong> Company<br />

Louisville, Kentucky<br />

Henry C. Hunt, CPG<br />

Collector Wells International, Inc.<br />

Columbus, Ohio<br />

Jürgen Schubert<br />

Stadtwerke Düsseldorf<br />

Düsseldorf, Germany<br />

The Benefits of Riverbank Filtration<br />

The history of <strong>RBF</strong> in modern times is connected to the experience of disease outbreaks in Europe<br />

in the 1890s, with specific reference to the cholera epidemic in Hamburg, Germany, in 1892. The<br />

preference <strong>for</strong> groundwater, <strong>RBF</strong>, and artificial recharge to surface water stems from this<br />

experience, noting much more wholesome water from these sources than from surface water.<br />

A much earlier reference to <strong>RBF</strong> (albeit far less scientific) is found in the Bible:<br />

The fish that were in the Nile died, and the Nile became foul, so that the Egyptians<br />

could not drink water from the Nile … So all the Egyptians dug around the Nile <strong>for</strong><br />

water to drink, <strong>for</strong> they could not drink of the water of the Nile. (Exodus 7, 21-24)<br />

Thus, it appears that the benefits of <strong>RBF</strong> are anything but new!<br />

The benefits of <strong>RBF</strong> have been cataloged in recent publications to include:<br />

• Particle removal.<br />

• Pathogen removal.<br />

• Organic and inorganic chemical removal.<br />

• Peak smoothing in spills.<br />

• Reduction in DBP <strong>for</strong>mation.<br />

• Production of a more biologically stable water.<br />

When faced with the decision to choose an advanced treatment technology <strong>for</strong> its two treatment<br />

plants, the Louisville <strong>Water</strong> Company in Louisville, Kentucky, sought to compare these benefits<br />

against the benefits of in-plant treatment techniques from both a treatment efficiency perspective<br />

and cost-based perspective; however, a comprehensive, quantitative measure was difficult to develop.<br />

Correspondence should be addressed to:<br />

Stephen A. Hubbs, P.E.<br />

Vice President, New Technology<br />

Louisville <strong>Water</strong> Company<br />

550 South Third Street • Louisville, Kentucky 40202 USA<br />

Phone: (502) 569-3675 • Fax: (502) 569-0813 • Email: SHubbs@lwcky.com<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!