RBF_Cover (for eps) - National Water Research Institute

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Friday, September 19, 2003 7:00 am Speaker Breakfast Rosewood Room 8:00 am Session 11: Case Studies “Lessons Learned” Moderated by Stephen Hubbs, P.E., Louisville Water Company, Kentucky Greater Cincinnati Water Works Flowpath Study Field Design: Methodology and Evaluation. . . . . . . . . . . . 187 Bruce Whitteberry, P.G., Greater Cincinnati Water Works, Ohio The Hungarian Experience with Riverbank Filtration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 193 Ferenc Laszlo, Ph.D., Institute for Water Pollution Control, Water Resources Research Centre, Hungary Nitrate Pollution of a Water Resource – 15 18 N and 0 Study of Infiltrated Surface Water . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197 Frantisek Buzek, Ph.D., Czech Geological Survey, Czech Republic Microbial Growth in Artificially Recharged Groundwater: Experiences from a 4-Year Project . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 203 Ilkka T. Miettinen, Ph.D., National Public Health Institute, Finland Evaluation of the Existing Performance of Infiltration Galleries in the Alluvial Deposits of the Parapeti River . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207 Dip.-Eng. Alvaro Camacho Garnica, Bolivian Association of Sanitary Engineers, Bolivia Sensitivity and Implication of Microscopic Particulate Analysis – A Collector Well Owner’s Perspective. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 215 Barry C. Beyeler, City of Boardman, Oregon Combined Use of Surface Water and Groundwater for Drinking-Water Production in the Barcelona Metropolitan Area. . . . . 217 Jordi Martín-Alonso, Barcelona’s Water Company, Spain 11:30 am Conference Wrap-Up Edward J. Bouwer, Ph.D., Johns Hopkins University, Maryland Martin Jekel, Ph.D., Technical University of Berlin, Germany ix
Page 1 and 2: 2RBF The National Water Research In
Page 3 and 4: Published by the NATIONAL WATER RES
Page 6: Foreword In 1999, the National Wate
Page 9 and 10: vi 1:30 pm Session 3B: Hydraulic As
Page 11: viii 1:15 pm Session 8: Emerging Co
Page 15 and 16: xii Units of Measure cfu Colony-for
Page 18 and 19: Keynote Presentation Riverbank Filt
Page 20 and 21: Session 1: Costs The Costs and Bene
Page 22 and 23: Cost-Evaluation of Riverbank Filtra
Page 24 and 25: Session 2: Operations Bridging Rese
Page 26 and 27: Ohio River Southern Caisson (capped
Page 28 and 29: TBM Exit Construction Vertical Coll
Page 30 and 31: Leakance (inverse days) 10 1 0.1 10
Page 32: REFERENCES Deere, D.U., and D.W. De
Page 35 and 36: 18 Riverbank Filtration Suitability
Page 37 and 38: 20 Laterals Alternate Systems In ad
Page 40 and 41: Session 2: Operations Aquifer Stora
Page 42 and 43: that is important when considering
Page 44: was designed to deliver a dose of 1
Page 47 and 48: 30 The Cedar River and its water qu
Page 49 and 50: 32 contaminants from the river to t
Page 52 and 53: Session 3: Hydraulic Aspects Ground
Page 54 and 55: In addition, a comparison of water-
Page 56 and 57: Session 3: Hydraulic Aspects The Us
Page 58: Table 1. Measured Leakance Values D
Page 61 and 62: 44 • River and caisson water temp
Page 63 and 64:
46 the Kentucky side of the river o
Page 66 and 67:
Session 3: Hydraulic Aspects Applic
Page 68 and 69:
Methodology Transects generally rea
Page 70 and 71:
Figure 3. Percentage of treated was
Page 72 and 73:
similar in the lake and Wells 3 and
Page 74 and 75:
Session 4: Siting Siting and Testin
Page 76 and 77:
• Potential for hydraulic testing
Page 78:
testing, and a short constant rate
Page 81 and 82:
64 Water-quality management could i
Page 83 and 84:
66 Table 1. Effect of Control Measu
Page 85 and 86:
68 Luckner, L., and W. Nestler (198
Page 87 and 88:
70 as described by Dillon and Liget
Page 89 and 90:
72 In Equation 1, the fraction of r
Page 91 and 92:
74 When the hydraulic conductivity
Page 93 and 94:
76 two-dimensional, finite element-
Page 95 and 96:
78 REFERENCES Barry, D.A., H. Promm
Page 98 and 99:
Session 5: Dynamics The 100-Year Fl
Page 100 and 101:
In Torgau, the water level of the E
Page 102:
stable water supply for millions of
Page 105 and 106:
88 Protection Zones II IIIa IIIb Lo
Page 107 and 108:
90 REFERENCES Irmscher, R., and I.
Page 109 and 110:
92 The City of Guelph’s supply sy
Page 111 and 112:
94 resulting numerical dispersion o
Page 113 and 114:
96 As an alternative to PHREEQC for
Page 115 and 116:
98 Mathematician EKKEHARD HOLZBECHE
Page 117 and 118:
100 Figure 1. Schematic overview an
Page 119 and 120:
102 Figure 4. Courses of oxygen, ni
Page 121 and 122:
104 Conclusions Biologically mediat
Page 123 and 124:
106 Geohydraulic Characteristics Gr
Page 125 and 126:
108 Problems At several sites (e.g.
Page 127 and 128:
110 Water chemist and treatment eng
Page 129 and 130:
112 and other material in the finis
Page 131 and 132:
114
Page 133 and 134:
116
Page 135 and 136:
118 necessitated because of the afo
Page 137 and 138:
120 Microsphere Removal (log 10 ) 5
Page 139 and 140:
122 REFERENCES Box, G.E., and G.C.
Page 141 and 142:
124 In the above context, research
Page 143 and 144:
126 Table 1. Results from 1999 to 2
Page 145 and 146:
128 Ray, C., G. Melin, and R.B. Lin
Page 147 and 148:
130 Objectives The overall study ob
Page 149 and 150:
132 The contribution of river water
Page 151 and 152:
134 Louisville, Kentucky. Aerobic s
Page 153 and 154:
136 REFERENCES Ballester, N.A., and
Page 155 and 156:
138 experiments. Most of the hydrop
Page 157 and 158:
140 contradiction to the results of
Page 159 and 160:
142
Page 161 and 162:
144 Well 1C is located at the top o
Page 163 and 164:
146 Absorbance (cm -1 ) 0.30 0.25 0
Page 165 and 166:
148
Page 167 and 168:
150 classification. Where bin class
Page 169 and 170:
152 Acknowledgements The authors wo
Page 171 and 172:
154
Page 173 and 174:
156 recharges surface water from th
Page 175 and 176:
158 Acknowledgments Deutsche Forsch
Page 177 and 178:
160 identified by isolating three b
Page 179 and 180:
162
Page 181 and 182:
164 Site Description There are 40 a
Page 183 and 184:
166 Hydrologist JASON VOGEL has bee
Page 185 and 186:
168 supply option when these condit
Page 187 and 188:
170 EXPLANATION Dune Sand NOT TO SC
Page 189 and 190:
172 LEO GENTILE is Senior Hydrogeol
Page 191 and 192:
174 RICHARD BROWN, an Environmental
Page 193 and 194:
176 Wilson et al., 1996; USEPA, 200
Page 195 and 196:
178 Water-quality monitoring during
Page 197 and 198:
180 BILL GOLLNITZ is a Supervisor o
Page 199 and 200:
182 Figure 1. Location of the Dyje
Page 201 and 202:
184 As a result of improvements in
Page 203 and 204:
186 PETR HLAVÍNEK has 20 years exp
Page 205 and 206:
188 the river. This allowed water-s
Page 207 and 208:
190 Microscopic Particulate Analysi
Page 209 and 210:
192
Page 211 and 212:
194 During the field investigation
Page 213 and 214:
196
Page 215 and 216:
198 Site Description The study area
Page 217 and 218:
200 The nitrate content and δ 15 N
Page 219 and 220:
202 Figure 5. Nitrate isotopic comp
Page 221 and 222:
204 Methodology Experimental Sites
Page 223 and 224:
206 REFERENCES Hahn, M.W., and M.G.
Page 225 and 226:
208 a network and linked to a colle
Page 227 and 228:
210 6045 5045 4045 3045 2045 1045 4
Page 229 and 230:
212 Cummulative Distribution 100% 9
Page 231 and 232:
214
Page 233:
216 forums concerning Endangered Sp
show all

RBF_Cover (for eps) - National Water Research Institute

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?