RDML McManamon SNA 11 Jan - Navsea
RDML McManamon SNA 11 Jan - Navsea
RDML McManamon SNA 11 Jan - Navsea
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Surface Ship Maintenance<br />
S Sustaining t i i Th The Current C t Fleet Fl t<br />
<strong>RDML</strong> <strong>McManamon</strong><br />
<strong>11</strong> <strong>Jan</strong>uary 20<strong>11</strong><br />
1
COMBATANTS<br />
OFFICE<br />
SHIPS ACQUISITION<br />
MANAGEMENT OFFICE<br />
DIRECTOR<br />
PROGRAM EXECUTIVE<br />
OFFICER SHIPS<br />
Team Ships Organization<br />
SWE SUPPORT<br />
PEO STAFF<br />
DEPUTY COMMANDER FOR<br />
SURFACE WARFARE<br />
<strong>RDML</strong> DAVE LEWIS <strong>RDML</strong> JAMES McMANAMON<br />
DEPUTY<br />
DIRECTOR<br />
AMPHIBIOUS & AUXILIARY<br />
SEALIFT OFFICE<br />
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR<br />
PMS 400D<br />
DDG51<br />
PMS 500<br />
DDG 1000<br />
PMS 501<br />
LCS<br />
PMS 502<br />
CG(X)<br />
DPM<br />
DPM<br />
DPM<br />
DPM<br />
PMS 377<br />
LHD8 / LCAC / LHAR / AADS<br />
PMS 317<br />
LPD-1 7/ JCC(X)<br />
PMS 325<br />
AUXILIARY SHIPS /<br />
SMALL BOATS & CRAFTS<br />
PMS 385<br />
STRATEGIC AND THEATER<br />
SEALIFT<br />
DPM<br />
DPM<br />
DPM<br />
DPM<br />
SURFACE WARFARE<br />
DIRECTORATE<br />
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR<br />
FLEET READINESS<br />
SEA 21A<br />
COMMANDING OFFICER<br />
SURFACE SHIP<br />
ENGINEERING<br />
PLANNING PROGRAM<br />
(SURFMEPP)<br />
PMS 400F<br />
CGs / FFGs / DDG51s<br />
PMS 470<br />
AMPHIBIOUS /AUXILIARY/MINE<br />
PMS 333<br />
INACTIVE SHIPS/<br />
SHIP TRANSFERS<br />
PMS 326<br />
INTERNATIONAL FLEET<br />
SUPPORT<br />
PMS 333/336<br />
INACTIVE SHIPS/<br />
SHIP TRANSFERS<br />
DPM<br />
DEPUTY<br />
DPM<br />
DPM<br />
DPM<br />
INACTIVE SHIPS<br />
DPM<br />
SHIP TRANSFERS<br />
DPM<br />
2
Bridge to the Fleet<br />
� SEA 21 is the ‘bridge’ bridge<br />
linking requirements and<br />
acquisition commands to<br />
the waterfront and the<br />
Navy’s operating forces<br />
Alignment<br />
� Operating within the<br />
integrated framework of<br />
the Surface Warfare<br />
Enterprise (SWE), our<br />
strategic strategic objectives are<br />
Accountability<br />
� Surface Combatants<br />
� Amphibious Ships<br />
� Special Mission / Boats &<br />
Crafts / Mine Warfare<br />
SEA 21A – Surface Warfare - Readiness<br />
Ensuring Surface Ships are Ready for Tasking<br />
Increase Operational Availability (A o) and reduce Total Ownership<br />
Costs (TOC) by adhering to time tested, combat proven, standards of<br />
performance performance, reliability reliability, and effectiveness<br />
Deputy Commander,<br />
Surface Warfare<br />
Our vision is clear<br />
We are dedicated to building and<br />
sustaining a culture of readiness<br />
iin the th Navy’s N ’ surface f fforces tto<br />
ensure surface ships are ready<br />
for tasking<br />
challenging Our mission is of critical<br />
importance to the nation<br />
SEA 21 is responsible for the<br />
maintenance and modernization of non-<br />
nuclear l surface f ships hi that th t are currently tl<br />
operating in the Fleet<br />
Commander,<br />
Naval Surface Forces<br />
Fleet Readiness<br />
Fleet Maintenance<br />
Surface Training<br />
Fleet Logistics<br />
Planning Yard<br />
MSMO Contracts<br />
Fleet Technical<br />
3<br />
2
Surface Single Training Integrator (SSTI)<br />
• Created a single, centralized NAVSEA division responsible for developing,<br />
managing, executing, standardizing and evaluating all aspects of Fleet<br />
Introduction and Manpower, p , Personnel, , and Training g (MPT) ( )<br />
• Readiness Deep Dives / MPT Support<br />
• Crew Swap Coordination<br />
� TEAM SHIPS Fleet Introduction Team<br />
� Surface Warfare Enterprise Personnel Readiness Team<br />
• Manages and coordinates MPT initiatives across the lifecycle to increase and<br />
maintain surface ship readiness<br />
• Planning: Crew scheduling and phasing plans, Training Planning Process Methodology<br />
(TRPPM) Boards, Training System Installation Plans (TSIPs)<br />
• AAcquisition: i iti MPT management t of f new construction t ti ships hi ttransferring f i tto th the Fl Fleet, t CCrew<br />
Scheduling & Phasing Plan (CSPP)<br />
• Modernization: Mid-life/modernization manpower analysis, review and update of Ship Class<br />
Navy Training System Plan (NTSP)<br />
• Maintenance: Crew swap coordination, Surface Warfare Enterprise Personnel Readiness<br />
Team, Human Performance Readiness Reviews (HPRRs)<br />
4
Take Away: SEA 21A Is…<br />
• The single point of entry into NAVSEA for resolution of Fleet<br />
readiness issues<br />
• The preferred provider for Fleet readiness answers<br />
• Ensuring a balance of lifecycle management and responsive,<br />
Fleet readiness issue resolution<br />
• Increasing and maintaining operational availability<br />
• The provider of complete lifecycle answers, recommendations<br />
and decisions<br />
• Integrator of technical guidance and program priorities<br />
• The policy setter, process owner, and coordinator for Fleet<br />
readiness metrics for NAVSEA<br />
• Governing body ensuring readiness is achieved efficiently and based on analytical<br />
rigor<br />
• Bridging the gap between platform acquisition and Lifecycle<br />
Management<br />
• Reduce Total Ownership Cost to the Fleet<br />
Readiness is a Result of Good Lifecycle Management Practices<br />
5
Carrier - Submarine – Surface<br />
Engineering Life Cycle Support Comparison<br />
Carriers Subs Surface<br />
FY <strong>11</strong><br />
FY <strong>11</strong><br />
FY <strong>11</strong><br />
$ / Hull H ll $5M $721K $246K<br />
Service Life 50 years<br />
Prognosis<br />
33 years SSN<br />
40 years SSBN<br />
�� ��<br />
30‐50 years<br />
NAVSEA Recommended Actions increase this to $636K / Hull<br />
Thi This iis part t of f th the cost t of f Ownership<br />
O hi<br />
?<br />
6<br />
6
Surface Ship End-to-End Process Map,<br />
Maintenance & Modernization Process Gaps<br />
Assessment<br />
Plan/Policyy<br />
Sustainment<br />
Program<br />
• Need for Integrated Assessment Program<br />
• Need for Integrated Sustainment Program<br />
• SSLCM scope limitations<br />
• No Maintenance Material Management<br />
• Need for sufficiently “Engineered” Work Packages<br />
• Availability Schedule Milestones<br />
• Maintenance and Modernization Integration<br />
• Establish appropriate Avail Type, Schedule and<br />
Duration<br />
• Insufficient IT support systems<br />
• WWork k Package P k Development, D l t Logistics L i ti<br />
• Lack of QA oversight<br />
SURFMEPP<br />
IMA<br />
Capacity/<br />
Capability<br />
Avail<br />
Execution/Wor<br />
k Certification<br />
• Reconstitution of IMA Capacity/Capability<br />
• “I” Level<br />
• No Existing Avail Completion/Work<br />
Certification Process<br />
Gaps p Identified f<br />
7
SURFMEPP<br />
Developed from Proven Carrier & Submarine Processes<br />
SURFMEPP is “Getting the Maintenance Requirement ‘RIGHT’”<br />
• Technical Foundation Papers (TFP) by CLASS)<br />
• SHIP SHEETS<br />
• Baseline Availability Work Packages (BAWPs)<br />
Integgration<br />
ASSESSMENTS<br />
AVAIL WORK CERT<br />
SURFMEPP<br />
SUSTAINMENT<br />
RMC MANNING<br />
Timeline<br />
Other<br />
NSA<br />
Ship<br />
E xecuting Activity<br />
Ships Force<br />
SURFM EPP "P lann ing Activity"<br />
TYC OM<br />
PEO / PARM<br />
S YSCOM<br />
Fle et<br />
OPNAV<br />
MSM O<br />
RM C<br />
Deli ve ry A-7 Yea rs<br />
Initial Class<br />
M ain tena nce<br />
Plan identifies<br />
l ife-cycl e<br />
m ain tena nce<br />
requirements<br />
(deli ve ry)<br />
Refi ned Class<br />
Mai nten ance<br />
Pl an i den tifie s<br />
Life Cycle<br />
Mai nten ance<br />
Requirements<br />
(cont inuo us)<br />
Fleet<br />
Sche dul ing<br />
Co nfe rence @<br />
A-7 years. Sy<br />
first identi fied,<br />
wo rkloa d first<br />
iden tifie d,<br />
Capability Plan<br />
revised<br />
(Au gust ) (A-7<br />
ye ars)<br />
Up dated<br />
End End- to – End<br />
Process<br />
A-30<br />
A-29<br />
(A-900 )<br />
(A-87 0)<br />
SRA<br />
1-1<br />
Surface Ship End-to-End<br />
Maintenance Process<br />
01 Octo ber 200 5<br />
A-28<br />
A-26<br />
A-27<br />
(A-8 40)<br />
(A-7 80)<br />
(A-810 )<br />
SRA<br />
1-2<br />
SRA<br />
1-3<br />
Scen e Set ter - POM 0 8<br />
IRGA - POM 08<br />
OPNAV N4 3 presen ts "cu rren t FAST Team reviews workload,<br />
st ate " of p lann ing all orga nizati ons n ego tiat es re vise d workload<br />
o ffer fee dba ck (Octob er)<br />
guid ance (Novem ber)<br />
(A-2 7 m ont hs)<br />
(A-26 months)<br />
0 1 <strong>Jan</strong>u ary 20 06<br />
A-25<br />
A-23<br />
A-22<br />
A-21<br />
A-20<br />
A-19<br />
A-18<br />
A-17<br />
A-24<br />
(A-730)<br />
(A -690 )<br />
(A-6 60)<br />
(A-630 )<br />
(A-60 0)<br />
(A-570 )<br />
(A-5 40)<br />
(A-5 10)<br />
(A-7 20)<br />
DSRA<br />
1<br />
SRA<br />
2-1<br />
A-650<br />
50% ICMP<br />
Screened<br />
Sh ip Co ntin uou sly Asse ssing Cond itio n, wri ting 2Ks a nd e nte ring int o Shi p Sp eci fic<br />
C5 MP<br />
NCM C provides l ong -ran ge<br />
Progra mm ing Review (FYOP<br />
an d be yo nd)<br />
(A-24 )<br />
Spo nsor P rogram Propo sal (SPP) - P OM 08<br />
Th ird itera tive re vie w of worklo ad prog ram min g<br />
p rocess OPNAV Sp onso r N43<br />
(February)<br />
(A-23 mo nth s)<br />
SRA<br />
2-2<br />
A-60 0<br />
80% ICM P<br />
Screened<br />
SRA<br />
2-3<br />
A-5 30<br />
Fina l<br />
BAWP<br />
A-5 30<br />
10 0% ICMP<br />
Screened<br />
P lann ed basel ine review focus<br />
o n stri ke fo rce an d<br />
Quart erly Me eti ng NCM C to<br />
interoperability, i ntegration, review C5 1 M ode rnizat ion Plan,<br />
ca pab ility an d b alan ce issues<br />
EM I assessm ent<br />
NCM C, EM I assessm ent<br />
(A-18 )<br />
DoN Bu dge t Sub mit tal - POM 0 8<br />
Flee t sub mit s prop osed Ma inte nan ce Type b udg et t o Do N<br />
(Jun e)<br />
(A-1 9 m on ths)<br />
01 Octob er 2 006<br />
A-16<br />
A-14<br />
A-15<br />
(A-48 0)<br />
(A-42 0)<br />
(A-450 )<br />
EDS RA<br />
Instal l certification<br />
re adi ness re vie w<br />
(SEA 62)<br />
(A-18 to A-15)<br />
S cen e Se tter<br />
PR 09<br />
(Octobe r)<br />
(A-1 6 m ont hs)<br />
OSD Bu dge t Sub mit tal - POM 0 8<br />
DoN su bm its propo se d M ain tena nce<br />
type bud get to OSD (Septe mb er)<br />
(A-16 mo nths)<br />
ESRA<br />
Quarterly Meeting NCMC to IRCA - PR 0 9<br />
review C51 Modernization Plan, (Novem be r)<br />
EM I a sse ssmen t<br />
(A-14 mo nth s)<br />
Surface Ship Maintenance n Modernization Future State_v2.igx<br />
01 Ja nua ry 200 7<br />
A-13<br />
A-<strong>11</strong><br />
A-10<br />
A-9<br />
A-8<br />
A-7<br />
A-6<br />
A-5<br />
A-12<br />
(A-3 90)<br />
(A-3 30 )<br />
(A-30 0)<br />
(A-2 70)<br />
(A-240)<br />
(A-2 10)<br />
(A -180 )<br />
(A-1 50)<br />
(A-36 0)<br />
SRA<br />
3-1<br />
SEA 6 2 cond ucts fin al<br />
ce rtificat ion read ine ss<br />
review (FCRR)<br />
(A-15 to A-12)<br />
SPP - PR 09<br />
(Octob er)<br />
(A-16 months)<br />
PresBud get Subm itta l - POM 08<br />
DoN su bmi ts pro pose d M ain tena nce<br />
Type b ud get to Pre side nt's Budg et<br />
(<strong>Jan</strong> uary)<br />
(A-12 mo nths)<br />
SRA<br />
3-2<br />
SYSCOMs<br />
con duct<br />
Wea pon s<br />
System<br />
Inte gra tion &<br />
Operability<br />
Te st (WSIIT)<br />
(A-12 to A-9)<br />
DSRA<br />
2<br />
A-2 40<br />
Pre-AWP<br />
#1<br />
A-2 40<br />
50 % D<br />
Lev el M aint.<br />
Locked to $<br />
Flee t id enti fies m ain tena nce fu ndi ng Pla nne d ba selin e re vie w<br />
Quarterly Meeting NCMC to allocation, availability, in shi p specific focus o n i nterope rabi lity,<br />
re vi ew C51 M ode rnizatio n M aint ena nce & M od erni zat ion Busine ss inte gra tion and ma turi ty<br />
Pl an, EMI assessme nt<br />
Plan (MMB P)<br />
issues<br />
(M arch; A-10 )<br />
NCM C, EM I asse ssm en t<br />
(A-9 )<br />
DoN<br />
Su bmi t - PR 09<br />
(Jun e)<br />
(A-8 months)<br />
SRA<br />
4-1<br />
SYSCOMs<br />
conduct initial<br />
Pl atfo rm<br />
Certification<br />
Decision (PCQ)<br />
(SEA 06 2)<br />
(A-5 )<br />
C5I MP d ead line for<br />
M ode rnizati on, late<br />
pro posa ls use<br />
Ele ct roni c Ch ang e<br />
Co nfig ura tion Board<br />
NCMC<br />
(A-6)<br />
0 1 Octobe r 20 07<br />
A-4<br />
A-2<br />
A-3<br />
(A-120 )<br />
(A-60 )<br />
(A-90)<br />
SRA<br />
4-2<br />
NSA (RM C actin g) review wo rk<br />
package with Executin g<br />
Activitie s an d AITs a t Work<br />
Packag e In teg ratio n<br />
Co nfe rence (WFIC)<br />
(A-4)<br />
SRA<br />
4-3<br />
A-1 20<br />
A-85<br />
80 % D<br />
Pre-AWP<br />
Lev e l M aint.<br />
#2<br />
Lock ed to $<br />
A ppro ve d C5 IMP i nstal latio ns no t<br />
cert ified re quires SYSCOM requ est<br />
risk assessment approval from the<br />
co gni za nt TYCOM<br />
(A-4)<br />
OSD<br />
Submit - PR 09<br />
(September)<br />
(A-4 months)<br />
A-75<br />
10 0% D<br />
Level Maint.<br />
Lock ed to $<br />
01 Ja nua ry 2 00 8<br />
A-1<br />
A+1<br />
A-0<br />
(A-3 0)<br />
(A+30)<br />
SA00<br />
DSRA<br />
3<br />
A-4 5 A-30<br />
A-0<br />
Final<br />
AWP WPE R<br />
Av ail<br />
Start<br />
A-35<br />
A-14<br />
WP<br />
Send<br />
Definitized<br />
"Ready to<br />
Start" MSG<br />
NSA (RMC a ct ing)<br />
d efin itizes (fi nali ze s<br />
t erm s and cond ition s of<br />
cont ract) wit h M SMO<br />
(A-35 da ys)<br />
PresBudg<br />
Submit - PR 09<br />
(<strong>Jan</strong> uary)<br />
(A-0 m ont hs)<br />
CA00<br />
C+1<br />
C+2<br />
C+3<br />
A+2<br />
(C+3 0)<br />
(C+60)<br />
(C+9 0)<br />
(A +60 )<br />
MSMO<br />
MSMO<br />
MSMO<br />
com pl etes p lan ning<br />
co mpl etes plan nin g<br />
co mp lete s plan nin g<br />
an d e stima ting of work<br />
a nd e stim atin g of work<br />
a nd e stim atin g of all<br />
assign ed by A-8<br />
assig ned by A-4<br />
work a ssi gne d<br />
tim ef ram e<br />
time fram e<br />
MSM O repo rts<br />
(A-5 5 da ys)<br />
(A-55 da ys)<br />
(A-5 5 d ays)<br />
closeo ut d ata<br />
P lann ing Start<br />
(cost) in NM O<br />
(A-1 2)<br />
(C+1 )<br />
Port<br />
Port<br />
Port<br />
Port<br />
E ngin eer Eng ine er Engi nee r<br />
Eng ine er<br />
Maintenan<br />
(RMC) (RM C) (RM C)<br />
(RM C)<br />
ce T eam<br />
Executin g<br />
Po rt En gin eer<br />
Ma inte nan<br />
screen s / scre ens / scree ns /<br />
scre ens /<br />
cond ucts<br />
Activity<br />
(RMC) scre ens<br />
ce Team<br />
au thorize s aut hori ze s authorizes<br />
au thorize s<br />
Wor k<br />
Mai nten an<br />
Maintenance<br />
establishes<br />
/ au tho rize r<br />
80% of D- 1 00% of O- 1 00% of I-<br />
1 00% of D-<br />
Packag e<br />
Co mp<br />
issues<br />
ce Team<br />
Team M onth ly<br />
Avai labi lity in<br />
50% of D-level<br />
levellevellevellevel<br />
Executio n Start of Do ck Undo c Prod. Avail<br />
de part ure<br />
con ducts<br />
Pla nnin g<br />
Navy<br />
re pair work<br />
re pai r work re pair work repa ir wo rk<br />
re pai r work<br />
Re vie w Avai l Ship k Ship Work Com pl.<br />
repo rt<br />
hot wash<br />
Me etin gs<br />
M ain tena nce<br />
pa cka ge;<br />
pa cka ge; pa ckag e; p ackage ;<br />
pa cka ge;<br />
(WPER) (SA00) (DD00 ) (DD0 0) (WC0 (CA00 )<br />
ide ntifying<br />
(C+ 1)<br />
(PB4 M)<br />
Data base<br />
MSMO i nitiates<br />
MSMO MSM O MSMO<br />
MSM O<br />
fi nali ze<br />
0)<br />
final Avail<br />
(NMD)<br />
pl ann ing<br />
co sts (C+2 )<br />
initiates initiates initiates initiates<br />
funding (A-<br />
(A-12)<br />
(A-8)<br />
pl ann ing (A plan nin g (A p lan ning (A<br />
pla nnin g (A<br />
1)<br />
-4 )<br />
-4)<br />
-4)<br />
-4)<br />
RM C Req uests<br />
Port Eng ine er<br />
Avail abil ity fun ding<br />
Review<br />
(R MC) clo se s<br />
from TYCOM for<br />
Defe rred Item s<br />
Execute<br />
ou t Avail, clo se<br />
initial planni ng of<br />
wit h CR<br />
Assessm ent s<br />
ou t d ate to<br />
repa ir wo rk<br />
Review<br />
an d Do cu men t<br />
NM D<br />
(A-345 days)<br />
Deferred Item s<br />
Re qui red<br />
(C+2)<br />
with CR<br />
Re pai Action s<br />
on<br />
SHOREFILE<br />
(Review<br />
De ferral I tem s<br />
Submit Final<br />
P lann ing Act ivi ty (PEO / PARM )<br />
Plan ning Activity<br />
Plan ning SEA 05 Begins<br />
Plan ning Activi ty issues sh ip<br />
BA WP/AWP<br />
with<br />
Pl anning Activity (PEO / PARM)<br />
Plan ning Activi ty deli ve rs<br />
BAWP/AWP<br />
Technical<br />
Issue Form Formal al<br />
pro povides desincre ceme ental ta fun u dding gfo or<br />
Maainte tenan a ce ce WP<br />
requ equ ests fu u nding d g fo o r<br />
Activity ct t y Ch C aange ge<br />
integ tegato ratio n da d rawin gs(S gs (SIDs) s)to to<br />
Close-Out CoseOut Li fe Cycle<br />
TYCOM/CR)<br />
id iden tifi tifies iinitial i ti l li list t of f HHea ddqu arters t<br />
materia t i l l (LLTM (LL TM and d Kitt Kitte dd<br />
Cl Closeout t<br />
Foun dat ion<br />
Pl ann ing<br />
acquisi tion of He adq uarters Co ntro lled<br />
Req uireme nts to<br />
development of Ship<br />
com pl etes a ll De ferra l<br />
NSA for u se b y Executi ng Y ard<br />
Verifi ca tion &<br />
Plan ning<br />
Co ntro lled & Pro cu red Ma teria l (HCPM )<br />
Ma teri al)<br />
Repo rt<br />
Paper<br />
Schedule<br />
& Procured Material (HCPM)<br />
Cont rols<br />
Insta llat ion Drawin gs<br />
ship checks Re que st Le tter<br />
an d AI Ts<br />
Assessme nt<br />
Conference<br />
(A-22)<br />
(A-1 )<br />
Co mp lete<br />
Le tte r<br />
(A-20 )<br />
All 2ks Brand ed<br />
(A-16 )<br />
(A-9 ) Ad judi ca tion<br />
(A-6)<br />
Me etin g<br />
Su bmi t Bud get<br />
CSMP Review<br />
De fer/ Adju dicate<br />
Turn over Pre-<br />
Review Review<br />
I npu t (Sh ip<br />
Up dat e BAWP a nd B rand ing Upd ate BAWP<br />
Continuous<br />
AWP to<br />
Ch ang e Ch ang e<br />
Sheet) TSO<br />
Up load BAWP<br />
ICMP Tasks<br />
With<br />
ICMP Tasks<br />
CLAS SRON<br />
De fferal De ferra l<br />
Up date AWP<br />
En d of Cycle ne xt PR/POM<br />
Life Cycle<br />
Wi th<br />
TYCOM/CR &<br />
Wit h<br />
Conduct BAWP<br />
Re que st Re que st<br />
I CMP Ta sks<br />
Analysis<br />
Review<br />
ICM P Ta sks t o<br />
Assessment<br />
MT<br />
Assessm ent<br />
Finalization<br />
Lett ers L ette rs<br />
AVAILABILITY<br />
(Def erra ls/<br />
Wit h<br />
RMAIS<br />
Result s/ New<br />
Resul ts/New<br />
Meeting<br />
Assessm ent<br />
LRM S)<br />
Requirements<br />
Req uire men ts<br />
Resul ts/New<br />
EXECUTION<br />
Requirements I ssu e Final<br />
RM C/SPM<br />
AWP<br />
L RMS Upda te<br />
n ego tia te<br />
Issue Pre-AWP<br />
by hul l<br />
MMBPs with<br />
#1<br />
Final BAWP<br />
TYCOM<br />
(Hand Off to<br />
(M ar prio r FY)<br />
TYCOM)<br />
Pre AWP<br />
Ship deployed<br />
Shi p<br />
TYCOM ide ntifi es<br />
Re vie w.<br />
w/ initial M ode rnized &<br />
CNO/CM Availa bilit y<br />
Approves AWP<br />
Review and<br />
Revie w<br />
Operatin g<br />
Maintained to<br />
S che du le a t Ann ual<br />
f or RM C/M T.<br />
Ap prove<br />
Ch ang e<br />
Re vie w an d<br />
Capability<br />
Curre nt<br />
Fle et Sche dul ing<br />
Issue s<br />
BAWP/AWP<br />
Operating<br />
Co nfe ren ce (A-24 )<br />
Modernization<br />
Review<br />
De ferral<br />
App rove<br />
Clo se-Out<br />
Capa bili ty (A-7<br />
LOA<br />
Ch ang e<br />
Requ est Issue Pre-AWP<br />
Al tera tion /<br />
Re port<br />
De ferra l<br />
Lett ers<br />
#2<br />
M ode rnizati on<br />
ye ars)<br />
Fi nal Risk<br />
Re que st<br />
Risk<br />
Assessm ent<br />
L ette rs<br />
Assessme nt<br />
Let ter<br />
Le tter. Subm it<br />
Review<br />
and Im plem en t<br />
Cha nge<br />
Alt erzatio n/<br />
Sen d "Rea dy<br />
Defe rral Ite ms<br />
M ode rnizati on<br />
with RM C<br />
Mo dern iza Mod ern iza<br />
Risk<br />
to Sta rt"<br />
Technical<br />
tion &<br />
tio n<br />
Modernization<br />
Assessme nt<br />
M essage<br />
Re pair Sponsor<br />
Authority<br />
& Repa ir<br />
L ette r<br />
(Continuous)<br />
M ode rnizat ion<br />
Spon sors (AIT<br />
Mo derniza<br />
Spon sors<br />
Sponsors<br />
sub mit Ma nag er)<br />
Moderniza<br />
tio n Sp on<br />
Mo dernizatio n Modernization<br />
pro vid e<br />
tio n S pon<br />
provide fund ing<br />
a nd i den tifie s<br />
sor<br />
Sp onso rs<br />
Spon sors lo ck<br />
to Pl ann ing<br />
increm ent al<br />
receive AIT,<br />
so r (AIT<br />
provid es<br />
pro vid e fu ndi ng work package SEA 2 issues initial Hull<br />
f und s for<br />
Activity for Ship<br />
app roval sup port /<br />
Pl ann ing Acti vit y (P EO) issues Man age r)<br />
Avai lability<br />
to Plan nin g to su ppo rt Sh ip M ode rnizati on P lan /<br />
acq uisit ion of<br />
In st alla tion<br />
on all sched ule /<br />
fin al Hu ll M ode rnizati on P lan / awards AIT<br />
Fund ing for<br />
Advanced pla nnin g le tter<br />
Activity for Ship<br />
Ch ecks Le tter of Au tho rizatio n<br />
l ong lea d-tim e<br />
SEA 21 LOA<br />
Drawin g (S ID)<br />
Mo dern iza im pact<br />
L ette r o f Auth orizat ion (LOA) co ntra ct for<br />
Upload<br />
Mo derniza<br />
(A-18)<br />
Ch ang e De sign<br />
(A-1 3) (LOA) (includ ing AITs)<br />
m aterial b y<br />
Ch ang e 1<br />
development<br />
t ion Risk re qui rem e<br />
Cha nge 2, Certi ficatio n Pla ns work n ot<br />
BAWP/AWP<br />
tio n to<br />
(A-14)<br />
(A-12)<br />
(A-6) Locks<br />
Executi ng<br />
(A-14 )<br />
Assessme nts<br />
ap proved<br />
be ing don e<br />
Ma nda tory<br />
RM C<br />
Activity<br />
by prime<br />
nts<br />
(A-13 5<br />
(A-4 )<br />
ICM P Ta sks<br />
(A-45<br />
(A-9 )<br />
(A-5 ) da ys)<br />
co ntra ct or<br />
days)<br />
(A-3)<br />
DoDD<br />
/ D o N<br />
(A 16 (A 8 (A 4 (A 0 m mo nths) (<strong>Jan</strong> uary)<br />
months) months) ont hs)<br />
A-765 C+90<br />
Maintenance and<br />
Modernization<br />
Integration Single POC<br />
for ALL<br />
REQUIREMENTS &<br />
Material History<br />
SRA<br />
5-1<br />
SYSCOMs<br />
Con solid ated<br />
Software<br />
Del ive ry NSWC<br />
Port Huen em e<br />
(A+2 )<br />
SRA<br />
5-2<br />
C+60<br />
Av ail<br />
Clos e Out<br />
SYSCOMs<br />
co ndu ct Fin al<br />
Platfo rm<br />
Certification<br />
Decision<br />
(IPCD) (SEA<br />
062 )<br />
(C+4)<br />
INACT<br />
Tying It All Together<br />
• LRMS (by hull)<br />
• CMP Strengthening<br />
• CDM<br />
• Modernization<br />
• Planning Yards<br />
• Ship Life Cycle Health<br />
• Cost Wise Readiness Risk Assessments<br />
War Ships Ready<br />
for Tasking Now and<br />
In the Future<br />
Cross – Enterprise<br />
Alignment<br />
SURFMEPP<br />
SUBMEPP<br />
CPA<br />
8
SSLCM to SURFMEPP Transition<br />
SURFMEPP & PRE / PRL SUBMEPP<br />
Covered by ISEAs at NSWC<br />
2S COG Discussion<br />
SHAPEC / Planning Yard Integration �<br />
Included<br />
Plan includes integrated waterfront support<br />
SURFMEPP w / continued Support from<br />
NAVSEALGOCEN<br />
Increased due to functional complexity & Scope<br />
Increased due to PMS & Modernization<br />
Integration<br />
Increased to improved System and Hull level<br />
requirements<br />
�<br />
�<br />
��<br />
�<br />
�<br />
�<br />
�<br />
SSLCM<br />
9<br />
9
Surface Force<br />
Corrosion Challenge<br />
• PROBLEM: “Annual Cost of Corrosion for Navy Ships” study estimated<br />
25% of surface s rface ship maintenance bbudget dget is eexpended pended maintaining and<br />
correcting corrosion/structure issues<br />
Significant g surface force maintenance cost driver<br />
• SOLUTION SOLUTION: WWaterfront t f t surface f force f organizations i ti will ill lleverage all ll<br />
existing efforts - including submarine force material preservation and<br />
corrosion control methodologies (Spruce Program) - to develop and<br />
execute a standardized preservation plan to maintain and sustain the<br />
highest level of surface force preservation across asset lifecycles<br />
Develop and execute ships force corrosion prevention and control program<br />
10
Corrosion Control<br />
Corrosion Control Assistance Teams (CCAT)<br />
Expand<br />
In NFLK<br />
• Training<br />
• Tools<br />
Envelop Anti-Corrosion Covers<br />
• Significant<br />
reduction in<br />
corrosion<br />
related<br />
maintenance<br />
maintenance.<br />
• Technical Expertise<br />
• Technology Insertion<br />
All ships<br />
by FY <strong>11</strong><br />
Integrate<br />
Paint Teams<br />
Establish<br />
In MYPT<br />
Water Tight Doors<br />
• Fluidized Bed<br />
Coating provides<br />
complete coverage in<br />
gaps g p and cracks.<br />
FY <strong>11</strong> Pilot<br />
(23 on LSD-43<br />
(10) On DDG-51<br />
<strong>11</strong><br />
<strong>11</strong>
Pilot Ships & Survey Timeline<br />
• LSD 42 USS GERMANTOWN<br />
(EDPMA, 03 Dec 08 - 12 Aug 09, San Diego)<br />
• DDG 67 USS COLE<br />
(DSRA, 15 Apr 09 - 28 June 09, Norfolk)<br />
• CG 53 USS MOBILE BAY<br />
(EDSRA, June 09 - April 10, San Diego)<br />
• FFG 36 USS UNDERWOOD<br />
(DSRA ( 10 Apr p 09 - 6 July y 09, , Mayport) yp )<br />
Material Condition Pilots<br />
Timeline/Products<br />
Pilot Products<br />
• Finite Element Model<br />
• Survey Process Checksheets<br />
• Hull Maintenance Model<br />
• Initial Survey Reports<br />
• SafeNet Doc Documentation mentation<br />
• Ship Life Assessment Booklet<br />
Update<br />
• Hull Maintenance Model Update<br />
• Periodic Survey Plan<br />
#<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
66.<br />
7.<br />
8.<br />
9.<br />
WB #<br />
AMERICAN BUREAU OF SHIPPING<br />
Naval Vessel Hull Assessment Check Sheet<br />
VESSEL:DDG-55<br />
SYSTEM: N/A<br />
TANK: Fuel Tk GP-4<br />
STATUS:<br />
5-300-2-F<br />
Compartment Findings<br />
DATE:<br />
10.<br />
LOCATION: INNERBOTTOM (Fr.300-338) Tk 5-300-2-F<br />
Status<br />
Any RED r esponses should be brought to the attention of the Surveyor -in-C harge prior to sur vey / process being considered complete.<br />
COMMENTS:<br />
Baseline Material Condition<br />
Surveyor<br />
<strong>11</strong><br />
ABS Assessments<br />
FY <strong>11</strong> Ships<br />
USS New Orleans<br />
USS Bonhomme Richard<br />
USS Chosin<br />
USS Winston Churchill<br />
USS Sampson<br />
USS Benfold<br />
USS Ashland<br />
USS Mesa Verde<br />
USS Shoup<br />
USS Barry<br />
USS Sterret<br />
USS Bulkeley<br />
USS Germantown (Revisit)<br />
USS LLake k Ch Champlain l i<br />
USS Port Royal<br />
USS Stout<br />
• Utilizing ABS commercial experience & tracking software<br />
• Focus is Hull Structure & Key Distributed Systems<br />
– Hull, Scantlings, Deckhouse, Tanks<br />
– A/C A/C, El Electric i Pl Plant, CHT CHT, Fi Firemain, i Chill Chilled d WWater<br />
• Finite element models produced<br />
• Risk assessment enables targeted maintenance activity<br />
• Way y ahead – Integration g w/SURFMEPP & RMCs, , CLASSRONs<br />
– Included in ICMP updates<br />
USS GERMANTOWN Survey Summary<br />
WB Tank 6-56-1-W - Severe corrosion breakdown, stiffeners with thinned edges. Recommend blast, renewal of<br />
wasted steel, re-coat tank.<br />
WB Tank 6-43-1-W - Thinned and wasted stiffeners. Recommend renewal.<br />
WB Tank 6-52-1-W 6 52 1 W - Wasted overhead stiffeners stiffeners. Recommend renewal renewal.<br />
WB Tank 6-70-2-W - Heavily wasted overhead stiffeners, transverse bulkhead stiffeners, longitudinal bulkhead<br />
stiffeners, poor coating condition, poor outfitting condition. Recommendations have been<br />
addressed during availability.<br />
WB Tank 6-74-1-W - Tank blasted and coated, holes in stiffeners and plating coated over.<br />
Recommend repair wasted structure.<br />
WB Tank 6-85-4-W - Tank blasted and coated, holes in stiffeners and plating coated over.<br />
Recommend repair wasted structure.<br />
WB Tank 6-101-1-W - Fair coating condition with thinned and wasted transverse bulkhead stiffeners and wasted<br />
overhead longitudinal stiffeners. Recommend repair structure.<br />
WB Tank 3-93-1-W - Poor coating condition, thinned and wasted bulkhead stiffeners and poor condition of the<br />
outfitting in the tank. tank Recommend repair structure structure.<br />
WB Tank 2-107-3-W - Fair coating condition however rated poor due to wastage in way of the<br />
overhead longitudinal stiffeners, holed out deck plating in way of the longitudinal bulkhead<br />
vertical stiffeners and poor condition of the outfitting within the tank. Recommend repair<br />
structure.<br />
WB Tank 5-<strong>11</strong>5-1-W - Fair coating condition, however rated poor due to wastage in way of the overhead<br />
longitudinal stiffeners, after transverse bulkhead vertical stiffeners, and holed out<br />
overhead plating. Recommend repair structure.<br />
WB Tank 5-125-1-W - Poor to fair coating condition however rated poor due to wastage in way of the overhead<br />
longitudinal stiffeners. Recommend repair structure.<br />
Foundations Under - Severely wasted. Renewal required.<br />
A/C Plants<br />
AC Machinery – Tank tops with holes and thinned plate, only minor repairs made in way of holed tank top.<br />
Recommend wasted tank top be renewed.<br />
If this were a commercial vessel and these critical deficiencies were corrected,<br />
ABS would feel confident classing the ship 16<br />
Germantown Initial Results<br />
� Outstanding support from Crew, CLASSRON<br />
and RMC<br />
� Survey identified areas requiring attention<br />
� Analysis demonstrated the following:<br />
• Initial structural design well-conceived<br />
• Structured survey plan necessary to achieve expected<br />
service life<br />
� Developed tools will facilitate analytically-based future<br />
maintenance planning<br />
12<br />
5<br />
12
ABS Assessments<br />
Example of SSLCM / SURFMEPP Impact<br />
Baseline Material Condition<br />
• Utilizing ABS commercial experience & tracking<br />
software<br />
• Focus is Hull Structure & Key Distributed Systems<br />
• Hull, Scantlings, Deckhouse, Tanks<br />
• A/C, Electric Plant, CHT, Firemain, Chilled Water<br />
• Finite element models produced<br />
• Risk assessment enables targeted maintenance<br />
activity<br />
• Way ahead – Integration w/SSLCM & RMCs,<br />
CLASSRONs<br />
• Included in ICMP updates<br />
FY10 Ships<br />
•USS Philippine Sea<br />
•USS Roosevelt<br />
•USS Paul Hamilton<br />
•USS Antietam<br />
•USS Fort McHenry<br />
•USS John Paul Jones<br />
•USS Rushmore<br />
•USS Arleigh Burke<br />
•USS USS Hue City<br />
•USS Boxer<br />
FY<strong>11</strong> Ships<br />
•USS New Orleans<br />
•USS Bonhomme Richard<br />
•USS Winston S. Churchhill<br />
•USS Chosin<br />
•USS Sampson<br />
•USS Benfold<br />
•USS Ashland<br />
•USS Mesa Verde<br />
•USS USS Shoup<br />
•USS Barry<br />
•USS Sterret<br />
•USS Bulkeley<br />
•USS Stout<br />
•USS Lake Champlain p<br />
•USS Port Royal<br />
•USS Germantown (Revisit)<br />
Ex. of Findings on LSD 43: Excessive corrosion and metal loss – ballast tank 6-103-0-W<br />
Conditions found and documented on Ship CSMP: Repairs in progress<br />
13
Phase1: Establish<br />
Readiness Task<br />
Force<br />
• SPY SPY-AWS AWS Task Force (Phase 5)<br />
Tackling Wholeness Issues across all<br />
Stakeholders<br />
Phase 2: Capture &<br />
Analyze Current<br />
State Readiness<br />
Data<br />
Phase 3: Develop<br />
Actionable<br />
Recommendations<br />
• Significant Sustainment Recommendations Identified<br />
Phase 4: Final<br />
Report & POA&M<br />
Development<br />
Phase 5: Manage<br />
Recommendation<br />
Execution<br />
• Ship's Self Sufficiency, Shore Support, Enhanced Periodic Assessments<br />
• Next Steps:<br />
• $12M in FY10 sweep-up funds identified to apply to FY10 and FY<strong>11</strong> recommendations, and<br />
acceleration of many FY12 recommendations<br />
• CFFC AEGIS IPR<br />
• MCM Readiness R di Task T k Force F (Phase (Ph 5)<br />
• Completed Actions: Recommendation prioritization & Final Report signed out by SEA 21–<br />
• 28 Dec 2010<br />
• Next Steps: POM -13 13 issue papers developed for each recommendation and POA&M<br />
• LPD-17 Readiness Task Force (Phase 3)<br />
• Completed Actions: Assessment Team Deep Dive followed by Class Wholeness TF Update Dec 2010<br />
• Next Steps: MP&T IWG/ Assessment Team Workshop Phase III + Final Recommendations<br />
• BMD Readiness Task Force (Phase 2)<br />
• Completed Actions: Up to Deep Dive on Detailed Recommendations<br />
• Next Steps: p Japan p Ship p visits followed by y Review of initial inputs p for Draft report p<br />
14<br />
14
Back Up<br />
• SSRI Process<br />
• SSRI Pilot Ship Progress<br />
• Total Ship Readiness Assessment (TSRA)<br />
• Sustainment Program<br />
• SSLCM to SURFMEPP Transition<br />
•IMA Capacity p y / Capability p y<br />
• Availability Execution & Work Certification<br />
• A Global RMC Organization<br />
• Wholeness Task Forces<br />
• SPY-AWS<br />
• MCM<br />
15
SURFMEPP Stand Up Status<br />
Building on success of SSLCM, SURFMEPP will synergize benefits of HQ and waterfront alignment<br />
PRODUCTS FY09 RESULT FY 10 RESULT FY <strong>11</strong> PLAN<br />
�PR<strong>11</strong> technical “quick-look”<br />
and d parametric t i studies t di �LSD �LSD-41/49 41/49 complete. l t 127 127,000 000 man-day d<br />
Engineering Studies / complete<br />
requirements increase per LSD over<br />
Technical Foundation<br />
Paper (TFPs)<br />
�DDG-51 class complete:<br />
74,000 man-days of<br />
remaining service life per hull<br />
�Completed CG-47 and LHD-1 Class<br />
understated requirements<br />
per DDG<br />
TFPs<br />
�DDG -51, and LSD 41/ 49 SHIPSHEETs<br />
based on TFP<br />
SHIPSHEETS<br />
�Supported TYCOM with all<br />
SHIPSHEETS for FY 12 & FY13<br />
Availabilities. (Unfunded Technical<br />
Requirements (UTR) and high value<br />
targets incorporated)<br />
�BAWP: Business Rules established and<br />
BBaseline li Availability<br />
A il bilit<br />
Work Packages<br />
(BAWPs) /<br />
SSRI (Surface Ship<br />
Readiness Initiative)<br />
�28 �28 of f 28 DDG DDG-51 51 ships hi with ith<br />
FY12 CNO avails being<br />
managed by rigorous and<br />
disciplined process<br />
implemented p by y USFFC/CPF<br />
�SSRI: SURFMEPP is integration node<br />
for End – to –End Surface Ship<br />
Maintenance Process Map<br />
�Initial individual ship transition s from<br />
BAWP to AWP in progress (A-360<br />
milestone)<br />
Corrosion<br />
Control/ABS<br />
�4 ships<br />
�Initiated automated process<br />
to captu capture e ABS S repair epa<br />
recommendations to BAWP<br />
development process<br />
�SURFMEPP leadership for management<br />
of all Surface Ship corrosion initiatives<br />
�Integration teg at o oof ABS S results esu ts in<br />
requirements definition and budgeting<br />
process<br />
�Complete Complete LPD-17 LPD 17 and LCS<br />
TFPs<br />
�Complete Long Range<br />
Maintenance Schedules<br />
(LRMS) ISO DDG/CG/LSD<br />
& LHD individual ships<br />
�Complete SHIPSHEETS<br />
for all Surface Ships to<br />
support POM 13 (Oct / Nov<br />
10)<br />
��<br />
Execution of Business<br />
Rules for FY12<br />
availabilities for<br />
LSD/CG/LHD Class ships.<br />
(70 total ships)<br />
�FY <strong>11</strong>-16 plan ISO<br />
assessing (148) surface<br />
ships<br />
�C �Complete l t automation. t ti<br />
ABS to be a tool, not a<br />
separate program<br />
16
THE PLAN – BAE San Diego:<br />
Pilot Phase 1: DDG 53 EDSRA (23 Jun SOA)<br />
– Limited to 4 BAE trades & 1 Subcontractor<br />
Pilot Phase 2: DDG 76 SRA ( 8 Sep SOA)<br />
– Expanded to all trades and all workers to include subcontractors<br />
MSMO M-Curve<br />
Pilot Implementation – BAE SDSR:<br />
Pilot Phase 1 Timeline<br />
DDG 53 (JOHN PAUL JONES) EDSRA<br />
End JPJ Monitoring<br />
• Funding in place 3 May<br />
• Purchase Order processed 5May 5 May<br />
• Equipment Delivered to BAE 28 May<br />
• Install and Test 9-16 June<br />
• Start of Availability DDG 53 EDSRA 23 June<br />
DDG 76 (HIGGINS) SRA<br />
Goal: Demonstrate capability to track ingress and<br />
egress of shipyard personnel onto ships pier side or<br />
into drydock y areas in a pprivate ship p repair p yyard.<br />
The<br />
Proof of Concept is limited in scope and duration.<br />
Post Analysis<br />
6/10 7/10 8/10 9/1 10/1 <strong>11</strong>/1 12/1 1/<strong>11</strong> 2/<strong>11</strong><br />
Pilot Phase 2 Timeline<br />
• Equipment qu p e t Delivered e e ed to BAE 28 8 May ay<br />
• Start of Availability DDG 76 SRA 8 Sep<br />
Pilot Phase 1 Complete; Phase 2 Underway…<br />
3/<strong>11</strong><br />
17
Pier #1<br />
Antenna<br />
Installation<br />
(HIGGINS)<br />
MSMO BAE SDSR Pilot<br />
Proof of Concept: p<br />
Drydock<br />
Antenna<br />
Installation<br />
(JPJ)<br />
18
“RAP” = Resource<br />
Allocation Program<br />
(headcount)<br />
21 October 2010 Report<br />
BAE SDSR Pilot<br />
All Departments p & Contractors:<br />
19
Findings<br />
• Software issues<br />
– Cribmaster support was required to resolve software issues<br />
– Manual head count was very close to manning expectation;<br />
electronic data shows manpower shortages.<br />
– We preformed manual head counts several times that<br />
showed h d actual t l manning i vs. projected j t d manning i results lt within ithi<br />
10%. Electronic data showed 50-60% shortage<br />
• Structural placement<br />
– Location of receiver important. Cribmaster verified location<br />
and installation of antenna<br />
• Excellent Management tool<br />
– Time on task clearly displayed, even with limited data<br />
collection<br />
BAE Systems Proprietary Information<br />
BAE SDSR Pilot<br />
Mid-Term Findings: g<br />
4<br />
M-Curve Implementation – San Diego Ship Repair LPR Pilot<br />
Recommendations for improvement<br />
• Research the possibility of having the RFID tag embedded into the hard<br />
hat by y the manufacturer. Ship p Yard work environment ( (i.e. inclement<br />
weather, hydro blasting, etc.), can render the RFID tag inoperable.<br />
• Standardized placement of antennas on brows would prevent<br />
reconfiguration for each pier side availability and erroneous data.<br />
Reporting Process<br />
• BAE SSystems t has h collected ll t d data d t on a daily d il bbasis i ffor all ll ddepartments t t by b<br />
shift. The reports are available to various departments within BAE<br />
Systems. On a weekly basis, SDSR provides SWRMC and SEA 21 with<br />
a PDF snapshot of the M-Curve report, reflecting one day’s activity with<br />
verification back up information.<br />
BAE Systems Proprietary Information<br />
5<br />
20
M-Curve Implementation<br />
Way y Ahead:<br />
Goal: Implement M-Curve tracking in all MSMO (prime) private yards.<br />
• Socialize M-Curve requirement with all MSMO Primes<br />
• Plan is to provide equipment, services and software as Government Furnished<br />
(GFE/GFM)<br />
• Mod existing MSMO contracts and ensure future contracts include:<br />
• New CDRL/DID requirement<br />
• Award Fee Evaluation Board (AFEB) criteria to evaluate “Management”<br />
actions based on demonstrated cost reductions attributable to productivity<br />
enhancements derived from M-Curve analysis<br />
• Continue working closely with SEA 04X to document lessons learned & best<br />
practices ti from f public bli and d private i t yard d pilots il t<br />
Other Considerations<br />
• Equipment/Software Configuration Baseline, Baseline Varies by Facility<br />
• Union Buy-In<br />
• Overall Procurement & Installation Cost<br />
• Reporting Formats & Analysis<br />
21
Phase1: Establish<br />
Readiness Task<br />
Force<br />
Tackling Wholeness Issues<br />
Across All Stakeholders<br />
Phase 2: Capture &<br />
Analyze Current<br />
State Readiness<br />
Data<br />
• SPY-AWS Task Force (Phase 5)<br />
Phase 3: Develop<br />
Actionable<br />
Recommendations<br />
• Significant Sustainment Recommendations Identified<br />
Phase 4: Final<br />
Report & POA&M<br />
Development<br />
• Ship's Self Sufficiency, Shore Support, Enhanced Periodic Assessments, Policy Updates<br />
• Next Steps:<br />
Phase 5: Manage<br />
Recommendation<br />
Execution<br />
• $12M in CPF EOY FY10 sweep-up funds identified to apply to “must do” recommendations; Request support in<br />
POM 13 required to affect long term fixes<br />
• MCM Readiness Task Force (Phase 4)<br />
• Completed Actions: Survey, Assessment Interviews, IWG Draft Recommendations, Recommendation Prioritization<br />
• Next Steps: Final Report Development and Submission – ECD 31 Oct 2010<br />
• LPD-17 Readiness Task Force (Phase 3)<br />
• Completed Actions: Charter & POA&M promulgated promulgated, Survey Results Analyzed Analyzed, Historical Studies analyzed analyzed,<br />
Assessment Team completed Fleet and Organizational deep dive interviews and analysis in Norfolk, VA<br />
• Next Steps: Assessment Conducting Site Assessments in San Diego – ECD 31 OCT 2010; IWG Draft Recommendation<br />
Development – ECD 1 <strong>Jan</strong> 20<strong>11</strong><br />
• BMD Readiness Task Force (Phase 1)<br />
• Completed Actions: Initial Tasking Letter approved by CNSF, Charter / POA&M promulgated, IWGs Established<br />
• Next Steps: Survey Development – ECD 25 Oct 2010, System Component Reviews – ECD 20 Dec 2010<br />
22
CNRMC Lines of Report<br />
RDA CNO ECH I<br />
BSO 70 BSO 60<br />
IN SERVICE CVNs BSO 24<br />
CPF PEO CV<br />
SEA 00 FFC<br />
SEA 21 SEA 09 SEA 04<br />
SEA 07<br />
REQQUIREMENTS<br />
GENNERATION<br />
SRF PMS312 SURFMEPP<br />
RQMT GENN<br />
CPA<br />
PHNSY +<br />
IMF<br />
C400<br />
PROCESS<br />
and EXECUTION<br />
PSNS +<br />
IMF<br />
C101<br />
SEA 04X<br />
NNSY PNSY<br />
RQQMT<br />
GEN<br />
SUB<br />
MEPP<br />
CNSL<br />
ECH II<br />
SWRMC SERMC NSSA ECH<br />
IV<br />
BRAC 2005<br />
ECH<br />
III<br />
23
CNRMC Intentions<br />
�CNRMC to Engage Key Surface Community Initiatives:<br />
�Surface Team One (ST1)<br />
�Life Cycle Management Group<br />
�Surface �Surface Ship Readiness Initiatives<br />
� Transition to SURFMEPP<br />
� Assessments (TSRA)<br />
�� Sustainment<br />
� RMC Manning / “I” Level Manning<br />
� Availability Execution and Work Certification<br />
�P �Performance f Agreement A t / Improvement<br />
I t<br />
�Industry Relationships<br />
24
ST1 & LCMG Status<br />
Efforts in Progress<br />
• CContinuing SSupport of f the SSurface f Ship S Fleet Readiness Initiative (C (Carrier and SSub S SMEs involved where appropriate) )<br />
• Surface Ship Sustainment Program<br />
• Integrated Assessment Program<br />
• Transition from SSLCM Activity to SURFMEPP<br />
• Availability Execution and Work Certification<br />
• RMC / I-Level manning<br />
• Establishing LCMG (Carrier best practice)<br />
• Analyzing Fleet and subject matter experts’ feedback and performance metrics.<br />
• Gaining insight into existing resources and action plans<br />
• Cataloguing sustainment resources/plans so as to mitigate duplication and maximize efficiencies<br />
• Prioritizing resources, including Sustainment<br />
• Implementing “Global RMC” Practices<br />
•Coordinating the Global RMC Annual Budget and Requirements Planning Process<br />
•Implementing a Global RMC Consistency and Commonality Initiative<br />
•Implementing a Global RMC Performance Measurement Plan<br />
• Developing p g Strategic g Approach pp for Availability y Planning g and Execution<br />
• Developed and implementing a unifying Availability Project Team Handbook. (Carrier and Sub best practice)<br />
• Strategy Development Underway (Carrier and Sub best practice)<br />
• USS ARLEIGH BURKE (DDG51) FY10 Mod Avail: 7 Specific Execution Strategies in development (including Risk Management, Hull Access,<br />
Work Integration, etc.)<br />
• USS CHOSIN (CG 65) MMod d FY<strong>11</strong> AAvail: il 12 Pl Planning i St Strategies t i ddrafted, ft d EExecution ti St Strategies t i under d ddevelopment l t<br />
• Continuous Hot Wash Process on LSD 41 Mid-Life Program allows for strategic collection of lessons learned throughout avail<br />
execution.<br />
• Leveraging Hot Wash / Super Hot Wash Program<br />
• Align with ST1 and “Global Global RMC” RMC approach<br />
• Serve as input to Availability Planning/Execution Strategies, Avail Project Team Handbook, Project Team Development,<br />
Knowledge Sharing Networks<br />
25
Fleet<br />
Intro<br />
Surface Ship Readiness Initiative (SSRI)<br />
Expected Expected p Service Life<br />
Assess Ship<br />
TSRA<br />
Contin Continuous o s SSustainment stainment<br />
Process<br />
Maintain Readiness<br />
Readiness<br />
Sustainment<br />
Execute<br />
Avail.<br />
Avail Ex. & Work Cert<br />
Pl Plan Maintenance<br />
M i t<br />
SURFMEPP<br />
Decom<br />
Assessments:<br />
• Skilled techs performing<br />
documented procedures<br />
• Utilize NMD & other tools<br />
• Mission specific focus<br />
SURFMEPP:<br />
• Class Maint. Planningg<br />
• Availability Planning<br />
• Maint. Planning Data Systems<br />
• Cost Engineering<br />
• Material Management<br />
Avail Ex. & Work Cert:<br />
• Technical Adjudication of work<br />
• Event Readiness<br />
• Test & Certification of work<br />
Sustainment:<br />
• Maintenance Engineering<br />
• Performance Monitoring<br />
• Fleet Engineering Support<br />
• Training & Tech. Docs<br />
• Obsolescence<br />
26
Shipp<br />
Hommeport<br />
Avaail<br />
Type<br />
SSRI Pilot Ship Progress<br />
14 October 2010 Update<br />
Starrt<br />
Date<br />
Endd<br />
Date<br />
Endd‐to‐End<br />
Proocess<br />
Possition<br />
LSD 43 Norfolk EDPMA 5/10/2010 3/7/20<strong>11</strong> Begun<br />
LPD 17 Norfolk CMAV 5/31/2010 6/18/2010 Begun<br />
LSD 47 San Diego EDPMA 7/21/2010 6/15/20<strong>11</strong> Begun<br />
DDG 51 Norfolk EDSRA 8/4/2010 1/28/20<strong>11</strong> Begun<br />
DDG 105 San Diego PSA 9/8/2010 12/13/2010 Begun<br />
CG 66 Mayport DSRA 9/29/2010 3/23/20<strong>11</strong> Begun<br />
LPD 18 San Diego g PMA <strong>11</strong>/2/2010 // 1/9/20<strong>11</strong> // A‐27<br />
LHD 6 San Diego DPMA <strong>11</strong>/3/2010 7/13/20<strong>11</strong> A‐28<br />
FFG 54 Puget Sound SRA <strong>11</strong>/15/2010 2/4/20<strong>11</strong> A‐40<br />
DDG 67 Norfolk SRA 1/5/20<strong>11</strong> 4/5/20<strong>11</strong> A‐90<br />
MCM 2 Japan DSRA 1/12/20<strong>11</strong> 4/13/20<strong>11</strong> A‐97<br />
MCM 3 San Diego DSRA 1/12/20<strong>11</strong> 3/16/20<strong>11</strong> A‐97<br />
CG 65 Pearl Harbor DSRA 1/19/20<strong>11</strong> 7/13/20<strong>11</strong> A‐104<br />
MCM 13 Bahrain DSRA 1/31/20<strong>11</strong> 5/2/20<strong>11</strong> A‐<strong>11</strong>6<br />
DDG 81 Norfolk DSRA 2/9/20<strong>11</strong> 5/25/20<strong>11</strong> A‐124<br />
DDG 65 San Diego EDSRA 2/16/20<strong>11</strong> 8/3/20<strong>11</strong> A‐131<br />
FFG 38 San Diego DSRA 5/4/20<strong>11</strong> 8/5/20<strong>11</strong> A‐209<br />
Full Test, 0 “gaps”<br />
Partial Test, significant “gaps”<br />
Asssessment<br />
Proogram<br />
Avaail<br />
Ex &<br />
Woork<br />
Cert<br />
Susstainment<br />
Proogram<br />
Partial Test, minor “gaps”<br />
No Yield, major “gaps”<br />
Enhance ESL & Improve Readiness on Every Hull<br />
RMMC<br />
Manning<br />
SURRFMEPP<br />
27
TSRA<br />
Continuous Assessment During FRP<br />
• TSRA I - Baselining systems material condition to support end-ofavailability<br />
integrated test phase<br />
• Pre-Availability (A-240)<br />
• Identify all Depot level worthy items<br />
• RReduce d llate di discovery<br />
• Reduce growth and new work (Premiums)<br />
• TSRA II - Tanks, voids, structures and selected HM&E/C5I systems<br />
• Concurrent with CNO Availability<br />
• Integrated Test Plan (CNRMC instruction)<br />
• TSRA III - Get ship ready for successful deployment<br />
• Pre-deployment (D-90 to D-180)<br />
• HM&E, Combat Systems & C4I systems (assess, repair and train)<br />
• BMDRA - Mission Specific<br />
• Initial phase of BMDRA (D-90 to D-180)<br />
• Pre-Deployment (D-30 to D-45)<br />
• TSRA IV - Get ship ready for special events<br />
• Pre-INSURV (I-90 and I-120), TYCOM directed, etc.<br />
28
TSRA (Cont’d)<br />
Status<br />
• DRAFT TYCOM Instruction<br />
• CNSL lead, Joint CNSP/CNSL Instruction<br />
• DRAFT CNRMC Policy Instruction<br />
• NNotional ti l bbudget d t projections j ti bbeing i ddeveloped l d ffor POM POM-13 13<br />
• Ship class assessment matrices developed<br />
• Assessment procedures p 95% completed p development p<br />
• TFBRs submitted for non-ICMP tasks (incorporate into ICMP)<br />
• Position descriptions developed for RMC Assessment Directors<br />
• TSRAs commenced on Pilot ships<br />
• CHOSIN TSRA I – 85% complete<br />
• BENFOLD TSRA IV – In progress<br />
• ARLEIGH BURKE, RUSHMORE, HUE CITY TSRA II – In progress<br />
• Aggressive management of Pilots to improve<br />
effectiveness/efficiency of TSRA policy & execution<br />
29
Sustainment Program<br />
• The Sustainment Program received end of year funding from USFFC and CPF<br />
• Fully funded HM&E and C5I for ISEAs to support the SSRI pilot program across 16 + 1 ships<br />
(USS COLE added) dd d)<br />
• Supports CASREP / DFS / TSO reviews<br />
• Funds PMS / EOSS / TM deficiencies<br />
• Naval Maintenance Database Sustainment ($4.75M)<br />
• Provides NMD software maintenance and upgrades<br />
• Funds troubleshooting and discrepancy resolutions<br />
• HM&E sustainment ($13.1M)<br />
• Supports pp shortfalls in pperformance monitoring g ( (MRDB) )<br />
• Technical Document deficiencies<br />
• Obsolescence management<br />
• Distance Support<br />
• Other Sustainment Functions ($8.4M)<br />
• Supports Surface Team 1 & Lifecycle Management Group<br />
• Critical Spares Procurement ($ $ TBD)<br />
30
• Transition to SURFMEPP<br />
SSLCM to SURFMEPP Transition<br />
• SURFMEPP shore-based command establishment at Under Secretary of the Navy for approval<br />
• Additional FY10 funds received from CPF and USFF to support further acceleration of core products<br />
• Technical Foundation Papers (TFP) and BAWPs<br />
• Class Maintenance Plan Strengthening<br />
• Corrosion Control Management<br />
• ABS Management g 16 ships p scheduled for FY<strong>11</strong> survey y / Providing g direct oversight g of for all FY<strong>11</strong> dry-dock y surveys y<br />
SURFMEPP – TYCOM BAWP / AWP / TFP Management<br />
CLASS<br />
FY FY‐10 10 FY FY‐<strong>11</strong> <strong>11</strong> FY FY‐12 12<br />
28 55<br />
DDG 87<br />
CG 8<br />
16<br />
LSD<br />
5<br />
9<br />
LHD<br />
2<br />
4<br />
LHA 0<br />
LPD<br />
LCC 1<br />
MCM<br />
PC<br />
FFG<br />
LCS<br />
TOTAL<br />
28 70 134<br />
3<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
• Additional ship classes receive BAWPs,<br />
AWPs and TFPs every year<br />
• All ship classes will have BAWPs,<br />
AWP AWPs and d TFPs TFP by b FY 14<br />
• Production schedule is dependent upon<br />
resources in place at SURFMEPP<br />
31
IMA Capacity / Capability<br />
• Staff RMCs with appropriate skill-sets to execute the Navy’s maintenance<br />
efforts and train future Sailors to be Journeyman engineers<br />
• Return Journeyman training at I-Level organizations<br />
• Increase I-Level capacity by 385 CIV and 1584 MIL<br />
• Re-establish capabilities in the following areas:<br />
• HM&E (Inside/Outside) (Propulsion, Electrical Repair)<br />
• Services (Weight Test Test, Rigging Rigging, Cranes, Cranes Corrosion Control, Control Small Boats/Rhibs Boats/Rhibs, Lagging Lagging,<br />
Tool Issue)<br />
• Combat Systems (VLS, Nav, Sonar, Fire Control, Chain Gun, CIWS, Int/Ext. Comms)<br />
• QA, Tech Library, y Planning, g Safety y<br />
SERMC SWRMC NWRMC NSSA HRMC Total<br />
Department Name Civ. Mil. Civ. Mil. Civ. Mil. Civ. Mil. Civ. Mil. Civ. Mil.<br />
Current RMC Manning<br />
Proposed RMC Manning<br />
324 <strong>11</strong>6 1,025 430 73 33 1,430 546 89 13 2,941 1,138<br />
Increase<br />
Total Required RMC<br />
72 320 0 539 30 <strong>11</strong>1 262 569 21 35 385 1,584<br />
Manning 396 436 <strong>11</strong>,085 085 <strong>11</strong>,000 000 103 135 <strong>11</strong>,692 692 <strong>11</strong>,<strong>11</strong>5 <strong>11</strong>5 <strong>11</strong>0 13 33,386 386 22,734 734<br />
32
Availability Execution & Work Certification<br />
• Tasking sent to RMC Commanders 17 Sept 2010:<br />
• Pilot Implementation Letter<br />
• DRAFT IInstruction t ti and d PPolicy li ffor Pil Pilot t Shi Ships<br />
• 5 focus areas for improvement:<br />
• Technical Adjudication of work identified in execution<br />
• Integrated Test Plan management<br />
• Availability Certification<br />
• Event Readiness<br />
• Availability Closeout<br />
• Actions to Date:<br />
• Commenced Pilots (RMC ( ownership) p)<br />
• Teams commissioned for rapid process improvement:<br />
• Identify resource shortfalls to execute availabilities<br />
• Plan to Institutionalize changes to standard items: updates to JFMM etc.<br />
• On glide slope for Full implementation in FY12<br />
• Preliminary Results:<br />
• Trained CHOSIN, ARLEIGH BURKE & FORT MCHENRY project teams on new processes<br />
• Collecting survey feedback on current state & new processes<br />
33
A Global RMC Organization<br />
•…of a Global RMC Organization that operates in a consistent<br />
manner utilizing increasingly common processes.<br />
• …of a Global RMC Organization that will have an effective<br />
centrally monitored business, manning and operations plan<br />
that supports the entire organization.<br />
• …of a Global RMC Organization that enables each RMC to be<br />
responsive to their assigned ships with regard to the planning<br />
and d execution ti of f maintenance i t and d modernization d i ti AND th that t our<br />
collective performance measures will show that responsiveness.<br />
34
Phase<br />
Action Iteems<br />
Next Steps S<br />
Phase1: Establish<br />
Readiness Task<br />
Force<br />
SPY-AWS TF Current Status<br />
Phase 2: Capture &<br />
Analyze Current<br />
State Readiness<br />
Data<br />
Phase 3: Develop<br />
Actionable<br />
Recommendations<br />
Phase 4: Final<br />
Report & POA&M<br />
Development<br />
Phase 5: Manage<br />
Recommendation<br />
Execution<br />
Action Description Status Date<br />
FY10 / FY<strong>11</strong> / FY12<br />
Recommendations<br />
$12M in FY10 sweep-up funds received; initiated TPSs to<br />
apply funds to remaining FY10, FY<strong>11</strong> and discrete FY12<br />
recommendations.<br />
08 SEP<br />
SWE BOD <strong>RDML</strong> <strong>McManamon</strong> briefed SWE BOD on TF Status. 15 SEP<br />
FY<strong>11</strong> Periodic Assessment (PA)<br />
Plan<br />
Completed FY<strong>11</strong> PA schedule – majority of Fleet EOY Funding<br />
supporting PA’s.<br />
Status Updates Per request: provided a status of current funding and<br />
recommendations to ADM Harvey staff for input to VCNO.<br />
POM 13 Issue Papers Developed and coordinated papers with N1, N86, N43, and<br />
NETC N4.<br />
24 SEP<br />
04 OCT<br />
04 OCT<br />
N86 Recommendations N86 briefed N86 owned recommendations in developed POM<br />
13 issue papers.<br />
08 OCT<br />
N1 Recommendations N1 owned POM 13 issue papers briefed to Admiral Pandolfe. 18 OCT<br />
• 26 OCT: Task Force to begin tracking recommendations and associated funding execution in<br />
implementation model and dashboard<br />
35<br />
2
Phase<br />
Actionn<br />
Items<br />
Neext<br />
Steps<br />
Phase1: Establish<br />
Readiness Task<br />
Force<br />
MCM TF Current Status<br />
Phase 2: Capture &<br />
Analyze Current<br />
State Readiness<br />
Data<br />
Phase 3: Develop<br />
Actionable<br />
Recommendations<br />
Phase 4: Final<br />
Report & POA&M<br />
Development<br />
Phase 5: Manage<br />
Recommendation<br />
Execution<br />
Action Description Status Date<br />
Recommendation Task Force Leadership met with each working<br />
Review<br />
group g p ( (MPT, , ILS, , Sustainment) ) and provided p<br />
additional feedback on each recommendation.<br />
Recommendation Final actionable recommendation including cost,<br />
Submittals<br />
funding sponsor, and implementation plan<br />
submitted by each working group group.<br />
1st Draft of Final Report Draft of Task Force final report developed and<br />
submitted to SEA 21A Leadership for review.<br />
4 OCT<br />
8 OCT<br />
15 OCT<br />
Reading Session Reading session held by SEA 21A Leadership<br />
with key stakeholders. Recommended edits and<br />
feedback were provided to the writing team.<br />
18 OCT<br />
• 31 OCT: All recommended edits and feedback incorporated and report finalized.<br />
36<br />
3
Phase<br />
Items<br />
Action<br />
Neext<br />
Steps<br />
Phase1: Establish<br />
Readiness Task<br />
Force<br />
LPD 17 TF Current Status<br />
Phase 2: Capture &<br />
Analyze Current<br />
State Readiness<br />
Data<br />
Phase 3: Develop<br />
Actionable<br />
Recommendations<br />
Phase 4: Final<br />
Report & POA&M<br />
Development<br />
Phase 5: Manage<br />
Recommendation<br />
Execution<br />
Action Description Status Date<br />
Endorsement of Charter and<br />
POA&M<br />
Norfolk Assessment Deep Dive<br />
San Diego Assessment Deep<br />
Dive<br />
Task Force Status<br />
COMPACFLT endorsed, with USFF for signature and<br />
then to be returned to NAVSEA .<br />
AAssessment t Team T completed l t d deep d dive di iinterviews t i<br />
with ESG 2, NSSA, Port Engineers, INSURV, PMR,<br />
CNE, ATGLANT, SURFLANT, LPD 17, LPD 19, and<br />
LPD 21 communities.<br />
AAssessment t Team T deployed d l d tto SSan Di Diego tto conduct d t<br />
deep dive interviews. To date, the Assessment Team<br />
has met with LPD 18, LPD 20, CLASSRON, and Port<br />
Engineers.<br />
Task Force status and preliminary findings briefed to<br />
<strong>RDML</strong> Murdoch.<br />
17 AUG –<br />
(Ongoing)<br />
8 OCT<br />
<strong>11</strong> OCT – 1 NOV<br />
13 OCT<br />
• 18 OCT – 1 NOV: Assessment Team to continue PACFLT / West Coast deep dive interviews with SWRMC,<br />
ESG3, CS Port Engineers, CNSP (N6, N7, N43), ATG, SPAWAR, EA-PAC, and NSWC PHD.<br />
• Ongoing: IWG developing preliminary findings and recommendations leveraging assessment team and<br />
historical data data.<br />
37<br />
4
Phase<br />
Actionn<br />
Items<br />
Neext<br />
Steps<br />
Phase1: Establish<br />
Readiness Task<br />
Force<br />
BMD TF Current Status<br />
Phase 2: Capture &<br />
Analyze Current<br />
State Readiness Data<br />
Phase 3: Develop<br />
Actionable<br />
Recommendations<br />
Phase 4: Final<br />
Report & POA&M<br />
Development<br />
Phase 5: Manage<br />
Recommendation<br />
Execution<br />
Action Description Status Date<br />
Charter / POA&M Charter and POA&M submitted to <strong>RDML</strong><br />
<strong>McManamon</strong> for signature.<br />
28 SEP –<br />
(Ongoing)<br />
04 OCT<br />
WWeekly kl OOutbrief tb i f DDeveloped l d standardized t d di d weekly kl outbrief tb i f schedule h d l 04 OCT<br />
for the Task Force to review detailed issues, begin<br />
development of recommendations, and update<br />
schedule as needed.<br />
Survey Comprehensive BMD survey distributed to the<br />
Fleet.<br />
System Component Analysis Task Force conducted system component analysis<br />
on AWS AWS, 400 Hz Hz, ECW ECW, and APC-1A APC 1A to understand<br />
associated Readiness concerns with these<br />
components.<br />
• 22 OCT: Final determination of Assessment Team site visits / travel schedule.<br />
• 26 OCT: System component analysis of CDLMS complete.<br />
• 29 OCT: Surveys returned from the Fleet, and commencement of Survey analysis.<br />
•15 •15-19 19 NOV: Task Force Deep Dive Interview #1: NSWC Corona Corona.<br />
13 OCT<br />
19 OCT<br />
38<br />
5