RDML McManamon SNA 11 Jan - Navsea

Surface Ship Maintenance
S Sustaining t i i Th The Current C t Fleet Fl t
RDML McManamon
11 January 2011
1

COMBATANTS
OFFICE
SHIPS ACQUISITION
MANAGEMENT OFFICE
DIRECTOR
PROGRAM EXECUTIVE
OFFICER SHIPS
Team Ships Organization
SWE SUPPORT
PEO STAFF
DEPUTY COMMANDER FOR
SURFACE WARFARE
RDML DAVE LEWIS RDML JAMES McMANAMON
DEPUTY
DIRECTOR
AMPHIBIOUS & AUXILIARY
SEALIFT OFFICE
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
PMS 400D
DDG51
PMS 500
DDG 1000
PMS 501
LCS
PMS 502
CG(X)
DPM
DPM
DPM
DPM
PMS 377
LHD8 / LCAC / LHAR / AADS
PMS 317
LPD-1 7/ JCC(X)
PMS 325
AUXILIARY SHIPS /
SMALL BOATS & CRAFTS
PMS 385
STRATEGIC AND THEATER
SEALIFT
DPM
DPM
DPM
DPM
SURFACE WARFARE
DIRECTORATE
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
FLEET READINESS
SEA 21A
COMMANDING OFFICER
SURFACE SHIP
ENGINEERING
PLANNING PROGRAM
(SURFMEPP)
PMS 400F
CGs / FFGs / DDG51s
PMS 470
AMPHIBIOUS /AUXILIARY/MINE
PMS 333
INACTIVE SHIPS/
SHIP TRANSFERS
PMS 326
INTERNATIONAL FLEET
SUPPORT
PMS 333/336
INACTIVE SHIPS/
SHIP TRANSFERS
DPM
DEPUTY
DPM
DPM
DPM
INACTIVE SHIPS
DPM
SHIP TRANSFERS
DPM
2

Bridge to the Fleet
� SEA 21 is the ‘bridge’ bridge
linking requirements and
acquisition commands to
the waterfront and the
Navy’s operating forces
Alignment
� Operating within the
integrated framework of
the Surface Warfare
Enterprise (SWE), our
strategic strategic objectives are
Accountability
� Surface Combatants
� Amphibious Ships
� Special Mission / Boats &
Crafts / Mine Warfare
SEA 21A – Surface Warfare - Readiness
Ensuring Surface Ships are Ready for Tasking
Increase Operational Availability (A o) and reduce Total Ownership
Costs (TOC) by adhering to time tested, combat proven, standards of
performance performance, reliability reliability, and effectiveness
Deputy Commander,
Surface Warfare
Our vision is clear
We are dedicated to building and
sustaining a culture of readiness
iin the th Navy’s N ’ surface f fforces tto
ensure surface ships are ready
for tasking
challenging Our mission is of critical
importance to the nation
SEA 21 is responsible for the
maintenance and modernization of non-
nuclear l surface f ships hi that th t are currently tl
operating in the Fleet
Commander,
Naval Surface Forces
Fleet Readiness
Fleet Maintenance
Surface Training
Fleet Logistics
Planning Yard
MSMO Contracts
Fleet Technical
3
2

Surface Single Training Integrator (SSTI)
• Created a single, centralized NAVSEA division responsible for developing,
managing, executing, standardizing and evaluating all aspects of Fleet
Introduction and Manpower, p , Personnel, , and Training g (MPT) ( )
• Readiness Deep Dives / MPT Support
• Crew Swap Coordination
� TEAM SHIPS Fleet Introduction Team
� Surface Warfare Enterprise Personnel Readiness Team
• Manages and coordinates MPT initiatives across the lifecycle to increase and
maintain surface ship readiness
• Planning: Crew scheduling and phasing plans, Training Planning Process Methodology
(TRPPM) Boards, Training System Installation Plans (TSIPs)
• AAcquisition: i iti MPT management t of f new construction t ti ships hi ttransferring f i tto th the Fl Fleet, t CCrew
Scheduling & Phasing Plan (CSPP)
• Modernization: Mid-life/modernization manpower analysis, review and update of Ship Class
Navy Training System Plan (NTSP)
• Maintenance: Crew swap coordination, Surface Warfare Enterprise Personnel Readiness
Team, Human Performance Readiness Reviews (HPRRs)
4

Take Away: SEA 21A Is…
• The single point of entry into NAVSEA for resolution of Fleet
readiness issues
• The preferred provider for Fleet readiness answers
• Ensuring a balance of lifecycle management and responsive,
Fleet readiness issue resolution
• Increasing and maintaining operational availability
• The provider of complete lifecycle answers, recommendations
and decisions
• Integrator of technical guidance and program priorities
• The policy setter, process owner, and coordinator for Fleet
readiness metrics for NAVSEA
• Governing body ensuring readiness is achieved efficiently and based on analytical
rigor
• Bridging the gap between platform acquisition and Lifecycle
Management
• Reduce Total Ownership Cost to the Fleet
Readiness is a Result of Good Lifecycle Management Practices
5

Carrier - Submarine – Surface
Engineering Life Cycle Support Comparison
Carriers Subs Surface
FY 11
FY 11
FY 11
$ / Hull H ll $5M $721K $246K
Service Life 50 years
Prognosis
33 years SSN
40 years SSBN
�� ��
30‐50 years
NAVSEA Recommended Actions increase this to $636K / Hull
Thi This iis part t of f th the cost t of f Ownership
O hi
?
6
6

Surface Ship End-to-End Process Map,
Maintenance & Modernization Process Gaps
Assessment
Plan/Policyy
Sustainment
Program
• Need for Integrated Assessment Program
• Need for Integrated Sustainment Program
• SSLCM scope limitations
• No Maintenance Material Management
• Need for sufficiently “Engineered” Work Packages
• Availability Schedule Milestones
• Maintenance and Modernization Integration
• Establish appropriate Avail Type, Schedule and
Duration
• Insufficient IT support systems
• WWork k Package P k Development, D l t Logistics L i ti
• Lack of QA oversight
SURFMEPP
IMA
Capacity/
Capability
Avail
Execution/Wor
k Certification
• Reconstitution of IMA Capacity/Capability
• “I” Level
• No Existing Avail Completion/Work
Certification Process
Gaps p Identified f
7

SURFMEPP
Developed from Proven Carrier & Submarine Processes
SURFMEPP is “Getting the Maintenance Requirement ‘RIGHT’”
• Technical Foundation Papers (TFP) by CLASS)
• SHIP SHEETS
• Baseline Availability Work Packages (BAWPs)
Integgration
ASSESSMENTS
AVAIL WORK CERT
SURFMEPP
SUSTAINMENT
RMC MANNING
Timeline
Other
NSA
Ship
E xecuting Activity
Ships Force
SURFM EPP "P lann ing Activity"
TYC OM
PEO / PARM
S YSCOM
Fle et
OPNAV
MSM O
RM C
Deli ve ry A-7 Yea rs
Initial Class
M ain tena nce
Plan identifies
l ife-cycl e
m ain tena nce
requirements
(deli ve ry)
Refi ned Class
Mai nten ance
Pl an i den tifie s
Life Cycle
Mai nten ance
Requirements
(cont inuo us)
Fleet
Sche dul ing
Co nfe rence @
A-7 years. Sy
first identi fied,
wo rkloa d first
iden tifie d,
Capability Plan
revised
(Au gust ) (A-7
ye ars)
Up dated
End End- to – End
Process
A-30
A-29
(A-900 )
(A-87 0)
SRA
1-1
Surface Ship End-to-End
Maintenance Process
01 Octo ber 200 5
A-28
A-26
A-27
(A-8 40)
(A-7 80)
(A-810 )
SRA
1-2
SRA
1-3
Scen e Set ter - POM 0 8
IRGA - POM 08
OPNAV N4 3 presen ts "cu rren t FAST Team reviews workload,
st ate " of p lann ing all orga nizati ons n ego tiat es re vise d workload
o ffer fee dba ck (Octob er)
guid ance (Novem ber)
(A-2 7 m ont hs)
(A-26 months)
0 1 Janu ary 20 06
A-25
A-23
A-22
A-21
A-20
A-19
A-18
A-17
A-24
(A-730)
(A -690 )
(A-6 60)
(A-630 )
(A-60 0)
(A-570 )
(A-5 40)
(A-5 10)
(A-7 20)
DSRA
1
SRA
2-1
A-650
50% ICMP
Screened
Sh ip Co ntin uou sly Asse ssing Cond itio n, wri ting 2Ks a nd e nte ring int o Shi p Sp eci fic
C5 MP
NCM C provides l ong -ran ge
Progra mm ing Review (FYOP
an d be yo nd)
(A-24 )
Spo nsor P rogram Propo sal (SPP) - P OM 08
Th ird itera tive re vie w of worklo ad prog ram min g
p rocess OPNAV Sp onso r N43
(February)
(A-23 mo nth s)
SRA
2-2
A-60 0
80% ICM P
Screened
SRA
2-3
A-5 30
Fina l
BAWP
A-5 30
10 0% ICMP
Screened
P lann ed basel ine review focus
o n stri ke fo rce an d
Quart erly Me eti ng NCM C to
interoperability, i ntegration, review C5 1 M ode rnizat ion Plan,
ca pab ility an d b alan ce issues
EM I assessm ent
NCM C, EM I assessm ent
(A-18 )
DoN Bu dge t Sub mit tal - POM 0 8
Flee t sub mit s prop osed Ma inte nan ce Type b udg et t o Do N
(Jun e)
(A-1 9 m on ths)
01 Octob er 2 006
A-16
A-14
A-15
(A-48 0)
(A-42 0)
(A-450 )
EDS RA
Instal l certification
re adi ness re vie w
(SEA 62)
(A-18 to A-15)
S cen e Se tter
PR 09
(Octobe r)
(A-1 6 m ont hs)
OSD Bu dge t Sub mit tal - POM 0 8
DoN su bm its propo se d M ain tena nce
type bud get to OSD (Septe mb er)
(A-16 mo nths)
ESRA
Quarterly Meeting NCMC to IRCA - PR 0 9
review C51 Modernization Plan, (Novem be r)
EM I a sse ssmen t
(A-14 mo nth s)
Surface Ship Maintenance n Modernization Future State_v2.igx
01 Ja nua ry 200 7
A-13
A-11
A-10
A-9
A-8
A-7
A-6
A-5
A-12
(A-3 90)
(A-3 30 )
(A-30 0)
(A-2 70)
(A-240)
(A-2 10)
(A -180 )
(A-1 50)
(A-36 0)
SRA
3-1
SEA 6 2 cond ucts fin al
ce rtificat ion read ine ss
review (FCRR)
(A-15 to A-12)
SPP - PR 09
(Octob er)
(A-16 months)
PresBud get Subm itta l - POM 08
DoN su bmi ts pro pose d M ain tena nce
Type b ud get to Pre side nt's Budg et
(Jan uary)
(A-12 mo nths)
SRA
3-2
SYSCOMs
con duct
Wea pon s
System
Inte gra tion &
Operability
Te st (WSIIT)
(A-12 to A-9)
DSRA
2
A-2 40
Pre-AWP
#1
A-2 40
50 % D
Lev el M aint.
Locked to $
Flee t id enti fies m ain tena nce fu ndi ng Pla nne d ba selin e re vie w
Quarterly Meeting NCMC to allocation, availability, in shi p specific focus o n i nterope rabi lity,
re vi ew C51 M ode rnizatio n M aint ena nce & M od erni zat ion Busine ss inte gra tion and ma turi ty
Pl an, EMI assessme nt
Plan (MMB P)
issues
(M arch; A-10 )
NCM C, EM I asse ssm en t
(A-9 )
DoN
Su bmi t - PR 09
(Jun e)
(A-8 months)
SRA
4-1
SYSCOMs
conduct initial
Pl atfo rm
Certification
Decision (PCQ)
(SEA 06 2)
(A-5 )
C5I MP d ead line for
M ode rnizati on, late
pro posa ls use
Ele ct roni c Ch ang e
Co nfig ura tion Board
NCMC
(A-6)
0 1 Octobe r 20 07
A-4
A-2
A-3
(A-120 )
(A-60 )
(A-90)
SRA
4-2
NSA (RM C actin g) review wo rk
package with Executin g
Activitie s an d AITs a t Work
Packag e In teg ratio n
Co nfe rence (WFIC)
(A-4)
SRA
4-3
A-1 20
A-85
80 % D
Pre-AWP
Lev e l M aint.
#2
Lock ed to $
A ppro ve d C5 IMP i nstal latio ns no t
cert ified re quires SYSCOM requ est
risk assessment approval from the
co gni za nt TYCOM
(A-4)
OSD
Submit - PR 09
(September)
(A-4 months)
A-75
10 0% D
Level Maint.
Lock ed to $
01 Ja nua ry 2 00 8
A-1
A+1
A-0
(A-3 0)
(A+30)
SA00
DSRA
3
A-4 5 A-30
A-0
Final
AWP WPE R
Av ail
Start
A-35
A-14
WP
Send
Definitized
"Ready to
Start" MSG
NSA (RMC a ct ing)
d efin itizes (fi nali ze s
t erm s and cond ition s of
cont ract) wit h M SMO
(A-35 da ys)
PresBudg
Submit - PR 09
(Jan uary)
(A-0 m ont hs)
CA00
C+1
C+2
C+3
A+2
(C+3 0)
(C+60)
(C+9 0)
(A +60 )
MSMO
MSMO
MSMO
com pl etes p lan ning
co mpl etes plan nin g
co mp lete s plan nin g
an d e stima ting of work
a nd e stim atin g of work
a nd e stim atin g of all
assign ed by A-8
assig ned by A-4
work a ssi gne d
tim ef ram e
time fram e
MSM O repo rts
(A-5 5 da ys)
(A-55 da ys)
(A-5 5 d ays)
closeo ut d ata
P lann ing Start
(cost) in NM O
(A-1 2)
(C+1 )
Port
Port
Port
Port
E ngin eer Eng ine er Engi nee r
Eng ine er
Maintenan
(RMC) (RM C) (RM C)
(RM C)
ce T eam
Executin g
Po rt En gin eer
Ma inte nan
screen s / scre ens / scree ns /
scre ens /
cond ucts
Activity
(RMC) scre ens
ce Team
au thorize s aut hori ze s authorizes
au thorize s
Wor k
Mai nten an
Maintenance
establishes
/ au tho rize r
80% of D- 1 00% of O- 1 00% of I-
1 00% of D-
Packag e
Co mp
issues
ce Team
Team M onth ly
Avai labi lity in
50% of D-level
levellevellevellevel
Executio n Start of Do ck Undo c Prod. Avail
de part ure
con ducts
Pla nnin g
Navy
re pair work
re pai r work re pair work repa ir wo rk
re pai r work
Re vie w Avai l Ship k Ship Work Com pl.
repo rt
hot wash
Me etin gs
M ain tena nce
pa cka ge;
pa cka ge; pa ckag e; p ackage ;
pa cka ge;
(WPER) (SA00) (DD00 ) (DD0 0) (WC0 (CA00 )
ide ntifying
(C+ 1)
(PB4 M)
Data base
MSMO i nitiates
MSMO MSM O MSMO
MSM O
fi nali ze
0)
final Avail
(NMD)
pl ann ing
co sts (C+2 )
initiates initiates initiates initiates
funding (A-
(A-12)
(A-8)
pl ann ing (A plan nin g (A p lan ning (A
pla nnin g (A
1)
-4 )
-4)
-4)
-4)
RM C Req uests
Port Eng ine er
Avail abil ity fun ding
Review
(R MC) clo se s
from TYCOM for
Defe rred Item s
Execute
ou t Avail, clo se
initial planni ng of
wit h CR
Assessm ent s
ou t d ate to
repa ir wo rk
Review
an d Do cu men t
NM D
(A-345 days)
Deferred Item s
Re qui red
(C+2)
with CR
Re pai Action s
on
SHOREFILE
(Review
De ferral I tem s
Submit Final
P lann ing Act ivi ty (PEO / PARM )
Plan ning Activity
Plan ning SEA 05 Begins
Plan ning Activi ty issues sh ip
BA WP/AWP
with
Pl anning Activity (PEO / PARM)
Plan ning Activi ty deli ve rs
BAWP/AWP
Technical
Issue Form Formal al
pro povides desincre ceme ental ta fun u dding gfo or
Maainte tenan a ce ce WP
requ equ ests fu u nding d g fo o r
Activity ct t y Ch C aange ge
integ tegato ratio n da d rawin gs(S gs (SIDs) s)to to
Close-Out CoseOut Li fe Cycle
TYCOM/CR)
id iden tifi tifies iinitial i ti l li list t of f HHea ddqu arters t
materia t i l l (LLTM (LL TM and d Kitt Kitte dd
Cl Closeout t
Foun dat ion
Pl ann ing
acquisi tion of He adq uarters Co ntro lled
Req uireme nts to
development of Ship
com pl etes a ll De ferra l
NSA for u se b y Executi ng Y ard
Verifi ca tion &
Plan ning
Co ntro lled & Pro cu red Ma teria l (HCPM )
Ma teri al)
Repo rt
Paper
Schedule
& Procured Material (HCPM)
Cont rols
Insta llat ion Drawin gs
ship checks Re que st Le tter
an d AI Ts
Assessme nt
Conference
(A-22)
(A-1 )
Co mp lete
Le tte r
(A-20 )
All 2ks Brand ed
(A-16 )
(A-9 ) Ad judi ca tion
(A-6)
Me etin g
Su bmi t Bud get
CSMP Review
De fer/ Adju dicate
Turn over Pre-
Review Review
I npu t (Sh ip
Up dat e BAWP a nd B rand ing Upd ate BAWP
Continuous
AWP to
Ch ang e Ch ang e
Sheet) TSO
Up load BAWP
ICMP Tasks
With
ICMP Tasks
CLAS SRON
De fferal De ferra l
Up date AWP
En d of Cycle ne xt PR/POM
Life Cycle
Wi th
TYCOM/CR &
Wit h
Conduct BAWP
Re que st Re que st
I CMP Ta sks
Analysis
Review
ICM P Ta sks t o
Assessment
MT
Assessm ent
Finalization
Lett ers L ette rs
AVAILABILITY
(Def erra ls/
Wit h
RMAIS
Result s/ New
Resul ts/New
Meeting
Assessm ent
LRM S)
Requirements
Req uire men ts
Resul ts/New
EXECUTION
Requirements I ssu e Final
RM C/SPM
AWP
L RMS Upda te
n ego tia te
Issue Pre-AWP
by hul l
MMBPs with
#1
Final BAWP
TYCOM
(Hand Off to
(M ar prio r FY)
TYCOM)
Pre AWP
Ship deployed
Shi p
TYCOM ide ntifi es
Re vie w.
w/ initial M ode rnized &
CNO/CM Availa bilit y
Approves AWP
Review and
Revie w
Operatin g
Maintained to
S che du le a t Ann ual
f or RM C/M T.
Ap prove
Ch ang e
Re vie w an d
Capability
Curre nt
Fle et Sche dul ing
Issue s
BAWP/AWP
Operating
Co nfe ren ce (A-24 )
Modernization
Review
De ferral
App rove
Clo se-Out
Capa bili ty (A-7
LOA
Ch ang e
Requ est Issue Pre-AWP
Al tera tion /
Re port
De ferra l
Lett ers
#2
M ode rnizati on
ye ars)
Fi nal Risk
Re que st
Risk
Assessm ent
L ette rs
Assessme nt
Let ter
Le tter. Subm it
Review
and Im plem en t
Cha nge
Alt erzatio n/
Sen d "Rea dy
Defe rral Ite ms
M ode rnizati on
with RM C
Mo dern iza Mod ern iza
Risk
to Sta rt"
Technical
tion &
tio n
Modernization
Assessme nt
M essage
Re pair Sponsor
Authority
& Repa ir
L ette r
(Continuous)
M ode rnizat ion
Spon sors (AIT
Mo derniza
Spon sors
Sponsors
sub mit Ma nag er)
Moderniza
tio n Sp on
Mo dernizatio n Modernization
pro vid e
tio n S pon
provide fund ing
a nd i den tifie s
sor
Sp onso rs
Spon sors lo ck
to Pl ann ing
increm ent al
receive AIT,
so r (AIT
provid es
pro vid e fu ndi ng work package SEA 2 issues initial Hull
f und s for
Activity for Ship
app roval sup port /
Pl ann ing Acti vit y (P EO) issues Man age r)
Avai lability
to Plan nin g to su ppo rt Sh ip M ode rnizati on P lan /
acq uisit ion of
In st alla tion
on all sched ule /
fin al Hu ll M ode rnizati on P lan / awards AIT
Fund ing for
Advanced pla nnin g le tter
Activity for Ship
Ch ecks Le tter of Au tho rizatio n
l ong lea d-tim e
SEA 21 LOA
Drawin g (S ID)
Mo dern iza im pact
L ette r o f Auth orizat ion (LOA) co ntra ct for
Upload
Mo derniza
(A-18)
Ch ang e De sign
(A-1 3) (LOA) (includ ing AITs)
m aterial b y
Ch ang e 1
development
t ion Risk re qui rem e
Cha nge 2, Certi ficatio n Pla ns work n ot
BAWP/AWP
tio n to
(A-14)
(A-12)
(A-6) Locks
Executi ng
(A-14 )
Assessme nts
ap proved
be ing don e
Ma nda tory
RM C
Activity
by prime
nts
(A-13 5
(A-4 )
ICM P Ta sks
(A-45
(A-9 )
(A-5 ) da ys)
co ntra ct or
days)
(A-3)
DoDD
/ D o N
(A 16 (A 8 (A 4 (A 0 m mo nths) (Jan uary)
months) months) ont hs)
A-765 C+90
Maintenance and
Modernization
Integration Single POC
for ALL
REQUIREMENTS &
Material History
SRA
5-1
SYSCOMs
Con solid ated
Software
Del ive ry NSWC
Port Huen em e
(A+2 )
SRA
5-2
C+60
Av ail
Clos e Out
SYSCOMs
co ndu ct Fin al
Platfo rm
Certification
Decision
(IPCD) (SEA
062 )
(C+4)
INACT
Tying It All Together
• LRMS (by hull)
• CMP Strengthening
• CDM
• Modernization
• Planning Yards
• Ship Life Cycle Health
• Cost Wise Readiness Risk Assessments
War Ships Ready
for Tasking Now and
In the Future
Cross – Enterprise
Alignment
SURFMEPP
SUBMEPP
CPA
8

SSLCM to SURFMEPP Transition
SURFMEPP & PRE / PRL SUBMEPP
Covered by ISEAs at NSWC
2S COG Discussion
SHAPEC / Planning Yard Integration �
Included
Plan includes integrated waterfront support
SURFMEPP w / continued Support from
NAVSEALGOCEN
Increased due to functional complexity & Scope
Increased due to PMS & Modernization
Integration
Increased to improved System and Hull level
requirements
�
�
��
�
�
�
�
SSLCM
9
9

Surface Force
Corrosion Challenge
• PROBLEM: “Annual Cost of Corrosion for Navy Ships” study estimated
25% of surface s rface ship maintenance bbudget dget is eexpended pended maintaining and
correcting corrosion/structure issues
Significant g surface force maintenance cost driver
• SOLUTION SOLUTION: WWaterfront t f t surface f force f organizations i ti will ill lleverage all ll
existing efforts - including submarine force material preservation and
corrosion control methodologies (Spruce Program) - to develop and
execute a standardized preservation plan to maintain and sustain the
highest level of surface force preservation across asset lifecycles
Develop and execute ships force corrosion prevention and control program
10

Corrosion Control
Corrosion Control Assistance Teams (CCAT)
Expand
In NFLK
• Training
• Tools
Envelop Anti-Corrosion Covers
• Significant
reduction in
corrosion
related
maintenance
maintenance.
• Technical Expertise
• Technology Insertion
All ships
by FY 11
Integrate
Paint Teams
Establish
In MYPT
Water Tight Doors
• Fluidized Bed
Coating provides
complete coverage in
gaps g p and cracks.
FY 11 Pilot
(23 on LSD-43
(10) On DDG-51
11
11

Pilot Ships & Survey Timeline
• LSD 42 USS GERMANTOWN
(EDPMA, 03 Dec 08 - 12 Aug 09, San Diego)
• DDG 67 USS COLE
(DSRA, 15 Apr 09 - 28 June 09, Norfolk)
• CG 53 USS MOBILE BAY
(EDSRA, June 09 - April 10, San Diego)
• FFG 36 USS UNDERWOOD
(DSRA ( 10 Apr p 09 - 6 July y 09, , Mayport) yp )
Material Condition Pilots
Timeline/Products
Pilot Products
• Finite Element Model
• Survey Process Checksheets
• Hull Maintenance Model
• Initial Survey Reports
• SafeNet Doc Documentation mentation
• Ship Life Assessment Booklet
Update
• Hull Maintenance Model Update
• Periodic Survey Plan
#
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
66.
7.
8.
9.
WB #
AMERICAN BUREAU OF SHIPPING
Naval Vessel Hull Assessment Check Sheet
VESSEL:DDG-55
SYSTEM: N/A
TANK: Fuel Tk GP-4
STATUS:
5-300-2-F
Compartment Findings
DATE:
10.
LOCATION: INNERBOTTOM (Fr.300-338) Tk 5-300-2-F
Status
Any RED r esponses should be brought to the attention of the Surveyor -in-C harge prior to sur vey / process being considered complete.
COMMENTS:
Baseline Material Condition
Surveyor
11
ABS Assessments
FY 11 Ships
USS New Orleans
USS Bonhomme Richard
USS Chosin
USS Winston Churchill
USS Sampson
USS Benfold
USS Ashland
USS Mesa Verde
USS Shoup
USS Barry
USS Sterret
USS Bulkeley
USS Germantown (Revisit)
USS LLake k Ch Champlain l i
USS Port Royal
USS Stout
• Utilizing ABS commercial experience & tracking software
• Focus is Hull Structure & Key Distributed Systems
– Hull, Scantlings, Deckhouse, Tanks
– A/C A/C, El Electric i Pl Plant, CHT CHT, Fi Firemain, i Chill Chilled d WWater
• Finite element models produced
• Risk assessment enables targeted maintenance activity
• Way y ahead – Integration g w/SURFMEPP & RMCs, , CLASSRONs
– Included in ICMP updates
USS GERMANTOWN Survey Summary
WB Tank 6-56-1-W - Severe corrosion breakdown, stiffeners with thinned edges. Recommend blast, renewal of
wasted steel, re-coat tank.
WB Tank 6-43-1-W - Thinned and wasted stiffeners. Recommend renewal.
WB Tank 6-52-1-W 6 52 1 W - Wasted overhead stiffeners stiffeners. Recommend renewal renewal.
WB Tank 6-70-2-W - Heavily wasted overhead stiffeners, transverse bulkhead stiffeners, longitudinal bulkhead
stiffeners, poor coating condition, poor outfitting condition. Recommendations have been
addressed during availability.
WB Tank 6-74-1-W - Tank blasted and coated, holes in stiffeners and plating coated over.
Recommend repair wasted structure.
WB Tank 6-85-4-W - Tank blasted and coated, holes in stiffeners and plating coated over.
Recommend repair wasted structure.
WB Tank 6-101-1-W - Fair coating condition with thinned and wasted transverse bulkhead stiffeners and wasted
overhead longitudinal stiffeners. Recommend repair structure.
WB Tank 3-93-1-W - Poor coating condition, thinned and wasted bulkhead stiffeners and poor condition of the
outfitting in the tank. tank Recommend repair structure structure.
WB Tank 2-107-3-W - Fair coating condition however rated poor due to wastage in way of the
overhead longitudinal stiffeners, holed out deck plating in way of the longitudinal bulkhead
vertical stiffeners and poor condition of the outfitting within the tank. Recommend repair
structure.
WB Tank 5-115-1-W - Fair coating condition, however rated poor due to wastage in way of the overhead
longitudinal stiffeners, after transverse bulkhead vertical stiffeners, and holed out
overhead plating. Recommend repair structure.
WB Tank 5-125-1-W - Poor to fair coating condition however rated poor due to wastage in way of the overhead
longitudinal stiffeners. Recommend repair structure.
Foundations Under - Severely wasted. Renewal required.
A/C Plants
AC Machinery – Tank tops with holes and thinned plate, only minor repairs made in way of holed tank top.
Recommend wasted tank top be renewed.
If this were a commercial vessel and these critical deficiencies were corrected,
ABS would feel confident classing the ship 16
Germantown Initial Results
� Outstanding support from Crew, CLASSRON
and RMC
� Survey identified areas requiring attention
� Analysis demonstrated the following:
• Initial structural design well-conceived
• Structured survey plan necessary to achieve expected
service life
� Developed tools will facilitate analytically-based future
maintenance planning
12
5
12

ABS Assessments
Example of SSLCM / SURFMEPP Impact
Baseline Material Condition
• Utilizing ABS commercial experience & tracking
software
• Focus is Hull Structure & Key Distributed Systems
• Hull, Scantlings, Deckhouse, Tanks
• A/C, Electric Plant, CHT, Firemain, Chilled Water
• Finite element models produced
• Risk assessment enables targeted maintenance
activity
• Way ahead – Integration w/SSLCM & RMCs,
CLASSRONs
• Included in ICMP updates
FY10 Ships
•USS Philippine Sea
•USS Roosevelt
•USS Paul Hamilton
•USS Antietam
•USS Fort McHenry
•USS John Paul Jones
•USS Rushmore
•USS Arleigh Burke
•USS USS Hue City
•USS Boxer
FY11 Ships
•USS New Orleans
•USS Bonhomme Richard
•USS Winston S. Churchhill
•USS Chosin
•USS Sampson
•USS Benfold
•USS Ashland
•USS Mesa Verde
•USS USS Shoup
•USS Barry
•USS Sterret
•USS Bulkeley
•USS Stout
•USS Lake Champlain p
•USS Port Royal
•USS Germantown (Revisit)
Ex. of Findings on LSD 43: Excessive corrosion and metal loss – ballast tank 6-103-0-W
Conditions found and documented on Ship CSMP: Repairs in progress
13

Phase1: Establish
Readiness Task
Force
• SPY SPY-AWS AWS Task Force (Phase 5)
Tackling Wholeness Issues across all
Stakeholders
Phase 2: Capture &
Analyze Current
State Readiness
Data
Phase 3: Develop
Actionable
Recommendations
• Significant Sustainment Recommendations Identified
Phase 4: Final
Report & POA&M
Development
Phase 5: Manage
Recommendation
Execution
• Ship's Self Sufficiency, Shore Support, Enhanced Periodic Assessments
• Next Steps:
• $12M in FY10 sweep-up funds identified to apply to FY10 and FY11 recommendations, and
acceleration of many FY12 recommendations
• CFFC AEGIS IPR
• MCM Readiness R di Task T k Force F (Phase (Ph 5)
• Completed Actions: Recommendation prioritization & Final Report signed out by SEA 21–
• 28 Dec 2010
• Next Steps: POM -13 13 issue papers developed for each recommendation and POA&M
• LPD-17 Readiness Task Force (Phase 3)
• Completed Actions: Assessment Team Deep Dive followed by Class Wholeness TF Update Dec 2010
• Next Steps: MP&T IWG/ Assessment Team Workshop Phase III + Final Recommendations
• BMD Readiness Task Force (Phase 2)
• Completed Actions: Up to Deep Dive on Detailed Recommendations
• Next Steps: p Japan p Ship p visits followed by y Review of initial inputs p for Draft report p
14
14

Back Up
• SSRI Process
• SSRI Pilot Ship Progress
• Total Ship Readiness Assessment (TSRA)
• Sustainment Program
• SSLCM to SURFMEPP Transition
•IMA Capacity p y / Capability p y
• Availability Execution & Work Certification
• A Global RMC Organization
• Wholeness Task Forces
• SPY-AWS
• MCM
15

SURFMEPP Stand Up Status
Building on success of SSLCM, SURFMEPP will synergize benefits of HQ and waterfront alignment
PRODUCTS FY09 RESULT FY 10 RESULT FY 11 PLAN
�PR11 technical “quick-look”
and d parametric t i studies t di �LSD �LSD-41/49 41/49 complete. l t 127 127,000 000 man-day d
Engineering Studies / complete
requirements increase per LSD over
Technical Foundation
Paper (TFPs)
�DDG-51 class complete:
74,000 man-days of
remaining service life per hull
�Completed CG-47 and LHD-1 Class
understated requirements
per DDG
TFPs
�DDG -51, and LSD 41/ 49 SHIPSHEETs
based on TFP
SHIPSHEETS
�Supported TYCOM with all
SHIPSHEETS for FY 12 & FY13
Availabilities. (Unfunded Technical
Requirements (UTR) and high value
targets incorporated)
�BAWP: Business Rules established and
BBaseline li Availability
A il bilit
Work Packages
(BAWPs) /
SSRI (Surface Ship
Readiness Initiative)
�28 �28 of f 28 DDG DDG-51 51 ships hi with ith
FY12 CNO avails being
managed by rigorous and
disciplined process
implemented p by y USFFC/CPF
�SSRI: SURFMEPP is integration node
for End – to –End Surface Ship
Maintenance Process Map
�Initial individual ship transition s from
BAWP to AWP in progress (A-360
milestone)
Corrosion
Control/ABS
�4 ships
�Initiated automated process
to captu capture e ABS S repair epa
recommendations to BAWP
development process
�SURFMEPP leadership for management
of all Surface Ship corrosion initiatives
�Integration teg at o oof ABS S results esu ts in
requirements definition and budgeting
process
�Complete Complete LPD-17 LPD 17 and LCS
TFPs
�Complete Long Range
Maintenance Schedules
(LRMS) ISO DDG/CG/LSD
& LHD individual ships
�Complete SHIPSHEETS
for all Surface Ships to
support POM 13 (Oct / Nov
10)
��
Execution of Business
Rules for FY12
availabilities for
LSD/CG/LHD Class ships.
(70 total ships)
�FY 11-16 plan ISO
assessing (148) surface
ships
�C �Complete l t automation. t ti
ABS to be a tool, not a
separate program
16

THE PLAN – BAE San Diego:
Pilot Phase 1: DDG 53 EDSRA (23 Jun SOA)
– Limited to 4 BAE trades & 1 Subcontractor
Pilot Phase 2: DDG 76 SRA ( 8 Sep SOA)
– Expanded to all trades and all workers to include subcontractors
MSMO M-Curve
Pilot Implementation – BAE SDSR:
Pilot Phase 1 Timeline
DDG 53 (JOHN PAUL JONES) EDSRA
End JPJ Monitoring
• Funding in place 3 May
• Purchase Order processed 5May 5 May
• Equipment Delivered to BAE 28 May
• Install and Test 9-16 June
• Start of Availability DDG 53 EDSRA 23 June
DDG 76 (HIGGINS) SRA
Goal: Demonstrate capability to track ingress and
egress of shipyard personnel onto ships pier side or
into drydock y areas in a pprivate ship p repair p yyard.
The
Proof of Concept is limited in scope and duration.
Post Analysis
6/10 7/10 8/10 9/1 10/1 11/1 12/1 1/11 2/11
Pilot Phase 2 Timeline
• Equipment qu p e t Delivered e e ed to BAE 28 8 May ay
• Start of Availability DDG 76 SRA 8 Sep
Pilot Phase 1 Complete; Phase 2 Underway…
3/11
17

Pier #1
Antenna
Installation
(HIGGINS)
MSMO BAE SDSR Pilot
Proof of Concept: p
Drydock
Antenna
Installation
(JPJ)
18

“RAP” = Resource
Allocation Program
(headcount)
21 October 2010 Report
BAE SDSR Pilot
All Departments p & Contractors:
19

Findings
• Software issues
– Cribmaster support was required to resolve software issues
– Manual head count was very close to manning expectation;
electronic data shows manpower shortages.
– We preformed manual head counts several times that
showed h d actual t l manning i vs. projected j t d manning i results lt within ithi
10%. Electronic data showed 50-60% shortage
• Structural placement
– Location of receiver important. Cribmaster verified location
and installation of antenna
• Excellent Management tool
– Time on task clearly displayed, even with limited data
collection
BAE Systems Proprietary Information
BAE SDSR Pilot
Mid-Term Findings: g
4
M-Curve Implementation – San Diego Ship Repair LPR Pilot
Recommendations for improvement
• Research the possibility of having the RFID tag embedded into the hard
hat by y the manufacturer. Ship p Yard work environment ( (i.e. inclement
weather, hydro blasting, etc.), can render the RFID tag inoperable.
• Standardized placement of antennas on brows would prevent
reconfiguration for each pier side availability and erroneous data.
Reporting Process
• BAE SSystems t has h collected ll t d data d t on a daily d il bbasis i ffor all ll ddepartments t t by b
shift. The reports are available to various departments within BAE
Systems. On a weekly basis, SDSR provides SWRMC and SEA 21 with
a PDF snapshot of the M-Curve report, reflecting one day’s activity with
verification back up information.
BAE Systems Proprietary Information
5
20

M-Curve Implementation
Way y Ahead:
Goal: Implement M-Curve tracking in all MSMO (prime) private yards.
• Socialize M-Curve requirement with all MSMO Primes
• Plan is to provide equipment, services and software as Government Furnished
(GFE/GFM)
• Mod existing MSMO contracts and ensure future contracts include:
• New CDRL/DID requirement
• Award Fee Evaluation Board (AFEB) criteria to evaluate “Management”
actions based on demonstrated cost reductions attributable to productivity
enhancements derived from M-Curve analysis
• Continue working closely with SEA 04X to document lessons learned & best
practices ti from f public bli and d private i t yard d pilots il t
Other Considerations
• Equipment/Software Configuration Baseline, Baseline Varies by Facility
• Union Buy-In
• Overall Procurement & Installation Cost
• Reporting Formats & Analysis
21

Phase1: Establish
Readiness Task
Force
Tackling Wholeness Issues
Across All Stakeholders
Phase 2: Capture &
Analyze Current
State Readiness
Data
• SPY-AWS Task Force (Phase 5)
Phase 3: Develop
Actionable
Recommendations
• Significant Sustainment Recommendations Identified
Phase 4: Final
Report & POA&M
Development
• Ship's Self Sufficiency, Shore Support, Enhanced Periodic Assessments, Policy Updates
• Next Steps:
Phase 5: Manage
Recommendation
Execution
• $12M in CPF EOY FY10 sweep-up funds identified to apply to “must do” recommendations; Request support in
POM 13 required to affect long term fixes
• MCM Readiness Task Force (Phase 4)
• Completed Actions: Survey, Assessment Interviews, IWG Draft Recommendations, Recommendation Prioritization
• Next Steps: Final Report Development and Submission – ECD 31 Oct 2010
• LPD-17 Readiness Task Force (Phase 3)
• Completed Actions: Charter & POA&M promulgated promulgated, Survey Results Analyzed Analyzed, Historical Studies analyzed analyzed,
Assessment Team completed Fleet and Organizational deep dive interviews and analysis in Norfolk, VA
• Next Steps: Assessment Conducting Site Assessments in San Diego – ECD 31 OCT 2010; IWG Draft Recommendation
Development – ECD 1 Jan 2011
• BMD Readiness Task Force (Phase 1)
• Completed Actions: Initial Tasking Letter approved by CNSF, Charter / POA&M promulgated, IWGs Established
• Next Steps: Survey Development – ECD 25 Oct 2010, System Component Reviews – ECD 20 Dec 2010
22

CNRMC Lines of Report
RDA CNO ECH I
BSO 70 BSO 60
IN SERVICE CVNs BSO 24
CPF PEO CV
SEA 00 FFC
SEA 21 SEA 09 SEA 04
SEA 07
REQQUIREMENTS
GENNERATION
SRF PMS312 SURFMEPP
RQMT GENN
CPA
PHNSY +
IMF
C400
PROCESS
and EXECUTION
PSNS +
IMF
C101
SEA 04X
NNSY PNSY
RQQMT
GEN
SUB
MEPP
CNSL
ECH II
SWRMC SERMC NSSA ECH
IV
BRAC 2005
ECH
III
23

CNRMC Intentions
�CNRMC to Engage Key Surface Community Initiatives:
�Surface Team One (ST1)
�Life Cycle Management Group
�Surface �Surface Ship Readiness Initiatives
� Transition to SURFMEPP
� Assessments (TSRA)
�� Sustainment
� RMC Manning / “I” Level Manning
� Availability Execution and Work Certification
�P �Performance f Agreement A t / Improvement
I t
�Industry Relationships
24

ST1 & LCMG Status
Efforts in Progress
• CContinuing SSupport of f the SSurface f Ship S Fleet Readiness Initiative (C (Carrier and SSub S SMEs involved where appropriate) )
• Surface Ship Sustainment Program
• Integrated Assessment Program
• Transition from SSLCM Activity to SURFMEPP
• Availability Execution and Work Certification
• RMC / I-Level manning
• Establishing LCMG (Carrier best practice)
• Analyzing Fleet and subject matter experts’ feedback and performance metrics.
• Gaining insight into existing resources and action plans
• Cataloguing sustainment resources/plans so as to mitigate duplication and maximize efficiencies
• Prioritizing resources, including Sustainment
• Implementing “Global RMC” Practices
•Coordinating the Global RMC Annual Budget and Requirements Planning Process
•Implementing a Global RMC Consistency and Commonality Initiative
•Implementing a Global RMC Performance Measurement Plan
• Developing p g Strategic g Approach pp for Availability y Planning g and Execution
• Developed and implementing a unifying Availability Project Team Handbook. (Carrier and Sub best practice)
• Strategy Development Underway (Carrier and Sub best practice)
• USS ARLEIGH BURKE (DDG51) FY10 Mod Avail: 7 Specific Execution Strategies in development (including Risk Management, Hull Access,
Work Integration, etc.)
• USS CHOSIN (CG 65) MMod d FY11 AAvail: il 12 Pl Planning i St Strategies t i ddrafted, ft d EExecution ti St Strategies t i under d ddevelopment l t
• Continuous Hot Wash Process on LSD 41 Mid-Life Program allows for strategic collection of lessons learned throughout avail
execution.
• Leveraging Hot Wash / Super Hot Wash Program
• Align with ST1 and “Global Global RMC” RMC approach
• Serve as input to Availability Planning/Execution Strategies, Avail Project Team Handbook, Project Team Development,
Knowledge Sharing Networks
25

Fleet
Intro
Surface Ship Readiness Initiative (SSRI)
Expected Expected p Service Life
Assess Ship
TSRA
Contin Continuous o s SSustainment stainment
Process
Maintain Readiness
Readiness
Sustainment
Execute
Avail.
Avail Ex. & Work Cert
Pl Plan Maintenance
M i t
SURFMEPP
Decom
Assessments:
• Skilled techs performing
documented procedures
• Utilize NMD & other tools
• Mission specific focus
SURFMEPP:
• Class Maint. Planningg
• Availability Planning
• Maint. Planning Data Systems
• Cost Engineering
• Material Management
Avail Ex. & Work Cert:
• Technical Adjudication of work
• Event Readiness
• Test & Certification of work
Sustainment:
• Maintenance Engineering
• Performance Monitoring
• Fleet Engineering Support
• Training & Tech. Docs
• Obsolescence
26

Shipp
Hommeport
Avaail
Type
SSRI Pilot Ship Progress
14 October 2010 Update
Starrt
Date
Endd
Date
Endd‐to‐End
Proocess
Possition
LSD 43 Norfolk EDPMA 5/10/2010 3/7/2011 Begun
LPD 17 Norfolk CMAV 5/31/2010 6/18/2010 Begun
LSD 47 San Diego EDPMA 7/21/2010 6/15/2011 Begun
DDG 51 Norfolk EDSRA 8/4/2010 1/28/2011 Begun
DDG 105 San Diego PSA 9/8/2010 12/13/2010 Begun
CG 66 Mayport DSRA 9/29/2010 3/23/2011 Begun
LPD 18 San Diego g PMA 11/2/2010 // 1/9/2011 // A‐27
LHD 6 San Diego DPMA 11/3/2010 7/13/2011 A‐28
FFG 54 Puget Sound SRA 11/15/2010 2/4/2011 A‐40
DDG 67 Norfolk SRA 1/5/2011 4/5/2011 A‐90
MCM 2 Japan DSRA 1/12/2011 4/13/2011 A‐97
MCM 3 San Diego DSRA 1/12/2011 3/16/2011 A‐97
CG 65 Pearl Harbor DSRA 1/19/2011 7/13/2011 A‐104
MCM 13 Bahrain DSRA 1/31/2011 5/2/2011 A‐116
DDG 81 Norfolk DSRA 2/9/2011 5/25/2011 A‐124
DDG 65 San Diego EDSRA 2/16/2011 8/3/2011 A‐131
FFG 38 San Diego DSRA 5/4/2011 8/5/2011 A‐209
Full Test, 0 “gaps”
Partial Test, significant “gaps”
Asssessment
Proogram
Avaail
Ex &
Woork
Cert
Susstainment
Proogram
Partial Test, minor “gaps”
No Yield, major “gaps”
Enhance ESL & Improve Readiness on Every Hull
RMMC
Manning
SURRFMEPP
27

TSRA
Continuous Assessment During FRP
• TSRA I - Baselining systems material condition to support end-ofavailability
integrated test phase
• Pre-Availability (A-240)
• Identify all Depot level worthy items
• RReduce d llate di discovery
• Reduce growth and new work (Premiums)
• TSRA II - Tanks, voids, structures and selected HM&E/C5I systems
• Concurrent with CNO Availability
• Integrated Test Plan (CNRMC instruction)
• TSRA III - Get ship ready for successful deployment
• Pre-deployment (D-90 to D-180)
• HM&E, Combat Systems & C4I systems (assess, repair and train)
• BMDRA - Mission Specific
• Initial phase of BMDRA (D-90 to D-180)
• Pre-Deployment (D-30 to D-45)
• TSRA IV - Get ship ready for special events
• Pre-INSURV (I-90 and I-120), TYCOM directed, etc.
28

TSRA (Cont’d)
Status
• DRAFT TYCOM Instruction
• CNSL lead, Joint CNSP/CNSL Instruction
• DRAFT CNRMC Policy Instruction
• NNotional ti l bbudget d t projections j ti bbeing i ddeveloped l d ffor POM POM-13 13
• Ship class assessment matrices developed
• Assessment procedures p 95% completed p development p
• TFBRs submitted for non-ICMP tasks (incorporate into ICMP)
• Position descriptions developed for RMC Assessment Directors
• TSRAs commenced on Pilot ships
• CHOSIN TSRA I – 85% complete
• BENFOLD TSRA IV – In progress
• ARLEIGH BURKE, RUSHMORE, HUE CITY TSRA II – In progress
• Aggressive management of Pilots to improve
effectiveness/efficiency of TSRA policy & execution
29

Sustainment Program
• The Sustainment Program received end of year funding from USFFC and CPF
• Fully funded HM&E and C5I for ISEAs to support the SSRI pilot program across 16 + 1 ships
(USS COLE added) dd d)
• Supports CASREP / DFS / TSO reviews
• Funds PMS / EOSS / TM deficiencies
• Naval Maintenance Database Sustainment ($4.75M)
• Provides NMD software maintenance and upgrades
• Funds troubleshooting and discrepancy resolutions
• HM&E sustainment ($13.1M)
• Supports pp shortfalls in pperformance monitoring g ( (MRDB) )
• Technical Document deficiencies
• Obsolescence management
• Distance Support
• Other Sustainment Functions ($8.4M)
• Supports Surface Team 1 & Lifecycle Management Group
• Critical Spares Procurement ($ $ TBD)
30

• Transition to SURFMEPP
SSLCM to SURFMEPP Transition
• SURFMEPP shore-based command establishment at Under Secretary of the Navy for approval
• Additional FY10 funds received from CPF and USFF to support further acceleration of core products
• Technical Foundation Papers (TFP) and BAWPs
• Class Maintenance Plan Strengthening
• Corrosion Control Management
• ABS Management g 16 ships p scheduled for FY11 survey y / Providing g direct oversight g of for all FY11 dry-dock y surveys y
SURFMEPP – TYCOM BAWP / AWP / TFP Management
CLASS
FY FY‐10 10 FY FY‐11 11 FY FY‐12 12
28 55
DDG 87
CG 8
16
LSD
5
9
LHD
2
4
LHA 0
LPD
LCC 1
MCM
PC
FFG
LCS
TOTAL
28 70 134
3
5
4
3
2
• Additional ship classes receive BAWPs,
AWPs and TFPs every year
• All ship classes will have BAWPs,
AWP AWPs and d TFPs TFP by b FY 14
• Production schedule is dependent upon
resources in place at SURFMEPP
31

IMA Capacity / Capability
• Staff RMCs with appropriate skill-sets to execute the Navy’s maintenance
efforts and train future Sailors to be Journeyman engineers
• Return Journeyman training at I-Level organizations
• Increase I-Level capacity by 385 CIV and 1584 MIL
• Re-establish capabilities in the following areas:
• HM&E (Inside/Outside) (Propulsion, Electrical Repair)
• Services (Weight Test Test, Rigging Rigging, Cranes, Cranes Corrosion Control, Control Small Boats/Rhibs Boats/Rhibs, Lagging Lagging,
Tool Issue)
• Combat Systems (VLS, Nav, Sonar, Fire Control, Chain Gun, CIWS, Int/Ext. Comms)
• QA, Tech Library, y Planning, g Safety y
SERMC SWRMC NWRMC NSSA HRMC Total
Department Name Civ. Mil. Civ. Mil. Civ. Mil. Civ. Mil. Civ. Mil. Civ. Mil.
Current RMC Manning
Proposed RMC Manning
324 116 1,025 430 73 33 1,430 546 89 13 2,941 1,138
Increase
Total Required RMC
72 320 0 539 30 111 262 569 21 35 385 1,584
Manning 396 436 11,085 085 11,000 000 103 135 11,692 692 11,115 115 110 13 33,386 386 22,734 734
32

Availability Execution & Work Certification
• Tasking sent to RMC Commanders 17 Sept 2010:
• Pilot Implementation Letter
• DRAFT IInstruction t ti and d PPolicy li ffor Pil Pilot t Shi Ships
• 5 focus areas for improvement:
• Technical Adjudication of work identified in execution
• Integrated Test Plan management
• Availability Certification
• Event Readiness
• Availability Closeout
• Actions to Date:
• Commenced Pilots (RMC ( ownership) p)
• Teams commissioned for rapid process improvement:
• Identify resource shortfalls to execute availabilities
• Plan to Institutionalize changes to standard items: updates to JFMM etc.
• On glide slope for Full implementation in FY12
• Preliminary Results:
• Trained CHOSIN, ARLEIGH BURKE & FORT MCHENRY project teams on new processes
• Collecting survey feedback on current state & new processes
33

A Global RMC Organization
•…of a Global RMC Organization that operates in a consistent
manner utilizing increasingly common processes.
• …of a Global RMC Organization that will have an effective
centrally monitored business, manning and operations plan
that supports the entire organization.
• …of a Global RMC Organization that enables each RMC to be
responsive to their assigned ships with regard to the planning
and d execution ti of f maintenance i t and d modernization d i ti AND th that t our
collective performance measures will show that responsiveness.
34

Phase
Action Iteems
Next Steps S
Phase1: Establish
Readiness Task
Force
SPY-AWS TF Current Status
Phase 2: Capture &
Analyze Current
State Readiness
Data
Phase 3: Develop
Actionable
Recommendations
Phase 4: Final
Report & POA&M
Development
Phase 5: Manage
Recommendation
Execution
Action Description Status Date
FY10 / FY11 / FY12
Recommendations
$12M in FY10 sweep-up funds received; initiated TPSs to
apply funds to remaining FY10, FY11 and discrete FY12
recommendations.
08 SEP
SWE BOD RDML McManamon briefed SWE BOD on TF Status. 15 SEP
FY11 Periodic Assessment (PA)
Plan
Completed FY11 PA schedule – majority of Fleet EOY Funding
supporting PA’s.
Status Updates Per request: provided a status of current funding and
recommendations to ADM Harvey staff for input to VCNO.
POM 13 Issue Papers Developed and coordinated papers with N1, N86, N43, and
NETC N4.
24 SEP
04 OCT
04 OCT
N86 Recommendations N86 briefed N86 owned recommendations in developed POM
13 issue papers.
08 OCT
N1 Recommendations N1 owned POM 13 issue papers briefed to Admiral Pandolfe. 18 OCT
• 26 OCT: Task Force to begin tracking recommendations and associated funding execution in
implementation model and dashboard
35
2

Phase
Actionn
Items
Neext
Steps
Phase1: Establish
Readiness Task
Force
MCM TF Current Status
Phase 2: Capture &
Analyze Current
State Readiness
Data
Phase 3: Develop
Actionable
Recommendations
Phase 4: Final
Report & POA&M
Development
Phase 5: Manage
Recommendation
Execution
Action Description Status Date
Recommendation Task Force Leadership met with each working
Review
group g p ( (MPT, , ILS, , Sustainment) ) and provided p
additional feedback on each recommendation.
Recommendation Final actionable recommendation including cost,
Submittals
funding sponsor, and implementation plan
submitted by each working group group.
1st Draft of Final Report Draft of Task Force final report developed and
submitted to SEA 21A Leadership for review.
4 OCT
8 OCT
15 OCT
Reading Session Reading session held by SEA 21A Leadership
with key stakeholders. Recommended edits and
feedback were provided to the writing team.
18 OCT
• 31 OCT: All recommended edits and feedback incorporated and report finalized.
36
3

Phase
Items
Action
Neext
Steps
Phase1: Establish
Readiness Task
Force
LPD 17 TF Current Status
Phase 2: Capture &
Analyze Current
State Readiness
Data
Phase 3: Develop
Actionable
Recommendations
Phase 4: Final
Report & POA&M
Development
Phase 5: Manage
Recommendation
Execution
Action Description Status Date
Endorsement of Charter and
POA&M
Norfolk Assessment Deep Dive
San Diego Assessment Deep
Dive
Task Force Status
COMPACFLT endorsed, with USFF for signature and
then to be returned to NAVSEA .
AAssessment t Team T completed l t d deep d dive di iinterviews t i
with ESG 2, NSSA, Port Engineers, INSURV, PMR,
CNE, ATGLANT, SURFLANT, LPD 17, LPD 19, and
LPD 21 communities.
AAssessment t Team T deployed d l d tto SSan Di Diego tto conduct d t
deep dive interviews. To date, the Assessment Team
has met with LPD 18, LPD 20, CLASSRON, and Port
Engineers.
Task Force status and preliminary findings briefed to
RDML Murdoch.
17 AUG –
(Ongoing)
8 OCT
11 OCT – 1 NOV
13 OCT
• 18 OCT – 1 NOV: Assessment Team to continue PACFLT / West Coast deep dive interviews with SWRMC,
ESG3, CS Port Engineers, CNSP (N6, N7, N43), ATG, SPAWAR, EA-PAC, and NSWC PHD.
• Ongoing: IWG developing preliminary findings and recommendations leveraging assessment team and
historical data data.
37
4

Phase
Actionn
Items
Neext
Steps
Phase1: Establish
Readiness Task
Force
BMD TF Current Status
Phase 2: Capture &
Analyze Current
State Readiness Data
Phase 3: Develop
Actionable
Recommendations
Phase 4: Final
Report & POA&M
Development
Phase 5: Manage
Recommendation
Execution
Action Description Status Date
Charter / POA&M Charter and POA&M submitted to RDML
McManamon for signature.
28 SEP –
(Ongoing)
04 OCT
WWeekly kl OOutbrief tb i f DDeveloped l d standardized t d di d weekly kl outbrief tb i f schedule h d l 04 OCT
for the Task Force to review detailed issues, begin
development of recommendations, and update
schedule as needed.
Survey Comprehensive BMD survey distributed to the
Fleet.
System Component Analysis Task Force conducted system component analysis
on AWS AWS, 400 Hz Hz, ECW ECW, and APC-1A APC 1A to understand
associated Readiness concerns with these
components.
• 22 OCT: Final determination of Assessment Team site visits / travel schedule.
• 26 OCT: System component analysis of CDLMS complete.
• 29 OCT: Surveys returned from the Fleet, and commencement of Survey analysis.
•15 •15-19 19 NOV: Task Force Deep Dive Interview #1: NSWC Corona Corona.
13 OCT
19 OCT
38
5