11.07.2015 Views

Letters of Anton Chekhov (Tchekhov) - Penn State University

Letters of Anton Chekhov (Tchekhov) - Penn State University

Letters of Anton Chekhov (Tchekhov) - Penn State University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Letters</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Anton</strong> <strong>Chekhov</strong> to His Family and Friends with biographical sketchMOSCOW, October 27, 1888.… In conversation with my literary colleagues I always insist thatit is not the artist’s business to solve problems that require a specialist’sknowledge. It is a bad thing if a writer tackles a subject he does notunderstand. We have specialists for dealing with special questions:it is their business to judge <strong>of</strong> the commune, <strong>of</strong> the future <strong>of</strong> capitalism,<strong>of</strong> the evils <strong>of</strong> drunkenness, <strong>of</strong> boots, <strong>of</strong> the diseases <strong>of</strong> women.An artist must only judge <strong>of</strong> what he understands, his field is just aslimited as that <strong>of</strong> any other specialist—I repeat this and insist on italways. That in his sphere there are no questions, but only answers,can only be maintained by those who have never written and havehad no experience <strong>of</strong> thinking in images. An artist observes, selects,guesses, combines—and this in itself presupposes a problem: unlesshe had set himself a problem from the very first there would benothing to conjecture and nothing to select. To put it briefly, I willend by using the language <strong>of</strong> psychiatry: if one denies that creativework involves problems and purposes, one must admit that an artistcreates without premeditation or intention, in a state <strong>of</strong> aberration;therefore, if an author boasted to me <strong>of</strong> having written a novel withouta preconceived design, under a sudden inspiration, I should callhim mad.You are right in demanding that an artist should take an intelligentattitude to his work, but you confuse two things: solving aproblem and stating a problem correctly. It is only the second that isobligatory for the artist. In “Anna Karenin” and “Evgeny Onyegin”not a single problem is solved, but they satisfy you completely becauseall the problems are correctly stated in them. It is the business<strong>of</strong> the judge to put the right questions, but the answers must begiven by the jury according to their own lights.92* * *… You say that the hero <strong>of</strong> my “Party” is a character worth developing.Good Lord! I am not a senseless brute, you know, I understandthat. I understand that I cut the throats <strong>of</strong> my characters andspoil them, and that I waste good material …. To tell you the truth,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!