N° 2005-09 Juin 2005 Guillaume Daudin* Jean-Luc Gaffard ...

N° 2005-09 Juin 2005 Guillaume Daudin* Jean-Luc Gaffard ... N° 2005-09 Juin 2005 Guillaume Daudin* Jean-Luc Gaffard ...

ofce.sciences.po.fr
from ofce.sciences.po.fr More from this publisher
11.07.2015 Views

III. INTERNATIONAL RELOCATION AND DEINDUSTRIALISATION:SOME FRENCH PERSPECTIVESCatherine Mathieu and Henri Sterdyniak *International relocation has become a topical issue in recent months, in France aselsewhere in Europe. The debate is not new, but while it was focusing 12 years ago ontraditional industries and trade with emerging Asia, it includes now higher value-addedgoods and trade with CEEC’s. The article deals first with the impact of internationalrelocation on employment in Europe and the need for policy answers. A variety of strategiesare then addressed: making France more attractive in a free market world, making Francemore competitive in line with the Lisbon Agenda, supporting growth through highereducation, research and innovation spending; promoting innovating companies;implementing employment measures in favour of the lower skilled. Last, in a Europeancontext, should tax and social harmonisations be favoured? Should a French or a Europeanstrategy be implemented?1. IntroductionGeneral public debates on international relocation in the EU-15 generally focus on theprocess in its narrow sense: a company closing a plant in one of EU-15 countries whilesimultaneously opening a plant in a low-wage emerging country where it will produce goodsat lower costs to be offered on the same market as previously. We will consider hererelocation processes in a broader sense: production relocation from ‘Northern’ countries tolow-wage economies, initiated by a ‘Northern’ company choosing to locate or to outsourcepart of or all its production in a Southern area; a ‘Northern’ company leaving its ‘Northern’supplier of intermediate consumption purchases for a supplier in a southern country; a‘Northern’ company of the trade sector leaving a supplier in a ‘Northern country’ for asupplier in a ‘Southern’ country; a ‘Southern’ company winning market shares over‘Northern’ companies, first in its domestic market, then in third countries and finally in‘Northern’ countries themselves. International relocation processes are difficult both tomeasure and to stop.International relocation or in other words ‘delocalisation’ will be addressed in this paperfrom a French policy perspective. The issue was already very topical 12 years ago and* OFCE. catherine.mathieu@ofce.sciences-po.fr; sterdyniak@ofce.sciences-po.fr50

International Relocation and Deindustrialisation: some French Perspectivesfocused on how to tackle relocation of traditional production industries, mainly textile (aswell as shoe and leather) industries, from France to Asian newly emerging economies. At thattime a number of politicians raised the issue of introducing fiscal measures to stopdelocalisation (see Arthuis, 1993, Lauré, 1993). Among the ideas were: lowering taxation onlow-skilled labour, introducing a social VAT, i.e. compensatory duties (droits compensateurs)on imports from developing countries (see Lauré, 1993, and, for a critical view, Mathieu andSterdyniak, 1994).International relocation and the domestic job losses involved became again highlytopical in 2004, as elsewhere in Europe, with several reports being released: Fontagné andLorenzi (2004), Grignon (2004) and Roustan (2004). The 2005 budget contains severalmeasures aiming at promoting the attractiveness of specific French areas. It is worth notingthat over the last 10 years, the policy debate has moved from supporting low-skilledemployment in traditional industries to supporting high-tech industries and possiblyemployment in ‘sheltered’ services (see Letournel, 2004). Some French economists, likeMesserlin (2004), think French labour, goods and services markets are too regulated andshould simply be deregulated, with no other measures needed. But a majority of Frencheconomists think measures should be introduced either to support endangered industries or tofavour the emergence of well-positioned industries.Section 2 discusses the potential impacts of relocation from Northern to Southerncountries and policy answers. Section 3 addresses global strategies aiming at promotinggrowth and competitiveness in line with the Lisbon Strategy based on research andinnovation. Section 4 addresses proposals aiming at the promotion of top-priority sectors.Section 5 considers measures in favour of unskilled workers. Section 6 describes anddiscusses specific measures taken by the French government to stop relocation. Section 7concludes.2. Potential impacts of international relocation and policy answersThe emergence of low-wage countries in international trade has seven main impacts onNorthern countries:1. Imports from the ‘South’ rapidly increase their market share in Northerndomestic markets, especially for goods requiring a high proportion of unskilled labour.2. Southern countries rapidly increase their market share in Northern foreignmarkets, especially for goods requiring a high proportion of unskilled labour.51

International Relocation and Deindustrialisation: some French Perspectivesfocused on how to tackle relocation of traditional production industries, mainly textile (aswell as shoe and leather) industries, from France to Asian newly emerging economies. At thattime a number of politicians raised the issue of introducing fiscal measures to stopdelocalisation (see Arthuis, 1993, Lauré, 1993). Among the ideas were: lowering taxation onlow-skilled labour, introducing a social VAT, i.e. compensatory duties (droits compensateurs)on imports from developing countries (see Lauré, 1993, and, for a critical view, Mathieu andSterdyniak, 1994).International relocation and the domestic job losses involved became again highlytopical in 2004, as elsewhere in Europe, with several reports being released: Fontagné andLorenzi (2004), Grignon (2004) and Roustan (2004). The <strong>2005</strong> budget contains severalmeasures aiming at promoting the attractiveness of specific French areas. It is worth notingthat over the last 10 years, the policy debate has moved from supporting low-skilledemployment in traditional industries to supporting high-tech industries and possiblyemployment in ‘sheltered’ services (see Letournel, 2004). Some French economists, likeMesserlin (2004), think French labour, goods and services markets are too regulated andshould simply be deregulated, with no other measures needed. But a majority of Frencheconomists think measures should be introduced either to support endangered industries or tofavour the emergence of well-positioned industries.Section 2 discusses the potential impacts of relocation from Northern to Southerncountries and policy answers. Section 3 addresses global strategies aiming at promotinggrowth and competitiveness in line with the Lisbon Strategy based on research andinnovation. Section 4 addresses proposals aiming at the promotion of top-priority sectors.Section 5 considers measures in favour of unskilled workers. Section 6 describes anddiscusses specific measures taken by the French government to stop relocation. Section 7concludes.2. Potential impacts of international relocation and policy answersThe emergence of low-wage countries in international trade has seven main impacts onNorthern countries:1. Imports from the ‘South’ rapidly increase their market share in Northerndomestic markets, especially for goods requiring a high proportion of unskilled labour.2. Southern countries rapidly increase their market share in Northern foreignmarkets, especially for goods requiring a high proportion of unskilled labour.51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!