ISSN: 2250-3005 - ijcer

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Energy Consumed in Received ModeEnergy Consumed in Reacived ModeInternational Journal Of Computational Engineering Research (ijceronline.com) Vol. 2 Issue. 8Energy Consumed in Transmit Mode Vs Routing Protocols0.0040.00350.0030.00250.0020.00150.0010.00050AODV DYMO Olsrv2 Niigata Olsr Inria RIPng10 0.0016 0.002138 0.001917 0.002054 0.00148650 0.003009 0.002111 0.000674 0.002683 0.00165100 0.003 0.003389 0.003241 0.003389 0.002337Routing ProtocolsFigure 6. Shows the impact variation of Energy consumption in transmit mode with different routing protocolsFig. 6 shows the total energy consumed (Joules) by all the nodes while varying the number of nodes in the network connectionby (10-100). The routing packet is increased which impacts that energy consumption also increased of all protocols in Ipv6network. AODV performed better than all other protocols due to route cache. By observation from graph the maximum energy consumes by AODV, followed by DYMO, Olsr inria , Olsrv2 Niigata andRIPng. RIPng consumes the minimum power in transmit mode for Ipv6 networks.4.6. Analysis and impact of energy consumed in receive mode:The mobile ad-hoc network routing protocol efficiency depends upon the energy of network. If more power failurethen efficiency of network goes down therefore energy consumption in received mode is required for maintaining the efficiencyof the nodes in the network, during transmission of data as well receiving the packets.Energy Consumed in Received Mode Vs Routing Protocol0.0010.00090.00080.00070.00060.00050.00040.00030.00020.00010AODV DYMO Olsrv2 Niigata Olsr Inria RIPng10 0.00064 0.000708 0.0007523 0.00025444 0.000507150 0.000349 0.000577 0.000896 0.00070077 0.0007651100 0.000505 0.000413 0.000438 0.000413 0.000826Routing ProtocolsFigure .7 shows the impact variation of Energy consumption in receive mode with different routing protocols. By observation from graph the maximum energy received by AODV which is followed by DYMO, Olsr inria, RIPng thanOlsrv2 Niigata in Ipv6 network.4.7. Analysis and impact of energy consumed in ideal mode:The energy consumption in idle mode that there is maximum consumption in AODV followed by Olsrv2 Niigata,DYMO, Olsr inria than RIPng.||Issn 2250-3005(online) || ||December|| 2012 Page 329
Energy Consumed in Ideal ModeInternational Journal Of Computational Engineering Research (ijceronline.com) Vol. 2 Issue. 8Energy Consumed in Ideal Mode Vs Routing Protocols0.00070.00060.00050.00040.00030.00020.00010AODV DYMO Olsrv2 Niigata Olsr Inria RIPng10 0.000509 0.000133 0.0004749 0.00013026 0.000247750 0.000514 0.000342 0.0001557 0.0005875 0.00035100 0.000594 0.000432 0.000361 0.000432 0.000172Routing ProtocolsFigure 8. Shows the impact variation of Energy consumption in ideal mode with different routing protocols.By observation we are considering the energy consumed in idle mode AODV consumed more and RIPng consumes veryless in idle mode but in the case of Olsrv2 Niigata , it is consumes in between DYMO and Olsr inria in Ip v6 network.5. ConclusionIn this paper we have made a comparison between five different types of routing protocols in Ipv6 network i.e.,AODV, DYMO, Olsrv2 Niigata, Olsr inria and RIPng. These results of comparison are very much useful for researcher to beimplemented in professional purposes. We are observed that route maintenance and route construction mechanisms have mucheffect on protocol performance in Ipv6 network. The above graphical simulation results showed that the OLSR inria throughputis almost the same as the OLSRv2 Niigata packet throughput. Both take a different path as if the network topology is same Ipv6network. We simulate and analyzed energy model comparison and impact shown in above graphs. As far as we can conclude,the performance of DYMO and Olsr inria was promising in almost all scenarios but with a high end-to-end delay varyingbetween (10 to 50) nodes. AODV was the third best performing protocol but resulted to be more sensitive than the others tonetwork size and traffic load. AODV performance is not much affected by mobility. Olsrv2 Niigata is the route maintenancemechanis m does not locally repair the broken links which results in initiating another route discovery, which introduces extr adelays with more routing overhead. We can conclude that Olsr inria is more reliable and more adaptable to changing networkconditions in Ipv6 network. As mobility increases, the average end-to-end delay decreases. For future work we can nextperform using QualNet simulator taking all above Manet routing protocols AODV, DYMO, Olsrv2 Niigata, Olsr inria andRIPng using Dual IP (Ipv4 and Ipv6) taking all performance matrices parameters same.References[1] Boukerche A., 2004. Performance Evaluation of Routing Protocols for Ad Hoc Wireless Networks Mobile Networks andApplications, Vol. 9, pp 333 - 42[2] C. E. Perkins, Performance Comparison of Two On-Demand Routing Protocols for Ad Hoc Networks. In: IEEE personalcommunication. 2001[3] Md. Arafatur Rahman, Farhat Anwar, Jannatul Naeem and Md. Sharif Minhazul Abedin, “Simulation Based PerformanceComparison of Routing Protocol on Mobile Ad-hoc Network (Proactive, Reactive and Hybrid)”, International Conferenceon Computer and Communication Engineering (ICCCE 2010), 11-13 May 2010, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.[4] C.Siva Rammurty and B.S. Manoj , ”Ad hoc wireless networks architectures and protocols” ISBN 978-81-317-0688-6,2011.[5] C.E. Perkins, and E. M. R., 1999. Ad hoc on-demand distance vector routing(AODV). In: Proceedings of the 2nd IEEEWorkshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, New Orleans, LA, pp 90-100.[6] Ha Duyen Trung, W. B., and Phan Minh Duc, 2007. Performance evaluation and comparison of different ad hoc routingprotocols Computer Communications, Vol 30, pp 2478-96.[7] Alexander Klein,” Performance Comparison and Evaluation of AODV, OLSR, and SBR in Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks” PP571-575, 2008 IEEE[8] Hong Jiang, and J. J. G-L-A., 2001. Performance Comparison of Three Routing Protocols for Ad Hoc Networks. In: Proc.of IEEE Tenth International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN), pp 547 - 54.||Issn 2250-3005(online) || ||December|| 2012 Page 330
Page 1 and 2:
ISSN: 2250-3005VOLUME 2 December 20
Page 3 and 4:
Meisam MahdaviQualification: Phd El
Page 5 and 6:
16. Implementation Of Serial Commun
Page 7 and 8:
45 Performance Evaluation Of Energy
Page 9 and 10:
International Journal Of Computatio
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
01 .048International Journal Of Com
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIO
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Body Acceleration (m/Sec2)Dynamic T
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
EigenvalueEigenvalueInternational J
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253:
Page 254 and 255:
Page 256 and 257:
Page 258 and 259:
Page 260 and 261:
Page 262 and 263:
Page 264 and 265:
Page 266 and 267:
Page 268 and 269:
Page 270 and 271:
Page 272 and 273:
Page 274 and 275:
Page 276 and 277:
Page 278 and 279:
Page 280 and 281:
Page 282 and 283:
Page 284 and 285:
Page 286 and 287: International Journal Of Computatio
Page 334 and 335: Average JitterThroughputInternation
show all

ISSN: 2250-3005 - ijcer

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?