ISSN: 2250-3005 - ijcer

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Average JitterThroughputInternational Journal Of Computational Engineering Research (ijceronline.com) Vol. 2 Issue. 86000Throughput Vs No. of Network Nodes500040003000200010000AODV DYMO Olsrv2 Niigata Olsr Inria RIPng10 4192 4945 3095 2735 240150 4574 5274 3273 3917 3274100 3906 4165 1207 3665 2523No. of Network NodesFigure.2 shows the impact variation of throughput for various routing protocols which considered for Ipv6 as parameter inapplication layer.It has observed in Fig.2 that the throughput of DYMO is better than AODV & OLSRv2-Niigata, OLSR-Inria and RIPngwhereas the performance of DYMO is better than others.DYMO, AODV, Olsr Inria, Olsrv2 Niigata, And Ripng Are Having Minor Degradation.By Observation The Throughput Is Maximum For DYMO Which Is Respectively By AODV, Olsr Inria, Olsrv2 Niigata,And RIPng for Ipv6. RIPng gives the minimum throughput for Ipv6 network.4.2. Analysis And Impact Of Average Jitter (S):The discrepancy in Jitter which is caused due to obstruction by network, timing drift, route changes, topology changeetc. in a network. Low value of jitter provides the better performance of any protocol. This includes all possible delays causedby buffering during route discovery.Average Jitter Vs Network Nodes0.0060.0050.0040.0030.0020.0010AODV DYMO Olsrv2 Niigata Olsr Inria RIPng10 0.00339662 0.00128489 0.002996347 0.00229261 0.0027050350 0.00245475 0.00248703 0.00476944 0.00517916 0.0025201100 0.00226521 0.00189144 0.0025091 0.00329144 0.00355745No. of Network NodesFigure 3. Shows the impact variation of average jitter for various routing protocols which considered for Ipv6 as parameter inapplication layer.DYMO shows the constant least jitter when mobility is restricted to only 60 nodes.By observation the Jitter is maximum for Olsrv2 Niigata which is followed by AODV, RIPng, Olsr Inria and Olsrv2Niigata and DYMO. DYMO gives the minimum jitter for Ipv6 network.Olsr Inria gives an average amount of jitter.4.3. Analysis of Average End-to-End Delay (AE2ED):The successful data packet delivered and divides that sum by the number of successfully received data packets. T heaverage time taken in delivery of data packets from source to destination nodes.||Issn 2250-3005(online) || ||December|| 2012 Page 327
End to End DelayTotal Packet ReceivedInternational Journal Of Computational Engineering Research (ijceronline.com) Vol. 2 Issue. 8End to End Delay Vs No. of Network Nodesl0.10.090.080.070.060.050.040.030.020.010AODV DYMO Olsrv2 Niigata Olsr Inria RIPng10 0.016575 0.0231681 0.0120947 0.0401269 0.018448150 0.0361693 0.0262093 0.0686388 0.015538 0.0361786100 0.0528369 0.0526092 0.0865926 0.0716092 0.0220769No. of Network NodesFigure 4. Shows impact variation of Average End to End Delay for various routing protocol as parameter Ipv6 network.By observation the Average End to End Delay is maximum for Olsrv2 Niigata which is followed by Olsr inria, AODV,DYMO then RIPng. RIPng gives the minimum average End to End delay for Ipv6 energy model.4.4. Total Packet Received/Efficiency :Ratio between the data packets received from to the destination and those generated by CBR sources. This evaluatesthe ability of the protocol to discover routes and its efficiency.Total Packet Received Vs No. of Network Nodes/Efficiency120100806040200AODV DYMO Olsrv2 Niigata Olsr Inria RIPng10 77.18 69.111 68.111 96.333 74.2450 88.1 71 79.341 88.84 78.134100 63.12 68.1212 66.22 78.111 69.19No. of Network NodesFigure 5: Comparison of Routing protocol with varying network size in effect to Total Packet Received in Application Layer By observation of Fig.5 the Total Packet Received in Ipv6 is maximum for Olsr inria which is followed by Olsrv2 Niigata,AODV, DYMO then RIPng. RIPng protocol received the minimum packets for Ipv6 in application layer.4.5. Analysis And Impact Of Energy Consumed In Trans mit Mode:The mobility, efficiency, scalability, response time of nodes, lifetime of nodes, and effective sampling frequenc y, allthese parameters of the MANET depend upon the energy. In case of power failure the network goes down break thereforeenergy is required for maintaining the individual health of the nodes in the network, during transmission of data as wellreceiving the packets.||Issn 2250-3005(online) || ||December|| 2012 Page 328
Page 1 and 2:
ISSN: 2250-3005VOLUME 2 December 20
Page 3 and 4:
Meisam MahdaviQualification: Phd El
Page 5 and 6:
16. Implementation Of Serial Commun
Page 7 and 8:
45 Performance Evaluation Of Energy
Page 9 and 10:
International Journal Of Computatio
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
01 .048International Journal Of Com
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIO
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Body Acceleration (m/Sec2)Dynamic T
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
EigenvalueEigenvalueInternational J
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253:
Page 254 and 255:
Page 256 and 257:
Page 258 and 259:
Page 260 and 261:
Page 262 and 263:
Page 264 and 265:
Page 266 and 267:
Page 268 and 269:
Page 270 and 271:
Page 272 and 273:
Page 274 and 275:
Page 276 and 277:
Page 278 and 279:
Page 280 and 281:
Page 282 and 283:
Page 284 and 285: International Journal Of Computatio
Page 336 and 337: Energy Consumed in Received ModeEne
show all

ISSN: 2250-3005 - ijcer

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?