ISSN: 2250-3005 - ijcer

Average JitterThroughputInternational Journal Of Computational Engineering Research (ijceronline.com) Vol. 2 Issue. 86000Throughput Vs No. of Network Nodes500040003000200010000AODV DYMO Olsrv2 Niigata Olsr Inria RIPng10 4192 4945 3095 2735 240150 4574 5274 3273 3917 3274100 3906 4165 1207 3665 2523No. of Network NodesFigure.2 shows the impact variation of throughput for various routing protocols which considered for Ipv6 as parameter inapplication layer.It has observed in Fig.2 that the throughput of DYMO is better than AODV & OLSRv2-Niigata, OLSR-Inria and RIPngwhereas the performance of DYMO is better than others.DYMO, AODV, Olsr Inria, Olsrv2 Niigata, And Ripng Are Having Minor Degradation.By Observation The Throughput Is Maximum For DYMO Which Is Respectively By AODV, Olsr Inria, Olsrv2 Niigata,And RIPng for Ipv6. RIPng gives the minimum throughput for Ipv6 network.4.2. Analysis And Impact Of Average Jitter (S):The discrepancy in Jitter which is caused due to obstruction by network, timing drift, route changes, topology changeetc. in a network. Low value of jitter provides the better performance of any protocol. This includes all possible delays causedby buffering during route discovery.Average Jitter Vs Network Nodes0.0060.0050.0040.0030.0020.0010AODV DYMO Olsrv2 Niigata Olsr Inria RIPng10 0.00339662 0.00128489 0.002996347 0.00229261 0.0027050350 0.00245475 0.00248703 0.00476944 0.00517916 0.0025201100 0.00226521 0.00189144 0.0025091 0.00329144 0.00355745No. of Network NodesFigure 3. Shows the impact variation of average jitter for various routing protocols which considered for Ipv6 as parameter inapplication layer.DYMO shows the constant least jitter when mobility is restricted to only 60 nodes.By observation the Jitter is maximum for Olsrv2 Niigata which is followed by AODV, RIPng, Olsr Inria and Olsrv2Niigata and DYMO. DYMO gives the minimum jitter for Ipv6 network.Olsr Inria gives an average amount of jitter.4.3. Analysis of Average End-to-End Delay (AE2ED):The successful data packet delivered and divides that sum by the number of successfully received data packets. T heaverage time taken in delivery of data packets from source to destination nodes.||Issn 2250-3005(online) || ||December|| 2012 Page 327